AzTrials
AzTrials

Von Willebrand DiseasesNCT04466878

Prognostic Value of Implementing VCE on Top in Constitutional VWD-patients With GI-bleeding

An observational study of Von Willebrand Diseases, run by University Hospital, Lille.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Inclusion criteria: Only constitutional VWD-patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria of the French reference center for VWD will be included. Patients with acquired von Willebrand syndrome will not be included. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Von Willebrand Diseases
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jan 2015to 31 Dec 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: - VWD-patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria of the French reference center for VWD

Who may be able to join

  • At least one overt or occult GI-bleeding (unexplained iron deficiency anemia causing a drop of hemoglobin level by more than 2g/dL from baseline) episode between January 1st 2015 and December 31th 2017

Who cannot join

  • acquired Von Willebrand syndrome

About this study

Inclusion criteria: Only constitutional VWD-patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria of the French reference center for VWD will be included. Patients with acquired von Willebrand syndrome will not be included.

Material and Methods: A 15-items survey that will be sent to the 30 centers involved in the French network for bleeding disorders (MHEMO) to identify VWD-patients referred for endoscopic exploration of at least one GI-bleeding from January 2015 to December 2017. Only constitutional VWD-patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria of the French reference center for VWD will be included. Constitutional VWD diagnosis will be confirmed confirmed centrally in all patients by the French reference center for von Willebrand disease. A GI-bleeding episode will be defined as any overt or occult GI-bleeding (unexplained chronic iron deficiency anemia causing a drop of hemoglobin level by more than 2 g/dL from baseline). We will analyze patient characteristics, GI-bleeding pattern, VWD type/subtype, nature (gastroscopy, colonoscopy or VCE) and results of the endoscopic exploration and management that was applied: endoscopic therapy by argon plasma coagulation, on-demand/prophylactic-VWF replacement therapy, use of antiangiogenic drugs. If angiodysplasia without another bleeding source is identified, GI-bleeding will be categorized as angiodysplasia, if another lesion is identified GI-bleeding will be categorized as "no-angiodysplasia" and if no bleeding source is identified, GI-bleeding will be categorized as obscure GI-bleeding. Recurrence will be defined as evidence of overt GI-bleeding or a drop of hemoglobin level by more than 2 g/dL from baseline.

Keywords
Gastrointestinal bleeding, Videocapsule endoscopy, Angiodysplasia
Medical subject headings
von Willebrand Diseases, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Angiodysplasia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnosis yield of an endoscopic strategy including video capsule on top of conventional endoscopy

    Diagnosis yield of an endoscopic strategy including video capsule on top of conventional endoscopy compared to conventional endoscopy alone in VWD-patients with GI-bleeding

    Measured: 3-years follow-up

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Risk prediction of GI-bleeding recurrence with videocapsule endoscopy

    Recurrence-free survival after the first GI-bleeding event according to the presence of angiodysplasia on videocapsule endoscopy

    Measured: 2-years follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jul 2020
  2. Study start1 Jan 2015
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2017
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04466878
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020 02
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
6 Jul 2020
Last updated
22 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Von Willebrand Diseases, run by University Hospital, Lille.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnosis yield of an endoscopic strategy including video capsule on top of conventional endoscopy (time frame: 3-years follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in