AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic DissectionTRIOMPHENCT04471909

NEXUS Aortic Arch Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness

A study testing NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System in people with Aortic Dissection and Aortic Aneurysm, run by Endospan Ltd. at 32 sites in 2 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prospective, non-randomized, multi-center clinical investigation of the NEXUS™ Aortic Arch Stent Graft System (NEXUSTM) for the treatment of thoracic aortic lesions involving the aortic arch with a proximal landing zone, native or previously implanted surgical graft, in the ascending aorta and with a brachiocephalic… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
110 participants
Where
32 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
20 Oct 2020to Oct 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male and female age ≥ 18.
  • Proximal/ascending native or previously implanted surgical graft landing zone of appropriate length
  • Proximal/ascending native or previously implanted surgical graft landing zone of appropriate diameter
  • Distal/descending native landing zone of appropriate length
  • Distal/descending native landing zone of appropriate diameter
  • Brachiocephalic trunk native landing zone of appropriate length
Show all 35Show fewer
  • Brachiocephalic trunk native landing zone of appropriate diameter
  • Appropriate take off angle between the Brachiocephalic Artery and the Aortic Arch perpendicular
  • Appropriate aortic arch perpendicular diameter
  • Chronic dissection with at least one of the following conditions:
  • An aortic aneurysm with a maximum diameter ≥ 55 mm
  • Rapidly expanding false lumen (growth of > 0.5 cm/6 months)
  • Compressed true lumen associated with end organ malperfusion
  • Symptomatic
  • Aneurysm with at least one of the following conditions:
  • Dilatation of the aortic arch larger than 5 cm in diameter for subject with fusiform aneurysm
  • Dilatation of the aortic arch is 1.5 times the normal diameter for subjects ascending or descending
  • Dilation of the aortic arch larger than 2.5 cm for subject with saccular aneurysm
  • Symptomatic aneurysm of the aortic arch
  • Aortic diameter growth rate > 5mm per 6 months
  • Postoperative pseudoaneurysm expanding from anastomotic suture lines
  • Penetrating aortic ulcer with at least one of the following:
  • Symptomatic
  • Ulcer demonstrates expansion
  • Intramural hematoma with at least one of the following:
  • Symptomatic (persistent pain)
  • Transverse or longitudinal expansion on serial imaging
  • In the event of a lesion in the ascending aortic, the proximal/ascending native or previously implanted surgical graft the landing zone must be appropriate
  • Femoral / iliac artery diameter as documented by CTA or MRA that allows endovascular access to the diseased site with a 20 Fr. delivery catheter.
  • Access vessels morphology suitable for endovascular repair in terms of tortuosity, calcification and angulation, documented by CTA/MRA.
  • Brachial/Axial Artery diameter that allows endovascular access suitable for 7 Fr.
  • Subject is considered an appropriate candidate for an elective surgery.
  • Subject is considered to be at high risk for open repair, as determined by the investigator.
  • Access vessels, iliac/femoral \& brachial/axillary compatible with vascular access techniques (femoral cutdown or percutaneous), devices, and /or accessories.
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with procedures specified in the protocol and is able to return for follow-up visits as specified by the protocol.

Who cannot join

  • Acute dissection
  • Lesions that can be safely treated with TEVAR landing in zone 2 (with or w/o LSA vascularization)
  • Required emergent treatment, e.g., trauma, rupture
  • Acute vascular injury of the aorta due to trauma
  • Aortic rupture or unstable aneurysm
  • Received a previous stent or stent graft in the treated area (including planned landing area)
Show all 31Show fewer
  • Required surgical or endovascular treatment of an infra-renal aneurysm at time of implantation
  • Planned major surgical or interventional procedure at time of screening, to be performed after the NEXUS™ implantation.
  • Any major surgical or interventional procedure 6 weeks before the NEXUS™ implantation, exclusive of planned procedures that are needed for the safe and effective placement of the stent graft (e.g. supra-aortic bypass).
  • Subject has had a myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebral vascular accident (CVA) within 90 days prior to the planned implantation
  • Subjects with severe aortic valvular insufficiency as determined by echocardiography
  • Mechanical valve that preclude safe delivery of NEXUS™
  • Known Connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan's or Ehler's-Danlos syndromes)
  • Subject has an active systemic infection at the time of the procedure documented by pain, fever, drainage, positive culture
  • Pregnant
  • Life expectancy of less than 2 years
  • Unsuitable vascular anatomy
  • Subject who have a previously implanted surgical wrap of the ascending aorta
  • Any medical condition that, according to the investigator's decision, might expose the subject to increased risk by the investigational device or procedure.
  • An aneurysm that is mycotic, inflammatory or suspected to be infected.
  • Subject with hostile groins/axilla (scarring, obesity, or previous failed puncture) unless conduit are used.
  • Subjects with severe atherosclerosis, severe calcification or extensive intraluminal thrombus of the aorta or in the brachiocephalic trunk
  • Subject is suffering from unstable angina or NYHA classification III and IV.
  • Subject has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment.
  • Subject with a contraindication to undergo angiography
  • Subject with known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials (including Nitinol [NiTi], polyester fabric [PET], tantalum [TA])
  • Clinical conditions that severely inhibit x-ray visualization of the Aorta.
  • Subject has history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that may limit the use of dual antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy by the decision of the investigator
  • Acute renal failure; chronic renal failure (excluding dialysis); Creatinine > 2.00 mg/dl
  • Any other medical, social, or psychological issues that in the opinion of the investigator preclude them from receiving this treatment, or the procedures and evaluations pre- and post- treatment.
  • Active participation in another clinical study that has not completed primary endpoint(s) evaluation or that clinically interferes with the endpoints in this study, or subject is planning to participate in such study prior to the completion of this study.

Trial locations and contacts

32 sites in 2 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

32 sites in 2 countries

United States31 sites, 24 recruiting
  • University of Michigan

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

    Jessica Woodford, jesstw@med.umich.edu

    Himanshu Patel, M.D

    Recruiting
  • Emory University

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

    Shaneka Douglas, shaneka.douglas@emory.edu

    Bradley Leshnower, M.D

    Recruiting
  • University of Colorado

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

    Tien Ngo, tien.ngo@cuanschutz.edu

    Brett Reece, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • University of Maryland

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21201

    Kaitlyn Masih, kmasih@som.umaryland.edu

    Howard Massey, M.D

    Recruiting
  • University of Alabama Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

    Rebecca St. John, rstjohn@uabmc.edu

    Adam Beck, M.D

    Recruiting
  • Tufts Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02111

    Completed
  • Ascension St. Vincent

    Carmel, Indiana, 46290

    Completed
  • University of North Carolina

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

    Rebekah Roten, rebekah_roten@med.unc.edu

    Federico Parodi

    Recruiting
  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

    Natalie Koren, korenn@musc.edu

    Sanford Zeigler, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Atrium Health

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203

    Madelyn Smyth, Madelyn.Smyth@advocatehealth.org

    Frank Arko, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • The University of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60637

    MacKenton Johnson, mackenton@bsd.uchicago.edu

    Trissa Babrowski, M.D

    Recruiting
  • The Lindner Research Center

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

    Michael Weber, michael.weber@thechristhospital.com

    Geoffrey Answini, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • University Hospitals of Cleveland

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

    Terence Semenec, Terence.Semenec@UHhospitals.org

    Jae Cho

    Recruiting
  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

    Completed
  • Hartford Hospital

    Hartford, Connecticut, 06102

    Vicky Macleod, Vicky.Macleod@hhchealth.org

    Mohiuddin Cheema

    Recruiting
  • Ballad Health

    Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660

    Completed
  • University of California San Diego Medical Center

    La Jolla, California, 92037

    Kathleen Groh, kagroh@health.ucsd.edu

    John Lane, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

    Lisa Slinger, lisa.slinger@vumc.org

    Ashish Shah

    Recruiting
  • The Mount Sinai Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10029

    Catherine Marin, Catherine.Marin@mountsinai.org

    Rami Tadros

    Recruiting
  • Northwell Health Lenox Hill Hospital

    New York, New York, 10075

    Nhan Tran, nnguyentran@northwell.edu

    Derek Brinster, M.D

    Recruiting
  • Sentara Norfolk General Hospital

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23507

    Amanda Anderson, aganders@sentara.com

    Christopher Barreiro, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Advent Health Orlando

    Orlando, Florida, 32804

    Completed
  • University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

    Elizabeth Durham, elizabeth.durham@pennmedicine.upenn.edu

    Nimesh Desai, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Baylor Scott and White

    Plano, Texas, 75093

    Niat Tekle, Niat.Tekle@BSWHealth.org

    William Brinkman, M.D

    Recruiting
  • Oregon Health

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

    Amie Lorisch, lorischa@ohsu.edu

    Castigliano Bhamidipati, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • Carilion Clinic

    Roanoke, Virginia, 24014

    Yili Zhong, yzhong@carilionclinic.org

    Esmaeel Dadashzadeh

    Recruiting
  • UC Davis Health

    Sacramento, California, 95817

    Completed
  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

    Laura McDonald, m.laura@wustl.edu

    Luis Sanchez, M.D

    Recruiting
  • Stanford University School of Medicine

    Stanford, California, 94305

    Tiffany Koyano, 650-724-6921, tkoyano3@stanford.edu

    Claire Watkins, M.D.

    Recruiting
  • MedStar Washington Hospital

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010

    Suman Singh, suman.singh@medstar.net

    Steven Abramowitz, M.D

    Recruiting
  • Lankenau Medical Center

    Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096

    Completed

Other trials in United States

New Zealand1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Auckland City Hospital

    Auckland, Grafton, 1023

    Courtney Armstrong, CourtneyAr@adhb.govt.nz

    Andrew Holden, Prof.

    Recruiting

Other trials in New Zealand

About this study

Official title: A Multi-arm, Multi-Center, Non-Randomized, Prospective, Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the NEXUS Aortic Arch Stent Graft System in Treating Thoracic Aortic Lesions Involving the Aortic Arch

Prospective, non-randomized, multi-center clinical investigation of the NEXUS™ Aortic Arch Stent Graft System (NEXUSTM) for the treatment of thoracic aortic lesions involving the aortic arch with a proximal landing zone, native or previously implanted surgical graft, in the ascending aorta and with a brachiocephalic trunk native landing zone.

Being tested
NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System
Medical subject headings
Aortic Dissection, Aortic Aneurysm, Penetrating Atherosclerotic Ulcer

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft SystemDevice

    Arch Stent Graft, whose cranial narrow end is intended to be deployed into the Brachiocephalic artery and whose distal end is intended to be deployed into the Descending Thoracic Aorta.

    Ascending Stent Graft intended to be deployed in the Ascending Aorta.

    OPTIONAL: Descending Extension can be used in case the aortic lesion elongates further distally and out of the covered length offered by the Arch Stent Graft. Multiple Descending Extensions can be used if needed to cover the entire length of the lesion.

Study groups in NCT04471909
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Chronic Dissection (arm closed to enrollment)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System
Penetrating Aortic Ulcer and/or Intramural HematomaExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System
Aneurysm (arm closed to enrollment)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Device Technical Failure

    • Failure to accurately deliver, track and deploy all required endovascular device components at the intended implantation site and failure to retrieve the device delivery systems without the need for unplanned additional procedures
    • Device occlusion
    • Failed exclusion of primary entry tear
    • Additional unanticipated surgical or interventional procedure related to the device or procedure, to prevent life-threatening or permanent disabling event.

    Measured: 30 Days

  2. Clinical Failure

    Subjects experiencing early mortality or at least one of the following MAEs through 30-Day of Phase 1 Procedure and 30-Day of Index Procedure: Disabling stroke, permanent paralysis/paraplegia, renal failure, aortic rupture, development of new dissections in the thoracic aorta or brachiocephalic artery.

    Measured: 30 Days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jul 2020
  2. Study start20 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completionOct 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
110 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04471909
Sponsor's protocol ID
CIP-009
Acronym
TRIOMPHE
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
9 Jul 2020
Last updated
20 Oct 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System in people with Aortic Dissection and Aortic Aneurysm, run by Endospan Ltd. at 32 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 35 inclusion and 31 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 32 sites in United States, New Zealand. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jessica Kleine (+1 (612) 280-0208, j.kleine@endospan.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Device Technical Failure (time frame: 30 Days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in