AzTrials
AzTrials

Depressive Disorder, MajorPhase 3NCT04476030

A Comparative Study of Sage-217 Plus an Antidepressant (ADT) Versus Placebo Plus an ADT in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder

A Phase 3 study testing SAGE-217, Sertraline and Escitalopram in people with Depressive Disorder, Major, run by Biogen at 51 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of SAGE-217 plus an ADT in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) compared to placebo plus an ADT. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 64 years
Conditions the study is for
Depressive Disorder, Major
What is being tested?
SAGE-217, Sertraline and Escitalopram
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
440 participants
Where
51 sitesUnited States
Study dates
9 Nov 2020to 22 Dec 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of MDD as diagnosed by Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition Clinical Trials Version (SCID-5-CT), with symptoms that have been present for at least a 4-week period
  • 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) total score of ≥24 at Screening and Day 1
  • Participant in good physical health and has no clinically significant findings, as determined by the investigator, on physical examination, 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), or clinical laboratory tests
  • Participant is willing, able, and eligible to take at least 1 of the 5 ADTs specified in the protocol (an eligible ADT is an ADT that has not been taken during the current depressive episode and for which the participant has no contraindications; further, a participant is not eligible for citalopram if escitalopram has been taken during the current depressive episode, and vice versa)

Who cannot join

  • Has attempted suicide associated with the current episode of MDD
  • Participant had onset of the current depressive episode during pregnancy or 4 weeks postpartum, or the participant has presented for screening during the 6-month postpartum period
  • Participant has treatment-resistant depression
  • History of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and/or schizoaffective disorder
  • Known allergy to SAGE-217, allopregnanolone, or related compounds
  • Has taken antidepressants within 30 days prior to Day 1, and/or has taken fluoxetine within 60 days prior to Day 1

Trial locations and contacts

51 sites in 1 country.

51 sites in 1 country

United States51 sites
  • Sage Investigational Site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87109

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Alpharetta, Georgia, 30022

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Anaheim, California, 92805

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30331

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Austin, Texas, 78759

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Beachwood, Ohio, 44122

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Bellevue, Washington, 98007

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Brooklyn, New York, 11229

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Brooklyn, New York, 11235

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Cherry Hill, New Jersey, 08002

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60634

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60640

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45212

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45215

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80910

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Coral Springs, Florida, 33067

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Costa Mesa, California, 92626

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Cromwell, Connecticut, 06416

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75231

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Dothan, Alabama, 36303

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Glendale, California, 91206

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Houston, Texas, 77081

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Irvine, California, 92614

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32256

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68526

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Los Alamitos, California, 90720

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Marietta, Georgia, 30060

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Marlton, New Jersey, 08053

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Mount Kisco, New York, 10549

  • Sage Investigational Site

    North Canton, Ohio, 44720

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Norwich, Connecticut, 06360

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Oceanside, California, 92056

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73112

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Orange, California, 92868

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Orlando, Florida, 32801

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Orlando, Florida, 32807

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Pensacola, Florida, 32502

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85012

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania, 19462

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Princeton, New Jersey, 08540

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Riverside, California, 92503

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Saint Charles, Missouri, 63304

  • Sage Investigational Site

    San Diego, California, 92103

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Savannah, Georgia, 31405

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Temecula, California, 92591

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Towson, Maryland, 21204

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Watertown, Massachusetts, 02472

  • Sage Investigational Site

    Wichita Falls, Texas, 76309

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of SAGE-217 Plus an Antidepressant Versus Placebo Plus an Antidepressant in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder

The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of SAGE-217 plus an ADT in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) compared to placebo plus an ADT.

Read the detailed description

This study was previously posted by Sage Therapeutics. In November 2023, sponsorship of the trial was transferred to Biogen.

Being tested
SAGE-217, Matching Placebo, Sertraline, Escitalopram, Citalopram
Keywords
Major Depressive Disorder, MDD, SAGE-217
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Major

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SAGE-217Drug

    Oral capsules

  • Matching PlaceboDrug

    Oral capsules

  • SertralineDrug

    Oral tablets

  • EscitalopramDrug

    Oral tablets

  • CitalopramDrug

    Oral tablets

  • DuloxetineDrug

    Oral capsules

  • DesvenlafaxineDrug

    Oral tablets

Study groups in NCT04476030
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Placebo + Assigned ADTActive comparatorParticipants received SAGE-217-matching placebo capsules, orally, once daily along with an assigned ADT (sertraline, escitalopram, citalopram, duloxetine, or desvenlafaxine administered per labeled prescribing information), daily, from Day 1 through 14, followed by the same ADT, per labeled prescribing information, daily, up to Day 42.
Receives: Drug: Matching Placebo; Drug: Sertraline; Drug: Escitalopram; Drug: Citalopram; Drug: Duloxetine; Drug: Desvenlafaxine
SAGE-217 + Assigned ADTExperimentalParticipants received SAGE-217, 50 milligrams (mg), orally, once daily along with an assigned ADT (sertraline, escitalopram, citalopram, duloxetine, or desvenlafaxine administered per labeled prescribing information), daily from Day 1 through 14, followed by the same ADT, per labeled prescribing information, daily, up to Day 42.
Receives: Drug: SAGE-217; Drug: Sertraline; Drug: Escitalopram; Drug: Citalopram; Drug: Duloxetine; Drug: Desvenlafaxine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in the HAMD-17 Total Score at Day 3

    The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Least Squares (LS) mean was estimated using mixed effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) analysis.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 3

Secondary outcomes (15)
  1. Change From Baseline in the HAMD-17 Total Score Over the Double-Blind Treatment Period

    The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis. The data reported is summary of data collected and analyzed during double-blind treatment period at Baseline, Day 3, Day 8, Day 12, and Day 15 using equal weights for the scheduled visits.

    Measured: Baseline through Day 15

  2. Change From Baseline in the HAMD-17 Total Score at Days 15 and 42

    The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis. The missing values were imputed for the analysis.

    Measured: Baseline, Days 15 and 42

  3. Change From Baseline in the HAMD-17 Total Score Around End of Blinded Treatment

    The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. End of blinded treatment was defined as the average of change from baseline values of Days 12, 15 and 18. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis.

    Measured: Baseline, End of blinded treatment assessment (i.e., average of Days 12, 15 , and 18)

  4. Percentage of Participants With HAMD-17 Response at Day 15 and Day 42

    HAM-D response was defined as having a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in HAM-D total score. The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. Percentages were rounded off to the first decimal point.

    Measured: At Days 15 and 42

  5. Percentage of Participants With HAMD-17 Remission at Day 15 and Day 42

    HAM-D remission was defined as having a HAM-D total score of ≤7. The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. Percentages were rounded off to the first decimal point.

    Measured: Days 15 and 42

  6. Change From Baseline in CGI-S Score at Day 15

    The CGI-S uses a 7-point Likert scale to rate the severity of the participant's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with participants who have the same diagnosis. Considering total clinical experience, the investigator rated the participant on severity of mental illness at the time of rating as: 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = extremely ill. A higher score indicated extreme illness. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15

  7. Percentage of Participants With CGI-I Response, at Day 3 and Day 15

    CGI-I response was defined as having a CGI-I score of "very much improved" or "much improved." The CGI-I employs a 7-point Likert scale to measure the overall improvement in the participant's condition post-treatment. The investigator rated the participant's total improvement whether or not it was due entirely to IP. Response choices included: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse. By definition, all CGI-I assessments are evaluated against baseline conditions. Higher scores indicated worse condition. Percentages were rounded off to the first decimal point.

    Measured: Days 3 and 15

  8. Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at Day 15

    The MADRS is a 10-item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. The MADRS total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores. Each item yields a score of 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The total MADRS score (sum of all individual items) ranges from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Higher MADRS scores indicated more severe depression. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15

  9. Percentage of Participants With MADRS Response at Day 15

    MADRS response was defined as having a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in MADRS total score. The MADRS is a 10-item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. The MADRS total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores. Each item yields a score of 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The total MADRS score (sum of all individual items) ranges from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Higher MADRS scores indicated more severe depression. Percentages were rounded off to the first decimal point.

    Measured: Day 15

  10. Percentage of Participants With MADRS Remission at Day 15

    MADRS remission was defined as having a MADRS total score of ≤10. The MADRS is a 10-item diagnostic questionnaire used to measure the severity of depressive episodes in participants with mood disorders. The MADRS total score was calculated as the sum of the 10 individual item scores. Each item yields a score of 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (symptoms of maximum severity). The total MADRS score (sum of all individual items) ranges from 0 (symptoms absent) to 60 (severe depression). Higher MADRS scores indicated more severe depression. Percentages were rounded off to the first decimal point.

    Measured: Day 15

  11. Change From Baseline in HAM-A Total Score at Day 15

    Each of the 14 items in the HAM-A was defined by a series of symptoms, and measured both psychic anxiety (mental agitation and psychological distress) and somatic anxiety (physical complaints). The HAM-A total score was calculated as sum of the 14 individual item scores, each rated on a five point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (very severe). The total score (sum of all individual items) range from 0 to 56, where <17 indicated mild severity, 18 to 24 indicated mild to moderate severity, and 25 to 30 indicated moderate to severe severity. Higher scores indicated more severe disease. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis.

    Measured: Baseline, Day 15

  12. Time to First HAMD-17 Response

    HAM-D response was defined as having a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in HAM-D total score. The 17-item HAM-D scale is used to assess the severity of depression. It is comprised of individual ratings related to following symptoms: depressed mood, feelings of guilt, suicide, insomnia, work and activities, retardation, agitation, anxiety, somatic symptoms, genital symptoms, hypochondriasis, loss of weight, and insight. Individual items are scored on either 3-point (0=none to 2=severe) or 5-point scale (0=none/absent to 4=most severe). Total score is the sum of individual items, ranging from 0 (not depressed) to 52 (severely depressed); where a higher score indicates more depression. Time (in days) from first dose of study drug to time of first HAMD response was reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug up to first HAMD-17 response (up to approximately 65 days)

  13. Change From Baseline in Depressive Symptoms at Day 15, as Assessed by PHQ-9

    The PHQ-9 is a participant-rated depressive symptom severity scale. The PHQ-9 total score is calculated as the sum of the 9 individual item scores. For individual items, scoring is based on responses to specific questions, as follows: 0 = not at all; 1 = several days; 2 = more than half the days; and 3 = nearly every day. The PHQ-9 possible total score range is 0 to 27, with higher scores reflecting greater depressive symptoms, and is categorized as follows: 0 to 4 = minimal depression, 5 to 9 = mild depression, 10 to 14 = moderate depression, 15 to 19 = moderately severe depression, and 20 to 27 = severe depression. Negative change from baseline indicated improvement. LS mean was estimated using MMRM analysis.

    Measured: Baseline and Day 15

  14. Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE was defined as an AE with onset after the start of IP, or any worsening of a pre-existing medical condition/AE with onset after the start of IP and throughout the study.

    Measured: Up to approximately 58 weeks

  15. Percentage of Participants With TEAEs, Graded by Severity

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. A TEAE was defined as an AE with onset after the start of IP, or any worsening of a pre-existing medical condition/AE with onset after the start of IP and throughout the study. The severity was graded as mild, moderate and severe.

    Measured: Up to approximately 58 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jul 2020
  2. Study start9 Nov 2020
  3. Primary completion25 Oct 2021
  4. Study completion22 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
440 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04476030
Sponsor's protocol ID
217-MDD-305
Status last verified
Dec 2023
First submitted
15 Jul 2020
Last updated
22 Dec 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: In accordance with Biogen's Clinical Trial Transparency and Data Sharing Policy on https://www.biogentrialtransparency.com/

Publications

  • Parikh SV, Aaronson ST, Mathew SJ, Alva G, DeBattista C, Kanes S, Lasser R, Bullock A, Kotecha M, Jung J, Forrestal F, Jonas J, Vera T, Leclair B, Doherty J. Efficacy and safety of zuranolone co-initiated with an antidepressant in adults with major depressive disorder: results from the phase 3 CORAL study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Jan;49(2):467-475. doi: 10.1038/s41386-023-01751-9. Epub 2023 Oct 24.

    PubMed 37875578

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing SAGE-217, Sertraline and Escitalopram in people with Depressive Disorder, Major, run by Biogen at 51 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 51 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Nov 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in the HAMD-17 Total Score at Day 3 (time frame: Baseline, Day 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04476030, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in