Respiratory FailureNCT04476914
Stress Related Disorders in Family Members of COVID-19 Patients Admitted to the ICU
An observational study of Respiratory Failure and SARS-CoV 2, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 9 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a novel infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This syndrome has been associated with high mortality, estimated to be about 1.7% of all infected in the US, though in those who develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Respiratory Failure, SARS-CoV 2, Corona Virus Infection
- How many people
- 330 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 29 Jun 2020to 15 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population will be consenting family members of COVID-19 positive patients who are admitted to the intensive care unit with respiratory failure
Who may be able to join
- Family members of COVID-19 positive patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit with respiratory failure
Who cannot join
- Family members will be excluded if they: are under 18 or unable to complete the survey's due to language barriers
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
United States9 sites
Eastern Colorado Veterans Affairs Health Care System, University Of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Brigham and Women's Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
University of Vermont Medical Center
Burlington, Vermont, 05401
Penn State Hershey Milton S Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Tulane Medical Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Columbia Milstein and Allen Hospitals
New York, New York, 10034
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98104
South Shore Medical Center
Weymouth, Massachusetts, 02910
About this study
Official title: Psychological Distress Symptoms in Family Members of Patients With COVID-19 Respiratory Failure in Intensive Care Units
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a novel infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This syndrome has been associated with high mortality, estimated to be about 1.7% of all infected in the US, though in those who develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the context of the infection, mortality rates appear to be much higher, perhaps up to 70%. To avoid transmission of the virus, patient isolation has become the standard of care, with many hospitals eliminating visitors of any type, and particularly eliminating visitation to patients infected with COVID-19. These necessary, but restrictive, measures add stress to the ICU and particularly to the family members who are not only left with fear, but also many unanswered questions. In contrast to the Society of Critical Care Guidelines (SCCM) which recommend family engagement in the ICU and recent data from this study team which suggests engaging families in end-of-life situations reduces symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in family members, family members are now unable to say good-bye and unable to provide support to their loved-one throughout the process of the patients' ICU stay. The study hypothesizes is that these restrictive visiting regulations will increase rates of Post-intensive care syndrome- family (PICS-F) which includes symptoms of PTSD, depression, and anxiety and aim to evaluate for factors that either exacerbate these symptoms or protect from them.
Read the detailed description
The study aims to define the prevalence of PICS-F in the study population 3-4 months after ICU admission of patient, specifically symptoms of PTSD as the primary outcome, and symptoms of depression and anxiety as secondary outcomes. The study hypothesizes prevalence will be higher than seen in other studies.
An additional aim is to identify predisposing or mitigating exposures for PICS-F. The study hypothesizes that increased psychological symptoms will be associated less exposure to virtual patient visits (tablet/video conferencing), higher number of patient comorbidities (using the Charleston comorbidity index), preexisting family member psychological conditions.
The study also plans to evaluate the association between family perception of quality of communication or decision-making using items from the validated Family Satisfaction in the ICU (FS-ICU) and psychological symptoms. The study hypothesizes that the quality of communication and decision-making will be associated with lower psychological symptoms.
Finally, the plan is to, using qualitative methods, explore and describe family members' stress, experiences with communication with healthcare providers and their satisfaction with ICU care while being physically distant from their loved ones. The aim is to use qualitative findings about family members' experiences to contextualize and explain results differences in stress, satisfaction and communication quality between low vs high PICS-F scores.
- Conditions
- Respiratory Failure, SARS-CoV 2, Corona Virus Infection, Post Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, Family Members, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
- Medical subject headings
- Respiratory Insufficiency, Coronavirus Infections, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Anxiety Disorders, Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Family Member | Family members of ICU patients admitted with respiratory failure from COVID-19 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Using Impact of Events Scale-Revised-6 , family members will be screened for symptoms of PTSD. Scale returns scores of 0-24, with higher scores indicating more likely to have symptoms of PTSD
Measured: 90-120 days after admission of patient to the ICU
Secondary outcomes (3)
Symptoms of Anxiety
Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score, family members will be screened for symptoms of anxiety. The HADS anxiety scale is scored between 0 and 21, with higher scores indicating more likely to have symptoms of anxiety
Measured: 90-120 days after admission of patient to the ICU
Symptoms of Depression
Using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score, family members will be screened for symptoms of Depression. The HADS depression scale is scored between 0 and 21, with higher scores indicating more likely to have symptoms of depression
Measured: 90-120 days after admission of patient to the ICU
Family Satisfaction with Communication and Decision Making
Using preselected questions from the Family Satisfaction in the ICU-27 questionnaire, we will survey families to evaluate their satisfaction with communication and decision making. Higher scores will indicate more satisfication
Measured: 90-120 days after admission of patient to the ICU
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2020
- Study start29 Jun 2020
- Primary completion15 Jun 2021
- Study completion15 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Respiratory FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Colorado, DenverThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 330 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Colorado, Denver
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Washington, Tulane University, University of Vermont, Penn State University, Columbia University, South Shore Hospital, Evergreen Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04476914
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20-1021
- Status last verified
- Jun 2021
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2020
- Last updated
- 22 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html. Accessed on 3/30/2020
Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, Lokhandwala S, Riedo FX, Chong M, Lee M. Characteristics and Outcomes of 21 Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1612-1614. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4326.
PubMed 32191259Davidson JE, Aslakson RA, Long AC, Puntillo KA, Kross EK, Hart J, Cox CE, Wunsch H, Wickline MA, Nunnally ME, Netzer G, Kentish-Barnes N, Sprung CL, Hartog CS, Coombs M, Gerritsen RT, Hopkins RO, Franck LS, Skrobik Y, Kon AA, Scruth EA, Harvey MA, Lewis-Newby M, White DB, Swoboda SM, Cooke CR, Levy MM, Azoulay E, Curtis JR. Guidelines for Family-Centered Care in the Neonatal, Pediatric, and Adult ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):103-128. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002169.
PubMed 27984278Amass TH, Villa G, OMahony S, Badger JM, McFadden R, Walsh T, Caine T, McGuirl D, Palmisciano A, Yeow ME, De Gaudio R, Curtis JR, Levy MM. Family Care Rituals in the ICU to Reduce Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Family Members-A Multicenter, Multinational, Before-and-After Intervention Trial. Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):176-184. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004113.
PubMed 31939785Davidson JE, Jones C, Bienvenu OJ. Family response to critical illness: postintensive care syndrome-family. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):618-24. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236ebf9.
PubMed 22080636Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, Joly LM, Chevret S, Adrie C, Barnoud D, Bleichner G, Bruel C, Choukroun G, Curtis JR, Fieux F, Galliot R, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Georges H, Goldgran-Toledano D, Jourdain M, Loubert G, Reignier J, Saidi F, Souweine B, Vincent F, Barnes NK, Pochard F, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 1;356(5):469-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063446.
PubMed 17267907Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, Chevret S, Aboab J, Adrie C, Annane D, Bleichner G, Bollaert PE, Darmon M, Fassier T, Galliot R, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Goulenok C, Goldgran-Toledano D, Hayon J, Jourdain M, Kaidomar M, Laplace C, Larche J, Liotier J, Papazian L, Poisson C, Reignier J, Saidi F, Schlemmer B; FAMIREA Study Group. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 May 1;171(9):987-94. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1295OC. Epub 2005 Jan 21.
PubMed 15665319Wall RJ, Engelberg RA, Downey L, Heyland DK, Curtis JR. Refinement, scoring, and validation of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) survey. Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):271-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251122.15053.50.
PubMed 17133189Sundin EC, Horowitz MJ. Horowitz's Impact of Event Scale evaluation of 20 years of use. Psychosom Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;65(5):870-6. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000084835.46074.f0.
PubMed 14508034Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
PubMed 6880820Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3.
PubMed 11832252Curtis JR, Treece PD, Nielsen EL, Gold J, Ciechanowski PS, Shannon SE, Khandelwal N, Young JP, Engelberg RA. Randomized Trial of Communication Facilitators to Reduce Family Distress and Intensity of End-of-Life Care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan 15;193(2):154-62. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-0900OC.
PubMed 26378963Carson SS, Cox CE, Wallenstein S, Hanson LC, Danis M, Tulsky JA, Chai E, Nelson JE. Effect of Palliative Care-Led Meetings for Families of Patients With Chronic Critical Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Jul 5;316(1):51-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8474.
PubMed 27380343White DB, Angus DC, Shields AM, Buddadhumaruk P, Pidro C, Paner C, Chaitin E, Chang CH, Pike F, Weissfeld L, Kahn JM, Darby JM, Kowinsky A, Martin S, Arnold RM; PARTNER Investigators. A Randomized Trial of a Family-Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 21;378(25):2365-2375. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1802637. Epub 2018 May 23.
PubMed 29791247Van Scoy LJ, Chiarolanzio PJ, Kim C, Heyland DK. Development and initial evaluation of an online decision support tool for families of patients with critical illness: A multicenter pilot study. J Crit Care. 2017 Jun;39:18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 Jan 19. No abstract available.
PubMed 28131020
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Psychological Distress Symptoms in Family Members of Patients With COVID-19 Respiratory Failure in Intensive Care Units
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04476914
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20-1021
- Conditions
- Respiratory Failure, SARS-CoV 2, Corona Virus Infection, Post Intensive Care Unit Syndrome, Family Members, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 330 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Colorado, DenverUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Washington, Tulane University, University of Vermont, Penn State University, Columbia University, South Shore Hospital, Evergreen Hospital, Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Study start
- 29 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a novel infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This syndrome has been associated with high mortality, estimated to be about 1.7% of all infected in the US, though in those who develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in the context of the infection, mortality rates appear to be much higher, perhaps up to 70%. To avoid transmission of the virus, patient isolation has become the standard of care, with many hospitals eliminating visitors of any type, and particularly eliminating visitation to patients infected with COVID-19. These necessary, but restrictive, measures add stress to the ICU and particularly to the family members who are not only left with fear, but also many unanswered questions. In contrast to the Society of Critical Care Guidelines (SCCM) which recommend family engagement in the ICU and recent data from this study team which suggests engaging families in end-of-life situations reduces symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in family members, family members are now unable to say good-bye and unable to provide support to their loved-one throughout the process of the patients' ICU stay. The study hypothesizes is that these restrictive visiting regulations will increase rates of Post-intensive care syndrome- family (PICS-F) which includes symptoms of PTSD, depression, and anxiety and aim to evaluate for factors that either exacerbate these symptoms or protect from them.
Detailed description
The study aims to define the prevalence of PICS-F in the study population 3-4 months after ICU admission of patient, specifically symptoms of PTSD as the primary outcome, and symptoms of depression and anxiety as secondary outcomes. The study hypothesizes prevalence will be higher than seen in other studies.
An additional aim is to identify predisposing or mitigating exposures for PICS-F. The study hypothesizes that increased psychological symptoms will be associated less exposure to virtual patient visits (tablet/video conferencing), higher number of patient comorbidities (using the Charleston comorbidity index), preexisting family member psychological conditions.
The study also plans to evaluate the association between family perception of quality of communication or decision-making using items from the validated Family Satisfaction in the ICU (FS-ICU) and psychological symptoms. The study hypothesizes that the quality of communication and decision-making will be associated with lower psychological symptoms.
Finally, the plan is to, using qualitative methods, explore and describe family members' stress, experiences with communication with healthcare providers and their satisfaction with ICU care while being physically distant from their loved ones. The aim is to use qualitative findings about family members' experiences to contextualize and explain results differences in stress, satisfaction and communication quality between low vs high PICS-F scores.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Family Member | – | –Family members of ICU patients admitted with respiratory failure from COVID-19 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population will be consenting family members of COVID-19 positive patients who are admitted to the intensive care unit with respiratory failure
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Family members of COVID-19 positive patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit with respiratory failure
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Family members will be excluded if they: are under 18 or unable to complete the survey's due to language barriers
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
Time frame: 90-120 days after admission of patient to the ICU
Using Impact of Events Scale-Revised-6 , family members will be screened for symptoms of PTSD. Scale returns scores of 0-24, with higher scores indicating more likely to have symptoms of PTSD
3 secondary outcomes
Symptoms of Anxiety
Time frame: 90-120 days after admission of patient to the ICU
Symptoms of Depression
Time frame: 90-120 days after admission of patient to the ICU
Family Satisfaction with Communication and Decision Making
Time frame: 90-120 days after admission of patient to the ICU
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jun 2021.
- Backgroundhttps://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html. Accessed on 3/30/2020
- Background: PubMed 32191259Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, Lokhandwala S, Riedo FX, Chong M, Lee M. Characteristics and Outcomes of 21 Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1612-1614. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4326.
- Background: PubMed 27984278Davidson JE, Aslakson RA, Long AC, Puntillo KA, Kross EK, Hart J, Cox CE, Wunsch H, Wickline MA, Nunnally ME, Netzer G, Kentish-Barnes N, Sprung CL, Hartog CS, Coombs M, Gerritsen RT, Hopkins RO, Franck LS, Skrobik Y, Kon AA, Scruth EA, Harvey MA, Lewis-Newby M, White DB, Swoboda SM, Cooke CR, Levy MM, Azoulay E, Curtis JR. Guidelines for Family-Centered Care in the Neonatal, Pediatric, and Adult ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan;45(1):103-128. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002169.
- Background: PubMed 31939785Amass TH, Villa G, OMahony S, Badger JM, McFadden R, Walsh T, Caine T, McGuirl D, Palmisciano A, Yeow ME, De Gaudio R, Curtis JR, Levy MM. Family Care Rituals in the ICU to Reduce Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Family Members-A Multicenter, Multinational, Before-and-After Intervention Trial. Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;48(2):176-184. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004113.
- Background: PubMed 22080636Davidson JE, Jones C, Bienvenu OJ. Family response to critical illness: postintensive care syndrome-family. Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):618-24. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318236ebf9.
- Background: PubMed 17267907Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, Joly LM, Chevret S, Adrie C, Barnoud D, Bleichner G, Bruel C, Choukroun G, Curtis JR, Fieux F, Galliot R, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Georges H, Goldgran-Toledano D, Jourdain M, Loubert G, Reignier J, Saidi F, Souweine B, Vincent F, Barnes NK, Pochard F, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E. A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 1;356(5):469-78. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa063446.
- Background: PubMed 15665319Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, Chevret S, Aboab J, Adrie C, Annane D, Bleichner G, Bollaert PE, Darmon M, Fassier T, Galliot R, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Goulenok C, Goldgran-Toledano D, Hayon J, Jourdain M, Kaidomar M, Laplace C, Larche J, Liotier J, Papazian L, Poisson C, Reignier J, Saidi F, Schlemmer B; FAMIREA Study Group. Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 May 1;171(9):987-94. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200409-1295OC. Epub 2005 Jan 21.
- Background: PubMed 17133189Wall RJ, Engelberg RA, Downey L, Heyland DK, Curtis JR. Refinement, scoring, and validation of the Family Satisfaction in the Intensive Care Unit (FS-ICU) survey. Crit Care Med. 2007 Jan;35(1):271-9. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000251122.15053.50.
- Background: PubMed 14508034Sundin EC, Horowitz MJ. Horowitz's Impact of Event Scale evaluation of 20 years of use. Psychosom Med. 2003 Sep-Oct;65(5):870-6. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000084835.46074.f0.
- Background: PubMed 6880820Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
- Background: PubMed 11832252Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3.
- Background: PubMed 26378963Curtis JR, Treece PD, Nielsen EL, Gold J, Ciechanowski PS, Shannon SE, Khandelwal N, Young JP, Engelberg RA. Randomized Trial of Communication Facilitators to Reduce Family Distress and Intensity of End-of-Life Care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan 15;193(2):154-62. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201505-0900OC.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Respiratory Failure
Enrolling by invitation
Personalized Ventilator Settings for Patients on ECMO
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Not yet recruiting
Regional Lung Ventilation During Prone Position in in Intubated Children
Pediatric Acute Respiratory Failure
Not yet recruiting
Smartphone Camera Measurement of Breathing-Related Heart Rate Variability Compared With ECG in Healthy Adults
Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia, Heart Rate Variability
Not yet recruiting
Mechanical Ventilator Adjustments and Patient Dyspnea
Respiratory Failure, Dyspnea During Mechanical Ventilation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Genetics Branch Eligibility Screening Survey
Melanoma, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Respiratory Failure and SARS-CoV 2, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 9 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (time frame: 90-120 days after admission of patient to the ICU). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04476914, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2021.