Early MobilityNCT04479943
Improving Patient Walking During Hospitalization
A study testing MOVIN and Surveys and Focus groups in people with Early Mobility and Older Adults, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The MOVIN (Mobilizing Older adult patients Via a systems-based Intervention) randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the impact of the MOVIN intervention on improving the functional ability of older adult hospital patients and reducing their healthcare utilization post-hospitalization. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Early Mobility, Older Adults, Hospital Acquired Condition
- What is being tested?
- MOVIN and Surveys and Focus groups
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 765 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2021to 27 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age 65 years or older
- able to walk with or without assistance
- living in the community (not long term care) prior to admission
- have an ambulation order
- admitted to hospital's general adult medical unit
- able to consent
- able to speak and understand English
- at least 24h planned length of stay after initial study enrollment.
Who cannot join
- activated Power of Attorney
- lower extremity amputation
- on hospice
- bed rest order or activity restriction
- wheelchair bound
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UW School of Medicine and Public Health
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705
About this study
Official title: Preventing Hospital-Acquired Disability: An Intervention to Improve Older Adult Patient Ambulation
The MOVIN (Mobilizing Older adult patients Via a systems-based Intervention) randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the impact of the MOVIN intervention on improving the functional ability of older adult hospital patients and reducing their healthcare utilization post-hospitalization. MOVIN is a program to increase patient ambulation while hospitalized. The study's hypothesis is that MOVIN will improve functional outcomes for hospitalized older adult patients by producing a change in nursing practice and culture of ambulation on inpatient units. MOVIN is a unit-based intervention. Therefore all patients on this unit are exposed to the intervention once it is implemented regardless of whether or not they participate in the trial. The study will enroll 360-420 total hospitalized participants 65 years and older for the duration of their stay. It will also enroll any nurses 18 years and older who worked on the units during the study and are willing to fill out surveys.
Read the detailed description
Up to 65% of hospitalized older adults will lose the ability to ambulate independently during their hospital stay. Loss of independent ambulation has been identified as a hospital-acquired disability and is a critical patient safety concern, resulting in permanent loss of function for 50% of older adults one-year post discharge. Functional loss is associated with multiple negative outcomes including a 33% increase in new nursing home placement, increase in length of hospital stay, need for home health services, falls, caregiver burden, decreased quality of life, and increased mortality. Given the rapid increase in the elderly population, loss of independent ambulation primarily due to the process of care in hospital settings may significantly increase future healthcare costs and further exacerbate concerns related to patient care quality.
Lack of walking during hospitalization has been directly linked to loss of independent ambulation in older adults. Nurses are responsible for promoting and maintaining patient independent mobility. However, the investigators research has identified multiple personal and organizational barriers that prevent nurses from walking patients. The investigators have developed and pilot tested a novel systems based multi-component intervention to improve ambulation of older adult patients, Mobilizing Older adult patients Via a systems-based INtervention (MOVIN).
MOVIN is comprised of five components: 1) psychomotor skills training; 2) communication tools; 3) ambulation pathways; 4) ambulation resources; and 5) unit ambulation culture. The Investigators pilot study of MOVIN demonstrated a statistically significant increase in frequency and weekly distance of patient ambulation as well as changes in nursing practice and unit culture. Notably, these changes have been sustained for greater than two years after completion of the study.
The investigators' goal is to eliminate loss of independent ambulation in hospitalized older adults. In pursuit of this goal, the specific aims are to:
- Specific Aim 1:Test the effectiveness of MOVIN to improve functional ability of older adult patients at discharge, and 1, 3 and 6 months post discharge
- Specific Aim 2: Test the effectiveness of MOVIN to reduce healthcare utilization of older adults at discharge, and 1, 3 and 6 months post discharge
- 2.A. To analyze a return on investment of MOVIN based on program costs and health utilization measures across different hospitals
- Specific Aim 3: Measure change in nurse behaviors and unit culture and identify ongoing systems barriers that impact translation of MOVIN across inpatient units and different hospitals.
- Conditions
- Early Mobility, Older Adults, Hospital Acquired Condition
- Being tested
- MOVIN, Surveys and Focus groups
- Keywords
- nursing care, hospitalization, aged, walking
- Medical subject headings
- Iatrogenic Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MOVINOther
MOVIN is a multi-component unit-based intervention comprised of five components that are implemented simultaneously in a hospital unit. The five components are: 1) psychomotor skills training, 2) unit ambulation culture, 3) communication, 4) resources, 5) ambulation environment.
Surveys and Focus groupsOther
Nurses will answer surveys about nurse behavior, changes in self-efficacy, frequency and distance of patient ambulation, documentation of ambulation, qualitative data collected to determine barriers to implementation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-intervention/control | No intervention | 160-200 older adult patients (age 65 or older) will be recruited on four units across two hospitals (two units per hospital) over 6-8 months prior to implementation of the unit-based MOVIN intervention. |
| Post-intervention | Experimental | 160-200 older adult patients (age 65 or older) will be recruited on four units across two hospitals (two units per hospital) over 6-8 months after MOVIN has been implemented on the unit. Receives: Other: MOVIN |
| Nurses | Other | Nurses will complete surveys and provide qualitative data to assess barriers to implementation. Nurses will be invited to enroll in the survey/qualitative data arm during both Pre-intervention and Post-intervention phases. Receives: Other: Surveys and Focus groups |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Aim 1: Change in Gait Speed
Gait Speed is a physical performance measure identified as a sensitive clinical indicator of health, mortality, healthcare utilization, and independence in ambulation, and is feasible to test in hospitalized older adults. A 4 meter walk test will be conducted on admission to the study, discharge from the hospital and at 3 months post discharge in the subjects home or the hospital or clinic. A trained member of the research team will conduct the gait speed test. Interrater reliability for the 4 meter walk test will be conducted between all members of the research team prior to collecting gait speed data on study participants. Change scores will be calculated as the difference among gait speeds measured at each time points.
Measured: Within 24 hours of hospital admission, Within 8 hours of hospital discharge, 3 months post-discharge; Up to 4 months total
Aim 1: Change in Self-report on Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
A trained member of the research team collected patients self-report of ADLs on admission to the study, discharge from the hospital, by phone at 1 month post intervention and 6 months post intervention, and in person at the 3 month post intervention visit using the Katz ADL Index. The Katz ADL Index is a self-report scale that measures six ADL on two levels (independent or requiring assistance of another). A score of 0-6 is possible, with higher scores indicating higher independence with ADLs and lower scores indicating higher dependence on others to perform ADLs. The scale demonstrates excellent reliability and predictive validity, and is sensitive to change in hospital settings. For the primary analysis, patients with a score of 6 were converted to a binary score of 1=Independent; all others were scored as 0=Dependent.
Measured: Within 24 hours of hospital admission, Within 8 hours of hospital discharge, 1 month post-discharge, 3 months post-discharge; 6 months post-discharge
Aim 1: Change in Life Space Assessment
The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Life Space Assessment (LSA) is a self-report scale of ambulation that measures spaces patients' move in, the frequency of moving into those spaces, and dependency in moving into those spaces. This scale has demonstrated reliability and predictive validity and sensitivity to change after hospital stay. Level scores are calculated by multiplying the life-space level (higher numbers indicate farther distances moved, e.g., 1-inside the home to 5-places outside of the person's town), degree of independence (higher scores indicate greater independence), and frequency of movement (higher scores equal greater frequency). Total scores range from 0 (totally bed-bound) to 120 (moved out of town every day without assistance). A trained member of the research team will collect patients self-report on Life Space. Change scores will be calculated as the difference among LSA ambulation measured at each time point.
Measured: Within 24 hours of hospital admission, 1 month post-discharge, 3 months post-discharge; 6 months post-discharge
Aim 2: Hospital Readmissions
Hospital readmissions were collected via patient self-report and via medical record review by a trained researcher from the study team. Patient readmission was coded as 0=not readmitted, 1=readmitted. Reported value for each cell reflects a model-based estimate of the probability of readmission, a type of least squares mean appropriate for a binary variable.
Measured: 1 month post-discharge; 3 months post-discharge; 6 months post-discharge; Up to 7 months total
Aim 2: Emergency Department Visits
Emergency department (ED) visits will be collected via patient self report. Patient ED usage was coded as 0=no ED visit, 1=any ED visit. Reported value for each cell reflects a model-based estimate of the probability of an ED visit, a type of least squares mean appropriate for a binary variable.
Measured: 1 month post-discharge; 3 months post-discharge; 6 months post-discharge; Up to 7 months total
Aim 2: Length of Hospital Stay
Length of hospital stay will be collected via patient medical record review by a nurse researcher from the study team.
Measured: During hospital stay in the Pre-Intervention and Post-Intervention periods
Aim 2: Discharge Destination
Discharge destination (home, skilled nursing facility) was collected via patient medical record review by a nurse researcher from the study team. Patient discharge destination was coded as 1=discharged to home, 0=discharged to a skilled nursing facility. Reported value for each cell reflects a model-based estimate of the probability of discharge to home, a type of least squares mean appropriate for a binary variable.
Measured: Within 3 months post-discharge; Up to 4 months total
Aim 3: Distance of Patient Ambulation
Unit level data on ambulation. Each week, the total distance walked on that unit by all patients on the unit was recorded. We report the average total weekly distance walked, using a model-based least squares mean. The number of participants analyzed is large because this measure is unit-level and includes all patients observed on the unit during the study period, not only those enrolled in the full study, and will double count patients who were observed during more than one week.
Measured: 6 months pre-intervention, during the 14-week intervention period, and 6 months post-intervention; up to 16 months total
Aim 3: Barriers to Ambulation Survey
Data collected from enrolled nursing staff via paper copies or online link before and after the intervention. The Barriers to Patient Ambulation Survey assesses the nurses opinions regarding ambulation of hospitalized patients within the past 2 weeks. It is scored from 0-100 with higher scores indicating increased barriers to ambulation.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Aim 3: Ambulation Culture Survey
Data collected from enrolled nursing staff via paper copies or online link before and after the intervention. The Ambulation Culture Survey asks for opinions on ambulation culture. We report responses to the item, "How would you rate your unit/work area on patient care related to ambulation?" This item has a minimum score of 1 (Poor) and a maximum score of 5 (Excellent). Higher values represent a better outcome.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (7)
Aim 3: Frequency of Patient Ambulation (Percent of Patients Ambulated by Nursing Staff)
Unit-level data on the percent of patients ambulated by nursing staff (as recorded in the electronic health record) out of the total number of ambulatory patients on the unit.
Measured: 6 months pre-intervention, during the 14-week intervention period, and 6 months post-intervention; up to 16 months total
Aim 3: Nurse Fatigue Survey: Chronic Fatigue Subscale
Data collected from enrolled nursing staff via paper copies or online link before and after the intervention. The Nurse Fatigue Survey measures experience of fatigue and strain at work and home. It is a 15 item survey scored on a 7 point likert scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree) with the 3 subscales of 5 questions each (chronic fatigue, acute fatigue and intershift recovery) scored separately. Items for each subscale are aggregated into a percent of the total highest possible points (30) resulting in a range of scores from 0-100%, higher scores indicate higher fatigue.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Aim 3: Nurse Fatigue Survey: Acute Fatigue Subscale
Data collected from enrolled nursing staff via paper copies or online link before and after the intervention. The Nurse Fatigue Survey measures experience of fatigue and strain at work and home. It is a 15 item survey scored on a 7 point likert scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree) with the 3 subscales of 5 questions each (chronic fatigue, acute fatigue and intershift recovery) scored separately. Items for each subscale are aggregated into a percent of the total highest possible points (30) resulting in a range of scores from 0-100%, higher scores indicate higher fatigue.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Aim 3: Nurse Fatigue Survey: Intershift Recovery Subscale
Data collected from enrolled nursing staff via paper copies or online link before and after the intervention. The Nurse Fatigue Survey measures experience of fatigue and strain at work and home. It is a 15 item survey scored on a 7 point likert scale from 0 (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly agree) with the 3 subscales of 5 questions each (chronic fatigue, acute fatigue and intershift recovery) scored separately. Items for each subscale are aggregated into a percent of the total highest possible points (30) resulting in a range of scores from 0-100%, higher scores indicate higher fatigue.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Aim 3: Professional Quality of Life Survey: Compassion Satisfaction
Data collected from enrolled nursing staff via paper copies or online link before and after the intervention. The Professional Quality of Life Survey measures positive and negative experiences within the last 30 days in a 30-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). The Compassion Satisfaction subscale has a range of scores from 10-50, with higher scores indicative of higher compassion satisfaction. Please note that for this subscale, scores were transformed before analysis using a Box-Cox (squared) transformation in order to meet the assumption of normally distributed model residuals; in effect the square-scale score has a range from 100-2500, where higher scores are still better. This results in reported least squares means that are very large compared to the original scale.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Aim 3: Professional Quality of Life Survey: Burnout
Data collected from enrolled nursing staff via paper copies or online link before and after the intervention. The Professional Quality of Life Survey measures positive and negative experiences within the last 30 days in a 30-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). There are 3 subscales: Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress, each subscale has a range of scores from 10-50, with higher scores indicative of higher compassion satisfaction, higher burnout, and higher secondary traumatic stress.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Aim 3: Professional Quality of Life Survey: Secondary Traumatic Stress
Data collected from enrolled nursing staff via paper copies or online link before and after the intervention. The Professional Quality of Life Survey measures positive and negative experiences within the last 30 days in a 30-item survey scored on a 5 point likert scale from 1 (never) to 5 (very often). There are 3 subscales: Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress, each subscale has a range of scores from 10-50, with higher scores indicative of higher compassion satisfaction, higher burnout, and higher secondary traumatic stress.
Measured: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jul 2020
- Study start2 Mar 2021
- Primary completion27 Jan 2025
- Study completion27 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Early MobilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- This study uses an incomplete stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. In the incomplete stepped wedge design, inpatient units are randomly sequenced into the intervention. A baseline (control period) and 2 follow up data collection periods (intervention and post intervention period) occur for each unit. Incomplete stepped wedge cluster randomized trials are novel study designs that are particularly beneficial for evaluating service delivery interventions using a pragmatic design, when evaluations need to be completed at a system or population level, or it is impractical or cost prohibitive to roll out an intervention across multiple units simultaneously.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 765 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, Madison
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Linsey M Steege, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Wisconsin, Madison
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04479943
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-0010
- Other IDs
- A549000, NUR/FACULTY AFFAIRS/ADMIN, Protocol Version 08/19/2024, 1R01HS026733-01A1
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Jul 2020
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Preventing Hospital-Acquired Disability: An Intervention to Improve Older Adult Patient Ambulation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04479943
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2020-0010
- Conditions
- Early Mobility, Older Adults, Hospital Acquired Condition
- Keywords
- nursing care, hospitalization, aged, walking
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 765 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Wisconsin, MadisonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 27 Mar 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The MOVIN (Mobilizing Older adult patients Via a systems-based Intervention) randomized controlled trial is designed to evaluate the impact of the MOVIN intervention on improving the functional ability of older adult hospital patients and reducing their healthcare utilization post-hospitalization. MOVIN is a program to increase patient ambulation while hospitalized. The study's hypothesis is that MOVIN will improve functional outcomes for hospitalized older adult patients by producing a change in nursing practice and culture of ambulation on inpatient units. MOVIN is a unit-based intervention. Therefore all patients on this unit are exposed to the intervention once it is implemented regardless of whether or not they participate in the trial. The study will enroll 360-420 total hospitalized participants 65 years and older for the duration of their stay. It will also enroll any nurses 18 years and older who worked on the units during the study and are willing to fill out surveys.
Detailed description
Up to 65% of hospitalized older adults will lose the ability to ambulate independently during their hospital stay. Loss of independent ambulation has been identified as a hospital-acquired disability and is a critical patient safety concern, resulting in permanent loss of function for 50% of older adults one-year post discharge. Functional loss is associated with multiple negative outcomes including a 33% increase in new nursing home placement, increase in length of hospital stay, need for home health services, falls, caregiver burden, decreased quality of life, and increased mortality. Given the rapid increase in the elderly population, loss of independent ambulation primarily due to the process of care in hospital settings may significantly increase future healthcare costs and further exacerbate concerns related to patient care quality.
Lack of walking during hospitalization has been directly linked to loss of independent ambulation in older adults. Nurses are responsible for promoting and maintaining patient independent mobility. However, the investigators research has identified multiple personal and organizational barriers that prevent nurses from walking patients. The investigators have developed and pilot tested a novel systems based multi-component intervention to improve ambulation of older adult patients, Mobilizing Older adult patients Via a systems-based INtervention (MOVIN).
MOVIN is comprised of five components: 1) psychomotor skills training; 2) communication tools; 3) ambulation pathways; 4) ambulation resources; and 5) unit ambulation culture. The Investigators pilot study of MOVIN demonstrated a statistically significant increase in frequency and weekly distance of patient ambulation as well as changes in nursing practice and unit culture. Notably, these changes have been sustained for greater than two years after completion of the study.
The investigators' goal is to eliminate loss of independent ambulation in hospitalized older adults. In pursuit of this goal, the specific aims are to:
- Specific Aim 1:Test the effectiveness of MOVIN to improve functional ability of older adult patients at discharge, and 1, 3 and 6 months post discharge
- Specific Aim 2: Test the effectiveness of MOVIN to reduce healthcare utilization of older adults at discharge, and 1, 3 and 6 months post discharge
- 2.A. To analyze a return on investment of MOVIN based on program costs and health utilization measures across different hospitals
- Specific Aim 3: Measure change in nurse behaviors and unit culture and identify ongoing systems barriers that impact translation of MOVIN across inpatient units and different hospitals.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This study uses an incomplete stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. In the incomplete stepped wedge design, inpatient units are randomly sequenced into the intervention. A baseline (control period) and 2 follow up data collection periods (intervention and post intervention period) occur for each unit. Incomplete stepped wedge cluster randomized trials are novel study designs that are particularly beneficial for evaluating service delivery interventions using a pragmatic design, when evaluations need to be completed at a system or population level, or it is impractical or cost prohibitive to roll out an intervention across multiple units simultaneously.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-intervention/control | No intervention | –160-200 older adult patients (age 65 or older) will be recruited on four units across two hospitals (two units per hospital) over 6-8 months prior to implementation of the unit-based MOVIN intervention. |
| Post-intervention | Experimental | Other: MOVIN160-200 older adult patients (age 65 or older) will be recruited on four units across two hospitals (two units per hospital) over 6-8 months after MOVIN has been implemented on the unit. |
| Nurses | Other | Other: Surveys and Focus groupsNurses will complete surveys and provide qualitative data to assess barriers to implementation. Nurses will be invited to enroll in the survey/qualitative data arm during both Pre-intervention and Post-intervention phases. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- age 65 years or older
- able to walk with or without assistance
- living in the community (not long term care) prior to admission
- have an ambulation order
- admitted to hospital's general adult medical unit
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- activated Power of Attorney
- lower extremity amputation
- on hospice
- bed rest order or activity restriction
- wheelchair bound
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MOVINMOVIN is a multi-component unit-based intervention comprised of five components that are implemented simultaneously in a hospital unit. The five components are: 1) psychomotor skills training, 2) unit ambulation culture, 3) communication, 4) resources, 5) ambulation environment. | Other | Post-intervention |
| Surveys and Focus groupsNurses will answer surveys about nurse behavior, changes in self-efficacy, frequency and distance of patient ambulation, documentation of ambulation, qualitative data collected to determine barriers to implementation | Other | Nurses |
Primary outcome
Aim 1: Change in Gait Speed
Time frame: Within 24 hours of hospital admission, Within 8 hours of hospital discharge, 3 months post-discharge; Up to 4 months total
Gait Speed is a physical performance measure identified as a sensitive clinical indicator of health, mortality, healthcare utilization, and independence in ambulation, and is feasible to test in hospitalized older adults. A 4 meter walk test will be conducted on admission to the study, discharge from the hospital and at 3 months post discharge in the subjects home or the hospital or clinic. A trained member of the research team will conduct the gait speed test. Interrater reliability for the 4 meter walk test will be conducted between all members of the research team prior to collecting gait speed data on study participants. Change scores will be calculated as the difference among gait speeds measured at each time points.
Aim 1: Change in Self-report on Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
Time frame: Within 24 hours of hospital admission, Within 8 hours of hospital discharge, 1 month post-discharge, 3 months post-discharge; 6 months post-discharge
A trained member of the research team collected patients self-report of ADLs on admission to the study, discharge from the hospital, by phone at 1 month post intervention and 6 months post intervention, and in person at the 3 month post intervention visit using the Katz ADL Index. The Katz ADL Index is a self-report scale that measures six ADL on two levels (independent or requiring assistance of another). A score of 0-6 is possible, with higher scores indicating higher independence with ADLs and lower scores indicating higher dependence on others to perform ADLs. The scale demonstrates excellent reliability and predictive validity, and is sensitive to change in hospital settings. For the primary analysis, patients with a score of 6 were converted to a binary score of 1=Independent; all others were scored as 0=Dependent.
Aim 1: Change in Life Space Assessment
Time frame: Within 24 hours of hospital admission, 1 month post-discharge, 3 months post-discharge; 6 months post-discharge
The University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Life Space Assessment (LSA) is a self-report scale of ambulation that measures spaces patients' move in, the frequency of moving into those spaces, and dependency in moving into those spaces. This scale has demonstrated reliability and predictive validity and sensitivity to change after hospital stay. Level scores are calculated by multiplying the life-space level (higher numbers indicate farther distances moved, e.g., 1-inside the home to 5-places outside of the person's town), degree of independence (higher scores indicate greater independence), and frequency of movement (higher scores equal greater frequency). Total scores range from 0 (totally bed-bound) to 120 (moved out of town every day without assistance). A trained member of the research team will collect patients self-report on Life Space. Change scores will be calculated as the difference among LSA ambulation measured at each time point.
Aim 2: Hospital Readmissions
Time frame: 1 month post-discharge; 3 months post-discharge; 6 months post-discharge; Up to 7 months total
Hospital readmissions were collected via patient self-report and via medical record review by a trained researcher from the study team. Patient readmission was coded as 0=not readmitted, 1=readmitted. Reported value for each cell reflects a model-based estimate of the probability of readmission, a type of least squares mean appropriate for a binary variable.
Aim 2: Emergency Department Visits
Time frame: 1 month post-discharge; 3 months post-discharge; 6 months post-discharge; Up to 7 months total
Emergency department (ED) visits will be collected via patient self report. Patient ED usage was coded as 0=no ED visit, 1=any ED visit. Reported value for each cell reflects a model-based estimate of the probability of an ED visit, a type of least squares mean appropriate for a binary variable.
Aim 2: Length of Hospital Stay
Time frame: During hospital stay in the Pre-Intervention and Post-Intervention periods
Length of hospital stay will be collected via patient medical record review by a nurse researcher from the study team.
Aim 2: Discharge Destination
Time frame: Within 3 months post-discharge; Up to 4 months total
Discharge destination (home, skilled nursing facility) was collected via patient medical record review by a nurse researcher from the study team. Patient discharge destination was coded as 1=discharged to home, 0=discharged to a skilled nursing facility. Reported value for each cell reflects a model-based estimate of the probability of discharge to home, a type of least squares mean appropriate for a binary variable.
Aim 3: Distance of Patient Ambulation
Time frame: 6 months pre-intervention, during the 14-week intervention period, and 6 months post-intervention; up to 16 months total
Unit level data on ambulation. Each week, the total distance walked on that unit by all patients on the unit was recorded. We report the average total weekly distance walked, using a model-based least squares mean. The number of participants analyzed is large because this measure is unit-level and includes all patients observed on the unit during the study period, not only those enrolled in the full study, and will double count patients who were observed during more than one week.
Aim 3: Barriers to Ambulation Survey
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Data collected from enrolled nursing staff via paper copies or online link before and after the intervention. The Barriers to Patient Ambulation Survey assesses the nurses opinions regarding ambulation of hospitalized patients within the past 2 weeks. It is scored from 0-100 with higher scores indicating increased barriers to ambulation.
Aim 3: Ambulation Culture Survey
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Data collected from enrolled nursing staff via paper copies or online link before and after the intervention. The Ambulation Culture Survey asks for opinions on ambulation culture. We report responses to the item, "How would you rate your unit/work area on patient care related to ambulation?" This item has a minimum score of 1 (Poor) and a maximum score of 5 (Excellent). Higher values represent a better outcome.
7 secondary outcomes
Aim 3: Frequency of Patient Ambulation (Percent of Patients Ambulated by Nursing Staff)
Time frame: 6 months pre-intervention, during the 14-week intervention period, and 6 months post-intervention; up to 16 months total
Aim 3: Nurse Fatigue Survey: Chronic Fatigue Subscale
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Aim 3: Nurse Fatigue Survey: Acute Fatigue Subscale
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Aim 3: Nurse Fatigue Survey: Intershift Recovery Subscale
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Aim 3: Professional Quality of Life Survey: Compassion Satisfaction
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Aim 3: Professional Quality of Life Survey: Burnout
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Aim 3: Professional Quality of Life Survey: Secondary Traumatic Stress
Time frame: pre-intervention, post-intervention (up to about 20 weeks)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Early Mobility
Enrolling by invitation
Early Rehabilitation After Transfemoral Amputation in Moderately Active Patients Using the Avior Knee
Transfemoral Amputees
Not yet recruiting
Wearable Knee-Assisted Rehabilitation for Range of Motion and Muscle Strength After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Total Knee Arthroplasty Recovery, Knee Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
E-Type - Early Wear of Polyethylene Liners Used in DMC
Osteoarthritis, Osteonecrosis
Recruiting
Short Term Effects of a Multimodal Intervention With RGM on Cognition in People With Parkinson's Disease.
Parkinson Disease (PD), Cognition
Recruiting
Home-Based Photobiomodulation Effects in the Postoperative Period of Distal Radius Fractures
Distal Radius Fracture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Linsey M Steege, PhD principal investigator
University of Wisconsin, Madison
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MOVIN and Surveys and Focus groups in people with Early Mobility and Older Adults, run by University of Wisconsin, Madison at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Mar 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Aim 1: Change in Gait Speed (time frame: Within 24 hours of hospital admission, Within 8 hours of hospital discharge, 3 months post-discharge; Up to 4 months total). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2026.