Post ICU SyndromeNCT04490278
CoV-PICS: A Virtual Post-ICU Clinic
A study testing Medical Record Review - Inpatient Treatment and Online Questionnaires in people with Post ICU Syndrome, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of a COVID-19 virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) clinic (CoV-PICS). The findings from this study are the first steps in determining the feasibility and potential impact of a telehealth PICS clinic that is able to address the needs of patients with COVID-19… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Post ICU Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Medical Record Review - Inpatient Treatment and Online Questionnaires
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 29 Sep 2020to 30 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age or older
- COVID-19 diagnosis with a stay in the ICU.
- A home internet connection or smartphone access, along with the ability to use them
- Missouri resident
Who cannot join
- Severe cognitive deficits or dementia prior to hospitalization
- Long-term resident of a skilled nursing facility prior to admission
- Non-English speaking (will not have an interpreter available)
- Hospice or Comfort Care at discharge
- No plans to return to some degree of independent living at the time of discharge
- Pregnant at the time of discharge
Show all 9Show fewer
- Prisoner at the time of discharge
- Blind
- Deaf
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes-Jewish Hospital
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
About this study
Official title: COVID-19 Virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (CoV-PICS) Clinic: Modern, Convenient and Practical Recovery Care
This is a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of a COVID-19 virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) clinic (CoV-PICS). The findings from this study are the first steps in determining the feasibility and potential impact of a telehealth PICS clinic that is able to address the needs of patients with COVID-19 disease and potentially other patients that are unable to attend a brick and mortar clinic and require virtual care.
- Conditions
- Post ICU Syndrome
- Being tested
- Medical Record Review - Inpatient Treatment, Online Questionnaires
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Medical Record Review - Inpatient TreatmentOther
Patient characteristics, medical history, and information regarding their inpatient treatment from the electronic medical record
Online QuestionnairesOther
Patients will complete online questionnaires related to their physical, cognitive and mental health function and inquire about current treatments. The multiprofessional CoV-PICS clinic practitioners will evaluate their responses and, combined with information obtained during their virtual visits, formulate a suggested treatment plan and needed referrals.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with PICS | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Medical Record Review - Inpatient Treatment; Other: Online Questionnaires |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acceptance With COVID-19 Virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (CoV-PICS) Visits - AIM
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Implementation of outcome measure. Response Scale: 1 = Completely disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely agree
Measured: up to 6 months after consent
Acceptance With COVID-19 Virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (CoV-PICS) Visits - IAM
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Implementation of outcome measure. Response Scale: 1 = Completely disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely agree
Measured: up to 6 months after consent
Acceptance With COVID-19 Virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (CoV-PICS) Visits - FIM
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) Implementation of outcome measure. Response Scale: 1 = Completely disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely agree
Measured: up to 6 months after consent
Secondary outcomes (7)
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Symptoms - Daily Living - Visit 1
Katz Independence in Activities in Daily Living Rates daily activities by independence or dependence in completing the task (range 0-6) 0=low or patient very dependent, 6 = high or patient independent
Measured: Up to 6 months after consent
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Symptoms - Daily Living - Visit 2
Katz Independence in Activities in Daily Living Rates daily activities by independence or dependence in completing the task (range 0-6) 0=low or patient very dependent, 6 = high or patient independent
Measured: Approximately 60 days after initial visit (scheduling dependent)
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Systems - Cognitive Visit 1
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Screening tool for mild cognitive dysfunction. Scores range from 0 to 15 with scores of 11 and above considered normal and below 11 considered cognitive impairment.
Measured: Up to 6 months after consent
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Systems - Cognitive Visit 2
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Screening tool for mild cognitive dysfunction. Scores range from 0 to 15 with scores of 11 and above considered normal and below 11 considered cognitive impairment
Measured: Approximately 60 days after initial visit (scheduling dependent)
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Systems - Nutrition Initial Visit
Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) The Scored PG-SGA© includes the four patient-generated historical components (Weight History, Food Intake, Symptoms and Activities and Function - also known as the PG-SGA Short Form©), the professional part, the Global Assessment, the total numerical score (0-1 No risk, 2-3 Mild risk, 4-8 Moderate risk, 9 or more High risk), and nutritional triage recommendations based on the score.
For each component of the PG-SGA, points (0-4) are awarded depending on the impact on nutritional status. Typical scores range from 0-35 with a higher score reflecting a greater risk of malnutrition and scores ≥9 indicating a critical need for nutrition intervention and symptom management
0-1: no intervention 2-3: patient and family education by dietician or nurse 4-8: requires intervention by dietician >9: critical need for symptom intervention
Measured: Up to 6 months after consent
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Systems - Nutrition Final Visit
Scored Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) The Scored PG-SGA© includes the four patient-generated historical components (Weight History, Food Intake, Symptoms and Activities and Function - also known as the PG-SGA Short Form©), the professional part, the Global Assessment, the total numerical score (0-1 No risk, 2-3 Mild risk, 4-8 Moderate risk, 9 or more High risk), and nutritional triage recommendations based on the score.
For each component of the PG-SGA, points (0-4) are awarded depending on the impact on nutritional status. Typical scores range from 0-35 with a higher score reflecting a greater risk of malnutrition and scores ≥9 indicating a critical need for nutrition intervention and symptom management
0-1: no intervention 2-3: patient and family education by dietician or nurse 4-8: requires intervention by dietician >9: critical need for symptom intervention
Measured: Approximately 60 days after initial visit (scheduling dependent)
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Symptoms - Memory
ICU Memory Tool (all inclusive tool that measures multiple items as described below)
Questionnaire of patient's memory and feelings of ICU stay. Outcomes reported as the total number of memory types per group: factual memories, memories of feelings, delusional memories, unexplained feelings of panic, intrusive memories.
Measured: up to 6 months after consent
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jul 2020
- Study start29 Sep 2020
- Primary completion30 Jun 2021
- Study completion30 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Post ICU SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Washington University School of MedicineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chris M Palmer, Washington University School of Medicine
- Investigators
- Chris Palmer, MD, Principal investigator, Washington University School of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04490278
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 202007053
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 23 Jul 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. No abstract available.
PubMed 32091533Sommer P, Lukovic E, Fagley E, Long DR, Sobol JB, Heller K, Moitra VK, Pauldine R, O'Connor MF, Shahul S, Nunnally ME, Tung A. Initial Clinical Impressions of the Critical Care of COVID-19 Patients in Seattle, New York City, and Chicago. Anesth Analg. 2020 Jul;131(1):55-60. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004830.
PubMed 32221172Rawal G, Yadav S, Kumar R. Post-intensive Care Syndrome: an Overview. J Transl Int Med. 2017 Jun 30;5(2):90-92. doi: 10.1515/jtim-2016-0016. eCollection 2017 Jun.
PubMed 28721340
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- COVID-19 Virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (CoV-PICS) Clinic: Modern, Convenient and Practical Recovery Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04490278
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 202007053
- Conditions
- Post ICU Syndrome
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Washington University School of MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 29 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 16 Mar 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a pilot study to evaluate the feasibility of a COVID-19 virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) clinic (CoV-PICS). The findings from this study are the first steps in determining the feasibility and potential impact of a telehealth PICS clinic that is able to address the needs of patients with COVID-19 disease and potentially other patients that are unable to attend a brick and mortar clinic and require virtual care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with PICS | Experimental | Other: Medical Record Review - Inpatient Treatment, Other: Online Questionnaires |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 18 years of age or older
- COVID-19 diagnosis with a stay in the ICU.
- A home internet connection or smartphone access, along with the ability to use them
- Missouri resident
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Severe cognitive deficits or dementia prior to hospitalization
- Long-term resident of a skilled nursing facility prior to admission
- Non-English speaking (will not have an interpreter available)
- Hospice or Comfort Care at discharge
- No plans to return to some degree of independent living at the time of discharge
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Record Review - Inpatient TreatmentPatient characteristics, medical history, and information regarding their inpatient treatment from the electronic medical record | Other | Patients with PICS |
| Online QuestionnairesPatients will complete online questionnaires related to their physical, cognitive and mental health function and inquire about current treatments. The multiprofessional CoV-PICS clinic practitioners will evaluate their responses and, combined with information obtained during their virtual visits, formulate a suggested treatment plan and needed referrals. | Other | Patients with PICS |
Primary outcome
Acceptance With COVID-19 Virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (CoV-PICS) Visits - AIM
Time frame: up to 6 months after consent
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Implementation of outcome measure. Response Scale: 1 = Completely disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely agree
Acceptance With COVID-19 Virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (CoV-PICS) Visits - IAM
Time frame: up to 6 months after consent
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Implementation of outcome measure. Response Scale: 1 = Completely disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely agree
Acceptance With COVID-19 Virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (CoV-PICS) Visits - FIM
Time frame: up to 6 months after consent
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) Implementation of outcome measure. Response Scale: 1 = Completely disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither agree nor disagree, 4 = Agree, 5 = Completely agree
7 secondary outcomes
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Symptoms - Daily Living - Visit 1
Time frame: Up to 6 months after consent
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Symptoms - Daily Living - Visit 2
Time frame: Approximately 60 days after initial visit (scheduling dependent)
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Systems - Cognitive Visit 1
Time frame: Up to 6 months after consent
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Systems - Cognitive Visit 2
Time frame: Approximately 60 days after initial visit (scheduling dependent)
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Systems - Nutrition Initial Visit
Time frame: Up to 6 months after consent
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Systems - Nutrition Final Visit
Time frame: Approximately 60 days after initial visit (scheduling dependent)
Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) Symptoms - Memory
Time frame: up to 6 months after consent
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 32091533Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020 Apr 7;323(13):1239-1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 32221172Sommer P, Lukovic E, Fagley E, Long DR, Sobol JB, Heller K, Moitra VK, Pauldine R, O'Connor MF, Shahul S, Nunnally ME, Tung A. Initial Clinical Impressions of the Critical Care of COVID-19 Patients in Seattle, New York City, and Chicago. Anesth Analg. 2020 Jul;131(1):55-60. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004830.
- Background: PubMed 28721340Rawal G, Yadav S, Kumar R. Post-intensive Care Syndrome: an Overview. J Transl Int Med. 2017 Jun 30;5(2):90-92. doi: 10.1515/jtim-2016-0016. eCollection 2017 Jun.
Related trials for Post ICU Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cumulative Intra-Abdominal Pressure Burden and Acute Kidney Injury After Emergency Abdominal Surgery
Acute Kidney Injury, Intra-Abdominal Hypertension
Not yet recruitingObservational study
PICS-p Longitudinal Cohort Study
Physical Functional Impairment, Cognitive Impairment
Not yet recruiting
Protocol for a Hybrid Implementation-effectiveness Feasibility Study of a Transdisciplinary ICU-to-home Recovery Model
Post ICU Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Patients With Long-stay at ICU: Factors and Evaluation - Feasibility Study
Frailty, Delirium Confusional State
RecruitingObservational study
Post-ICU Syndrome and Social Determinants of Healths
Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chris Palmer, MD principal investigator
Washington University School of Medicine
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Medical Record Review - Inpatient Treatment and Online Questionnaires in people with Post ICU Syndrome, run by Washington University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Mar 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acceptance With COVID-19 Virtual Post Intensive Care Syndrome (CoV-PICS) Visits - AIM (time frame: up to 6 months after consent). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04490278, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2023.