AzTrials
AzTrials

Older AdultsNCT04505527

Variability of Movement on an Altered Inertial Dynamics Task

A study testing Lateral stepping and Forward walking in people with Older Adults and Fall Patients, run by University of Nebraska at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The overall goal of this research is to compare the effects of two different exercise programs on gait function in older adults. The investigators want to determine if participation in lateral stepping exercise program for six weeks will improve gait functions compared to forward walking exercise program. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 to 90 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Older Adults, Fall Patients
What is being tested?
Lateral stepping and Forward walking
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
15 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
28 Nov 2017to 5 May 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects must
  • be aged between 19 and 35 for the young adult group
  • be over 65 years of age for the older adult groups
  • be independently residing in the community
  • be able to provide informed consent
  • be able to walk independently without an assistive device or 30 minutes in three-minute sections interspersed with rest periods.
  • The older participants must either have sustained two or more falls in the past year (i.e. Fallers) or not have sustained any falls in the past year (i.e. Non-Fallers).

Who cannot join

  • Neurological disorder or progressive neurologic condition - epilepsy, Alzheimer disease and other dementias, stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, brain infections, brain tumors.
  • Movement disorder - ataxia, dystonia, Huntington's disease, myoclonus, Parkinson disease, progressive supranuclear palsy, Wilson disease.
  • History of Cardiovascular events this includes any history of heart problems (such as heart attack, chest pain, or conditions which affect the heart's muscles, valves, or rhythm)
  • Current injury or moderate to severe pain affecting the lower limbs, pelvis, back, trunk.
  • Surgery within the past 6 months.
  • Current participation in any other study that involves walking, balance, or training.
  • Medications will not prevent inclusion in the study however they will be recorded to enable consideration in subsequent post-hoc analyses.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Nebraska-Omaha, Biomechanics Research Building

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68182

Other trials in United States

About this study

The overall goal of this research is to compare the effects of two different exercise programs on gait function in older adults. The investigators want to determine if participation in lateral stepping exercise program for six weeks will improve gait functions compared to forward walking exercise program.

Read the detailed description

The overall goal of this research is to compare the effects of two different exercise programs on gait function in older adults. It is expected that improved control of foot placement in the lateral stepping task will transfer to improved control during typical forward walking. Moreover, it is expected that lateral stepping gait training will have a greater effect on recurrent fallers older adults than on the non-fallers older adults and young adults. It is also expected that the above beneficial results will be retained in a follow-up test six weeks after completion of the intervention and will result in improvements in common clinical balance tests that are used to assess fall risk. Therefore, in the current proposal, older adults aged 65 years of age and over are being asked to participate.

Being tested
Lateral stepping, Forward walking
Keywords
balance, gait, variability

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lateral steppingBehavioural

    Also called Sideways walking

    Subjects will step laterally, changing direction every 10 m, thus alternating lead and lag limbs.

  • Forward walkingBehavioural

    Also called Typical walking

    Subjects will have a typical forward walking

Study groups in NCT04505527
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Recurrent fallers - control groupActive comparatorIn this control arm, older adults will have a typical forward walking training that mirror the lateral stepping intervention: 3 days/week for 6 weeks, resulting in a total of eighteen sessions. Each session consists of six trials of 3 min forward walking. The participants can increase their pace at the start of each trial but may not decrease it at the next session.
Receives: Behavioral: Forward walking
Recurrent fallers - intervention groupExperimentalIn this experimental arm, older adults will have a lateral stepping intervention: 3 days/week for 6 weeks, resulting in a total of eighteen sessions. Each session consists of six trials of 3 min sideways walking across a 10 m walkway changing body direction at the ends, thus alternating lead and lag limbs. The participants can increase their pace at the start of each trial but may not decrease it at the next session.
Receives: Behavioral: Lateral stepping
Older non-fallers intervention groupExperimentalIn this experimental arm, older adults will have a lateral stepping intervention: 3 days/week for 6 weeks, resulting in a total of eighteen sessions. Each session consists of six trials of 3 min sideways walking across a 10 m walkway changing body direction at the ends, thus alternating lead and lag limbs. The participants can increase their pace at the start of each trial but may not decrease it at the next session.
Receives: Behavioral: Lateral stepping
Younger adult control groupActive comparatorOutcome measures from a young healthy group will also be measured as a reference. Will be used to compare outcome measured between older and young adults. Young adults will have a lateral stepping intervention: 3 days/week for 6 weeks, resulting in a total of eighteen sessions. Each session consists of six trials of 3 min sideways walking across a 10 m walkway changing body direction at the ends, thus alternating lead and lag limbs. The participants can increase their pace at the start of each trial but may not decrease it at the next session.
Receives: Behavioral: Lateral stepping

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Step width variability

    The standard deviation of step width. Step width was measured as the mediolateral distance between the locations of the sequential left and right heel strikes

    Measured: Baseline and Post-Intervention: immediate, and 6 weeks after the completion of the intervention

  2. Step length variability

    The standard deviation of step length. Step length was measured as the anteroposterior distance between the locations of the sequential left and right heel strikes.

    Measured: Baseline and Post-Intervention: immediate, and 6 weeks after the completion of the intervention

  3. Swing time variability

    The standard deviation of swing time. Swing time was measured as the time elapse during the swing phase of a leg.

    Measured: Baseline and Post-Intervention: immediate, and 6 weeks after the completion of the intervention

  4. Stride time variability

    The standard deviation of stride time. Stride time was measured as the time between 2 consecutive ipsilateral heel strikes.

    Measured: Baseline and Post-Intervention: immediate, and 6 weeks after the completion of the intervention

  5. Stance time variability

    The standard deviation of stance time. Stance time was measured as the time elapse during the stance phase of a leg.

    Measured: Baseline and Post-Intervention: immediate, and 6 weeks after the completion of the intervention

  6. Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG)

    The Timed-Up-and-Go test is used to assess mobility in older adults. It measures the time to get up from chair, walk 3 m, turn around, walk back, and sit down

    Measured: Baseline and Post-Intervention: immediate, and 6 weeks after the completion of the intervention

  7. Berg Balance Test (BBS)

    The Berg Balance Test (14 items, max score: 56) is used to measure the functional balance in older adults. It consists of 14 tasks performed in a standardized order with each task scored on a five-point scale according to quality or time ranging from "0" (lowest level of function) to "4" (highest level).

    Measured: Baseline and Post-Intervention: immediate, and 6 weeks after the completion of the intervention

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Walking speed

    Self-selected forward walking and sideways walking speed

    Measured: Baseline and Post-Intervention: immediate, and 6 weeks after the completion of the intervention

  2. Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I)

    The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) questionnaire (16 items, max score: 64) is used to assess confidence in the performance of activities relevant to daily life. Participants rate 16 individual activities on a scale from 1 (not at all concerned) to 4 (very concerned).

    Measured: Baseline and Post-Intervention: immediate, and 6 weeks after the completion of the intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Aug 2020
  2. Study start28 Nov 2017
  3. Primary completion5 May 2018
  4. Study completion5 May 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Older adults will be screened and will be randomly assigned to three groups - (i) non-fallers, (ii) recurrent fallers - control group, and (iii) recurrent fallers - intervention group. A fourth group consisted of healthy young adults. This group will receive lateral stepping intervention and outcomes will be measured as a reference.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
15 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04505527
Sponsor's protocol ID
0448-16-FB
Other IDs
P20GM109090
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
2 Aug 2020
Last updated
29 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Skiadopoulos A, Stergiou N. Risk-of-falling related outcomes improved in community-dwelling older adults after a 6-week sideways walking intervention: a feasibility and pilot study. BMC Geriatr. 2021 Jan 14;21(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02010-6.

    PubMed 33446112

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lateral stepping and Forward walking in people with Older Adults and Fall Patients, run by University of Nebraska at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Step width variability (time frame: Baseline and Post-Intervention: immediate, and 6 weeks after the completion of the intervention). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04505527, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in