AzTrials
AzTrials

Anal InjuryAnalTestNCT04512508

Anal Injury Screening for High Risk HPV

A study testing Self test sample in people with Anal Injury and Anal Cancer, run by Hospital General de México Dr. Eduardo Liceaga at 1 site in Mexico.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The diagnosis of anal cancer is superior with the Anal Test system compared to liquid cytology and anoscopy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Anal Injury, Anal Cancer
What is being tested?
Self test sample
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
500 participants
Where
1 siteMexico
Study dates
30 Aug 2020to 31 Jan 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Men and women between 30 and 65 years old.
  • They agree to participate in the study and sign informed consent.
  • They have not received previous treatments for HPV or had previous intraepithelial lesions or anal cancer.
  • Immunosuppressed patients.
  • Women with LIAG of the genital tract (cervix, vagina, or vulva).
  • Patients who have had anal intercourse

Who cannot join

  • Patients sexually inactive
  • Subjects who had anal sex in less than 24 hours prior to the study.
  • Patients with local medication application (enemas, suppositories).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Carlos E Aranda Flores contact

5550043807

aranda_floresc@hotmail.com

Mexico1 site
  • Hospital General de México Eduardo Liceaga

    Mexico City, 06720

    Carlos E Aranda Flores, 55 5004 3807, aranda_floresc@hotmail.com

Other trials in Mexico

About this study

Official title: Anal Injury Screening for High Risk HPV in Population With Susceptibility to Anal Cancer Development

The diagnosis of anal cancer is superior with the Anal Test system compared to liquid cytology and anoscopy.

Read the detailed description

DESIGN METHODOLOGY: Prospective, cross-sectional, comparative, double-blind, randomized.

STUDY POPULATION:

Group 1, 250 HIV negative patients (150 men and 100 women) from the oncology service who agree to participate in the study and with a negative diagnosis for HIV made at the Infectious Diseases Service.

Group 2, 250 HIV positive patients (150 men and 100 women) attended by the Infectious Disease Service diagnosed with HIV positive. The sample size was adjusted to the donation of 500 Anal Test devices and the subsequent molecular determinations for each sample.

PROCEDURE:

In this study, men and women between 30 and 65 years old with active sexual life and who are susceptible to the development of anal cancer can participate.

  1. Immunosuppressed patients, a) infected with the human immunodeficiency virus, HIV or b) by medication after receiving an organ transplant.
  2. Individuals who have or have had anal intercourse. Women with a history of cervical, vulva, or vaginal cancer.

PLANNED ACTIVITIES:

First: Candidate patients who meet the inclusion criteria will have an explanation of the importance of their participation in this protocol, all their doubts will be resolved and they will be asked to sign the letter of informed consent with witnesses.

Second: After signing the letter of consent, the service provider will make a questionnaire to know the clinical characteristics and identification of the patient, they will be assigned a consecutive number.

If assignation is a non-number, the self-test will be performed as the first in sequence, followed by liquid cytology and then anoscopy.

If assignation is an even number, the liquid cytology will be done as the first in sequence, followed by self-test and the anoscopy.

  • For the Self-Test: the patient will be given the Anal Test medical device with the following recommendations: a) washing of patient hands, b) removing the plastic packaging from the device, c) removing the cover, d) Holding it by the handle, the device will be inserted into the anus, e) patient will be left intro-anal for 30 seconds and then it will be rotated 180 degrees, f) it will slowly withdraw the device and g) it will be delivered to the assistant nurse.
  • The nurse will put the device (with the sample) in a tube with 5 ml of PreservCyt solution and close it tightly.
  • The tube with the device and the sample will be kept at room temperature until transport to the laboratory for processing and obtaining results.
  • The patient will answer a satisfaction questionnaire.
  • An appointment will be given three weeks later to grant the result.

Third:

Processing of samples and issuance of results will be done in an external laboratory outside the Hospital General de México. In the Molecular Biology Laboratory, the coded samples will be processed as follows:

  1. DNA will be extracted using the Abbott Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) technology procedures, with the m2000 system. Presence and identification will be determined for HPV-Ar 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68.
  2. Only the positive samples from the first step; mRNA will be extracted and the viral oncology proteins expression of the E6 and E7 will be quantified for the following specific HPV-Ar 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52 and 58 by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR). The results of the laboratory studies will be sent to the responsible investigator.
  3. Processing of samples in an external laboratory outside the Hospital General de México and issuance of results. In the Molecular Biology Laboratory, the coded samples will be processed as follows:
  4. DNA will be extracted using the Abbott Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) technology procedures, with the m2000 system. The presence and identification will be determined for HPV-Ar 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68.
  5. Only the positive samples from the first step; mRNA will be extracted and the expression of the viral oncology proteins E6 and E7 will be quantified for the following specific HPV-Ar 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52 and 58 by Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR). The results of the laboratory studies will be sent to the responsible investigator.

Fourth:

If they are positive to HPV-Ar, investigator will follow-up patient to corroborate the elimination or persistence of the HPV infection (surveillance). Patients who are positive for E6 and E7 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) will be cited for high-resolution anoscopy and biopsy, negative patients will be under surveillance. Patients who are normal or with Low grade Intraepithelial Lesion (lSIL) (NIA1) by cytology will be under surveillance. High grade Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) patients (NIA2 and NIA3) will be scheduled for high-resolution anoscopy and biopsy.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statistical results will be reported first in a descriptive way, reporting means and standard deviations of the main study variables, as well as percentages of the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus analyzed in this investigation. Bi-variate comparative tests such as t-Student or Chi-square tests will be applied to identify possible differences between the group of people with the presence/absence of high-risk viruses and demographics and clinical variables such as the presence of HIV. When there is no normality, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test will be applied. Linear correlations will be analyzed with the Spearman and Pearson correlation tests depending on the type of analyzed variables. Data concordance analysis such as the kappa test will be performed because due to presence of human papillovirus HPV-Ar sub-types as well as lesion type compared to the results of liquid anal cytology that in this study the investigators will consider our "gold standard", in addition to perform sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value tests. Finally, and although it is not part of our main objectives, the investigators will analyze the possible associate risk factors with the presence of high-risk human papillovirus (HPV) using logistic regression models.

ETHICAL ASPECTS AND BIOSECURITY. ETHICS. What is indicated in relation to ethics on human studies will be strictly followed according to Regulations of the General Law of Health in Matters of Health Research of Mexico, and the Declaration of Helsinki, considering subsequent versions.

INFORMED CONSENT LETTER. SAFETY The subject under study will have complete information on the procedures that will be carrying out. The studies will be done exclusively with the assistance of the authorized research team and in consulting rooms belonging to the Oncology Service. If the subject under study expresses his desire not to participate in the process, it will be suspended immediately.

All the studies to be carried out on the patient are totally safe and innocuous.

Being tested
Self test sample
Keywords
Anal cancer, Anal test, Anoscopy, HPV
Medical subject headings
Anus Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Self test sampleDiagnostic test

    Also called Citology sample

    Self test sample, DNA analysis, Biopsy and Anoscopy

Study groups in NCT04512508
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1, HIV negative patients.OtherOnly HIV negative patients
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Self test sample
Group 2, HIV positive patientsOtherOnly HIV positive patients
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Self test sample

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of positive results for Anal Test system versus anal liquid cytology and anoscopy for the presence of high-risk human papillomaviruses

    Statistical difference for percentages of the presence of high-risk human papillomaviruses between self-test versus liquid anal cytology.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Number of predictive value for positive and negative results for self-test versus liquid cytology results

    Statistical difference To compare predictive positive and negative value by self-test versus liquid anal cytology.

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Number and percentage of patients with anal intraepithelial lesions caused by HPV-Ar infection compared between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients

    Difference for anal intraepithelial lesions caused by HPV-Ar infection between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Number and percentage of LSIL and HSIL for patients using self-test (by presence of mRNA for viral proteins E6 and E7) compared to number and percentage of LSIL and HSIL for patients with liquid cytology or with results by biopsy.

    Number and frequency of LSIL and HSIL concordant between self-test and by liquid cytology and anoscopy or with biopsy results in positive patients for viral DNA.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Number and percentage of patients to have a positive opinion to use Self-Test system.

    A survey will be applied to assess Anal Tests system acceptance.

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Aug 2020
  2. Study start30 Aug 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A randomized and consecutive number will be assigned. If it is a non-number, the self-test will be performed first, followed by liquid cytology and then anoscopy. If it is a even number, first the liquid cytology will be performed, then the autotoma and the anoscopy
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04512508
Sponsor's protocol ID
DI/20/111/03/11
Acronym
AnalTest
Status last verified
Aug 2020
First submitted
30 Jul 2020
Last updated
13 Aug 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Self test sample in people with Anal Injury and Anal Cancer, run by Hospital General de México Dr. Eduardo Liceaga at 1 site in Mexico.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Carlos E Aranda Flores (5550043807, aranda_floresc@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of positive results for Anal Test system versus anal liquid cytology and anoscopy for the presence of high-risk human papillomaviruses (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in