Cervical DilationNCT04529837
Ultrasound Assessment of DILAPAN-S
An observational study of Cervical Dilation and Induction of Labor, run by Eastern Virginia Medical School at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this observational prospective study is to assess the change in Dilapan-S rod diameters using transvaginal ultrasound over a period of 12 hours in term women undergoing induction of labor. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cervical Dilation, Induction of Labor, Ultrasound Evaluation
- What is being tested?
- Gauze and No gauze
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2020to 30 Jun 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Study population: Pregnant individuals at term undergoing labor induction at single academic institution.
Who may be able to join
- Pregnant individuals at gestational age 37 weeks or greater.
- Scheduled medical or elective induction at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital.
- Live, singleton IUP.
- Vertex presentation.
- Intact membranes.
- Bishop score of 6 or less.
Who cannot join
- Unwilling or unable to provide consent.
- Intrauterine fetal demise
- Contraindications to vaginal delivery.
- BMI > 45
- Vaginal bleeding
- Clinically evident genital tract infection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Eastern Virginia Medical School
Norfolk, Virginia, 23501
About this study
Official title: Longitudinal Ultrasound Evaluation of Dilapan-S During Cervical Ripening
The goal of this observational prospective study is to assess the change in Dilapan-S rod diameters using transvaginal ultrasound over a period of 12 hours in term women undergoing induction of labor.
Read the detailed description
On admission for induction, study participants assigned to each group underwent continuous cardiotocography for 20 minutes prior to placement of the Dilapan-S rods (rod size: 4 x 65mm). Placement of the Dilapan-S rods was limited to three physicians with the majority placed by the primary investigator. Placement was completed in a sterile manner under direct visualization and in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines. The number of rods placed varied per individual and was based on the discretion of the physician. Each participant allocated to the Dilapan-S with saturated gauze group received placement of one, 4x4 inch gauze saturated with 10 cc of normal saline and placed at the level of the external os. Immediately after placement of the Dilapan-S rods, the study participant was asked to complete a patient satisfaction survey.
Pre-specified transvaginal ultrasound assessment was performed at hours 3, 6, 8, and 12 post Dilapan-S placement using a GE Voluson E10 machine with a transvaginal GE RIC 5-9D transducer. Performance of the ultrasound evaluation was limited to the primary investigator and two co-authors of the study. After completion of the 12-hour ultrasound, the Dilapan-S rods and gauze, if used, were removed as per the manufacturer's instructions. The participant was then asked to complete a post Dilapan-S patient satisfaction survey.
- Conditions
- Cervical Dilation, Induction of Labor, Ultrasound Evaluation
- Being tested
- Gauze, No gauze
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
GauzeOther
placement of gauze
No gauzeOther
no gauze
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pregnant individuals with Dilapan-S only | 22 women received Dilapan-S rods without gauze at start of induction. Receives: Other: No gauze | |
| Pregnant individuals with Dilapan-S plus gauze placement | 22 women received Dilapan-S rods with 1 gauze at start of induction. Receives: Other: Gauze |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diameter change of Dilapan-S
Rod diameters of Dilapan-S rods were measured via transvaginal ultrasound at 3,6,8, and 12 hours after placement.
Measured: 12 hours
Secondary outcomes (2)
Gauze placement and rod diameter
Rod diameters of Dilapan-S rods plus gauze placement were measured via transvaginal ultrasound at 3,6,8, and 12 hours after placement.
Measured: 12 hours
Patient satisfaction
Patient satisfaction scores were assessed based on gauze versus no gauze placement.
Measured: 12 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Aug 2020
- Study start1 Oct 2020
- Primary completion30 Jun 2021
- Study completion30 Jun 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cervical DilationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eastern Virginia Medical School
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Elizabeth Seagraves, Eastern Virginia Medical School
- Investigators
- Elizabeth Seagraves, DO, Principal investigator, Eastern Virginia Medical School MFM Fellowship
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04529837
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 20-40-FB-0097
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 17 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent form were made available. Results from the study will be available to the manufacturer (Medicem) after statistical analysis is completed and will not be shared with the manufacturer during study execution. The manufacturer company will not be involved in data analysis and all data will be independently analyzed by HADSI. The results of this study will be presented at conferences or published in a peer-review journal.
Publications
Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK, Wen SW, Walker M, Gao Y, Tang Y. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG. 2016 Feb;123(3):346-54. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13456. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
PubMed 26538408Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.
PubMed 30089070American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of Labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107. August 2009.
Saad AF, Villarreal J, Eid J, Spencer N, Ellis V, Hankins GD, Saade GR. A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):275.e1-275.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
PubMed 30790569Drunecky T, Reidingerova M, Plisova M, Dudic M, Gdovinova D, Stoy V. Experimental comparison of properties of natural and synthetic osmotic dilators. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Aug;292(2):349-54. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3623-3. Epub 2015 Jan 25.
PubMed 25618749Gupta J, Chodankar R, Baev O, Bahlmann F, Brega E, Gala A, Hellmeyer L, Hruban L, Maier J, Mehta P, Murthy A, Ritter M, Saad A, Shmakov R, Suneja A, Zahumensky J, Gdovinova D. Synthetic osmotic dilators in the induction of labour-An international multicentre observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Oct;229:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
PubMed 30107363Chambers DG, Willcourt RJ, Laver AR, Baird JK, Herbert WY. Comparison of Dilapan-S and laminaria for cervical priming before surgical pregnancy termination at 17-22 weeks' gestation. Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:347-52. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S25551. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
PubMed 22114527Abuhamad, A. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Practical Approach. Chapter 1: Basic Physical Principles of Medical Ultrasound. 2014.
Sung YT, Wu JS. The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement. Behav Res Methods. 2018 Aug;50(4):1694-1715. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1041-8.
PubMed 29667082Kliger M, Stahl S, Haddad M, Suzan E, Adler R, Eisenberg E. Measuring the Intensity of Chronic Pain: Are the Visual Analogue Scale and the Verbal Rating Scale Interchangeable? Pain Pract. 2015 Jul;15(6):538-47. doi: 10.1111/papr.12216. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
PubMed 24735056
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Longitudinal Ultrasound Evaluation of Dilapan-S During Cervical Ripening
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04529837
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 20-40-FB-0097
- Conditions
- Cervical Dilation, Induction of Labor, Ultrasound Evaluation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eastern Virginia Medical SchoolUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this observational prospective study is to assess the change in Dilapan-S rod diameters using transvaginal ultrasound over a period of 12 hours in term women undergoing induction of labor.
Detailed description
On admission for induction, study participants assigned to each group underwent continuous cardiotocography for 20 minutes prior to placement of the Dilapan-S rods (rod size: 4 x 65mm). Placement of the Dilapan-S rods was limited to three physicians with the majority placed by the primary investigator. Placement was completed in a sterile manner under direct visualization and in accordance with the manufacturer's guidelines. The number of rods placed varied per individual and was based on the discretion of the physician. Each participant allocated to the Dilapan-S with saturated gauze group received placement of one, 4x4 inch gauze saturated with 10 cc of normal saline and placed at the level of the external os. Immediately after placement of the Dilapan-S rods, the study participant was asked to complete a patient satisfaction survey.
Pre-specified transvaginal ultrasound assessment was performed at hours 3, 6, 8, and 12 post Dilapan-S placement using a GE Voluson E10 machine with a transvaginal GE RIC 5-9D transducer. Performance of the ultrasound evaluation was limited to the primary investigator and two co-authors of the study. After completion of the 12-hour ultrasound, the Dilapan-S rods and gauze, if used, were removed as per the manufacturer's instructions. The participant was then asked to complete a post Dilapan-S patient satisfaction survey.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pregnant individuals with Dilapan-S only | – | Other: No gauze22 women received Dilapan-S rods without gauze at start of induction. |
| Pregnant individuals with Dilapan-S plus gauze placement | – | Other: Gauze22 women received Dilapan-S rods with 1 gauze at start of induction. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Pregnant individuals at term undergoing labor induction at single academic institution.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Pregnant individuals at gestational age 37 weeks or greater.
- Scheduled medical or elective induction at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital.
- Live, singleton IUP.
- Vertex presentation.
- Intact membranes.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Unwilling or unable to provide consent.
- Intrauterine fetal demise
- Contraindications to vaginal delivery.
- BMI > 45
- Vaginal bleeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gauzeplacement of gauze | Other | Pregnant individuals with Dilapan-S plus gauze placement |
| No gauzeno gauze | Other | Pregnant individuals with Dilapan-S only |
Primary outcome
Diameter change of Dilapan-S
Time frame: 12 hours
Rod diameters of Dilapan-S rods were measured via transvaginal ultrasound at 3,6,8, and 12 hours after placement.
2 secondary outcomes
Gauze placement and rod diameter
Time frame: 12 hours
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 12 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2023.
- Background: PubMed 26538408Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK, Wen SW, Walker M, Gao Y, Tang Y. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG. 2016 Feb;123(3):346-54. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13456. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
- Background: PubMed 30089070Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.
- BackgroundAmerican College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of Labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107. August 2009.
- Background: PubMed 30790569Saad AF, Villarreal J, Eid J, Spencer N, Ellis V, Hankins GD, Saade GR. A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):275.e1-275.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
- Background: PubMed 25618749Drunecky T, Reidingerova M, Plisova M, Dudic M, Gdovinova D, Stoy V. Experimental comparison of properties of natural and synthetic osmotic dilators. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Aug;292(2):349-54. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3623-3. Epub 2015 Jan 25.
- Background: PubMed 30107363Gupta J, Chodankar R, Baev O, Bahlmann F, Brega E, Gala A, Hellmeyer L, Hruban L, Maier J, Mehta P, Murthy A, Ritter M, Saad A, Shmakov R, Suneja A, Zahumensky J, Gdovinova D. Synthetic osmotic dilators in the induction of labour-An international multicentre observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Oct;229:70-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
- Background: PubMed 22114527Chambers DG, Willcourt RJ, Laver AR, Baird JK, Herbert WY. Comparison of Dilapan-S and laminaria for cervical priming before surgical pregnancy termination at 17-22 weeks' gestation. Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:347-52. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S25551. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
- BackgroundAbuhamad, A. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Practical Approach. Chapter 1: Basic Physical Principles of Medical Ultrasound. 2014.
- Background: PubMed 29667082Sung YT, Wu JS. The Visual Analogue Scale for Rating, Ranking and Paired-Comparison (VAS-RRP): A new technique for psychological measurement. Behav Res Methods. 2018 Aug;50(4):1694-1715. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1041-8.
- Background: PubMed 24735056Kliger M, Stahl S, Haddad M, Suzan E, Adler R, Eisenberg E. Measuring the Intensity of Chronic Pain: Are the Visual Analogue Scale and the Verbal Rating Scale Interchangeable? Pain Pract. 2015 Jul;15(6):538-47. doi: 10.1111/papr.12216. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
- Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational ageLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent form were made available. Results from the study will be available to the manufacturer (Medicem) after statistical analysis is completed and will not be shared with the manufacturer during study execution. The manufacturer company will not be involved in data analysis and all data will be independently analyzed by HADSI. The results of this study will be presented at conferences or published in a peer-review journal.
Related trials for Cervical Dilation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Effect of Dural Puncture Epidural Analgesia on Oxytocin in Early vs Late Labor
Labor Analgesia, Labor Pain
Recruiting
Cervical Ripening Balloons for Same-Day Cervical Prep
Dilation and Evacuation
Recruiting
Cervical Preparation for Same-Day Dilation & Evacuation
Abortion, Second Trimester, Procedural Pain
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Anticholinergics for Cervical Edema in Labor
Labor Dystocia
Recruiting
Foley Balloon for Cervical Preparation Before Dilation and Evacuation
Abortion, Second Trimester, Abortion, Medical
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elizabeth Seagraves, DO principal investigator
Eastern Virginia Medical School MFM Fellowship
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cervical Dilation and Induction of Labor, run by Eastern Virginia Medical School at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diameter change of Dilapan-S (time frame: 12 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04529837, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2023.