Psychotic DisordersNCT04546178
Psychotherapy for Psychosis, Adverse Events, and Substance Misuse
A study testing Prolonged exposure (PE)+ therapy and Treatment as usual (TAU) in people with Psychotic Disorders and Stress Disorders, Traumatic, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
People with psychosis have significantly higher rates of adversity (e.g., abuse) and substance misuse (i.e., problematic drug and alcohol use) than people with other mental illnesses. Research has found that adversity and substance use both negatively influence recovery from a psychotic disorder. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 35 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Psychotic Disorders, Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Substance Use
- What is being tested?
- Prolonged exposure (PE)+ therapy and Treatment as usual (TAU)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 19 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2021to 30 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 35 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Current patient at the Nova Scotia Early Psychosis Program (NSEPP) for the duration of the study
- Aged 19-35 years
- Diagnosis of a primary psychotic disorder (i.e., schizotypal disorder, delusional disorder, brief psychotic disorder, schizophreniform disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, substance/medication-induced psychotic disorder, other specified schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorder, unspecified schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorder)
- Diagnosis of a primary psychotic disorder within the past 5 years; participants must not surpass this 5-year diagnostic window whilst enrolled in the study
- Have experienced 1 or more negative, distressing lifetime adverse events (e.g., child abuse, discrimination) listed on the Trauma and Life Events (TALE) checklist that the participant indicates still affects them now
- At least one score within the "moderate" or "high" risk range for any substance (except tobacco products) on the WHO Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST)
- Speaks and understands English
Who cannot join
- Aged 36 and older
- Aged 18 and younger
- Score in the 'high risk' range for cocaine use on the ASSIST
- Participant does not speak or understand English
- Current involuntary inpatient admission in a hospital or under a Community Treatment Order
- Documented, diagnosed intellectual disability (ID)
- Not currently participating in any intervention designed to reduce substance use or treat symptoms related to adverse events (e.g., PTSD)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Nova Scotia Early Psychosis Program (NSEPP), Abbie J. Lane Memorial Building
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2E2
About this study
Official title: Implementation and Evaluation of Prolonged Exposure Psychotherapy for Adverse Events in Early Phase Psychosis With Comorbid Substance Misuse
People with psychosis have significantly higher rates of adversity (e.g., abuse) and substance misuse (i.e., problematic drug and alcohol use) than people with other mental illnesses. Research has found that adversity and substance use both negatively influence recovery from a psychotic disorder. Currently, there are few treatment options for people living with psychosis, substance misuse, and adversity-related symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression). This is especially true for young adults who are in the first years of a psychotic illness (i.e., early phase psychosis; EPP) who may be in the best position to benefit from treatment because they have not been ill for as long as others with more chronic psychosis (i.e., >10 years). Research has demonstrated that Prolonged Exposure (PE), a psychological therapy that helps improve adversity-related symptoms, may be appropriate for people in EPP, although there is limited evidence regarding its adaptation from use in chronic psychosis to EPP. The aim of the proposed study is to adapt and optimize PE therapy for young adults in EPP. We aim to recruit 20 individuals from the Nova Scotia Early Psychosis Program (NSEPP) aged 19-35 who will participate in 15 sessions of adapted PE; we will compare their scores before and after treatment on measures of psychotic symptoms, amount and frequency of substance use, and adversity-related problems. Our goal is to target two factors that may be contributing to and maintaining negative outcomes: avoidance and hopelessness. These factors will be addressed by asking participants to face feared reminders of adversity and learn new ways to think about adverse experiences and mental health problems. The adaptation and application of this evidence-based intervention has the potential to create a new treatment avenue for EPP, reducing impairment and distress, and improving recovery rates.
- Being tested
- Prolonged exposure (PE)+ therapy, Treatment as usual (TAU)
- Keywords
- Substance misuse, Schizophrenia spectrum disorders, Adversity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
- Medical subject headings
- Psychotic Disorders, Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Substance-Related Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prolonged exposure (PE)+ therapyBehavioural
Also called PE+ therapy
The intervention will be adapted prolonged exposure therapy, called PE+ therapy. Participants will receive 15 weekly 90-minute sessions of PE+; these appointments will be divided into five sets of three sessions each: 1) psychoeducation about AEs, SM, and the interplay of both with psychosis; 2) emotion regulation strategies; 3) imaginal exposures, 4) in vivo exposures, and 5) review of treatment and planning for termination and maintenance.
Also called Antipsychotics and program access
The intervention will be antipsychotics prescribed by clinicians working within the Nova Scotia Early Psychosis Program (NSEPP) as well as case management supplied by their primary nurse. Program participants will have access to educational programs about psychosis, skills/vocational training, as well as familial education and support.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PE+ intervention group | Experimental | This group will participate in 15 sessions of PE+ therapy and participate in frequent symptom assessments; this is the same group of participants as the pre-intervention scores group, but they have crossed over from pre-intervention phase into intervention (active) phase. Receives: Behavioral: Prolonged exposure (PE)+ therapy; Other: Treatment as usual (TAU) |
| Pre-intervention scores group (TAU) | Active comparator | This group will participate in symptom assessments but will not receive the PE+ intervention until the begin the active part of the trial. Participants in this group have been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder, have also experienced adversity, and use substances. This group will receive medication for psychosis as well as access to standard education programs and clinical care; thus treatment as usual (TAU). Receives: Other: Treatment as usual (TAU) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS); Change in hopelessness
This 20-item true/false scale measures hopelessness in participants; we will use the total score on this measure as an indicator of hopelessness. Scores range from 0 to 20; higher scores indicate greater hopelessness.
Detailed timeline: Pre-intervention baseline assessment (study week 1); pre-intervention follow-up appointments (study weeks 2; 2,3; or 2,3, and 4; depending on randomization); pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 2 (study week 6,7, or 8, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 3 (study week 9,10, or 11, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 4 (study week 12,13, or 14, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 5 (study week 15,16, or 17, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 6 (study week 18,19, or 20, depending on randomization); 8 weeks post-assessment 6 (week 18, 19, or 20); 9 weeks post-assessment 6
Measured: Study weeks 1, 2; depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered weeks 3 through 20, 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ); Change in avoidance
This 15-item scale measures avoidance in participants; we will use the overall score on this measure as an indicator of avoidance. Scores range from 15 to 90; higher scores indicate greater avoidance.
Detailed timeline: Pre-intervention baseline assessment (study week 1); pre-intervention follow-up appointments (study weeks 2; 2,3; or 2,3, and 4; depending on randomization); pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 2 (study week 6,7, or 8, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 3 (study week 9,10, or 11, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 4 (study week 12,13, or 14, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 5 (study week 15,16, or 17, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 6 (study week 18,19, or 20, depending on randomization); 8 weeks post-assessment 6 (week 18, 19, or 20); 9 weeks post-assessment 6 (week 18, 19, or 20)
Measured: Study weeks 1, 2; depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered weeks 3 through 20, 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
World Health Organization's Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (WHO ASSIST); Change in substance use
The ASSIST measures substance use; we will use the total score for each substance as an indicator of substance use. Scores range from 0-39 for each subscale; higher scores indicate substance misuse.
Detailed timeline: Eligibility screening assessment (pre-study enrollment); pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 2 (study week 6,7, or 8, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 3 (study week 9,10, or 11, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 4 (study week 12,13, or 14, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 5 (study week 15,16, or 17, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 6 (study week 18,19, or 20, depending on randomization); 8 weeks post-assessment 6 (week 18, 19, or 20); 9 weeks post-assessment 6
Measured: Eligibility assessment (week 0); Depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered weeks 3 through 20, 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Negative subscale; Change in negative psychotic symptoms
The PANSS measures positive and negative psychotic symptoms; we will use the total score of the negative symptoms subscale on this measure as an indicator of negative symptoms. Scores range from 7 to 49; higher scores indicate greater negative symptoms.
Measured: Study week 1; pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5, depending on randomization); 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 and 9 weeks post study week 18,19, or 20 (depending on randomization to intervention start time)
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS); Change in functioning
This clinician-reported instrument measures social and occupational functioning. Scores on this measure range from 1 to 100; higher scores indicate greater functioning, lower scores indicate greater impairment in functioning.
Detailed timeline: Pre-intervention follow-up appointments (study weeks 2; 2 and 3; or 2,3, and 4; depending on randomization to intervention start time); pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 2 (study week 6,7, or 8, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 3 (study week 9,10, or 11, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 4 (study week 12,13, or 14, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 5 (study week 15,16, or 17, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 6 (study week 18,19, or 20, depending on randomization); 8 weeks post-assessment 6 (week 18, 19, or 20); 9 weeks post-assessment 6 (week 18, 19, or 20)
Measured: Study weeks 1, 2; depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered weeks 3 through 20, 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Trauma Symptom Checklist-40 (TSC-40); Change in adversity sequelae
TSC-40 measures adversity sequelae. We will use the total score and the subscale scores (e.g., dissociation, anxiety, depression). Total scores range from 0 to 120; higher scores indicate greater psychopathology.
Detailed timeline: Pre-intervention baseline assessment (study week 1); pre-intervention follow-up appointments (study weeks 2; 2,3; or 2,3, and 4; depending on randomization to intervention start time); pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 2 (study week 6,7, or 8, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 3 (study week 9,10, or 11, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 4 (study week 12,13, or 14, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 5 (study week 15,16, or 17, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 6 (study week 18,19, or 20, depending on randomization); 8 weeks post-assessment 6; 9 weeks post-assessment 6
Measured: Study weeks 1, 2; depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered weeks 3 through 20, 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Positive subscale; Change in positive psychotic symptoms
The PANSS measures positive and negative psychotic symptoms; we will use the total score of the positive symptoms subscale on this measure. Scores range from 7 to 49; higher scores indicate greater positive symptoms.
Measured: Study week 1; pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5, depending on randomization); 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 and 9 weeks post study week 18, 19, or 20 (depending on randomization to intervention start time)
Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness and Improvement of Illness (CGI-S & -I); Change in functioning
The CGI-S measures the clinician's judgement of the severity of the participant's mental illness at this time and the CGI-I measures the degree of improvement from baseline; we will use the total severity score of the CGI-S and the total improvement score of the CGI-I. CGI-I scores range from 1 (Very much improved) to 7 (Very much worse); higher scores indicate worsening, lower scores indicate improvement. CGI-S scores range from 1 (Normal, not ill at all) to 7 (Among the most extremely ill); higher scores indicate greater illness severity, lower scores indicate low severity.
Detailed timeline: Pre-intervention baseline assessment (study week 1); 8 weeks post-intervention session 15; 9 weeks post-intervention session 15
Measured: Study week 1; depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 - 8-item screener version
The 8-item PTSD Checklist-5 (PCL-5) will collect information about symptoms commonly associated with adversity, such as intrusive thoughts, avoidance of event reminders, loss of interest, etc. All items are on a 5-point scale ranging from "Not at all" to "Extremely"; higher scores suggest greater symptom severity. This questionnaire has previously been validated for use with individuals with psychosis.
Detailed timeline: Pre-intervention baseline assessment (study week 1); pre-intervention follow-up appointments (study weeks 2; 2,3; or 2,3, and 4; depending on intervention start time); pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5); intra-intervention assessment 2 (study week 6,7, or 8); intra-intervention assessment 3 (study week 9,10, or 11); intra-intervention assessment 4 (study week 12,13, or 14); intra-intervention assessment 5 (study week 15,16, or 17); intra-intervention assessment 6 (study week 18,19, or 20); 8 weeks post-assessment 6; 9 weeks post-assessment 6
Measured: Study weeks 1, 2; depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered weeks 3 through 20, 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Sep 2020
- Study start15 Nov 2021
- Primary completion15 Sep 2023
- Study completion30 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Psychotic DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Nova Scotia Health AuthorityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- A single-case experimental design (SCED), specifically, a multiple-baseline design (MBD; Kratochwill et al., 2010) will be used; the MBD temporally staggers intervention start times across participants, thereby creating a control group composed of each individual's pre-intervention scores. Randomization of each participant's treatment start time will be used to increase internal validity and minimize bias (Kratochwill \& Levin, 2010). Participants will be randomized using a random sampling/assignment generator (randomizer.org). An MBD is an ideal design for a study focused on the optimization of PE+ and this approach will allow a fine-grained assessment (Lobo et al., 2017) of its effectiveness in EPP. This design can also detect significant changes during each phase of the intervention. In order to meet standards of evidence for SCEDs, this study will include a total of five treatment phases, which exceeds the recommended minimum of three phases (Kratochwill et al., 2010).
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nova Scotia Health Authority
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre Foundation, Research Nova Scotia, Killam Laureates
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Victoria Patterson, Dalhousie University
- Investigators
- Victoria Patterson, PhD student, Principal investigator, Dalhousie University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04546178
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REB1025608
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 28 Aug 2020
- Last updated
- 29 Nov 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Patterson VC, Tibbo PG, Stewart SH, Town J, Crocker CE, Ursuliak Z, Lee S, Morrison J, Abidi S, Dempster K, Alexiadis M, Henderson N, Pencer A. Outcomes of an adapted prolonged exposure psychotherapy for people with early phase psychosis, substance misuse, and a history of adversity: the PE + trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06050-1.
PubMed 39402517Patterson VC, Tibbo PG, Stewart SH, Town J, Crocker CE, Ursuliak Z, Lee S, Morrison J, Abidi S, Dempster K, Alexiadis M, Henderson N, Pencer A. A multiple baseline trial of adapted prolonged exposure psychotherapy for individuals with early phase psychosis, comorbid substance misuse, and a history of adversity: A study protocol. Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 12;13:1012776. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012776. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 36578677
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Nov 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Implementation and Evaluation of Prolonged Exposure Psychotherapy for Adverse Events in Early Phase Psychosis With Comorbid Substance Misuse
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04546178
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REB1025608
- Keywords
- Substance misuse, Schizophrenia spectrum disorders, Adversity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 19 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nova Scotia Health AuthorityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre Foundation, Research Nova Scotia, Killam Laureates
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
People with psychosis have significantly higher rates of adversity (e.g., abuse) and substance misuse (i.e., problematic drug and alcohol use) than people with other mental illnesses. Research has found that adversity and substance use both negatively influence recovery from a psychotic disorder. Currently, there are few treatment options for people living with psychosis, substance misuse, and adversity-related symptoms (e.g., anxiety, depression). This is especially true for young adults who are in the first years of a psychotic illness (i.e., early phase psychosis; EPP) who may be in the best position to benefit from treatment because they have not been ill for as long as others with more chronic psychosis (i.e., >10 years). Research has demonstrated that Prolonged Exposure (PE), a psychological therapy that helps improve adversity-related symptoms, may be appropriate for people in EPP, although there is limited evidence regarding its adaptation from use in chronic psychosis to EPP. The aim of the proposed study is to adapt and optimize PE therapy for young adults in EPP. We aim to recruit 20 individuals from the Nova Scotia Early Psychosis Program (NSEPP) aged 19-35 who will participate in 15 sessions of adapted PE; we will compare their scores before and after treatment on measures of psychotic symptoms, amount and frequency of substance use, and adversity-related problems. Our goal is to target two factors that may be contributing to and maintaining negative outcomes: avoidance and hopelessness. These factors will be addressed by asking participants to face feared reminders of adversity and learn new ways to think about adverse experiences and mental health problems. The adaptation and application of this evidence-based intervention has the potential to create a new treatment avenue for EPP, reducing impairment and distress, and improving recovery rates.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A single-case experimental design (SCED), specifically, a multiple-baseline design (MBD; Kratochwill et al., 2010) will be used; the MBD temporally staggers intervention start times across participants, thereby creating a control group composed of each individual's pre-intervention scores. Randomization of each participant's treatment start time will be used to increase internal validity and minimize bias (Kratochwill \& Levin, 2010). Participants will be randomized using a random sampling/assignment generator (randomizer.org). An MBD is an ideal design for a study focused on the optimization of PE+ and this approach will allow a fine-grained assessment (Lobo et al., 2017) of its effectiveness in EPP. This design can also detect significant changes during each phase of the intervention. In order to meet standards of evidence for SCEDs, this study will include a total of five treatment phases, which exceeds the recommended minimum of three phases (Kratochwill et al., 2010).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PE+ intervention group | Experimental | Behavioral: Prolonged exposure (PE)+ therapy, Other: Treatment as usual (TAU)This group will participate in 15 sessions of PE+ therapy and participate in frequent symptom assessments; this is the same group of participants as the pre-intervention scores group, but they have crossed over from pre-intervention phase into intervention (active) phase. |
| Pre-intervention scores group (TAU) | Active comparator | Other: Treatment as usual (TAU)This group will participate in symptom assessments but will not receive the PE+ intervention until the begin the active part of the trial. Participants in this group have been diagnosed with a psychotic disorder, have also experienced adversity, and use substances. This group will receive medication for psychosis as well as access to standard education programs and clinical care; thus treatment as usual (TAU). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Current patient at the Nova Scotia Early Psychosis Program (NSEPP) for the duration of the study
- Aged 19-35 years
- Diagnosis of a primary psychotic disorder (i.e., schizotypal disorder, delusional disorder, brief psychotic disorder, schizophreniform disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, substance/medication-induced psychotic disorder, other specified schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorder, unspecified schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorder)
- Diagnosis of a primary psychotic disorder within the past 5 years; participants must not surpass this 5-year diagnostic window whilst enrolled in the study
- Have experienced 1 or more negative, distressing lifetime adverse events (e.g., child abuse, discrimination) listed on the Trauma and Life Events (TALE) checklist that the participant indicates still affects them now
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Aged 36 and older
- Aged 18 and younger
- Score in the 'high risk' range for cocaine use on the ASSIST
- Participant does not speak or understand English
- Current involuntary inpatient admission in a hospital or under a Community Treatment Order
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prolonged exposure (PE)+ therapyAlso: PE+ therapyThe intervention will be adapted prolonged exposure therapy, called PE+ therapy. Participants will receive 15 weekly 90-minute sessions of PE+; these appointments will be divided into five sets of three sessions each: 1) psychoeducation about AEs, SM, and the interplay of both with psychosis; 2) emotion regulation strategies; 3) imaginal exposures, 4) in vivo exposures, and 5) review of treatment and planning for termination and maintenance. | Behavioural | PE+ intervention group |
| Treatment as usual (TAU)Also: Antipsychotics and program accessThe intervention will be antipsychotics prescribed by clinicians working within the Nova Scotia Early Psychosis Program (NSEPP) as well as case management supplied by their primary nurse. Program participants will have access to educational programs about psychosis, skills/vocational training, as well as familial education and support. | Other | PE+ intervention group, Pre-intervention scores group (TAU) |
Primary outcome
Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS); Change in hopelessness
Time frame: Study weeks 1, 2; depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered weeks 3 through 20, 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
This 20-item true/false scale measures hopelessness in participants; we will use the total score on this measure as an indicator of hopelessness. Scores range from 0 to 20; higher scores indicate greater hopelessness. Detailed timeline: Pre-intervention baseline assessment (study week 1); pre-intervention follow-up appointments (study weeks 2; 2,3; or 2,3, and 4; depending on randomization); pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 2 (study week 6,7, or 8, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 3 (study week 9,10, or 11, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 4 (study week 12,13, or 14, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 5 (study week 15,16, or 17, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 6 (study week 18,19, or 20, depending on randomization); 8 weeks post-assessment 6 (week 18, 19, or 20); 9 weeks post-assessment 6
Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (BEAQ); Change in avoidance
Time frame: Study weeks 1, 2; depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered weeks 3 through 20, 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
This 15-item scale measures avoidance in participants; we will use the overall score on this measure as an indicator of avoidance. Scores range from 15 to 90; higher scores indicate greater avoidance. Detailed timeline: Pre-intervention baseline assessment (study week 1); pre-intervention follow-up appointments (study weeks 2; 2,3; or 2,3, and 4; depending on randomization); pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 2 (study week 6,7, or 8, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 3 (study week 9,10, or 11, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 4 (study week 12,13, or 14, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 5 (study week 15,16, or 17, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 6 (study week 18,19, or 20, depending on randomization); 8 weeks post-assessment 6 (week 18, 19, or 20); 9 weeks post-assessment 6 (week 18, 19, or 20)
World Health Organization's Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (WHO ASSIST); Change in substance use
Time frame: Eligibility assessment (week 0); Depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered weeks 3 through 20, 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
The ASSIST measures substance use; we will use the total score for each substance as an indicator of substance use. Scores range from 0-39 for each subscale; higher scores indicate substance misuse. Detailed timeline: Eligibility screening assessment (pre-study enrollment); pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 2 (study week 6,7, or 8, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 3 (study week 9,10, or 11, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 4 (study week 12,13, or 14, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 5 (study week 15,16, or 17, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 6 (study week 18,19, or 20, depending on randomization); 8 weeks post-assessment 6 (week 18, 19, or 20); 9 weeks post-assessment 6
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Negative subscale; Change in negative psychotic symptoms
Time frame: Study week 1; pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5, depending on randomization); 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 and 9 weeks post study week 18,19, or 20 (depending on randomization to intervention start time)
The PANSS measures positive and negative psychotic symptoms; we will use the total score of the negative symptoms subscale on this measure as an indicator of negative symptoms. Scores range from 7 to 49; higher scores indicate greater negative symptoms.
Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS); Change in functioning
Time frame: Study weeks 1, 2; depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered weeks 3 through 20, 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
This clinician-reported instrument measures social and occupational functioning. Scores on this measure range from 1 to 100; higher scores indicate greater functioning, lower scores indicate greater impairment in functioning. Detailed timeline: Pre-intervention follow-up appointments (study weeks 2; 2 and 3; or 2,3, and 4; depending on randomization to intervention start time); pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 2 (study week 6,7, or 8, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 3 (study week 9,10, or 11, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 4 (study week 12,13, or 14, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 5 (study week 15,16, or 17, depending on randomization); intra-intervention assessment 6 (study week 18,19, or 20, depending on randomization); 8 weeks post-assessment 6 (week 18, 19, or 20); 9 weeks post-assessment 6 (week 18, 19, or 20)
4 secondary outcomes
Trauma Symptom Checklist-40 (TSC-40); Change in adversity sequelae
Time frame: Study weeks 1, 2; depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered weeks 3 through 20, 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) - Positive subscale; Change in positive psychotic symptoms
Time frame: Study week 1; pre-intervention assessment 1 (study week 3,4, or 5, depending on randomization); 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 and 9 weeks post study week 18, 19, or 20 (depending on randomization to intervention start time)
Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness and Improvement of Illness (CGI-S & -I); Change in functioning
Time frame: Study week 1; depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 - 8-item screener version
Time frame: Study weeks 1, 2; depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered weeks 3 through 20, 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Nov 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39402517Patterson VC, Tibbo PG, Stewart SH, Town J, Crocker CE, Ursuliak Z, Lee S, Morrison J, Abidi S, Dempster K, Alexiadis M, Henderson N, Pencer A. Outcomes of an adapted prolonged exposure psychotherapy for people with early phase psychosis, substance misuse, and a history of adversity: the PE + trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06050-1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36578677Patterson VC, Tibbo PG, Stewart SH, Town J, Crocker CE, Ursuliak Z, Lee S, Morrison J, Abidi S, Dempster K, Alexiadis M, Henderson N, Pencer A. A multiple baseline trial of adapted prolonged exposure psychotherapy for individuals with early phase psychosis, comorbid substance misuse, and a history of adversity: A study protocol. Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 12;13:1012776. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012776. eCollection 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Psychotic Disorders
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride for the Treatment of Psychiatric Disorders in Children and Adolescents
Schizophrenia, Autism-Related Irritability
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Sleep Monitoring for Early Detection of Relapse in People With Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder Receiving Usual Treatment
Bipolar Disorder (BD), SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics and Relative Bioavailability of Intranasal vs Intramuscular Olanzapine in Healthy Adult Participants
Healthy Adult Participants
Active, not recruiting
Designing and Evaluating a Classroom-Based Mental Health Programme for Adolescents.
Mental Health Promotion
RecruitingPhase 2/3
ACP-204 in Adults With Alzheimer's Disease Psychosis
Alzheimer's Disease Psychosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Victoria Patterson, PhD student principal investigator
Dalhousie University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Prolonged exposure (PE)+ therapy and Treatment as usual (TAU) in people with Psychotic Disorders and Stress Disorders, Traumatic, run by Nova Scotia Health Authority at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS); Change in hopelessness (time frame: Study weeks 1, 2; depending on randomization to intervention start time: administered weeks 3 through 20, 8 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20, and 9 weeks following study week 18,19, or 20 (see description above for more detail)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04546178, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2023.