DeliriumDELIS-3NCT04551508
Delirium Screening 3 Methods Study
An observational study of Delirium and Critical Illness, run by Hospitalsenheden Vest at 14 sites in Denmark.
Trial summary
Observational study comparing three different methods of delirium detection in critically ill patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Delirium, Critical Illness
- How many people
- 1,126 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesDenmark
- Study dates
- 9 Sep 2020to 1 Nov 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All adult patients admitted to critical care units may be included in this study.
Who may be able to join
- All patients admitted to critical care units.
Who cannot join
- Patients with RASS score of -3, -4, -5
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
Denmark14 sites
Aalborg Universitetshospital
Aalborg, 9000
Aarhus Universitetshospital
Aarhus, 8200
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen Ø, 2100
Sydvestjysk sygehus
Esbjerg, 6700
Regionshospitalet Herning
Herning, Central Jutland, 7400
Nordsjællands Hospital
Hillerød, 3400
Holbæk Sygehus
Holbæk, 4300
Regionshospitalet Holstebro
Holstebro, Central Jutland, 7500
Regionshospitalet Horsens
Horsens, 8700
Sjællands Universitetshospital
Køge, 4600
Odense Universitetshospital
Odense, C, 5000
Regionshospitalet Randers
Randers, 8930
Vejle Sygehus
Vejle, 7100
Regionshospitalet Viborg
Viborg, 8800
About this study
Official title: Delirium Screening 3 Methods Study (DELIS-3). Agreement Between CAM-ICU, CAM-ICU-7 and ICDSC in a Danish Population of ICU Patients and Nurses' Perception of the Clinical Relevance of Delirium Screening
Observational study comparing three different methods of delirium detection in critically ill patients.
Read the detailed description
The DELIS-3 study aims to compare three different approaches to detection of ICU (intensive care unit) delirium in critically ill patients. The CAM-ICU (Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU) and the ICDSC (Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist) have both been developed in the early 1990. The CAM-ICU is either positive or negative, whereas the ICDSC is a score between 0-8. A score above 3 is delirium positive. Neither scale has been validated as severity scales. The novel CAM-ICU-7 is developed from the original CAM-ICU and has been validated as a severity scale.
Detection of delirium in critically ill patients is highly necessary as delirium can be very painful to the patient. Moreover, certain subtypes of delirium is associated with increased mortality and poorer cognitive outcome when patients are followed up on long term.
Therefore, delirium screening of all patients is standard care in most intensive care units.
However, there is also a need to assess severity of delirium. The recently published CAM-ICU-7 has now been translated to Danish and this study will explore its performance compared to the CAM-ICU and the ICDSC.
In 17 Danish ICU's 10 nurses will be trained in using all three instruments. Each nurse will subsequently screen 10 patients each with all three instruments as part of their normal practice. The sequence of the instruments will be randomized to avoid that one instrument is favored by always being used first, second or last.
For each patient the following data will be collected: sex, age, reason for hospitalization (medical, neurological, surgical/ acute, planned), ventilator treatment, ability to verbalize, RASS score (sedation and agitation score) severity of disease (SMS score) and time of admission.
After all screenings has been collected, nurses will fill in a questionnaire on their perceptions of each scales' ability to reliably detect delirium, userfriendliness and how time consuming each scale were to use.
- Conditions
- Delirium, Critical Illness
- Medical subject headings
- Delirium, Critical Illness
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Confusion Assessment Method of the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
Clinical test for detecting delirium bedside, can be used by non-psychiatrists. CAM-ICU can be either positive (indicating delirium) or negative.
Measured: Day 1
Confusion assessment method of the intensive care unit 7 (CAM-ICU -7)
Clinical test for detecting delirium bedside, can be used by non-psychiatrists. CAM-ICU-7 can yield a score of 0-7 points, higher values indicative of worse delirium.
Measured: Day 1
intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC)
Clinical test for detecting delirium bedside, can be used by non-psychiatrists. ICDSC can yield a score of 0-8 points, higher values indicative of worse delirium.
Measured: Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2020
- Study start9 Sep 2020
- Primary completion1 Nov 2021
- Study completion1 Nov 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DeliriumStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,126 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospitalsenheden Vest
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anne Højager Nielsen, Hospitalsenheden Vest
- Investigators
- Helle Svenningsen, ph.d., Principal investigator, VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04551508
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 31-1521-440 (STPS)
- Acronym
- DELIS-3
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Khan BA, Perkins AJ, Gao S, Hui SL, Campbell NL, Farber MO, Chlan LL, Boustani MA. The Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 Delirium Severity Scale: A Novel Delirium Severity Instrument for Use in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):851-857. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002368.
PubMed 28263192Bergeron N, Dubois MJ, Dumont M, Dial S, Skrobik Y. Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: evaluation of a new screening tool. Intensive Care Med. 2001 May;27(5):859-64. doi: 10.1007/s001340100909.
PubMed 11430542Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Dittus R, Speroff T, Gautam S, Bernard GR, Inouye SK. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00012.
PubMed 11445689Almgren M, Lundmark M, Samuelson K. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: translation and reliability testing in a Swedish intensive care unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Jul;54(6):729-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02173.x. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
PubMed 20002362Granholm A, Perner A, Krag M, Marker S, Hjortrup PB, Haase N, Holst LB, Collet MO, Jensen AKG, Moller MH. External validation of the Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit (SMS-ICU). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Oct;63(9):1216-1224. doi: 10.1111/aas.13422. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
PubMed 31273763
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Delirium Screening 3 Methods Study (DELIS-3). Agreement Between CAM-ICU, CAM-ICU-7 and ICDSC in a Danish Population of ICU Patients and Nurses' Perception of the Clinical Relevance of Delirium Screening
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04551508
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DELIS-3 / 31-1521-440 (STPS)
- Conditions
- Delirium, Critical Illness
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,126 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospitalsenheden VestUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Nov 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Observational study comparing three different methods of delirium detection in critically ill patients.
Detailed description
The DELIS-3 study aims to compare three different approaches to detection of ICU (intensive care unit) delirium in critically ill patients. The CAM-ICU (Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU) and the ICDSC (Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist) have both been developed in the early 1990. The CAM-ICU is either positive or negative, whereas the ICDSC is a score between 0-8. A score above 3 is delirium positive. Neither scale has been validated as severity scales. The novel CAM-ICU-7 is developed from the original CAM-ICU and has been validated as a severity scale.
Detection of delirium in critically ill patients is highly necessary as delirium can be very painful to the patient. Moreover, certain subtypes of delirium is associated with increased mortality and poorer cognitive outcome when patients are followed up on long term.
Therefore, delirium screening of all patients is standard care in most intensive care units.
However, there is also a need to assess severity of delirium. The recently published CAM-ICU-7 has now been translated to Danish and this study will explore its performance compared to the CAM-ICU and the ICDSC.
In 17 Danish ICU's 10 nurses will be trained in using all three instruments. Each nurse will subsequently screen 10 patients each with all three instruments as part of their normal practice. The sequence of the instruments will be randomized to avoid that one instrument is favored by always being used first, second or last.
For each patient the following data will be collected: sex, age, reason for hospitalization (medical, neurological, surgical/ acute, planned), ventilator treatment, ability to verbalize, RASS score (sedation and agitation score) severity of disease (SMS score) and time of admission.
After all screenings has been collected, nurses will fill in a questionnaire on their perceptions of each scales' ability to reliably detect delirium, userfriendliness and how time consuming each scale were to use.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All adult patients admitted to critical care units may be included in this study.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients admitted to critical care units.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with RASS score of -3, -4, -5
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Confusion Assessment Method of the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU)
Time frame: Day 1
Clinical test for detecting delirium bedside, can be used by non-psychiatrists. CAM-ICU can be either positive (indicating delirium) or negative.
Confusion assessment method of the intensive care unit 7 (CAM-ICU -7)
Time frame: Day 1
Clinical test for detecting delirium bedside, can be used by non-psychiatrists. CAM-ICU-7 can yield a score of 0-7 points, higher values indicative of worse delirium.
intensive care delirium screening checklist (ICDSC)
Time frame: Day 1
Clinical test for detecting delirium bedside, can be used by non-psychiatrists. ICDSC can yield a score of 0-8 points, higher values indicative of worse delirium.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Apr 2022.
- Background: PubMed 28263192Khan BA, Perkins AJ, Gao S, Hui SL, Campbell NL, Farber MO, Chlan LL, Boustani MA. The Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 Delirium Severity Scale: A Novel Delirium Severity Instrument for Use in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):851-857. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002368.
- Background: PubMed 11430542Bergeron N, Dubois MJ, Dumont M, Dial S, Skrobik Y. Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: evaluation of a new screening tool. Intensive Care Med. 2001 May;27(5):859-64. doi: 10.1007/s001340100909.
- Background: PubMed 11445689Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Dittus R, Speroff T, Gautam S, Bernard GR, Inouye SK. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00012.
- Background: PubMed 20002362Almgren M, Lundmark M, Samuelson K. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: translation and reliability testing in a Swedish intensive care unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Jul;54(6):729-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02173.x. Epub 2009 Dec 5.
- Background: PubMed 31273763Granholm A, Perner A, Krag M, Marker S, Hjortrup PB, Haase N, Holst LB, Collet MO, Jensen AKG, Moller MH. External validation of the Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit (SMS-ICU). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Oct;63(9):1216-1224. doi: 10.1111/aas.13422. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Delirium
Active, not recruiting
TaVNS for Delirium
Delirium
Active, not recruiting
PICU Up!: A Pilot Stepped-wedge Trial of a Multicomponent Early Mobility Intervention for Critically Ill Children
Critical Illness
Recruiting
Low Pneumoperitoneum Pressure for Delirium Prevention in Elderly Laparoscopy
Postoperative Delirium (POD), Intracranial Hypertension
Recruiting
The Effect of Remimazolam Tosylate on the Incidence of Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Delirium - Postoperative
RecruitingPhase 4
Acetaminophen-Mannitol Injection and Postoperative Delirium
Postoperative Delirium
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Helle Svenningsen, ph.d. principal investigator
VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Delirium and Critical Illness, run by Hospitalsenheden Vest at 14 sites in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Confusion Assessment Method of the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) (time frame: Day 1). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04551508, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2022.