AzTrials
AzTrials

Epilepsy, Complex PartialNCT04573569

Neural Correlates of Cognition and Mood

An observational study of Epilepsy, Complex Partial, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The overall objective of this study is to determine the neural correlates of cognition and mood. This study represents the first preliminary study to begin investigating cognitive and emotional states in patients who have undergone implantation of invasive electrodes for the purpose of seizure localization. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Epilepsy, Complex Partial
What is being tested?
Behavioral testing
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
28 Mar 2018to 30 Jun 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients undergoing Phase II surgical epilepsy localization

Who may be able to join

  • Patient is able to consent for themselves and the patient has or is scheduled for surgically implanted electrodes for the purposes of phase II epilepsy surgical evaluation.

Who cannot join

  • None

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

Other trials in United States

About this study

The overall objective of this study is to determine the neural correlates of cognition and mood. This study represents the first preliminary study to begin investigating cognitive and emotional states in patients who have undergone implantation of invasive electrodes for the purpose of seizure localization. In the post-implantation paradigm where patients remain under close supervision with intracranial instrumentation for recording, this study aims to create the platform and preliminary data to inform a larger study for calibrated examination of neural correlates of cognition and mood. As such, this study has the following specific aims:

Aim 1: Establish a portable platform for the assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and emotional tasks with time synchronization to ECoG/SEEG recording platform Aim 2: Quantify the variance in clinical assessments of mood and cognitive function in patients undergoing phase II epilepsy monitoring Aim 3: Assess the relationship between validated surveys/tasks and electrophysiology

Read the detailed description

Study interventions are limited entirely to validated surveys completed on a computer or tablet PC, as outlined above. Patients may elect to have electrodes to be implanted that are not used in standard-of-care at this institution, but are FDA-approved for the same indications. Patients who consent and complete enrollment will be asked to complete cognitive and behavioral tasks on a portable computer or tablet PC while the invasive electrodes remain implanted. Tasks typically require the patient to think or act and then respond by interacting minimally with the portable computer.

The primary outcome for this study includes percentage of completed cognitive or behavioral tasks as a measure of the feasibility of the administration of these tasks. As this is a feasibility study, we are interested in the practical aspects of data acquisition.

Secondary outcomes include the cognitive and behavioral tasks themselves and their relationship with electrophysiology.

Being tested
Behavioral testing
Medical subject headings
Epilepsy, Complex Partial

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Behavioral testingBehavioural

    Patients recruited for this study have already undergone surgical implantation of invasive electrodes for purpose of localizing and characterizing electrographic seizures as part of the second phase of surgical epilepsy evaluation. Patients who consent and complete enrollment will then be asked to complete cognitive and behavioral tasks on a portable computer or tablet PC while the invasive electrodes remain implanted. Tasks typically require the patient to think or act and then respond by interacting minimally with the portable computer. These tasks are performed at the will of each patient during their stay in the intensive care unit while surgical electrodes remain.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of completed cognitive tasks

    The primary outcome for this study includes percentage of completed cognitive or behavioral tasks as a measure of the feasibility of the administration of these tasks. We are interested in the practical aspects of data acquisition. No comparison is made as no baseline data exists ECoG, SEEG recordings, and eye-tracking data are timestamped, this allows the validated surveys and tasks to be linked precisely. These results will establish the response rate to the intervention allowing calculation of the number of events to use in establishing relationships with the underlying physiology.

    Measured: Up to 1 month (Assessments start after Post-operative day 2)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Secondary outcomes include the cognitive and behavioral tasks themselves and their relationship with electrophysiology of the brain.

    Event-related potential will be calculated using time synchronized ECoG or SEEG recordings. Averaging will be performed across each task for event-related potentials and compared with shuffled data for bootstrapping about the median. Alpha is selected to be 0.05 with the Bonferroni correction with the number of tests. Causal inference will be used to assess the relationship between the various electrodes. Causal metrics including multivariate Granger causality and Transfer Entropy will be used to assess the adjacency matrices. Statistics are performed with shuffled bootstrapping also using the Bonferroni adjustment on the number of channels. The relationship between pupil size, gaze location, task behavior and E-phys measures will be assessed with generalized linear models, generalized canonical correlation analysis, and structured equation models.

    Measured: Up to 1 month (Assessments start after Post-operative day 2)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Oct 2020
  2. Study start28 Mar 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2019
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04573569
Sponsor's protocol ID
NEUROSURG-2019-28063
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
16 Dec 2018
Last updated
10 Sep 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Epilepsy, Complex Partial, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of completed cognitive tasks (time frame: Up to 1 month (Assessments start after Post-operative day 2)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in