Allogenic Bone Marrow TransplantationNCT04575779
Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome of Cyclosporine Short Infusion Versus Continuous Infusion Post Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation
An observational study of Allogenic Bone Marrow Transplantation, run by Shaymaa Mohammed El-Awady at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This study focuses on the basis for current immunosuppressive strategies in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the bone marrow transplantation unit in Ain Shams university hospitals. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Allogenic Bone Marrow Transplantation
- What is being tested?
- Cyclosporin with a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 h
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 10 Jul 2018to 30 May 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with related allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Who may be able to join
- Adult ages >18 years.
- Patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation, matched or mismatched related donors.
- Had never been exposed to cyclosporin before.
Who cannot join
- Patients with a hypersensitivity to cyclosporin or to any of the ingredients of the formulation.
- Patient with abnormal hepatic functions.
- Patient with abnormal renal functions with elevated serum creatinine levels in excess of 220 mmol/l at study entry.
- Patient receiving systemically active azoles within 2 weeks before Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) patients.
- Patient with body mass index (BMI) above 30 kg/m2.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study focuses on the basis for current immunosuppressive strategies in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the bone marrow transplantation unit in Ain Shams university hospitals. It discusses whether there is room for improving both the monitoring and the delivery of pharmacologically mediated immunosuppression in this population of patients. Our study will try to determine whether CsA administration at a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously (IV) in 2 hrs (short infusion) twice-daily will achieve C2 blood levels of at least 800 mg/l and whether it will be feasible and safe or not.
Read the detailed description
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) is considered as a curative treatment for patients with haematological malignancies like leukaemia, myelodysplasia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. However, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) both in its acute and chronic forms, has limited the benefits of allogeneic HSCT by significant morbidity and mortality.
Pharmacological suppression of the donor-derived alloreactive immune response has played a central role in reducing the morbidity and mortality of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), which remains the major cause of toxicity after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT).
Graft versus host disease (GvHD) is a condition that might occur after an allogenic transplant, In GvHD, the donated bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells view the recipient's body as foreign, and the donated cells/bone marrow attack the body. There are two forms of GvHD: Acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) and Chronic graft versus host disease (cGvHD). As an allogeneic transplant recipient, the patient might experience either form of GvHD, both forms, or neither.
Acute GvHD, which results from an interaction of donor T lymphocytes with the recipient's antigens, occurs in approximately 30%-60% of patients after allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT). At the same time, it has become clear that the intensity of post-transplant immunosuppression is one of the most important determinants of relapse risk through its impact on the potency of an immunologically mediated graft-versus leukaemia (GVL) effect.
Among the variety of immunosuppressants available, cyclosporin A (CsA) has been the most extensively used drug to prevent or treat graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, since its introduction in the 1970s. It has been shown that CsA is effective in preventing and controlling acute and chronic GvHD.
Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressive agent, a metabolite extracted from the fungus Tolypocladium. It is a potent suppressor of the immune system, particularly T-lymphocytes. Cyclosporine binds to the intracellular receptor cyclophilin, subsequently inhibiting cytokine production, including interleukin-2 and 4, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, and interferon-gamma, which leads to impairment of normal lymphoid cell activation.
Other mechanisms may contribute to immunosuppression. Cyclosporine is cell cycle phase-specific; lymphocytes in the G0 or G1 phase of the cell cycle are specifically and reversibly inhibited. Direct cytotoxic effects on T- and B-lymphocytes have also been demonstrated.
The cyclosporine (CsA) acts in a concentration-dependent rather than a time-dependent fashion. It has been shown that the most significant pharmacodynamic effect occurs within the first two h of exposure (C2) at peak CsA levels of 800-2285 mg/l which result in 70-96% calcineurin inhibition and maximum suppression of IL-2 release from T cells.
Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine (CsA) is highly complex and affected by many factors like demographics, concurrent medications and type of primary disease for which transplantation was indicated. Moreover, the complexity of CsA pharmacokinetics is increasing in critically ill patients in acute post-transplantation phase due to the presence of additional several clinical factors simultaneously affecting the in-vivo behaviour of CsA. This made very little research investigating the pharmacokinetic behaviour of CsA in acute post-transplantation period.
This study will focus on the basis for current immunosuppressive strategies in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the bone marrow transplantation unit in Ain Shams university hospitals and discuss whether there is room for improving both the monitoring and the delivery of pharmacologically mediated immunosuppression in this population of patients.
Although it has already been known that the clinical effect of the cyclosporine (CsA) depends on the reached concentration levels in the blood, the best way of therapeutic monitoring of this drug is not universally accepted. The measurement of the drug concentration. level in the blood prior to the administration of the next successive dose (C0) and dosing of the drug on the basis of this drug concentration, represents the more common way of CsA therapeutic monitoring. Recently, it has been shown that C0 does not correlate well with the episodes of acute rejection, and undesirable drug effects as well.
Many studies showed that the absorption, but not the elimination phase, is primarily significant for the cyclosporine (CsA) effectiveness and that the area under the concentration-time curve in the first 4 hours after the drug administration (AUC0-4) adequately reflects the exposure of the organism to the drug and correlates well with clinical events. It was also shown that out of all drug concentration levels separately measured at some points of time during the absorption phase; the drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration (C2) correlates the best with the area under the concentration-time curve in the first 4 hours after the drug administration (AUC0-4).
In the past few years, considerable refinement has occurred in the pharmacologically mediated immunosuppressive strategies utilized in recipients of solid organ transplants. This has occurred through the use of more precise methods of monitoring established agents, principally cyclosporin (CsA), which have been shown to reduce the risk of graft rejection in the setting of both kidney and liver transplantation. This experience suggests that there may be scope for translating the advances that have been made in the field of solid organ transplantation to recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cells.
The drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration (C2) monitoring has been adopted for renal, liver and heart transplant recipients as the two h peak concentration correlates well with the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 4 h after giving the drug and that this predicts the occurrence of acute rejection and nephrotoxicity.
The drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration (C2) monitoring is also associated with clinical benefits as a reduction in graft rejections after solid organ transplantation. Amazingly, data on pharmacokinetics and target C2 levels are lacking in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) patients. Moreover, there is no consensus about how cyclosporin (CsA) should be administered with some centres giving 1 or 2 intermittent infusions and others continuous 24 h infusion. Hence, our study will try to determine whether administering CsA at a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously(i.v.) in 2 hrs (short infusion) twice-daily will achieve C2 blood levels of at least 800 mg/l and whether it will be feasible and safe or not.
- Conditions
- Allogenic Bone Marrow Transplantation
- Being tested
- Cyclosporin with a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 h
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cyclosporin with a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 hDrug
To determine whether administering CsA at a dailydose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously(i.v.) in 2 hrs (short infusion) twice-daily will achieve C2 blood levels of at least 800 mg/l and whether it will be feasible and safe or not.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Cyclosporin of a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 h Receives: Drug: Cyclosporin with a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 h | |
| Group B | Administer cyclosporin daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day in a continuous infusion over 23 h every 24 h. Receives: Drug: Cyclosporin with a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 h |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recording the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) events [Safety and tolerability]
To compare between the administration of twice-daily cyclosporin infusion over two hours versus continuous cyclosporin infusion via recording the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) events
Measured: Three months following transplantation date
Recording the occurrence of cyclosporine toxicity adverse events [Safety and tolerability]
To compare between the administration of twice-daily cyclosporin infusion over two hours versus continuous cyclosporin infusion via recording the occurrence of cyclosporine toxicity adverse events
Measured: Three months following transplantation date
Secondary outcomes (2)
Recording the achievement of C2 (The drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration) blood levels of at least 800 mg/l. [Efficacy]
Recording the patient success to achieve C2 (The drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration) blood levels of at least 800 mg/l.
Measured: From Transplantation date till 3 months afterward
Correlation with the the area under the concentration-time curve in the first 4 hours after the drug administration (AUC0-4)
To determine which of the individual concentrations in the early phase after cyclosporin short infusion over 2 hours shows the best correlation with the the area under the concentration-time curve in the first 4 hours after the drug administration (AUC0-4).
Measured: From Transplantation date till day 8 afterward
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Oct 2020
- Study start10 Jul 2018
- Primary completion4 Apr 2021
- Study completion30 May 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Allogenic Bone Marrow TransplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Shaymaa Mohammed El-Awady
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Shaymaa Mohammed El-Awady, Ain Shams University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04575779
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 70
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 1 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Not decided yet
Publications
El-Awady SMM, El Afifi AM, Afifi R, Sabri NA, Ahmed MA. Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes of Cyclosporine Short Infusion Versus Continuous Infusion Postallogenic Stem Cell Transplantation. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2025 Jan;50(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s13318-024-00927-y. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
PubMed 39601981
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome of Cyclosporine Short Infusion Versus Continuous Infusion Post Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04575779
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 70
- Conditions
- Allogenic Bone Marrow Transplantation
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Shaymaa Mohammed El-AwadyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jul 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study focuses on the basis for current immunosuppressive strategies in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the bone marrow transplantation unit in Ain Shams university hospitals. It discusses whether there is room for improving both the monitoring and the delivery of pharmacologically mediated immunosuppression in this population of patients. Our study will try to determine whether CsA administration at a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously (IV) in 2 hrs (short infusion) twice-daily will achieve C2 blood levels of at least 800 mg/l and whether it will be feasible and safe or not.
Detailed description
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) is considered as a curative treatment for patients with haematological malignancies like leukaemia, myelodysplasia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. However, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) both in its acute and chronic forms, has limited the benefits of allogeneic HSCT by significant morbidity and mortality.
Pharmacological suppression of the donor-derived alloreactive immune response has played a central role in reducing the morbidity and mortality of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), which remains the major cause of toxicity after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT).
Graft versus host disease (GvHD) is a condition that might occur after an allogenic transplant, In GvHD, the donated bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells view the recipient's body as foreign, and the donated cells/bone marrow attack the body. There are two forms of GvHD: Acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) and Chronic graft versus host disease (cGvHD). As an allogeneic transplant recipient, the patient might experience either form of GvHD, both forms, or neither.
Acute GvHD, which results from an interaction of donor T lymphocytes with the recipient's antigens, occurs in approximately 30%-60% of patients after allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT). At the same time, it has become clear that the intensity of post-transplant immunosuppression is one of the most important determinants of relapse risk through its impact on the potency of an immunologically mediated graft-versus leukaemia (GVL) effect.
Among the variety of immunosuppressants available, cyclosporin A (CsA) has been the most extensively used drug to prevent or treat graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, since its introduction in the 1970s. It has been shown that CsA is effective in preventing and controlling acute and chronic GvHD.
Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressive agent, a metabolite extracted from the fungus Tolypocladium. It is a potent suppressor of the immune system, particularly T-lymphocytes. Cyclosporine binds to the intracellular receptor cyclophilin, subsequently inhibiting cytokine production, including interleukin-2 and 4, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, and interferon-gamma, which leads to impairment of normal lymphoid cell activation.
Other mechanisms may contribute to immunosuppression. Cyclosporine is cell cycle phase-specific; lymphocytes in the G0 or G1 phase of the cell cycle are specifically and reversibly inhibited. Direct cytotoxic effects on T- and B-lymphocytes have also been demonstrated.
The cyclosporine (CsA) acts in a concentration-dependent rather than a time-dependent fashion. It has been shown that the most significant pharmacodynamic effect occurs within the first two h of exposure (C2) at peak CsA levels of 800-2285 mg/l which result in 70-96% calcineurin inhibition and maximum suppression of IL-2 release from T cells.
Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine (CsA) is highly complex and affected by many factors like demographics, concurrent medications and type of primary disease for which transplantation was indicated. Moreover, the complexity of CsA pharmacokinetics is increasing in critically ill patients in acute post-transplantation phase due to the presence of additional several clinical factors simultaneously affecting the in-vivo behaviour of CsA. This made very little research investigating the pharmacokinetic behaviour of CsA in acute post-transplantation period.
This study will focus on the basis for current immunosuppressive strategies in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the bone marrow transplantation unit in Ain Shams university hospitals and discuss whether there is room for improving both the monitoring and the delivery of pharmacologically mediated immunosuppression in this population of patients.
Although it has already been known that the clinical effect of the cyclosporine (CsA) depends on the reached concentration levels in the blood, the best way of therapeutic monitoring of this drug is not universally accepted. The measurement of the drug concentration. level in the blood prior to the administration of the next successive dose (C0) and dosing of the drug on the basis of this drug concentration, represents the more common way of CsA therapeutic monitoring. Recently, it has been shown that C0 does not correlate well with the episodes of acute rejection, and undesirable drug effects as well.
Many studies showed that the absorption, but not the elimination phase, is primarily significant for the cyclosporine (CsA) effectiveness and that the area under the concentration-time curve in the first 4 hours after the drug administration (AUC0-4) adequately reflects the exposure of the organism to the drug and correlates well with clinical events. It was also shown that out of all drug concentration levels separately measured at some points of time during the absorption phase; the drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration (C2) correlates the best with the area under the concentration-time curve in the first 4 hours after the drug administration (AUC0-4).
In the past few years, considerable refinement has occurred in the pharmacologically mediated immunosuppressive strategies utilized in recipients of solid organ transplants. This has occurred through the use of more precise methods of monitoring established agents, principally cyclosporin (CsA), which have been shown to reduce the risk of graft rejection in the setting of both kidney and liver transplantation. This experience suggests that there may be scope for translating the advances that have been made in the field of solid organ transplantation to recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cells.
The drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration (C2) monitoring has been adopted for renal, liver and heart transplant recipients as the two h peak concentration correlates well with the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 4 h after giving the drug and that this predicts the occurrence of acute rejection and nephrotoxicity.
The drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration (C2) monitoring is also associated with clinical benefits as a reduction in graft rejections after solid organ transplantation. Amazingly, data on pharmacokinetics and target C2 levels are lacking in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) patients. Moreover, there is no consensus about how cyclosporin (CsA) should be administered with some centres giving 1 or 2 intermittent infusions and others continuous 24 h infusion. Hence, our study will try to determine whether administering CsA at a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously(i.v.) in 2 hrs (short infusion) twice-daily will achieve C2 blood levels of at least 800 mg/l and whether it will be feasible and safe or not.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | – | Drug: Cyclosporin with a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 hCyclosporin of a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 h |
| Group B | – | Drug: Cyclosporin with a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 hAdminister cyclosporin daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day in a continuous infusion over 23 h every 24 h. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with related allogeneic stem cell transplantation
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult ages >18 years.
- Patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation, matched or mismatched related donors.
- Had never been exposed to cyclosporin before.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with a hypersensitivity to cyclosporin or to any of the ingredients of the formulation.
- Patient with abnormal hepatic functions.
- Patient with abnormal renal functions with elevated serum creatinine levels in excess of 220 mmol/l at study entry.
- Patient receiving systemically active azoles within 2 weeks before Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) patients.
- Patient with body mass index (BMI) above 30 kg/m2.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclosporin with a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 hTo determine whether administering CsA at a dailydose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously(i.v.) in 2 hrs (short infusion) twice-daily will achieve C2 blood levels of at least 800 mg/l and whether it will be feasible and safe or not. | Drug | Group A, Group B |
Primary outcome
Recording the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) events [Safety and tolerability]
Time frame: Three months following transplantation date
To compare between the administration of twice-daily cyclosporin infusion over two hours versus continuous cyclosporin infusion via recording the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) events
Recording the occurrence of cyclosporine toxicity adverse events [Safety and tolerability]
Time frame: Three months following transplantation date
To compare between the administration of twice-daily cyclosporin infusion over two hours versus continuous cyclosporin infusion via recording the occurrence of cyclosporine toxicity adverse events
2 secondary outcomes
Recording the achievement of C2 (The drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration) blood levels of at least 800 mg/l. [Efficacy]
Time frame: From Transplantation date till 3 months afterward
Correlation with the the area under the concentration-time curve in the first 4 hours after the drug administration (AUC0-4)
Time frame: From Transplantation date till day 8 afterward
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Feb 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39601981El-Awady SMM, El Afifi AM, Afifi R, Sabri NA, Ahmed MA. Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes of Cyclosporine Short Infusion Versus Continuous Infusion Postallogenic Stem Cell Transplantation. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2025 Jan;50(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s13318-024-00927-y. Epub 2024 Nov 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Not decided yet
Related trials for Allogenic Bone Marrow Transplantation
RecruitingObservational study
Improved Methods of Cell Selection for Bone Marrow Transplant Alternatives
Graft-Versus-Host Disease, Graft-versus-leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Study to Determine Drug Metabolism Phenotype and Appropriate Germline Source DNA in Patients Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Leukemia, Lymphoma
RecruitingObservational study
HPC Offered for PRESERVE Expansion
Bone Marrow Transplant (BMT)
RecruitingPhase 2
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Severe Aplastic Anemia and Other Bone Marrow Failure Syndromes Using G-CSF Mobilized CD34+ Selected Hematopoietic Precursor Cells Co-Infused With a Reduced Dose of Non-Mobilized Donor T-cells
Severe Aplastic Anemia, MDS (Myelodysplastic Syndrome)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Allogenic Bone Marrow Transplantation, run by Shaymaa Mohammed El-Awady at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recording the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) events [Safety and tolerability] (time frame: Three months following transplantation date). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04575779, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2023.