AzTrials
AzTrials

Allogenic Bone Marrow TransplantationNCT04575779

Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome of Cyclosporine Short Infusion Versus Continuous Infusion Post Allogenic Stem Cell Transplantation

An observational study of Allogenic Bone Marrow Transplantation, run by Shaymaa Mohammed El-Awady at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study focuses on the basis for current immunosuppressive strategies in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the bone marrow transplantation unit in Ain Shams university hospitals. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Allogenic Bone Marrow Transplantation
What is being tested?
Cyclosporin with a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 h
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
How many people
31 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
10 Jul 2018to 30 May 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with related allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Who may be able to join

  • Adult ages >18 years.
  • Patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation, matched or mismatched related donors.
  • Had never been exposed to cyclosporin before.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a hypersensitivity to cyclosporin or to any of the ingredients of the formulation.
  • Patient with abnormal hepatic functions.
  • Patient with abnormal renal functions with elevated serum creatinine levels in excess of 220 mmol/l at study entry.
  • Patient receiving systemically active azoles within 2 weeks before Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) patients.
  • Patient with body mass index (BMI) above 30 kg/m2.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Shaymaa Mohammed Mohammed Youssef El-Awady

    Cairo

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

This study focuses on the basis for current immunosuppressive strategies in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the bone marrow transplantation unit in Ain Shams university hospitals. It discusses whether there is room for improving both the monitoring and the delivery of pharmacologically mediated immunosuppression in this population of patients. Our study will try to determine whether CsA administration at a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously (IV) in 2 hrs (short infusion) twice-daily will achieve C2 blood levels of at least 800 mg/l and whether it will be feasible and safe or not.

Read the detailed description

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) is considered as a curative treatment for patients with haematological malignancies like leukaemia, myelodysplasia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. However, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) both in its acute and chronic forms, has limited the benefits of allogeneic HSCT by significant morbidity and mortality.

Pharmacological suppression of the donor-derived alloreactive immune response has played a central role in reducing the morbidity and mortality of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), which remains the major cause of toxicity after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT).

Graft versus host disease (GvHD) is a condition that might occur after an allogenic transplant, In GvHD, the donated bone marrow or peripheral blood stem cells view the recipient's body as foreign, and the donated cells/bone marrow attack the body. There are two forms of GvHD: Acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) and Chronic graft versus host disease (cGvHD). As an allogeneic transplant recipient, the patient might experience either form of GvHD, both forms, or neither.

Acute GvHD, which results from an interaction of donor T lymphocytes with the recipient's antigens, occurs in approximately 30%-60% of patients after allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT). At the same time, it has become clear that the intensity of post-transplant immunosuppression is one of the most important determinants of relapse risk through its impact on the potency of an immunologically mediated graft-versus leukaemia (GVL) effect.

Among the variety of immunosuppressants available, cyclosporin A (CsA) has been the most extensively used drug to prevent or treat graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, since its introduction in the 1970s. It has been shown that CsA is effective in preventing and controlling acute and chronic GvHD.

Cyclosporine is an immunosuppressive agent, a metabolite extracted from the fungus Tolypocladium. It is a potent suppressor of the immune system, particularly T-lymphocytes. Cyclosporine binds to the intracellular receptor cyclophilin, subsequently inhibiting cytokine production, including interleukin-2 and 4, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, and interferon-gamma, which leads to impairment of normal lymphoid cell activation.

Other mechanisms may contribute to immunosuppression. Cyclosporine is cell cycle phase-specific; lymphocytes in the G0 or G1 phase of the cell cycle are specifically and reversibly inhibited. Direct cytotoxic effects on T- and B-lymphocytes have also been demonstrated.

The cyclosporine (CsA) acts in a concentration-dependent rather than a time-dependent fashion. It has been shown that the most significant pharmacodynamic effect occurs within the first two h of exposure (C2) at peak CsA levels of 800-2285 mg/l which result in 70-96% calcineurin inhibition and maximum suppression of IL-2 release from T cells.

Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine (CsA) is highly complex and affected by many factors like demographics, concurrent medications and type of primary disease for which transplantation was indicated. Moreover, the complexity of CsA pharmacokinetics is increasing in critically ill patients in acute post-transplantation phase due to the presence of additional several clinical factors simultaneously affecting the in-vivo behaviour of CsA. This made very little research investigating the pharmacokinetic behaviour of CsA in acute post-transplantation period.

This study will focus on the basis for current immunosuppressive strategies in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation at the bone marrow transplantation unit in Ain Shams university hospitals and discuss whether there is room for improving both the monitoring and the delivery of pharmacologically mediated immunosuppression in this population of patients.

Although it has already been known that the clinical effect of the cyclosporine (CsA) depends on the reached concentration levels in the blood, the best way of therapeutic monitoring of this drug is not universally accepted. The measurement of the drug concentration. level in the blood prior to the administration of the next successive dose (C0) and dosing of the drug on the basis of this drug concentration, represents the more common way of CsA therapeutic monitoring. Recently, it has been shown that C0 does not correlate well with the episodes of acute rejection, and undesirable drug effects as well.

Many studies showed that the absorption, but not the elimination phase, is primarily significant for the cyclosporine (CsA) effectiveness and that the area under the concentration-time curve in the first 4 hours after the drug administration (AUC0-4) adequately reflects the exposure of the organism to the drug and correlates well with clinical events. It was also shown that out of all drug concentration levels separately measured at some points of time during the absorption phase; the drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration (C2) correlates the best with the area under the concentration-time curve in the first 4 hours after the drug administration (AUC0-4).

In the past few years, considerable refinement has occurred in the pharmacologically mediated immunosuppressive strategies utilized in recipients of solid organ transplants. This has occurred through the use of more precise methods of monitoring established agents, principally cyclosporin (CsA), which have been shown to reduce the risk of graft rejection in the setting of both kidney and liver transplantation. This experience suggests that there may be scope for translating the advances that have been made in the field of solid organ transplantation to recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cells.

The drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration (C2) monitoring has been adopted for renal, liver and heart transplant recipients as the two h peak concentration correlates well with the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from 0 to 4 h after giving the drug and that this predicts the occurrence of acute rejection and nephrotoxicity.

The drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration (C2) monitoring is also associated with clinical benefits as a reduction in graft rejections after solid organ transplantation. Amazingly, data on pharmacokinetics and target C2 levels are lacking in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) patients. Moreover, there is no consensus about how cyclosporin (CsA) should be administered with some centres giving 1 or 2 intermittent infusions and others continuous 24 h infusion. Hence, our study will try to determine whether administering CsA at a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously(i.v.) in 2 hrs (short infusion) twice-daily will achieve C2 blood levels of at least 800 mg/l and whether it will be feasible and safe or not.

Being tested
Cyclosporin with a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 h

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cyclosporin with a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 hDrug

    To determine whether administering CsA at a dailydose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously(i.v.) in 2 hrs (short infusion) twice-daily will achieve C2 blood levels of at least 800 mg/l and whether it will be feasible and safe or not.

Study groups in NCT04575779
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group ACyclosporin of a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 h
Receives: Drug: Cyclosporin with a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 h
Group BAdminister cyclosporin daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day in a continuous infusion over 23 h every 24 h.
Receives: Drug: Cyclosporin with a daily dose of 3 mg/kg/day intravenously over 2 h (short infusion) every 12 h

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Recording the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) events [Safety and tolerability]

    To compare between the administration of twice-daily cyclosporin infusion over two hours versus continuous cyclosporin infusion via recording the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) events

    Measured: Three months following transplantation date

  2. Recording the occurrence of cyclosporine toxicity adverse events [Safety and tolerability]

    To compare between the administration of twice-daily cyclosporin infusion over two hours versus continuous cyclosporin infusion via recording the occurrence of cyclosporine toxicity adverse events

    Measured: Three months following transplantation date

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Recording the achievement of C2 (The drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration) blood levels of at least 800 mg/l. [Efficacy]

    Recording the patient success to achieve C2 (The drug concentration level determined 2 hours after the administration) blood levels of at least 800 mg/l.

    Measured: From Transplantation date till 3 months afterward

  2. Correlation with the the area under the concentration-time curve in the first 4 hours after the drug administration (AUC0-4)

    To determine which of the individual concentrations in the early phase after cyclosporin short infusion over 2 hours shows the best correlation with the the area under the concentration-time curve in the first 4 hours after the drug administration (AUC0-4).

    Measured: From Transplantation date till day 8 afterward

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Oct 2020
  2. Study start10 Jul 2018
  3. Primary completion4 Apr 2021
  4. Study completion30 May 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
31 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04575779
Sponsor's protocol ID
70
Status last verified
Jan 2023
First submitted
19 Sep 2020
Last updated
1 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Not decided yet

Publications

  • El-Awady SMM, El Afifi AM, Afifi R, Sabri NA, Ahmed MA. Evaluation of the Clinical Outcomes of Cyclosporine Short Infusion Versus Continuous Infusion Postallogenic Stem Cell Transplantation. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2025 Jan;50(1):53-64. doi: 10.1007/s13318-024-00927-y. Epub 2024 Nov 27.

    PubMed 39601981

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Allogenic Bone Marrow Transplantation, run by Shaymaa Mohammed El-Awady at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Recording the occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) events [Safety and tolerability] (time frame: Three months following transplantation date). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04575779, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in