Educational ProblemsNCT04578821
Social Justice Advocacy Skills and Ethical Sensitivity
A study testing Educational intervention in people with Educational Problems, run by Nesime Demirören at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of advocacy education on social justice advocacy skills and ethical sensitivity in undergraduate nursing students. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Educational Problems
- What is being tested?
- Educational intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 26 Sep 2019to 26 Dec 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Student who speak very well Turkish
Who cannot join
- Foreign students who do not speak very well Turkish.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Advocacy Education on Developing Social Justice Advocacy Skills and Ethical Sensitivity in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of advocacy education on social justice advocacy skills and ethical sensitivity in undergraduate nursing students.
Read the detailed description
Advocacy is an effort to correct or change situations that affect people, society and systems.The origin of advocacy is to provide active support in the Latin "Advocates" dictionary. It is defined as "defense work" in Turkish dictionary advocacy is an ethical dimension of nursing practices in nursing science that shows how nursing care is needed and how the nurse will approach the individual, group and society in need.Social justice advocacy has an increasing importance as people are affected by pressure from the social system.Disease, weakness and early deaths are more common in ethnic and diverse races, poor people and societies that do not receive services.Within the scope of advocacy, the duties and responsibilities of individuals, families and society have been determined by laws and regulations in order to protect and improve the health of the society. Advocacy is the nurse's professional role and ethical responsibility.Total 80 students (İntervention and control group)was selected randomly from 112 4 th grade student. Students were randomly assigned to the experimental group(n=40) and the control group(n=40). The experimental group students will take advocacy intervention courses The control group students will the routine curriculum. In this study, effect size will be determined with 5% error margin by using sample size power analysis Gpower 3.1.9.2 program. Accordingly, it was calculated that 35 students were included in the intervention and control groups with 5% error margin and 80% power. İt was decided to include at least 40 people in each working group with 20% surplus, considering that they might be lost in data collection. Theoretical education, film and video screening, case study, Social Security Institution (SSİ) Study, WEB based work, The student will preparation of advocacy action plan, students prepared poster and advocacy awareness activity, poster were exhibited at the campus. Data Collection Tools: Student Information Form, Social Justice Advocacy Scale , Moral-Ethical Sensitivity Scale. Statistical Analysis:Similarity of experimental and control groups; number, percentage, average and standard deviation, pre-test, post test; scale scores difference in dependent groups t-test.
- Conditions
- Educational Problems
- Being tested
- Educational intervention
- Keywords
- patient advocacy, justice, social, nursing education
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Educational interventionOther
Educational intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Deney group | Experimental | Education Program:The education program consists of theoretical didactic education, case discussion, film and video screening in class, Web-based laboratory work, SSI practice, poster preparation and awareness activities for a total of 12 weeks and 2 hours per week (24 hours per week).
Theoretical didactic education, film screening, video screening, Web-based laboratory work, Social Security Institution study, poster preparation, poster presentation at University Campus. Receives: Other: Educational intervention |
| Kontrol group | No intervention | The control group participated in the courses and practices included in the routine curriculum. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Social Justice Advocacy Scale score level
Score level of social justice advocacy skill before advocacy education
Measured: At the beginning of advocacy education, an avarage of 1 hour
Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire score level
Score level of moral sensitivity questionnaire before advocacy education. Similarity of experimental and control groups; number, percentage, average and standard deviation.
Measured: At the beginning of advocacy education, an avarage of 1 hour
Secondary outcomes (2)
Social Justice Advocacy Scale
Changes in the score level of social justice advocacy skill after advocacy education
Measured: 12 weeks
Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire
Changes in the score level of moral sensitivity questionnaire
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2020
- Study start26 Sep 2019
- Primary completion3 Oct 2019
- Study completion26 Dec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Educational ProblemsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Nesime Demirören
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Necmettin Erbakan University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Nesime Demirören, Necmettin Erbakan University
- Investigators
- Nesime DEMİRÖREN, Principal investigator, Selcuk UniversityNesime DEMİRÖREN, Principal investigator, Necmettin Erbakan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04578821
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- t5y4gddx
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 10 Sep 2020
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Study protocol
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Advocacy Education on Developing Social Justice Advocacy Skills and Ethical Sensitivity in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04578821
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- t5y4gddx
- Conditions
- Educational Problems
- Keywords
- patient advocacy, justice, social, nursing education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Nesime DemirörenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Necmettin Erbakan University
- Study start
- 26 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of advocacy education on social justice advocacy skills and ethical sensitivity in undergraduate nursing students.
Detailed description
Advocacy is an effort to correct or change situations that affect people, society and systems.The origin of advocacy is to provide active support in the Latin "Advocates" dictionary. It is defined as "defense work" in Turkish dictionary advocacy is an ethical dimension of nursing practices in nursing science that shows how nursing care is needed and how the nurse will approach the individual, group and society in need.Social justice advocacy has an increasing importance as people are affected by pressure from the social system.Disease, weakness and early deaths are more common in ethnic and diverse races, poor people and societies that do not receive services.Within the scope of advocacy, the duties and responsibilities of individuals, families and society have been determined by laws and regulations in order to protect and improve the health of the society. Advocacy is the nurse's professional role and ethical responsibility.Total 80 students (İntervention and control group)was selected randomly from 112 4 th grade student. Students were randomly assigned to the experimental group(n=40) and the control group(n=40). The experimental group students will take advocacy intervention courses The control group students will the routine curriculum. In this study, effect size will be determined with 5% error margin by using sample size power analysis Gpower 3.1.9.2 program. Accordingly, it was calculated that 35 students were included in the intervention and control groups with 5% error margin and 80% power. İt was decided to include at least 40 people in each working group with 20% surplus, considering that they might be lost in data collection. Theoretical education, film and video screening, case study, Social Security Institution (SSİ) Study, WEB based work, The student will preparation of advocacy action plan, students prepared poster and advocacy awareness activity, poster were exhibited at the campus. Data Collection Tools: Student Information Form, Social Justice Advocacy Scale , Moral-Ethical Sensitivity Scale. Statistical Analysis:Similarity of experimental and control groups; number, percentage, average and standard deviation, pre-test, post test; scale scores difference in dependent groups t-test.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Deney group | Experimental | Other: Educational interventionEducation Program:The education program consists of theoretical didactic education, case discussion, film and video screening in class, Web-based laboratory work, SSI practice, poster preparation and awareness activities for a total of 12 weeks and 2 hours per week (24 hours per week). Theoretical didactic education, film screening, video screening, Web-based laboratory work, Social Security Institution study, poster preparation, poster presentation at University Campus. |
| Kontrol group | No intervention | –The control group participated in the courses and practices included in the routine curriculum. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Student who speak very well Turkish
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Foreign students who do not speak very well Turkish.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Educational interventionEducational intervention | Other | Deney group |
Primary outcome
Social Justice Advocacy Scale score level
Time frame: At the beginning of advocacy education, an avarage of 1 hour
Score level of social justice advocacy skill before advocacy education
Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire score level
Time frame: At the beginning of advocacy education, an avarage of 1 hour
Score level of moral sensitivity questionnaire before advocacy education. Similarity of experimental and control groups; number, percentage, average and standard deviation.
2 secondary outcomes
Social Justice Advocacy Scale
Time frame: 12 weeks
Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Study protocol
Related trials for Educational Problems
Not yet recruiting
Standardized Educational Videos of Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgeries
Educational Problems, Surgery
Active, not recruiting
Impact of Surgical Coaching on Resident ObGyn Laparoscopic Skills
Educational Problems
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of a Couple-based Psycho-socio-educational Intervention Using WeChat/WhatsApp on Dyadic Psychological and Sleep Outcomes
Sleep Problems, Psychological
Active, not recruiting
Fostering Healthy Futures for Teens: An RCT
Child Abuse, Child Neglect
Recruiting
Health Equity and Rural Education (HERE!) Clinical Trial
Behavioral Symptoms, Community Health Workers
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nesime DEMİRÖREN principal investigator
Selcuk University
Nesime DEMİRÖREN principal investigator
Necmettin Erbakan University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Educational intervention in people with Educational Problems, run by Nesime Demirören at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Social Justice Advocacy Scale score level (time frame: At the beginning of advocacy education, an avarage of 1 hour). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2020.