HemodynamicsNCT04585568
Validation of Ballistocardiographic Biosensors and Other Hemodynamic Measures for Healthy Subjects
An observational study of Hemodynamics and Biosensors, run by Oslo University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
Ballistocardiographic (BCG) biosensors reflecting the patients' current state is established. There are few studies documenting BCG biosensors efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemodynamics, Biosensors, Cardiac
- What is being tested?
- Biosensors
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- 28 Sep 2020to 30 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Paramedic students recruited free of will.
Who may be able to join
- Healthy subjects who have signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Sick subjects at test day
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Validation and Comparison of Ballistocardiographic Biosensors and Other Hemodynamic Measures for Healthy Subjects During Different Situations
Ballistocardiographic (BCG) biosensors reflecting the patients' current state is established. There are few studies documenting BCG biosensors efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency. In addition, technologies using invasive blood pressure curves and Near Infrared Regional Spectrometry (NIRS) to measure hemodynamics have been used. Using these technologies to guide clinical decisions may be an major advance for patients with acute and chronic diseases. The investigators will explore how these technologies compares to well established technologies measuring vital signs of healthy subjects. The investigators will use live continuous and non-continuous biosensor data to monitor the development of vital parameters during different scenarios. The study will document how CPD measured by biosensors, cerebral oximetry measured by NIRS, and invasive blood pressure curves measured by FloTrac™ are compared to established technologies of vital organ functionality.
Data will be measured continuously and documented simultanuously with technologies such as Doppler Echocardiography, transthoracic impedance (TTI), Electrocardiogram (ECG), invasive blood pressure [cardiac output/index (CO/CI), stroke volume/stroke volume index (SV/SVI), stroke volume variation/pulse pressure variation (SVV/PPV), systemic vascular resistance/ systemic vascular resistance index (SVR/SVRI), mean arterial pressure (MAP)], pulse oximetry (SpO2) and cerebral oximetry (rSO2). Of special interest is to document how relative heart stroke volume reflects blood flow documented by the parallel technology measures. All these measures are the key part in the study to document user friendliness, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and correlations.
The main research question is whether adding BCG biosensor measures, cerebral oximetry and invasive blood pressure to monitor vital signs will add meaningful information to the care of patients in a situation where we are able to control all the factors that may impact these measures. The aim of the study is to document (correlation, sensitivity and specificity) how BCG biosensors perform compared to each other and to well established technologies used for monitoring blood flow, blood pressure, heart rate and respiration rate in steady state and during ambulance transport. In addition, the investigators will in a controlled manner measure how established maneuvers like Trendelenburg, hypo-/hyperventilation, and bolus of fluid influences our measures.
Read the detailed description
Ballistocardiographic (BCG) biosensors collecting continuous physiological data (CPD) in real time to generate information reflecting the patients' current state is established and have become more useful in monitoring vital signs of subjects and patients. There are few studies documenting BCG biosensors efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency. Using CPD to guide clinical decisions may be a major advance for patients with acute and chronic diseases. In addition, technologies using invasive blood pressure curves and Near Infrared Regional Spectrometry (NIRS) to measure hemodynamics have been used. This may drive the evolution from episodic to continuous patient care for these patients experiencing a severe medical event compromising blood flow. The investigators will explore how these technologies compares to well established technologies measuring vital signs of healthy subjects. In the present study the investigators will use live continuous and non-continuous biosensor data to monitor the development of vital parameters during different scenarios. The study will document how CPD measured by biosensors, cerebral oximetry measured by NIRS, and invasive blood pressure curves measured by FloTracTM are compared to established technologies of vital organ functionality.
In the present study data will be measured continuously and in phases of the study simultaneously with other well established technologies such as Doppler Echocardiography, transthoracic impedance (TTI), Electrocardiogram (ECG), invasive blood pressure [cardiac output/index (CO/CI), stroke volume/stroke volume index (SV/SVI), stroke volume variation/pulse pressure variation (SVV/PPV), systemic vascular resistance/ systemic vascular resistance index (SVR/SVRI), mean arterial pressure (MAP)], pulse oximetry (SpO2) and cerebral oximetry (rSO2). Based on this the investigators believe they will be able to pick up how dynamic differences develop. Of special interest is to document how relative heart stroke volume reflects blood flow documented by the parallel technology measures. HRV will also be evaluated in the light of other measures such as pulse, respiration, and relative stroke volume. All these measures are the key part in the study to document user friendliness, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and correlations.
The main research question is whether adding BCG biosensor measures, cerebral oximetry and invasive blood pressure to monitor vital signs will add meaningful information to the care of patients in a situation where we are able to control all the factors that may impact these measures. The aim of the study is to document (correlation, sensitivity and specificity) how BCG biosensors perform compared to each other and to well established technologies used for monitoring blood flow, blood pressure, heart rate and respiration rate in steady state and during ambulance transport. In addition, the investigators will in a controlled manner measure how established maneuvers like Trendelenburg, hypo-/hyperventilation, and bolus of fluid influences our measures.
- Conditions
- Hemodynamics, Biosensors, Cardiac
- Being tested
- Biosensors
- Keywords
- blood flow, correlations, ballistocardiography, invasive blood pressure, cardiac output, doppler eccocardiography
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BiosensorsOther
Also called FloTrac, Doppler eccocardiography
Measures of blood flow and preassures
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Correlation between different measures of hemodynamics
Calculated based on a number of hemodynamic measures listed in the protocol
Measured: September to December
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Oct 2020
- Study start28 Sep 2020
- Primary completion30 Sep 2020
- Study completion30 Sep 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HemodynamicsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Oslo University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Norwegian Telemedicine, Kopera Norway, Edwards Lifesciences, Stryker Medical, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), University of Stavanger
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lars Wik, Oslo University Hospital
- Investigators
- Lars Wik, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Oslo University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04585568
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 153368
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 1 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 14 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Based on informed consent this will be done with those parties listed.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation and Comparison of Ballistocardiographic Biosensors and Other Hemodynamic Measures for Healthy Subjects During Different Situations
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04585568
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 153368
- Conditions
- Hemodynamics, Biosensors, Cardiac
- Keywords
- blood flow, correlations, ballistocardiography, invasive blood pressure, cardiac output, doppler eccocardiography
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Norwegian Telemedicine, Kopera Norway, Edwards Lifesciences, Stryker Medical, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), University of Stavanger
- Study start
- 28 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Ballistocardiographic (BCG) biosensors reflecting the patients' current state is established. There are few studies documenting BCG biosensors efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency. In addition, technologies using invasive blood pressure curves and Near Infrared Regional Spectrometry (NIRS) to measure hemodynamics have been used. Using these technologies to guide clinical decisions may be an major advance for patients with acute and chronic diseases. The investigators will explore how these technologies compares to well established technologies measuring vital signs of healthy subjects. The investigators will use live continuous and non-continuous biosensor data to monitor the development of vital parameters during different scenarios. The study will document how CPD measured by biosensors, cerebral oximetry measured by NIRS, and invasive blood pressure curves measured by FloTrac™ are compared to established technologies of vital organ functionality.
Data will be measured continuously and documented simultanuously with technologies such as Doppler Echocardiography, transthoracic impedance (TTI), Electrocardiogram (ECG), invasive blood pressure [cardiac output/index (CO/CI), stroke volume/stroke volume index (SV/SVI), stroke volume variation/pulse pressure variation (SVV/PPV), systemic vascular resistance/ systemic vascular resistance index (SVR/SVRI), mean arterial pressure (MAP)], pulse oximetry (SpO2) and cerebral oximetry (rSO2). Of special interest is to document how relative heart stroke volume reflects blood flow documented by the parallel technology measures. All these measures are the key part in the study to document user friendliness, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and correlations.
The main research question is whether adding BCG biosensor measures, cerebral oximetry and invasive blood pressure to monitor vital signs will add meaningful information to the care of patients in a situation where we are able to control all the factors that may impact these measures. The aim of the study is to document (correlation, sensitivity and specificity) how BCG biosensors perform compared to each other and to well established technologies used for monitoring blood flow, blood pressure, heart rate and respiration rate in steady state and during ambulance transport. In addition, the investigators will in a controlled manner measure how established maneuvers like Trendelenburg, hypo-/hyperventilation, and bolus of fluid influences our measures.
Detailed description
Ballistocardiographic (BCG) biosensors collecting continuous physiological data (CPD) in real time to generate information reflecting the patients' current state is established and have become more useful in monitoring vital signs of subjects and patients. There are few studies documenting BCG biosensors efficacy, effectiveness, and efficiency. Using CPD to guide clinical decisions may be a major advance for patients with acute and chronic diseases. In addition, technologies using invasive blood pressure curves and Near Infrared Regional Spectrometry (NIRS) to measure hemodynamics have been used. This may drive the evolution from episodic to continuous patient care for these patients experiencing a severe medical event compromising blood flow. The investigators will explore how these technologies compares to well established technologies measuring vital signs of healthy subjects. In the present study the investigators will use live continuous and non-continuous biosensor data to monitor the development of vital parameters during different scenarios. The study will document how CPD measured by biosensors, cerebral oximetry measured by NIRS, and invasive blood pressure curves measured by FloTracTM are compared to established technologies of vital organ functionality.
In the present study data will be measured continuously and in phases of the study simultaneously with other well established technologies such as Doppler Echocardiography, transthoracic impedance (TTI), Electrocardiogram (ECG), invasive blood pressure [cardiac output/index (CO/CI), stroke volume/stroke volume index (SV/SVI), stroke volume variation/pulse pressure variation (SVV/PPV), systemic vascular resistance/ systemic vascular resistance index (SVR/SVRI), mean arterial pressure (MAP)], pulse oximetry (SpO2) and cerebral oximetry (rSO2). Based on this the investigators believe they will be able to pick up how dynamic differences develop. Of special interest is to document how relative heart stroke volume reflects blood flow documented by the parallel technology measures. HRV will also be evaluated in the light of other measures such as pulse, respiration, and relative stroke volume. All these measures are the key part in the study to document user friendliness, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and correlations.
The main research question is whether adding BCG biosensor measures, cerebral oximetry and invasive blood pressure to monitor vital signs will add meaningful information to the care of patients in a situation where we are able to control all the factors that may impact these measures. The aim of the study is to document (correlation, sensitivity and specificity) how BCG biosensors perform compared to each other and to well established technologies used for monitoring blood flow, blood pressure, heart rate and respiration rate in steady state and during ambulance transport. In addition, the investigators will in a controlled manner measure how established maneuvers like Trendelenburg, hypo-/hyperventilation, and bolus of fluid influences our measures.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Paramedic students recruited free of will.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Healthy subjects who have signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Sick subjects at test day
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BiosensorsAlso: FloTrac, Doppler eccocardiographyMeasures of blood flow and preassures | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Correlation between different measures of hemodynamics
Time frame: September to December
Calculated based on a number of hemodynamic measures listed in the protocol
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Oct 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Based on informed consent this will be done with those parties listed.
Related trials for Hemodynamics
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
CAROTID DOPPLER AND CEREBRAL OXIMERY IN POST CARDIAC ARREST ICU PATIENTS
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Carotid Doppler
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diastolic Shock Index for Predicting Hemodynamic Instability During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
Acute Kidney Injury, Hypotension (MeSH: D007022)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lars Wik, MD, PhD principal investigator
Oslo University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Hemodynamics and Biosensors, run by Oslo University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Correlation between different measures of hemodynamics (time frame: September to December). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2020.