AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiac ArrestCALMENCT04589559

The Care After Life-threatening Medical Events Study

A study testing Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Training in people with Cardiac Arrest and Fear, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study tests the feasibility of a home-based heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) intervention in survivors of cardiac arrest (CA). Specifically, the primary purpose of this pilot study is to assess feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, usability, and compliance for an at-home, 3-week HRVB intervention… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cardiac Arrest, Fear
What is being tested?
Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
23 Nov 2020to 23 Jul 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Fluent in English
  • A diagnosis of cardiac arrest (CA)
  • Time elapsed since their CA is less than 72 months
  • Elevated post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom total scores on the 17-item Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) of 30 or higher (i.e., greater than the median in a prior sample of cardiac arrest survivors) or elevated PCL-5 scores of 30 or higher or Acute Stress Disorder Scale (ASDS) scores of 34 or higher
  • Owns either an iPhone or Android smartphone in order to run the app involved in the intervention

Who cannot join

  • Breathing difficulty that does not allow participant to complete the intervention
  • Inability to comply with the protocol (either self-selected or indicated during screening that s/he could not complete all requested tasks). This includes, but is not limited to, patients with a level of cognitive impairment indicative of dementia and patients with current alcohol or substance abuse, and patients with severe mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: The Care After Life-threatening Medical Events (CALME) Pilot Study: An Investigation of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Training

This study tests the feasibility of a home-based heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) intervention in survivors of cardiac arrest (CA). Specifically, the primary purpose of this pilot study is to assess feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, usability, and compliance for an at-home, 3-week HRVB intervention in 10 participants. The study also tests whether cardiac-related interoceptive fear, trait anxiety, and negative affect decrease among CA survivors completing the HRVB intervention.

Read the detailed description

HRV biofeedback is a technique that combines slow paced breathing with the use of accurate, moment-to-moment physiological monitoring. The goal is to make internal cardiac information available to people in order to help them learn how to increase the beat-to-beat variability in their heart's activity and thereby increase parasympathetic activity of the autonomic nervous system. Apart from active interventions such as exercise training that reliably increase HRV but that may be inappropriate for many cardiac patients, HRV biofeedback is an easy-to-implement technique which allows people to monitor and then ultimately alter their parasympathetic activity.

Research is needed to determine whether HRV biofeedback training has beneficial consequences for mental and cardiovascular health in patients who have experienced serious, life-threatening cardiac events. The investigator believes that cardiac arrest survivors, in particular, may stand to benefit from such an intervention because many of them experience clinically significant psychological distress after their medical event.

Distressed cardiac patients may be especially motivated to learn to influence their own heart activity in order to improve their own HRV, reduce their cardiovascular risk, and lessen their symptoms of psychological distress. Therefore, it may be wise to harness this motivation in the service of helping these patients deliberately learn to alter their own autonomic activity rather than simply breathing at a rate that automatically improves HRV without any learning process. By providing patients with an external (e.g., visual) form of feedback about their otherwise largely inaccessible autonomic physiology (i.e., vagus nerve activity), the investigator will conduct a feasibility study of HRV biofeedback training with the goal of increasing HRV and reducing anxiety symptoms.

The purpose of this pilot study is to examine the feasibility of enrolling 10 participants and assessing the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and usability of the at-home, multi-week HRV biofeedback training as well as participants' compliance with the intervention. Additionally, the purpose of the study is to assess whether participants generally show a decrease in cardiac-related interoceptive fear, a decrease in trait anxiety, a decrease in negative affect, and an increase in HRV during the course of the study. The data collected from participants as part of this feasibility pilot will influence the decision to continue with a larger randomized clinical trial using the methods in this pilot together with a control group. Progress will be monitored with Polar H10 heart rate monitor - a supremely precise heart rate sensor that comes with the Polar Pro chest strap. It will be used with a smartphone app Elite HRV - which is non-experimental.

Conditions
Cardiac Arrest, Fear
Being tested
Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Training
Keywords
Cardiac arrest, Fear, Psychological distress, Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback
Medical subject headings
Heart Arrest

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback TrainingBehavioural

    Also called HRV Biofeedback

    First, participants are taught how to do relaxed, abdominal breathing. Second, they are taught how to breathe at a slow rate of 0.1 Hz (i.e., one completed breath cycle every 10 seconds). Third, they are taught how to monitor their heart rate variability (HRV) in real time using the smartphone app, which receives data wirelessly via Bluetooth from the heart rate monitor. Participants are instructed that their goal is to increase their HRV during the three weeks of at-home practice.

Study groups in NCT04589559
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention: Heart Rate Variability BiofeedbackExperimentalParticipants in this intervention group complete at-home heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) training using a chest-worn heart rate monitor and a smartphone app. They complete at least 10 minutes per day of HRVB training on at least 5 days per week for 3 weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Eligible Cardiac Arrest (CA) Survivors Whom we Approach Who Ultimately Agree to Participate in the Pilot Study

    This is to assess the feasibility of enrollment in the trial. The denominator for this metric is the number of potential participants who were approached and contacted by the study team who were determined to be eligible for the study. The numerator is the number of participants who enrolled in the study (i.e., 10 participants).

    Measured: Baseline/Visit 1

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Percentage of Enrolled Participants Who Complete the Pilot Study

    This is to assess successful program adherence.

    Measured: Pre-training/Visit 2, Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks apart)

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Complete a Majority of the At-home HRVB Sessions for the Pilot Study

    As a measure of intervention compliance, this is to assess the percentage of participants who complete a majority (>= 8 of 15) of the at-home HRVB sessions.

    Measured: Pre-training/Visit 2, Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks apart)

  3. Percentage of Participants Who Report Adequate Feasibility

    This is to assess the intervention's feasibility. The percentage of participants who report scores >= 4 for the feasibility total score reflects the percentage of participants who indicated that the intervention is adequately feasible.

    Measured: Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks)

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Report Adequate Acceptability

    This is to assess the intervention's acceptability. The percentage of participants who report scores >= 4 for the acceptability total score reflects the percentage of participants who indicated that the intervention is adequately acceptable.

    Measured: Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks)

  5. Percentage of Participants Who Report Adequate Appropriateness

    This is to assess the intervention's appropriateness for reducing anxiety, the proportion of participants who report scores >= 4 would be adequate.

    This is to assess the intervention's appropriateness for reducing anxiety. The percentage of participants who report scores >= 4 for the appropriateness-for-reducing-anxiety total score reflects the percentage of participants who indicated that the intervention is adequately appropriate for reducing anxiety.

    Measured: Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks)

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Report Adequate Usability

    We will assess the percentage of participants who report total scores >= 68 for their rating of the intervention's usability using the System Usability Scale.

    Measured: Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks)

  7. Visit-2-to-3 Change in Cardiac-related Interoceptive Fear

    This is to assess the Visit-2-to-3 change in cardiac-related interoceptive fear measured as the within-person difference in the sum of the four cardiac-related items from the physical subscale of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 units on a scale to a maximum of 16 units on a scale. Lower scores indicate lower anxiety.

    Measured: Pre-training/Visit 2, Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks apart)

  8. Visit-2-to-3 Change in Trait Anxiety

    This is to assess the Visit-2-to-3 change in trait anxiety measured as the within-person difference in the total score of the trait version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The total score ranges from a minimum of 20 units on a scale to a maximum of 80 units on a scale. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety.

    Measured: Pre-training/Visit 2, Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks apart)

  9. Visit-2-to-3 Change in Trait Negative Affect

    This is to assess the Visit-2-to-3 change in trait negative affect measured as the within-person difference in the total score of the negative subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. The total score ranges from a minimum of 10 units on a scale to a maximum of 50 units on a scale. Lower scores represent lower levels of Negative Affect.

    Measured: Pre-training/Visit 2, Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks apart)

  10. Heart Rate Variability (HRV)

    This is to assess HRV using participants' exported and deidentified data from the Elite HRV smartphone app. Specifically, HRV is operationalized as the natural log of the root mean square of the successive difference (lnRMSSD), a standard measure of beat-to-beat HRV. This HRV measure is recorded for each at-home training session completed by participants using the app and the heart rate monitor.

    Measured: Up to 3 weeks (starting after Visit 2 and extending until Visit 3)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Oct 2020
  2. Study start23 Nov 2020
  3. Primary completion23 Jul 2021
  4. Study completion23 Jul 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
The intervention involves heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) administered via a smartphone app (Elite HRV) that receives real-time cardiac information from a chest-worn heart rate monitor (Polar H10).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04589559
Sponsor's protocol ID
AAAS9001
Other IDs
P30AG064198
Acronym
CALME
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
14 Oct 2020
Last updated
19 Aug 2022
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Training in people with Cardiac Arrest and Fear, run by Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Aug 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Eligible Cardiac Arrest (CA) Survivors Whom we Approach Who Ultimately Agree to Participate in the Pilot Study (time frame: Baseline/Visit 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in