LonelinessNCT04595708
Telephone Calls for Health for Homebound Older Adults
A study testing Phone Call in people with Loneliness and Social Isolation, run by University of Texas at Austin at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
A randomized controlled trial of the effect of 4 weeks of regular check-in calls, up to 5 per week based on participant's choice and 2 survey collection calls and possible referral of other services, versus no daily check-in calls, on self-reported loneliness measures for current Meals on Wheels participants (MOW). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Loneliness, Social Isolation, Depression
- What is being tested?
- Phone Call
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 6 Jul 2020to 26 Sep 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult (18+) clients of Meals on Wheels of Central Texas
Who cannot join
- Cognitive impairment or in a hospice program.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
A randomized controlled trial of the effect of 4 weeks of regular check-in calls, up to 5 per week based on participant's choice and 2 survey collection calls and possible referral of other services, versus no daily check-in calls, on self-reported loneliness measures for current Meals on Wheels participants (MOW).
Read the detailed description
The intervention arm will include 125 MOW clients to receive a call of between 5 - 10 minutes in length each by a consistent caller, five times a week, Monday through Friday for 4 consecutive weeks to check in on them. After the first week of calls, subjects in the intervention arm will be asked if the frequency of calls is acceptable or if they would like to reduce the call frequency, potentially to a minimum of twice per week.
Brief guidance and training will be provided for the daily conversation to maximize time spent speaking by the recipient but otherwise, the calls are unscripted other than specific prompts to ask about the recipient's general sense of well-being. "How are you doing today?"
The control Arm will include 125 MOW clients who will be randomized to a control group that will not receive the intervention calls. The control group will receive calls from a member of the research team at the beginning of the study to collect baseline survey data and at the post-4-week period to collect post-study survey data.
- Conditions
- Loneliness, Social Isolation, Depression
- Being tested
- Phone Call
- Medical subject headings
- Social Isolation, Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Phone CallBehavioural
Calls were made by volunteers trained to engage with participants. Call structure was unscripted and call length was recommended to be between 5-10 min.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention - Calls | Experimental | Participants randomized to the intervention will receive a call of between 5 - 10 minutes in length each by a consistent caller, five times a week, Monday through Friday for 4 consecutive weeks to check in on them. After the first week of calls, subjects in the intervention arm will be asked if the frequency of calls is acceptable or if they would like to reduce the call frequency, potentially to a minimum of twice per week. Receives: Behavioral: Phone Call |
| Control - No calls | No intervention | Participants randomized to a control group will not receive the intervention calls. The control group will receive calls from a member of the research team at the beginning of the study to collect baseline survey data and at the post-4-week period to collect post-study survey data. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Loneliness as assessed by the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale
Investigators will use the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness 6-Item Scale for Overall, Emotional, and Social Loneliness. Scored from 0-6, a score of 0 indicates least lonely while a score of 6 indicates most lonely.
Measured: 4 weeks
Loneliness as Assessed by the UCLA Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys
Investigators will use the UCLA Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys to measure loneliness. Scored from 3-9, higher scores indicate greater degrees of loneliness.
Measured: 4 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Depression as Assessed by the 8-item Depression Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)
Investigators will use the Depression Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8) to measure depression. Scored from 0-3, and a score of 0 indicates lower levels of depression while a score of 3 indicates higher levels of depression.
Measured: 4 weeks
Anxiety as Assessed by the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)
Investigators will use the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) to measure anxiety. Scored from 0-3, and a score of 0 indicates lower levels of anxiety while a score of 3 indicates higher levels of anxiety.
Measured: 4 weeks
Health Status and Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form-12 Question Survey
Investigators will use the Short Form-12 question survey to measure physical and mental health status. Summary scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating a better self-reported level of health.
Measured: 4 weeks
Social Engagement as Assess by the Short Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS)
Investigators will use the 6-item Short Lubben Social Network Scale to measure social engagement. For the LSNS-6, the score ranges between 0 and 30, with a higher score indicating more social engagement.
Measured: 4 weeks
Empathy as Assessed by The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure
Investigators will use the CARE Measure to evaluate measures of empathy in the context of the caller/participant relationship
Measured: After the 4 week intervention (follow-up)
Toronto Empathy Questionnaire
The Toronto Empathy Questionnaire will be used to assess characteristics of callers that align with measures of ability to be empathetic.
Measured: Prior to the 4 week intervention (baseline)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Oct 2020
- Study start6 Jul 2020
- Primary completion24 Sep 2020
- Study completion26 Sep 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for LonelinessStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Texas at AustinThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas at Austin
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Meals on Wheels Central Texas
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maninder Kahlon, University of Texas at Austin
- Investigators
- Maninder Kahlon, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Texas at Austin
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04595708
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2020-05-0009
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):227-37. doi: 10.1177/1745691614568352.
PubMed 25910392Anderson, G., Thayer, C. . Loneliness and Social Connections: A National Survey of Adults 45 and Older. Washington, DC: AARP Research, September 2018. https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00246.001.
Cacioppo JT, Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Thisted RA. Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychol Aging. 2006 Mar;21(1):140-51. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140.
PubMed 16594799Steger MF, Kashdan TB. Depression and Everyday Social Activity, Belonging, and Well-Being. J Couns Psychol. 2009 Apr;56(2):289-300. doi: 10.1037/a0015416.
PubMed 20428460Derksen F, Bensing J, Lagro-Janssen A. Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jan;63(606):e76-84. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X660814.
PubMed 23336477Kahlon MK, Aksan N, Aubrey R. Effect of a Layperson-Delivered Telephone Program for People With Depressive Symptoms. Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Nov 1;74(11):1176-1179. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220440. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
PubMed 37042110Kahlon MK, Aksan N, Aubrey R, Clark N, Cowley-Morillo M, Jacobs EA, Mundhenk R, Sebastian KR, Tomlinson S. Effect of Layperson-Delivered, Empathy-Focused Program of Telephone Calls on Loneliness, Depression, and Anxiety Among Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 1;78(6):616-622. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0113.
PubMed 33620417
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Telephone Calls for Health for Homebound Older Adults
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04595708
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2020-05-0009
- Conditions
- Loneliness, Social Isolation, Depression
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Texas at AustinUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Meals on Wheels Central Texas
- Study start
- 6 Jul 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Sep 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A randomized controlled trial of the effect of 4 weeks of regular check-in calls, up to 5 per week based on participant's choice and 2 survey collection calls and possible referral of other services, versus no daily check-in calls, on self-reported loneliness measures for current Meals on Wheels participants (MOW).
Detailed description
The intervention arm will include 125 MOW clients to receive a call of between 5 - 10 minutes in length each by a consistent caller, five times a week, Monday through Friday for 4 consecutive weeks to check in on them. After the first week of calls, subjects in the intervention arm will be asked if the frequency of calls is acceptable or if they would like to reduce the call frequency, potentially to a minimum of twice per week.
Brief guidance and training will be provided for the daily conversation to maximize time spent speaking by the recipient but otherwise, the calls are unscripted other than specific prompts to ask about the recipient's general sense of well-being. "How are you doing today?"
The control Arm will include 125 MOW clients who will be randomized to a control group that will not receive the intervention calls. The control group will receive calls from a member of the research team at the beginning of the study to collect baseline survey data and at the post-4-week period to collect post-study survey data.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention - Calls | Experimental | Behavioral: Phone CallParticipants randomized to the intervention will receive a call of between 5 - 10 minutes in length each by a consistent caller, five times a week, Monday through Friday for 4 consecutive weeks to check in on them. After the first week of calls, subjects in the intervention arm will be asked if the frequency of calls is acceptable or if they would like to reduce the call frequency, potentially to a minimum of twice per week. |
| Control - No calls | No intervention | –Participants randomized to a control group will not receive the intervention calls. The control group will receive calls from a member of the research team at the beginning of the study to collect baseline survey data and at the post-4-week period to collect post-study survey data. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult (18+) clients of Meals on Wheels of Central Texas
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Cognitive impairment or in a hospice program.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Phone CallCalls were made by volunteers trained to engage with participants. Call structure was unscripted and call length was recommended to be between 5-10 min. | Behavioural | Intervention - Calls |
Primary outcome
Loneliness as assessed by the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale
Time frame: 4 weeks
Investigators will use the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness 6-Item Scale for Overall, Emotional, and Social Loneliness. Scored from 0-6, a score of 0 indicates least lonely while a score of 6 indicates most lonely.
Loneliness as Assessed by the UCLA Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys
Time frame: 4 weeks
Investigators will use the UCLA Short Scale for Measuring Loneliness in Large Surveys to measure loneliness. Scored from 3-9, higher scores indicate greater degrees of loneliness.
6 secondary outcomes
Depression as Assessed by the 8-item Depression Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Anxiety as Assessed by the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Health Status and Quality of Life as Assessed by the Short Form-12 Question Survey
Time frame: 4 weeks
Social Engagement as Assess by the Short Lubben Social Network Scale (LSNS)
Time frame: 4 weeks
Empathy as Assessed by The Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure
Time frame: After the 4 week intervention (follow-up)
Toronto Empathy Questionnaire
Time frame: Prior to the 4 week intervention (baseline)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2021.
- Background: PubMed 25910392Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Baker M, Harris T, Stephenson D. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):227-37. doi: 10.1177/1745691614568352.
- BackgroundAnderson, G., Thayer, C. . Loneliness and Social Connections: A National Survey of Adults 45 and Older. Washington, DC: AARP Research, September 2018. https://doi.org/10.26419/res.00246.001.
- Background: PubMed 16594799Cacioppo JT, Hughes ME, Waite LJ, Hawkley LC, Thisted RA. Loneliness as a specific risk factor for depressive symptoms: cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Psychol Aging. 2006 Mar;21(1):140-51. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.140.
- Background: PubMed 20428460Steger MF, Kashdan TB. Depression and Everyday Social Activity, Belonging, and Well-Being. J Couns Psychol. 2009 Apr;56(2):289-300. doi: 10.1037/a0015416.
- Background: PubMed 23336477Derksen F, Bensing J, Lagro-Janssen A. Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jan;63(606):e76-84. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X660814.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37042110Kahlon MK, Aksan N, Aubrey R. Effect of a Layperson-Delivered Telephone Program for People With Depressive Symptoms. Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Nov 1;74(11):1176-1179. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220440. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33620417Kahlon MK, Aksan N, Aubrey R, Clark N, Cowley-Morillo M, Jacobs EA, Mundhenk R, Sebastian KR, Tomlinson S. Effect of Layperson-Delivered, Empathy-Focused Program of Telephone Calls on Loneliness, Depression, and Anxiety Among Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 1;78(6):616-622. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0113.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Loneliness
RecruitingObservational study
Student Precarity and Psychiatry
Depressive Disorder, Major, Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Hangeoreum: A Self-Paced Web-Based Program for Loneliness and Connectedness Among Korean Immigrants Aged 50 and Older
Loneliness, Korean
Not yet recruiting
Interpersonal Relational Role Analysis Group Therapy for Nursing Students at Risk of Internet Addiction
Internet Addiction
Active, not recruiting
PREWELL Digital Well-being Promotion Intervention With the BitHabit App
General Mental Health and Well-Being, Mental Disorders
Recruiting
Intergenerational Interaction Program for Nursing Home Residents and Nursing Students
Ageism, Loneliness
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maninder Kahlon, PhD principal investigator
University of Texas at Austin
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Phone Call in people with Loneliness and Social Isolation, run by University of Texas at Austin at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Loneliness as assessed by the De Jong Gierveld Loneliness Scale (time frame: 4 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04595708, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2021.