AzTrials
AzTrials

Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornNCT04597333

Labor Induction After Failed Induction With Dinoprostone.

A study testing Dinoprostone and Cervical ripening balloon. in people with Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn, run by Rambam Health Care Campus at 1 site in Israel.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Women after induction of labor with a dinoprostone insert will be evaluated after 24 hours from the beginning of labor induction. Women with a BISHOP score of less than 5 will be randomized to 1 of 2 groups. Induction with a cervical ripening balloon versus induction with a 2nd dinoprostone insert. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
What is being tested?
Dinoprostone and Cervical ripening balloon.
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
144 participants
Where
1 siteIsrael
Study dates
15 Oct 2020to 31 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women after induction of labor with Dinoprostone.
  • BISHOP score of under 5 after 1st induction attempt.
  • Nulliparous women.

Who cannot join

  • Women after induction of labor with a cervical ripening balloon.
  • BISHOP score of over 5 after 1st induction attempt.
  • Multiparous women.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Israel1 site
  • Rambam health care campus

    Haifa

Other trials in Israel

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Cervical Ripening Balloon Versus 2nd Dinoprostone Insert for Labor Induction in Women With a Failed 1st Attempt of Induction With Dinoprostone.

Women after induction of labor with a dinoprostone insert will be evaluated after 24 hours from the beginning of labor induction. Women with a BISHOP score of less than 5 will be randomized to 1 of 2 groups. Induction with a cervical ripening balloon versus induction with a 2nd dinoprostone insert.

Read the detailed description

Nulliparous women with obstetric indications for induction of labor who were induced with a dinoprostone insert and failed to go into labor after 24 hours from the beginning of labor induction and a BISHOP score of less than 5 will receive a thorough explanation regarding the study and sign informed consent. The eligible women will be randomized to 1 of 2 groups. Induction with a cervical ripening balloon versus induction with a 2nd dinoprostone insert. Relevant demographic and medical information will be gathered from the patients' electronic files.

Being tested
Dinoprostone, Cervical ripening balloon.

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DinoprostoneDrug

    Dinoprostone vaginal insert.

  • Cervical ripening balloon.Device

    Double lumen cervical ripening balloon.

Study groups in NCT04597333
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
2nd Dinoprostone.Active comparatorWomen induced with a second dinoprostone insert.
Receives: Drug: Dinoprostone
Cervical ripening balloon.Active comparatorWomen induced with a cervical ripening balloon.
Receives: Device: Cervical ripening balloon.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Delivery within 24 hours.

    Rate of delivery in 24 hours.

    Measured: From the time of induction up to 24 hours from induction.

  2. Time to delivery.

    The number of hours it takes to deliver.

    Measured: From the time of induction up to 120 hours from induction.

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Mode of delivery.

    Vaginal and cesarean delivery rates.

    Measured: From the time of induction up to 120 hours from induction.

  2. Uterine revision.

    The rate of uterine revision postpartum.

    Measured: From the time of induction up to 120 hours from induction.

  3. Postpartum hemorrhage.

    The rate of postpartum hemorrhage.

    Measured: From the time of induction up to 120 hours from induction.

  4. Chorioamnionitis.

    The rate of chorioamnionitis.

    Measured: From the time of induction up to 120 hours from induction.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2020
  2. Study start15 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2021
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
144 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04597333
Sponsor's protocol ID
0009-20-RMB
Status last verified
Apr 2022
First submitted
15 Oct 2020
Last updated
20 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Dinoprostone and Cervical ripening balloon. in people with Induction of Labor Affected Fetus / Newborn, run by Rambam Health Care Campus at 1 site in Israel.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Delivery within 24 hours. (time frame: From the time of induction up to 24 hours from induction.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in