AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart FailureNCT04598659

Nene Remote Monitoring Proof of Concept

An observational study of Heart Failure and Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Doccla UK at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This feasibility study is being conducted to investigate the practicalities and potential benefits of equipping patients with wearable monitoring devices. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
How many people
180 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
6 Jan 2021to 6 Mar 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population will include patients who present themselves for care or consultation at the Northampton General Hospital during the period of the study.

Who may be able to join

  • The participant is able to provide informed consent.
  • The participant is able to comply with the English instructions for using a wearable device (e.g, follow simple instructions, able to answer the telephone, able to answer symptom questions, etc.).
  • The participant may have been recently discharged from a hospital care setting (including emergency departments, ward and acute assessment units) to home (including a relative's home) or be currently admitted to a hospital care setting.
  • The participant has a recent medical history that suggests there is a risk their health may deteriorate at home. In the first instance we will focus upon patients with at least one of the following conditions:
  • Heart Failure (the patient being discharged),
  • Arrhythmia (e.g. patient on the waitlist for a pacemaker)
  • We will also consider patients with other conditions that present a risk of deterioration at home, for example: COPD, stable angina, liver failure, minor trauma, chronic kidney disease, stroke, hypertension, cancer ( e.g. recent surgery)

Who cannot join

  • Patients that are clinically unstable (eg: respiratory distress, ongoing angina pectoris, sepsis, etc).
  • Aphasia or other conditions that prevents the patient from adequately communicating with the researchers.
  • Terminal diagnosis with life expectancy < 3 months.
  • Ongoing renal dialysis, or other treatment that prevents the patient from being at home for extended periods.
  • Dementia or uncontrolled psychiatric illness.
  • Severe dermatitis or another skin disorder that prevents the patient from wearing a patch.
  • Patient has a pacemaker or ICD
  • Other inability, or unwillingness, to adequately co-operate with the RPM-team.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Northampton General Hospital

    Northampton

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: NHS England Proof of Concept - Smart Tech - Nene CCG

This feasibility study is being conducted to investigate the practicalities and potential benefits of equipping patients with wearable monitoring devices.

Read the detailed description

Vital signs are important indicators used in healthcare to inform a patient's treatment options and care plan. However, the opportunity to monitor vital signs is largely limited to the time a patient spends at a healthcare providers premises. This study is being conducted to see if the use of small wearable monitoring devices could help deliver a better service and improve patient care by continuing to monitor patients remotely.

The study is observational and has been designed to address two key questions:

  1. Is it possible in principle to use the information captured from the devices to improve the treatment of the patient?
  2. How practical is it to implement remote patient monitoring (RPM)?

To address these questions, consenting patients will be asked to wear a small adhesive biosensor for a short period of time following discharge from hospital (either as an outpatient or inpatient).

The data gathered by the device will be examined retrospectively and patients will not be monitored in real-time. Following the monitoring period, the vital signs data captured by the device will be analysed to see if it correlates with any unscheduled healthcare needs (such as unplanned GP appointments or emergency hospital visits). Specifically, the study team will be investigating whether the monitoring could have picked up a nascent problem before it became more serious, or whether monitoring could have saved the patient from having to make a trip to see their GP.

Information regarding the practicalities of implementing RPM will be captured by monitoring compliance and through an exit interview with participating patients.

Medical subject headings
Heart Failure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Respiration Disorders, Stroke

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient compliance

    The percentage of all participating patients for whom a complete and unbroken record of their vital signs is obtained throughout the duration of the agreed monitoring period.

    Measured: 7 days (the monitoring period)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Device comfort assessed by a 5-point rating scale

    Participants will be asked to rate how comfortable they found the device to wear during a telephone administered exit interview.

    Measured: 15 minutes

  2. Convenience of remote monitoring assessed by a 5-point rating scale

    Participants will be asked how the remote monitoring device affected their daily routine during a telephone administered exit interview. Responses will be collected using a 5-point rating scale of convenience.

    Measured: 15 minutes

  3. The average time required to support patients through the remote monitoring process

    The amount of time that the study team spends on-boarding patients (fitting the devices and explaining how they work) and supporting patients to use the devices will be recorded, to calculate the average time that staff will need to support each patient and estimate the resource requirement for implementing remote monitoring.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Oct 2020
  2. Study start6 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion6 Jan 2022
  4. Study completion6 Mar 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
180 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04598659
Sponsor's protocol ID
NPoC1
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
16 Oct 2020
Last updated
29 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Heart Failure and Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Doccla UK at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient compliance (time frame: 7 days (the monitoring period)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in