Accident, TrafficNCT04600908
Incidence of Commuting Accidents Among Non-physician Staff of a Large University Hospital Center From 2012 to 2016
An observational study of Accident, Traffic, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Over the past thirty years, risk of road traffic accidents has decreased but remains high and accounts for 44% of fatal work-related accidents for commuting and mission-related accidents. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Accident, Traffic
- What is being tested?
- Characteristics of accidents
- How many people
- 390 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2012to 1 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: non-physician staff working at the Hospices Civils de Lyon and having had commuting accidents between 2012 and 2016
Who may be able to join
- non-physician staff
- commuting accidents
Who cannot join
- work accidents
- on-duty road accidents
- physician staff
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Over the past thirty years, risk of road traffic accidents has decreased but remains high and accounts for 44% of fatal work-related accidents for commuting and mission-related accidents. The aims of this study were to estimate the overall incidence of commuting accidents for non-physician professionals in a major university hospital and by gender and different professional categories, and to assess its evolution over a 5-year period. A descriptive analysis was performed on 390 commuting accidents from 2012 to 2016 extracted from the university hospital's occupational health service.
- Conditions
- Accident, Traffic
- Being tested
- Characteristics of accidents
- Keywords
- Commuting accident, Traffic accident, Hospital, Descriptive study, Incidence, Health care worker
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Characteristics of accidentsOther
informations about commuting accidents were recorded either during an occupational medicine consultation or by the medical service after reception of the medical certificate and the administrative declaration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Non-physician staff | All non-physician staff who have had commuting accidents Receives: Other: Characteristics of accidents |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of commuting accidents
Incidence of commuting accidents according to sex, occupational categories and year of accident.
The evolution of the number of accidents over the years was assessed by the Cochran-Armitage Chi² trend test. Crude Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals for the association of commuting accident with respectively sex, occupational categories and years were estimated on log-binomial regression using the using the GENMOD procedure in the SAS statistical package (version 9.4) with the DIST=BINOMIAL and LINK=LOG options.
Measured: at the enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Oct 2020
- Study start1 Jan 2012
- Primary completion1 Jan 2017
- Study completion1 Jan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Accident, TrafficStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospices Civils de LyonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 390 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04600908
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 07-3
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 19 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 23 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Incidence of Commuting Accidents Among Non-physician Staff of a Large University Hospital Center From 2012 to 2016
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04600908
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 07-3
- Conditions
- Accident, Traffic
- Keywords
- Commuting accident, Traffic accident, Hospital, Descriptive study, Incidence, Health care worker
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 390 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de LyonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Over the past thirty years, risk of road traffic accidents has decreased but remains high and accounts for 44% of fatal work-related accidents for commuting and mission-related accidents. The aims of this study were to estimate the overall incidence of commuting accidents for non-physician professionals in a major university hospital and by gender and different professional categories, and to assess its evolution over a 5-year period. A descriptive analysis was performed on 390 commuting accidents from 2012 to 2016 extracted from the university hospital's occupational health service.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Non-physician staff | – | Other: Characteristics of accidentsAll non-physician staff who have had commuting accidents |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- non-physician staff working at the Hospices Civils de Lyon and having had commuting accidents between 2012 and 2016
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- non-physician staff
- commuting accidents
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- work accidents
- on-duty road accidents
- physician staff
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Characteristics of accidentsinformations about commuting accidents were recorded either during an occupational medicine consultation or by the medical service after reception of the medical certificate and the administrative declaration | Other | Non-physician staff |
Primary outcome
Incidence of commuting accidents
Time frame: at the enrollment
Incidence of commuting accidents according to sex, occupational categories and year of accident. The evolution of the number of accidents over the years was assessed by the Cochran-Armitage Chi² trend test. Crude Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals for the association of commuting accident with respectively sex, occupational categories and years were estimated on log-binomial regression using the using the GENMOD procedure in the SAS statistical package (version 9.4) with the DIST=BINOMIAL and LINK=LOG options.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Oct 2020.
Related trials for Accident, Traffic
Not yet recruiting
Pilot Study: Clinical Trial of Ultrasound Guiding Pharmacopuncture Therapy for Acute Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain (LBP)
Recruiting
Recovering Sleep After Trauma
Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of Ultrasound-Guided Pharmacopuncture as an Adjunctive Therapy in Inpatients With Post-Traffic Accident Tension-Type Headache
Pharmacologic Action
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Epidemiological and Statistical Study of Facial Traumatic Fractures at Assiut University Trauma Hospital
Facial Fractures, Maxillofacial Injuries
Active, not recruiting
Transportation Safety in Adolescence
Automobile Accident
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Accident, Traffic, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of commuting accidents (time frame: at the enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2020.