AzTrials
AzTrials

Crowding of Anterior Mandibular TeethNCT04601662

Evaluation of the Root Resorption and Dehiscence Formation Between Two Methods of Leveling and Alignment of Lower Teeth

A study testing Corticision and Traditional Non-accelerated Treatment in people with Crowding of Anterior Mandibular Teeth, run by Damascus University at 1 site in Syria.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The duration of orthodontic treatment is one of the exacerbation causes of orthodontic pain. Several methods have been suggested to reduce the duration of orthodontic treatment classified to surgical and non-surgical methods. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 24 years
Conditions the study is for
Crowding of Anterior Mandibular Teeth
What is being tested?
Corticision and Traditional Non-accelerated Treatment
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
1 siteSyria
Study dates
15 Mar 2017to 15 Feb 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 24 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age range between 18 and 24 years
  • Completion permanent dentition (except third molars)
  • Mild to moderate crowding (2-6 mm according to Little's index)
  • Absence of medications intake that interferes with pain perception for at least one week before the beginning of the treatment

Who cannot join

  • Medical conditions that would affect tooth movement.
  • Cases which contraindication to oral surgery.
  • Previous orthodontic treatments.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Syria1 site
  • Orthodontic Department, University of Damascus Dental School

    Damascus, 00963

Other trials in Syria

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of Corticision-Based Acceleration of Lower Anterior Teeth Alignment on Root Resorption and Dehiscence Formation Using CBCT

The duration of orthodontic treatment is one of the exacerbation causes of orthodontic pain. Several methods have been suggested to reduce the duration of orthodontic treatment classified to surgical and non-surgical methods.

Researchers used minimally invasive surgical methods like corticision, piezocision, micro-osteoperforation, and piezopuncture indicated that most of these methods can accelerate dental movement by 20 - 40%.

Read more

The effect of corticision as a minimally invasive procedure on root resorption and dehiscence formation during orthodontic tooth movement has not been studied yet.

Applying corticision on the lower anterior teeth using a surgical blade and a hammer may accelerate tooth alignment during orthodontic treatment. This study consists of two groups, patients will be randomly assigned to one of these two groups.

Read the detailed description

Orthodontically induced external root resorption accompanying orthodontic treatment is defined as a microscopic loss of root tissue as a result of the inflammatory reaction that occurs in the area of application of orthodontic force. It can be diagnosed and measured using conventional radiography or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Dehiscence is a loss of alveolar bone on the facial (rarely lingual) aspect of a tooth that leaves a characteristic v-shaped, root-exposed defect from the cementoenamel junction apically. Bone dehiscence cannot be detected through conventional radiography or clinical examination. Actually, CBCT can be considered the best accessible technique providing 3D data.

Corticision is one of the minimally invasive surgical procedures that is not associated with flap lifting. It was used to accelerate tooth movement in animals and case report studies. Its application on humans may aggravate their fear and anxiety towards the pain that may accompany this technique.

No randomized controlled trial (RCT) has compared flapless corticision in the non-extraction-based orthodontic decrowding of lower anterior teeth (LAT) with the conventional treatment in terms of external apical root resorption (EARR) and dehiscence formation (DF).

Being tested
Corticision, Traditional Non-accelerated Treatment

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CorticisionProcedure or surgery

    A special instrument will be used to cut the cortex of the alveolar bone at different locations between the lower anterior teeth

  • Traditional Non-accelerated TreatmentOther

    The normal sequence of treatment steps will be followed in this group without using any kind of acceleration methods

Study groups in NCT04601662
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CorticisionExperimentalPatients in this group will be subjected to corticision to accelerate orthodontic movement
Receives: Procedure: Corticision
Traditional treatmentActive comparatorPatients in this group will undergo normal traditional treatment without any acceleration method.
Receives: Other: Traditional Non-accelerated Treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Root Length

    Cone-beam computed tomography imaging will be used for the lower jaw. Root length will be measured for each root of the six lower anterior teeth The change will be calculated between 'before' and 'after' images in mm.

    Measured: T1: one day before the beginning of the orthodontic treatment, T2: exactly at 12 months following the onset of orthodontic treatment

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Change in Dehiscence Proportion

    Cone-beam computed tomography imaging will be used for the lower jaw. Any V-shaped bone defect located buccally or lingually in the lower anterior region involving bone margin is preliminarily identified as dehiscence. This is going to be measured and the proportion of the presence of such defects will be calculated on two different occasions (T1 and T2).

    Measured: T1: one day before the beginning of the orthodontic treatment, T2: exactly at 12 months following the onset of orthodontic treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2020
  2. Study start15 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completion15 Nov 2018
  4. Study completion15 Feb 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04601662
Sponsor's protocol ID
UDDS-Ortho-06-2020
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
20 Oct 2020
Last updated
26 Oct 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Mandelaris GA, Neiva R, Chambrone L. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Interdisciplinary Dentofacial Therapy: An American Academy of Periodontology Best Evidence Review Focusing on Risk Assessment of the Dentoalveolar Bone Changes Influenced by Tooth Movement. J Periodontol. 2017 Oct;88(10):960-977. doi: 10.1902/jop.2017.160781.

    PubMed 28967331
  • Charavet C, Lecloux G, Bruwier A, Rompen E, Maes N, Limme M, Lambert F. Localized Piezoelectric Alveolar Decortication for Orthodontic Treatment in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Dent Res. 2016 Aug;95(9):1003-9. doi: 10.1177/0022034516645066. Epub 2016 Apr 29.

    PubMed 27129491
  • Charavet C, Lambert F, Lecloux G, Le Gall M. [Accelerated orthodontic treatment using corticotomies: what are the minimally invasive alternatives?]. Orthod Fr. 2019 Mar;90(1):5-12. doi: 10.1051/orthodfr/2019002. Epub 2019 Apr 17. French.

    PubMed 30994445
  • Makedonas D, Lund H, Hansen K. Root resorption diagnosed with cone beam computed tomography after 6 months and at the end of orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):389-93. doi: 10.2319/042012-332.1. Epub 2012 Oct 23.

    PubMed 23092202
  • Samandara A, Papageorgiou SN, Ioannidou-Marathiotou I, Kavvadia-Tsatala S, Papadopoulos MA. Evaluation of orthodontically induced external root resorption following orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2019 Jan 23;41(1):67-79. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjy027.

    PubMed 29771300

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Corticision and Traditional Non-accelerated Treatment in people with Crowding of Anterior Mandibular Teeth, run by Damascus University at 1 site in Syria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Syria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Root Length (time frame: T1: one day before the beginning of the orthodontic treatment, T2: exactly at 12 months following the onset of orthodontic treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04601662, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in