MelanomaMONITORNCT04605146
Impact of Telemonitoring for the Management of Side Effects in Patients with Melanoma, Lung or Renal Cancer, Treated with Immunotherapy Combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Adjuvant Nivolumab Monotherapy
A study testing Tele-monitoring in people with Melanoma and Lung Cancer, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 10 sites in France.
Trial summary
The ipilimumab and nivolumab combination is now part of the standard of care for the treatment of melanoma, renal and lung cancer patients. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) occur in 30 to 60% of patients included in clinical trials. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Melanoma, Lung Cancer, Renal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Tele-monitoring
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 5 May 2021to 5 Nov 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years
- Patients diagnosed with melanoma, or lung cancer or renal cancer
- Patients starting a treatment with a combination of immunotherapy of nivolumab + ipilimumab (NB: patients who have already received immunotherapy in the past may be included)
- Patients comfortable with the use of digital tools and computing
- Patients who agree to participate to the telemonitoring and signed consent form
Who cannot join
- Pregnant, parturient and lactating women
- Patients under legal protection measure or deprived of their liberty
- Patients not affiliated to a social security scheme (schemes such as the AME) or beneficiaries of a similar regime (foreign person, outside the EU)
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
10 sites in 1 country
France10 sites, 9 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Groupement hospitalier Est - Multidisciplinary oncological platform
Bron
Christophe SAJOUS, MD, 0427856577 ext. +33, christophe.sajous@chu-lyon.fr
Christophe SAJOUS, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpital Louis Pradel - Department of Pneumology
Bron
Michael DURUISSEAUX, MD, 0472357644 ext. +33, michael.duruisseaux@chu-lyon.fr
Michael DURUISSEAUX, MD
- Not yet recruiting
University hospital of Grenoble Alpes - Department of dermatology
Grenoble
Julie CHARLES, MD, 0476767575 ext. +33, JCharles@chu-grenoble.fr
Julie CHARLES, MD
- Not yet recruiting
University hospital of Grenoble Alpes - Department of Medical Oncology
Grenoble
Mathieu LARAMASSE, MD, mlaramas@chu-grenoble.fr
Mathieu LARAMASSE, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Hôpital de la Croix Rousse - Department of Pneumology
Lyon
Lize KIAKOUAMA-MALEKA, MD, 0426109237 ext. +33, lize.kiakouama-maleka@chu-lyon.fr
Lize KIAKOUAMA-MALEKA, MD
- Terminated
Hôpital Edouard Herriot - Department of urology
Lyon
- Recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud - Department of Medical Oncology
Pierre-Bénite
Denis MAILLET, MD, 0478864385 ext. +33, denis.maillet@chu-lyon.fr
Denis MAILLET, MD
- Recruiting
Hôpital Lyon Sud - Department of Dermatology, HCL-Cancer Institute
Pierre-Bénite
Stéphane DALLE, MD, 0478861679, stephane.dalle@chu-lyon.fr
Stéphane DALLE, MD
- Recruiting
Hôpital Lyon Sud - Department of pneumology,Thoracic oncology
Pierre-Bénite
Pierre Jean SOUQUET, MD, 0478864401 ext. +33, pierre-jean.souquet@chu-lyon.fr
Pierre Jean SOUQUET, MD
- Not yet recruiting
University hospital of Saint-Etienne - Department of dermatology
Saint-Etienne
Emmanuelle COUTY, MD, 0477828333 ext. +33, j.luc.perrot@chu-st-etienne.fr
Emmanuelle COUTY, MD
About this study
The ipilimumab and nivolumab combination is now part of the standard of care for the treatment of melanoma, renal and lung cancer patients. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) occur in 30 to 60% of patients included in clinical trials. Grade 3/4 AEs are more frequently observed (50-60% of patients) in melanoma because ipilimumab is administrated at 3mg/kg in this population. Among these AEs, early detection of immune related AEs is critical to an adequate medical management. In this context, dedicated tools for remote monitoring of these patients are crucial.
The investigators developed within the Immucare consortium a simplified medical questionnaire which is addressed weekly to the patients. This questionnaire along with an algorithm gives to the clinician regular feedback on their patients' general symptoms. The investigators herein want to evaluate in a randomized prospective trial the efficacy of this remote monitoring to reduce the time between the start of AE and the reporting to the medical team, which could lead to detect and treat earlier AEs induced by nivolumab and ipilimumab in the melanoma, lung and renal cancer patients' population.
- Conditions
- Melanoma, Lung Cancer, Renal Cancer
- Being tested
- Tele-monitoring
- Keywords
- Tele-monitoring, nivolumab, ipilimumab, immunotherapy
- Medical subject headings
- Melanoma, Lung Neoplasms, Kidney Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tele-monitoringBehavioural
The tele-monitoring will consist in filling in a specific questionnaire once a week in the first 6 months, every 2 weeks until 12 months, and on-demand (in case of upcoming toxicity, at any time). These questionnaires will be reviewed by a coordinating nurse. According to the result of the questionnaire, the coordinating nurse will adapt patients' management, either by giving them a phone call, or inviting them to directly contact their medical department, or even plan an emergency hospitalization if necessary. The coordinating nurse will closely work with the investigator to adapt patients' management.
Quality of life questionnaire (FACT-G) will also be filled in at inclusion, M3 and M12.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tele-monitoring group | Experimental | In the experimental group, in addition to routine practice, each patient will benefit of a tele-monitoring of one year, and a long term follow-up up to 5 years to evaluate the Overall Survival and the Progression-Free Survival. Quality of life questionnaire will also be filled in at inclusion, M3 and M12.
50 patients are expected in this arm. Receives: Behavioral: Tele-monitoring |
| Control group | No intervention | In the control group, patients will have a routine follow-up as per institutional practice, and a long term follow-up up to 5 years to evaluate the Overall Survival and the Progression-Free Survival. Quality of life questionnaire will also be filled in at inclusion, M3 and M12. 50 patients are expected in this arm. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Delay between the start of a side effect and reporting to the medical team (average number of days per patient).
The delay between the start of a side effect and medical information will be calculated for each AE and average per patient in each of the two groups studied, with its 95% confidence interval.The delays of the two groups will be compared using a Mann-Whitney test.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Levels of morbidity based on CTC-AE v5 (all toxicities)
Levels of morbidity based on CTC-AE v5 (all toxicities) will be compare using a generalised log linear regression. In case of several AEs, the average medical information per patient will be considered.
Measured: 12 months
Number of treatment interruptions and number of days of treatment delays interruptions, number of treatment discontinuation, number of dose reductions and and percentage of dose reduction
Number of treatment interruptions and number of days of treatment delays interruptions, number of treatment discontinuation, number of dose reductions and and percentage of dose reduction will be compared in the two groups using a Mann-Whitney test
Measured: 12 months
Number of admissions in the emergency room
Number of admissions in the emergency room will be compared in the two groups with a Wilcoxon rank sum test. The rate of admissions per patient-years will be calculated and compared between the 2 groups with a Negative Binomial generalized linear regression model accounting for overdispersed data and correlated events, using the log of follow-up time as an offset.
Measured: 12 months
Number of unplanned hospitalizations
Number of unplanned hospitalizations will be compared in the two groups with a Wilcoxon rank sum test.
The hospitalizations per patient-years will be calculated and compared between the 2 groups with a Negative Binomial generalized linear regression model accounting for overdispersed data and correlated events, using the log of follow-up time as an offset.
Measured: 12 months
Number of contact with general practitioner
Number of contact with general practitioner will be compared in the two groups with a Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Measured: 12 months
benefit for clinicians: interview of clinicians on their opinion on the self-monitoring, evaluation to the impact on the consultations during the first year of treatment, assessed with satisfaction questionnaires
benefit for clinicians will be compared in the 2 groups with adequate test according to the retained satisfaction scale
Measured: Month 12
Number of AE identified by clinicians
Number of AE identified by clinicians will be compared in the two groups with a Wilcoxon rank sum test.
In addition, the competitive risk of death with the recurrent events process will be explored using a joint frailty model (Rondeau V. et al. Joint frailty models for recurring events and death using maximum penalized likelihood estimation: application on cancer events. Biostatistics (2007), 8, 4, pp. 708-721).
Measured: 12 months
Overall quality of Life assessed with standardized QoL questionnaires (FACT-G)
Overall quality of Life will be described and compared between the two groups with the Student t-test, or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test in case of non-normality of the distributions. All data recorded at the follow-up visits will be considered, whatever the actual date of the visit
Measured: 12 months
Adherence: The number of full symptoms report completions and adherence to the completion schedule
Adherence will be described in the experimental group. All data recorded at the follow-up visits will be considered, whatever the actual date of the visit.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Oct 2020
- Study start5 May 2021
- Primary completion5 Nov 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion5 Nov 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MelanomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospices Civils de LyonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stéphane DALLE, Principal investigator, Department of Dermatology, HCL-Cancer Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04605146
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 69HCL20_0492
- Other IDs
- 2020-A02372-37
- Acronym
- MONITOR
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 16 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Telemonitoring for the Management of Side Effects in Patients with Melanoma, Lung or Renal Cancer, Treated with Immunotherapy Combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Adjuvant Nivolumab Monotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04605146
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MONITOR / 69HCL20_0492
- Conditions
- Melanoma, Lung Cancer, Renal Cancer
- Keywords
- Tele-monitoring, nivolumab, ipilimumab, immunotherapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de LyonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Nov 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 5 Nov 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The ipilimumab and nivolumab combination is now part of the standard of care for the treatment of melanoma, renal and lung cancer patients. Grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) occur in 30 to 60% of patients included in clinical trials. Grade 3/4 AEs are more frequently observed (50-60% of patients) in melanoma because ipilimumab is administrated at 3mg/kg in this population. Among these AEs, early detection of immune related AEs is critical to an adequate medical management. In this context, dedicated tools for remote monitoring of these patients are crucial.
The investigators developed within the Immucare consortium a simplified medical questionnaire which is addressed weekly to the patients. This questionnaire along with an algorithm gives to the clinician regular feedback on their patients' general symptoms. The investigators herein want to evaluate in a randomized prospective trial the efficacy of this remote monitoring to reduce the time between the start of AE and the reporting to the medical team, which could lead to detect and treat earlier AEs induced by nivolumab and ipilimumab in the melanoma, lung and renal cancer patients' population.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tele-monitoring group | Experimental | Behavioral: Tele-monitoringIn the experimental group, in addition to routine practice, each patient will benefit of a tele-monitoring of one year, and a long term follow-up up to 5 years to evaluate the Overall Survival and the Progression-Free Survival. Quality of life questionnaire will also be filled in at inclusion, M3 and M12. 50 patients are expected in this arm. |
| Control group | No intervention | –In the control group, patients will have a routine follow-up as per institutional practice, and a long term follow-up up to 5 years to evaluate the Overall Survival and the Progression-Free Survival. Quality of life questionnaire will also be filled in at inclusion, M3 and M12. 50 patients are expected in this arm. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age > 18 years
- Patients diagnosed with melanoma, or lung cancer or renal cancer
- Patients starting a treatment with a combination of immunotherapy of nivolumab + ipilimumab (NB: patients who have already received immunotherapy in the past may be included)
- Patients comfortable with the use of digital tools and computing
- Patients who agree to participate to the telemonitoring and signed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pregnant, parturient and lactating women
- Patients under legal protection measure or deprived of their liberty
- Patients not affiliated to a social security scheme (schemes such as the AME) or beneficiaries of a similar regime (foreign person, outside the EU)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tele-monitoringThe tele-monitoring will consist in filling in a specific questionnaire once a week in the first 6 months, every 2 weeks until 12 months, and on-demand (in case of upcoming toxicity, at any time). These questionnaires will be reviewed by a coordinating nurse. According to the result of the questionnaire, the coordinating nurse will adapt patients' management, either by giving them a phone call, or inviting them to directly contact their medical department, or even plan an emergency hospitalization if necessary. The coordinating nurse will closely work with the investigator to adapt patients' management. Quality of life questionnaire (FACT-G) will also be filled in at inclusion, M3 and M12. | Behavioural | Tele-monitoring group |
Primary outcome
Delay between the start of a side effect and reporting to the medical team (average number of days per patient).
Time frame: 12 months
The delay between the start of a side effect and medical information will be calculated for each AE and average per patient in each of the two groups studied, with its 95% confidence interval.The delays of the two groups will be compared using a Mann-Whitney test.
9 secondary outcomes
Levels of morbidity based on CTC-AE v5 (all toxicities)
Time frame: 12 months
Number of treatment interruptions and number of days of treatment delays interruptions, number of treatment discontinuation, number of dose reductions and and percentage of dose reduction
Time frame: 12 months
Number of admissions in the emergency room
Time frame: 12 months
Number of unplanned hospitalizations
Time frame: 12 months
Number of contact with general practitioner
Time frame: 12 months
benefit for clinicians: interview of clinicians on their opinion on the self-monitoring, evaluation to the impact on the consultations during the first year of treatment, assessed with satisfaction questionnaires
Time frame: Month 12
Number of AE identified by clinicians
Time frame: 12 months
Overall quality of Life assessed with standardized QoL questionnaires (FACT-G)
Time frame: 12 months
Adherence: The number of full symptoms report completions and adherence to the completion schedule
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Oct 2024.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-17 Blockade to Decrease irAEs (REPLAY)
Metastatic Melanoma
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Feasibility Study Utilizing Immune Recall to Increase Response to Checkpoint Therapy
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of Dapansutrile Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With PD-1 Refractory Advanced Melanoma
Melanoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Stéphane DALLE principal investigator
Department of Dermatology, HCL-Cancer Institute
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tele-monitoring in people with Melanoma and Lung Cancer, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 10 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Stéphane DALLE (0478861679 ext. +33, stephane.dalle@chu-lyon.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Delay between the start of a side effect and reporting to the medical team (average number of days per patient). (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2024.