Advance Care PlanningNCT04612738
Project Talk Trial: Engaging Underserved Communities in End-of-life Conversations
A study testing Hello (serious game), The Conversation Project (CP) Starter Kit and Table Topics (general conversation game) in people with Advance Care Planning and Advance Directives, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 79 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Compared to the general population, individuals from underserved communities are more likely to receive low quality end-of-life care and unwanted, costly and burdensome treatments due in part to a lack of advance care planning (ACP; the process of discussing wishes for end-of-life care with loved ones/clinicians and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Advance Care Planning, Advance Directives, Terminal Illness
- What is being tested?
- Hello (serious game), The Conversation Project (CP) Starter Kit and Table Topics (general conversation game)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1,800 participants
- Where
- 79 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 19 Mar 2022to 31 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ability to recruit 20 individuals from underserved populations to attend a community event
- Experience hosting a community event
- Experience working with underserved populations
- Participation in a series of mandatory live study-related web-based trainings
- Completes a research site agreement
- Research Participants
Show all 11Show fewer
- Adults over the age of 18 years old in underserved populations
- Able to speak and read English and/or Spanish
- Have not completed an AD within the previous 5 years
- All participants regardless of health status
- Individuals from the same household can enroll
Who cannot join
- Inability to recruit 20 individuals from underserved populations
- Inexperience for hosting a community event
- Inexperience working with underserved populations
- Unable to attend a series of mandatory live study-related web-based trainings
- Do not provide informed consent
- Do not complete a research site agreement
Show all 13Show fewer
- Previously hosted a Hello project event
- Research Participants
- Anyone <18 years of age
- Anyone not able to speak and read English and/or Spanish
- Have significant difficulties with hearing or speaking difficulties by self-report
- Completed an AD in the past 5 years
- Do not provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
79 sites in 1 country.
79 sites in 1 country
United States79 sites
Cleveland Clinic
Akron, Ohio, 44307
Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital
Albany, Georgia, 61763
DeSoto Memorial Hospital
Arcadia, Florida, 34266
Pincham-Lincoln Community Center
Athens, Alabama, 35611
Helene S. Mills
Atlanta, Georgia, 30328
Seniors First of GA
Atlanta, Georgia, 30345
University of Colorado Hospital
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Northeast Mississippi Coalition Against COVID-19
Belden, Mississippi, 38868
St. Mark Missionary Baptist Church
Bennettsville, South Carolina, 29512
Grove Hall Senior Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02121
All Saints Episcopal Church
Cameron, Texas, 76520
Stuart Community Center
Carlisle, Pennsylvania, 17013
Turner Alumni Association
Carthage, Texas, 75633
Welcome Home of Chattanooga
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37406
Trinity Lutheran Church
Cherokee, Iowa, 51012
University of Chicago Medical Ctr
Chicago, Illinois, 60616
High Point Neighborhood Family Center
Clearwater, Florida, 33760
Hospice of the Western Reserve
Cleveland, Ohio, 44110
McGregor Gardens
Cleveland, Ohio, 44112
Hope Behavioral Health
Cleveland, Ohio, 44120
Columbia Senior Activity Center
Columbia, Missouri, 65201
Eastside Fellowship Ministries
Columbus, Ohio, 43203
Dorothea Street Community Center
Crane, Texas, 79731
St. Thomas the Apostle Catholic Church
Crystal Lake, Illinois, 60014
Villa Schiano
Elizabethville, Pennsylvania, 17023
Gilmer County Senior Center
Ellijay, Georgia, 30540
Como Community Center
Fort Worth, Texas, 76107
Reformed Church of Freehold
Freehold, New Jersey, 07728
Washoe Tribe Health Center
Gardnerville, Nevada, 89410
Georgetown Public Library
Georgetown, Texas, 78626
Grayland Hall
Grayland, Washington, 98547
Latino Hispanic American Community Center
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17104
People's Community Baptist Church
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17104
Ohio County Senior Centers
Hartford, Kentucky, 42347
Greater Vision United Methodist Church
Huntersville, North Carolina, 28078
Hospice & Home Care of Reno
Hutchinson, Kansas, 67501
Ocean Beach Hospital
Ilwaco, Washington, 98640
Lightways Hospice & Serious Illness Care
Joilet, Illinois, 60435
Kingman Regional Medical Center
Kingman, Arizona, 86409
Acadian Advocacy Network
Lafayette, Louisiana, 70506
Hospice and Community Care
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17602
Hospice and Community Care
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17603
Booker T. Washington CES
Las Cruces, New Mexico, 88001
Center for Practical Bioethics
Lawrence, Kansas, 66101
St. Mary's Health System
Lewiston, Maine, 04240
Bluegrass Care Navigators
Lexington, Kentucky, 40504
Sunshine Terrace Foundation
Logan, Utah, 84321
United Crescent Hill Ministries
Louisville, Kentucky, 40206
Luray Fire Department
Luray, Virginia, 22835
Hospice Care of Middletown
Middletown, Ohio, 45044
HopeWest Montrose
Montrose, Colorado, 81401
Union County Senior Services
Morganfield, Kentucky, 42437
Colquitt Regional Medical Center
Moultrie, Georgia, 31768
Christ Temple Church
Muskegon Heights, Michigan, 49444
Community Economic Development Center
New Bedford, Massachusetts, 02746
Corsi Senior Center
New York, New York, 10029
Elder Law Project of North Mississippi Rural Legal Services
Oxford, Mississippi, 38655
East End Community Center
Portland, Maine, 04101
Hospice of St. Lawrence Valley
Potsdam, New York, 13676
First Baptist Church
Quincy, Illinois, 62301
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14622
Promotores y Promotoras
Santa Paula, California, 93060
Accord Health Group
Show Low, Arizona, 85901
Good Hope Union UMC
Silver Spring, Maryland, 20905
Holy Cross Health
Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910
Our Lady of Solitude
Soledad, California, 93960
Hospice of Lake Cumberland
Somerset, Kentucky, 42503
Patch Center
St Louis, Missouri, 63111
Stamford Senior Center
Stamford, Connecticut, 06901
Choice Hospice
Sulphur Springs, Texas, 75482
St. Phillip AME Church
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
City of Temple Terrace, Omar K. Lightfoot Center
Temple Terrace, Florida, 33617
Hospital Council of Northwest Ohio
Toledo, Ohio, 43607
El Rio Neighborhood Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85745
Vitas
Walnut Creek, California, 94590
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20020
Plaza on Princess
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401
Carmel Baptist Church
Winchester, Virginia, 22601
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27045
About this study
Official title: Project Talk Trial: Engaging Underserved Communities in End-of-life Conversations: a Cluster, Randomized Controlled Trial
Compared to the general population, individuals from underserved communities are more likely to receive low quality end-of-life care and unwanted, costly and burdensome treatments due in part to a lack of advance care planning (ACP; the process of discussing wishes for end-of-life care with loved ones/clinicians and documenting them in advance directives).
This study will use existing, trusted, and respected social networks to evaluate two conversation-based tools intended to engage underserved individuals in discussions about end-of-life issue and motivate them to carry out ACP behaviors.
Through this study, investigators will learn how best to engage underserved populations in ACP so as to: 1) increase the likelihood that patients from underserved communities will receive high-quality end-of-life care; 2) address health disparities related to end-of-life treatments; and 3) reduce unnecessary suffering for patients and their families.
Read the detailed description
The overall project goal of this 3-armed cluster, randomized control trial in underserved, diverse communities is to determine whether playing a serious conversation game called Hello is more effective than other advance care planning (ACP) approaches, or usual care (i.e., simply distributing an advance directive [AD]). The investigators will randomize 75 underserved communities across the US. The primary outcome is completion of a visually verified AD; secondary outcomes include performance of other ACP behaviors.
Many Black/African Americans and Latina/Latino patients are more likely to receive low quality end-of- life medical care than White individuals- in fact, they are 3 times more likely than white Americans to die after a lengthy intensive care unit stay. Advance care planning (ACP)- the process of discussing one's wishes with loved ones and clinicians, and then documenting them in an advance directive (AD)- can help reduce these health inequities by preventing costly/burdensome treatments that are unlikely to reduce suffering or improve quality of life. Though ~60% of Americans engage in ACP, <25% of underserved populations have done so- in large part due to distrust of the healthcare system/clinicians, and reluctance to discuss death and dying.
This study leverages underserved communities' existing, trusted social networks to deploy two community-based ACP interventions and study their mechanisms of action. By identifying which interventions increase engagement in ACP in underserved communities (and why), this project will help improve quality of end-of-life care, reduce unnecessary suffering, and end-of-life healthcare costs which conserves public health resources.
- Conditions
- Advance Care Planning, Advance Directives, Terminal Illness, Chronic Illness, Communication
- Being tested
- Hello (serious game), The Conversation Project (CP) Starter Kit, Table Topics (general conversation game)
- Keywords
- serious games
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Disease, Communication
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hello (serious game)Behavioural
Commercially available, 'Hello' 32 is a serious game that consists of 32 questions prompting players to share their values, goals, and beliefs about end-of-life issues. The creators developed the questions following interviews with palliative care clinicians, hospice nurses, and funeral directors, and then revised them through a series focus groups with >100 patients/caregivers from diverse backgrounds.
The Conversation Project (CP) Starter KitBehavioural
The CP Starter Kit is one of the most widely promoted and disseminated ACP tools nationwide, is available for free online, and does not require a healthcare professional for use. Like 'Hello', it is intended to help individuals have end-of-life conversations with loved ones. The 11-page workbook has open- ended prompts to consider one's values and preferences for end-of-life care, who to talk with about one's wishes, and suggestions on how to do so. It also prompts participants to rank priorities on a 5-point scale (e.g., What are your concerns about treatment? 1= I'm worried I won't get enough care, 5= I'm worried I'll get overly aggressive care). The CP website provides resources for running a community event using the 'CP Starter Kit', including a 23-page manual, "Coaching the Conversation- A Guide to Facilitating Conversation Groups," with details on hosting a community-based program.
Table Topics (general conversation game)Other
Table topics is a popular, commercially available conversation starter game that consists of question cards to prompt conversations (e.g., 'What do you love about your hometown?').
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1:Advance care planning conversation game, 'Hello' | Active comparator | The 'Hello' game is a commercially available serious game that consists of 32 questions prompting players to share their values, goals, and beliefs about end-of-life issues. The game is played with 4 - 5 players, with each receiving a game booklet and chips. A play reads the first question in the book. Then each player writes down their answers individually and takes turns sharing their answers with the group. Players control what they share, how long they share and when to move to the next questions. During the conversation, plays can acknowledge others for a thoughtful, poignant or even funny comments by giving them a chip. A pre-game coin flip determines whether the player with the most chips wins the game (heads) or player with the least chips win (tails) the game.
Other names; previously name "My Gift of Grace" Receives: Behavioral: Hello (serious game) |
| Group 2: The Conversation Project (CP) Starter Kit | Active comparator | The 'CP Starter Kit' (available for free online) is an 11-page workbook with open- ended prompts to consider one's values and preferences for end-of-life care, who to talk with about one's wishes, and suggestions on how to do so. Receives: Behavioral: The Conversation Project (CP) Starter Kit |
| Group 3: Control Arm (Placebo control game, 'Table Topics') | Placebo comparator | A placebo/attention control l conversation game called 'Table Topics' will be used. Table Topics is a general conversation starter game that is unrelated to advance care planning. It involves answering open-ended questions in a group setting about a variety of topics. Receives: Other: Table Topics (general conversation game) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Completion of a Self-reported or Visually Verified Advance Directive
Study team confirms completion of a signed advance directive collected via self-report or visual verification
Measured: 6 months post-intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Completion of at least one Other Advance Care Planning (ACP) behavior
Performance of at least one other ACP behaviors, since the event, such as self-reported ACP completion, discussions with loved ones, conversations with care providers, financial preparations (long-term health insurance, life insurance, disability insurance, etc.), nursing home/long-term care planning, hospice or palliative care planning, funeral arrangements, etc.
Measured: 6 months post-intervention
Change in Advance Care Planning(ACP) Engagement Readiness 4-Item Survey
This short-version survey measures stages of readiness to perform ACP.
Measured: Baseline (Day of event participation); 6 months post-event participation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Nov 2020
- Study start19 Mar 2022
- Primary completion31 Jul 2026
- Study completion31 Jul 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Advance Care PlanningStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This is a 3-armed, cluster randomized controlled trial that will compare the efficacy of two evidenced based interventions, with a nationally-promoted structured workbook, Conversation Project (CP) Starter Kit; and use of a Placebo/Attention control, non-ACP game called Table Topics. The primary outcome is completion of an advance directive 6 months post-intervention.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 1,800 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospice Foundation of America, University of Kentucky
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lauren Van Scoy, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Investigators
- Lauren J. Van Scoy, MD, Principal investigator, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center; Penn State University College of Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04612738
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00014689
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 12 Oct 2020
- Last updated
- 9 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Our study team is highly motivated to share data with outside investigators as a means to ensure reproducibility of findings, further the scientific inquiry, and to avoid unintentional duplication of research. However, only de-identified data would be shared from this database under the auspices of the PI, and only after securing a Data Transfer Agreement. Whether the individual participant data or aggregated data will be determined based on each individual request.
Publications
Costigan HJ, VanDyke E, Calo WA, Tucci A, Van Scoy LJ; Project Talk Trial Collaborative Working Group Members. Adapting Advance Care Planning Interventions for Hispanic Communities Across the U.S. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Dec;42(12):1290-1297. doi: 10.1177/10499091241306427. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
PubMed 39700514Van Scoy LJ, Levi BH, Bramble C, Calo W, Chinchilli VM, Currin L, Grant D, Hollenbeak C, Katsaros M, Marlin S, Scott AM, Tucci A, VanDyke E, Wasserman E, Witt P, Green MJ. Comparing two advance care planning conversation activities to motivate advance directive completion in underserved communities across the USA: The Project Talk Trial study protocol for a cluster, randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Sep 30;23(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06746-3.
PubMed 36180899
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Project Talk Trial: Engaging Underserved Communities in End-of-life Conversations: a Cluster, Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04612738
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STUDY00014689
- Conditions
- Advance Care Planning, Advance Directives, Terminal Illness, Chronic Illness, Communication
- Keywords
- serious games
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,800 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospice Foundation of America, University of Kentucky
- Study start
- 19 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Compared to the general population, individuals from underserved communities are more likely to receive low quality end-of-life care and unwanted, costly and burdensome treatments due in part to a lack of advance care planning (ACP; the process of discussing wishes for end-of-life care with loved ones/clinicians and documenting them in advance directives).
This study will use existing, trusted, and respected social networks to evaluate two conversation-based tools intended to engage underserved individuals in discussions about end-of-life issue and motivate them to carry out ACP behaviors.
Through this study, investigators will learn how best to engage underserved populations in ACP so as to: 1) increase the likelihood that patients from underserved communities will receive high-quality end-of-life care; 2) address health disparities related to end-of-life treatments; and 3) reduce unnecessary suffering for patients and their families.
Detailed description
The overall project goal of this 3-armed cluster, randomized control trial in underserved, diverse communities is to determine whether playing a serious conversation game called Hello is more effective than other advance care planning (ACP) approaches, or usual care (i.e., simply distributing an advance directive [AD]). The investigators will randomize 75 underserved communities across the US. The primary outcome is completion of a visually verified AD; secondary outcomes include performance of other ACP behaviors.
Many Black/African Americans and Latina/Latino patients are more likely to receive low quality end-of- life medical care than White individuals- in fact, they are 3 times more likely than white Americans to die after a lengthy intensive care unit stay. Advance care planning (ACP)- the process of discussing one's wishes with loved ones and clinicians, and then documenting them in an advance directive (AD)- can help reduce these health inequities by preventing costly/burdensome treatments that are unlikely to reduce suffering or improve quality of life. Though ~60% of Americans engage in ACP, <25% of underserved populations have done so- in large part due to distrust of the healthcare system/clinicians, and reluctance to discuss death and dying.
This study leverages underserved communities' existing, trusted social networks to deploy two community-based ACP interventions and study their mechanisms of action. By identifying which interventions increase engagement in ACP in underserved communities (and why), this project will help improve quality of end-of-life care, reduce unnecessary suffering, and end-of-life healthcare costs which conserves public health resources.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- This is a 3-armed, cluster randomized controlled trial that will compare the efficacy of two evidenced based interventions, with a nationally-promoted structured workbook, Conversation Project (CP) Starter Kit; and use of a Placebo/Attention control, non-ACP game called Table Topics. The primary outcome is completion of an advance directive 6 months post-intervention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1:Advance care planning conversation game, 'Hello' | Active comparator | Behavioral: Hello (serious game)The 'Hello' game is a commercially available serious game that consists of 32 questions prompting players to share their values, goals, and beliefs about end-of-life issues. The game is played with 4 - 5 players, with each receiving a game booklet and chips. A play reads the first question in the book. Then each player writes down their answers individually and takes turns sharing their answers with the group. Players control what they share, how long they share and when to move to the next questions. During the conversation, plays can acknowledge others for a thoughtful, poignant or even funny comments by giving them a chip. A pre-game coin flip determines whether the player with the most chips wins the game (heads) or player with the least chips win (tails) the game. Other names; previously name "My Gift of Grace" |
| Group 2: The Conversation Project (CP) Starter Kit | Active comparator | Behavioral: The Conversation Project (CP) Starter KitThe 'CP Starter Kit' (available for free online) is an 11-page workbook with open- ended prompts to consider one's values and preferences for end-of-life care, who to talk with about one's wishes, and suggestions on how to do so. |
| Group 3: Control Arm (Placebo control game, 'Table Topics') | Placebo comparator | Other: Table Topics (general conversation game)A placebo/attention control l conversation game called 'Table Topics' will be used. Table Topics is a general conversation starter game that is unrelated to advance care planning. It involves answering open-ended questions in a group setting about a variety of topics. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Ability to recruit 20 individuals from underserved populations to attend a community event
- Experience hosting a community event
- Experience working with underserved populations
- Participation in a series of mandatory live study-related web-based trainings
- Completes a research site agreement
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Inability to recruit 20 individuals from underserved populations
- Inexperience for hosting a community event
- Inexperience working with underserved populations
- Unable to attend a series of mandatory live study-related web-based trainings
- Do not provide informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hello (serious game)Commercially available, 'Hello' 32 is a serious game that consists of 32 questions prompting players to share their values, goals, and beliefs about end-of-life issues. The creators developed the questions following interviews with palliative care clinicians, hospice nurses, and funeral directors, and then revised them through a series focus groups with >100 patients/caregivers from diverse backgrounds. | Behavioural | Group 1:Advance care planning conversation game, 'Hello' |
| The Conversation Project (CP) Starter KitThe CP Starter Kit is one of the most widely promoted and disseminated ACP tools nationwide, is available for free online, and does not require a healthcare professional for use. Like 'Hello', it is intended to help individuals have end-of-life conversations with loved ones. The 11-page workbook has open- ended prompts to consider one's values and preferences for end-of-life care, who to talk with about one's wishes, and suggestions on how to do so. It also prompts participants to rank priorities on a 5-point scale (e.g., What are your concerns about treatment? 1= I'm worried I won't get enough care, 5= I'm worried I'll get overly aggressive care). The CP website provides resources for running a community event using the 'CP Starter Kit', including a 23-page manual, "Coaching the Conversation- A Guide to Facilitating Conversation Groups," with details on hosting a community-based program. | Behavioural | Group 2: The Conversation Project (CP) Starter Kit |
| Table Topics (general conversation game)Table topics is a popular, commercially available conversation starter game that consists of question cards to prompt conversations (e.g., 'What do you love about your hometown?'). | Other | Group 3: Control Arm (Placebo control game, 'Table Topics') |
Primary outcome
Completion of a Self-reported or Visually Verified Advance Directive
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Study team confirms completion of a signed advance directive collected via self-report or visual verification
2 secondary outcomes
Completion of at least one Other Advance Care Planning (ACP) behavior
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change in Advance Care Planning(ACP) Engagement Readiness 4-Item Survey
Time frame: Baseline (Day of event participation); 6 months post-event participation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Sep 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39700514Costigan HJ, VanDyke E, Calo WA, Tucci A, Van Scoy LJ; Project Talk Trial Collaborative Working Group Members. Adapting Advance Care Planning Interventions for Hispanic Communities Across the U.S. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 Dec;42(12):1290-1297. doi: 10.1177/10499091241306427. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36180899Van Scoy LJ, Levi BH, Bramble C, Calo W, Chinchilli VM, Currin L, Grant D, Hollenbeak C, Katsaros M, Marlin S, Scott AM, Tucci A, VanDyke E, Wasserman E, Witt P, Green MJ. Comparing two advance care planning conversation activities to motivate advance directive completion in underserved communities across the USA: The Project Talk Trial study protocol for a cluster, randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Sep 30;23(1):829. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06746-3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Our study team is highly motivated to share data with outside investigators as a means to ensure reproducibility of findings, further the scientific inquiry, and to avoid unintentional duplication of research. However, only de-identified data would be shared from this database under the auspices of the PI, and only after securing a Data Transfer Agreement. Whether the individual participant data or aggregated data will be determined based on each individual request.
Related trials for Advance Care Planning
Active, not recruiting
ACP Video Intervention for Patients With Life-Limiting Illness
Health Care Utilization, End Stage Disease
Recruiting
Patient Navigation and the Planning Advance Care Together Website to Improve Goals of Care Conversations in Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Survivors, IMPACT-HCT Trial
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm
Not yet recruiting
Development and Evaluation of a Disease-oriented Scenario Game to Promote ACP Among Older Adults and Family Caregivers
Heart Failure, Older Adults (65 Years and Older)
Not yet recruiting
Using a Conversation Game to Engage Native American Washoe Tribe Members in Advance Care Planning: Preparation for a Clinical Trial
Advance Care Planning, American Indian or Alaska Native
Active, not recruiting
Longitudinal Early Advance Care Planning Discussions and Documentation (LEADD) Program: An Exploratory Study in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lauren J. Van Scoy, MD principal investigator
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center; Penn State University College of Medicine
79 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Hello (serious game), The Conversation Project (CP) Starter Kit and Table Topics (general conversation game) in people with Advance Care Planning and Advance Directives, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 79 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 79 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Completion of a Self-reported or Visually Verified Advance Directive (time frame: 6 months post-intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04612738, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2026.