AzTrials
AzTrials

AstigmatismNCT04613882

Quantification of the Visual Benefits of Soft Toric Contact Lenses Compared to Soft Spherical Contact Lenses

A study testing Soft Toric Custom Made Contact lens, Soft Spherical Contact Lenses and Spectacle Correction in people with Astigmatism, run by CooperVision, Inc. at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this work is to undertake a range of vision-related measures with soft toric contact lenses soft spherical contact lenses and spectacle lens correction across a range of levels of astigmatism. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Astigmatism
What is being tested?
Soft Toric Custom Made Contact lens, Soft Spherical Contact Lenses and Spectacle Correction
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
59 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
28 Sep 2021to 21 Jun 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • -
  • Subjects will only be eligible for the study if:
  • They are of legal age between 18 and 40 years.
  • They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
  • They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
  • They are current wearers of any soft contact lens (i.e. have worn lenses in the last six months).
Show all 12Show fewer
  • They have refractive ocular astigmatism between 0.00DC and -1.50DC in one or both eyes.
  • They have a spherical component to their ocular refractive error between 0.00 and - 6.00 DS.
  • They could attain at least 0.10 logMAR distance high contrast visual acuity in one eye with the study lenses within the available power range.
  • They can be fitted satisfactorily with both lens types.
  • They own an acceptable pair of spectacles.
  • They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study.

Who cannot join

  • -
  • Subjects will not be eligible to take part in the study if:
  • They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
  • They have had corneal refractive surgery.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
  • They are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • They have any ocular abnormality which would, in the opinion of the investigator, normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • They have an amblyopic eye, in which case only dominant eye will be assessed for that subject.
  • They have an infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis), any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV) or diabetes.
  • They have a history of severe allergic reaction or anaphylaxis.
  • They have taken part in any other contact lens clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Eurolens Research

    Manchester, M13 9PL

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Quantification of the Visual Benefits of Soft Toric Contact Lenses Compared to Soft Spherical Contact Lenses Over a Range of Refractive Astigmatism

The aim of this work is to undertake a range of vision-related measures with soft toric contact lenses soft spherical contact lenses and spectacle lens correction across a range of levels of astigmatism.

Read the detailed description

This will be a randomised, crossover, partially subject-masked (for contact lenses only), non-dispensing study, controlled by cross-comparison.

Conditions
Astigmatism
Being tested
Soft Toric Custom Made Contact lens, Soft Spherical Contact Lenses, Spectacle Correction
Medical subject headings
Astigmatism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Soft Toric Custom Made Contact lensDevice

    Subjects will be randomized to wear soft toric custom made lenses for 30 minutes in one eye with other eye patched.

  • Soft Spherical Contact LensesDevice

    Subjects will be randomized to wear soft spherical contact lenses for 30 minutes in one eye with other eye patched.

  • Spectacle CorrectionDevice

    Subjects will be randomized to wear spectacle Correction for 30 minutes in one eye with other eye patched.

Study groups in NCT04613882
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Soft Toric Custom Made contact lensesExperimentalSubjects will be randomized to wear Soft Toric custom made contact lenses for 30 minutes in one eye with other eye patched.
Receives: Device: Soft Toric Custom Made Contact lens; Device: Soft Spherical Contact Lenses; Device: Spectacle Correction
Soft Spherical Contact LensesActive comparatorSubjects will be randomized to wear soft spherical contact lens for 30 minutes in one eye with other eye patched
Receives: Device: Soft Toric Custom Made Contact lens; Device: Soft Spherical Contact Lenses; Device: Spectacle Correction
Spectacle CorrectionActive comparatorSubjects will be randomized to wear spectacle Correction for 30 minutes in one eye with other eye patched.
Receives: Device: Soft Toric Custom Made Contact lens; Device: Soft Spherical Contact Lenses; Device: Spectacle Correction

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Acuity

    Visual acuity was assessed using logMAR for each intervention.

    Measured: Baseline with low contrast VA

  2. Visual Acuity

    Visual acuity was assessed using logMAR for each intervention.

    Measured: After 30 minutes of dispense (Low Contrast VA)

  3. Visual Acuity

    Visual acuity was assessed using logMAR for each intervention.

    Measured: Baseline with High contrast VA

  4. Visual Acuity

    Visual acuity was assessed using logMAR for each intervention.

    Measured: After 30 minutes of dispense (High Contrast VA)

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Conjunctival Redness

    Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).

    The assessments done were recorded prior to the first intervention.

    Here the time frame used is "Entrance" which refers to the time prior to wear of study lens.

    Measured: Entrance (Prior to wear of study lens)

  2. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Conjunctival Redness

    Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).

    The assessments were done following the removal of the third intervention. Here the time frame used is "Exit" which refers to those measurements taken post-lens/spectacle wear.

    Measured: At Exit (After 30 minutes in each of three interventions)

  3. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Limbal Redness

    Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).

    The assessments done were recorded prior to the first intervention. Here the time frame used is "Entrance" which refers to the time prior to wear of study lens.

    Measured: Entrance (Prior to wear of study lens)

  4. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Limbal Redness

    Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).

    The assessments were done following the removal of the third intervention. Here the time frame used is "Exit" which refers to those measurements taken post-lens/spectacle wear.

    Measured: At Exit (After 30 minutes in each of three interventions)

  5. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Corneal Staining

    Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).

    The assessments done were recorded prior to the first intervention. Here the time frame used is "Entrance" which refers to the time prior to wear of study lens.

    Measured: Entrance (Prior to wear of study lens)

  6. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Corneal Staining

    Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).

    The assessments were done following the removal of the third intervention. Here the time frame used is "Exit" which refers to those measurements taken post-lens/spectacle wear.

    Measured: At Exit (After 30 minutes in each of three interventions)

  7. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Conjunctival Staining

    Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).

    The assessments done were recorded prior to the first intervention.

    Here the time frame used is "Entrance" which refers to the time prior to wear of study lens.

    Measured: Entrance (Prior to wear of study lens)

  8. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Conjunctival Staining

    Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).

    The assessments were done following the removal of the third intervention. Here the time frame used is "Exit" which refers to those measurements taken post-lens/spectacle wear.

    Measured: At Exit (After 30 minutes in each of three interventions)

  9. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Papillary Conjunctivitis

    Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).

    The assessments done were recorded prior to the first intervention.

    Here the time frame used is "Entrance" which refers to the time prior to wear of study lens.

    Measured: Entrance (Prior to wear of study lens)

  10. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Papillary Conjunctivitis

    Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).

    The assessments were done following the removal of the third intervention.

    Here the time frame used is "Exit" which refers to those measurements taken post-lens/spectacle wear.

    Measured: At Exit (After 30 minutes in each of three interventions)

  11. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Corneal Oedema

    Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).

    The assessments done were recorded prior to the first intervention. Here the time frame used is "Entrance" which refers to the time prior to wear of study lens.

    Measured: Entrance (Prior to wear of study lens)

  12. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy Findings - Corneal Oedema

    Slit lamp Biomicroscopy findings were assessed on Efron Grading scales scored to the nearest 0.1 on a scale of 0 - 4 (0=normal, 1=trace, 2=mild, 3=moderate, 4=severe).

    The assessments were done following the removal of the third intervention.

    Here the time frame used is "Exit" which refers to those measurements taken post-lens/spectacle wear.

    Measured: At Exit (After 30 minutes in each of three interventions)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Nov 2020
  2. Study start28 Sep 2021
  3. Primary completion21 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion21 Jun 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
59 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04613882
Sponsor's protocol ID
C19-683 (EX-MKTG-116)
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
28 Oct 2020
Last updated
11 Oct 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes

Publications

  • Read M, Morgan P, Maldonado-Codina C, Orsborn G, Vega J, Navascues-Cornago M. Evaluating the visual benefits of toric soft contact lenses using a novel pupil-controlled vision testing system. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2025 Apr;49(2):102604. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2025.102604. Epub 2026 Jan 23.

    PubMed 41579512

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Soft Toric Custom Made Contact lens, Soft Spherical Contact Lenses and Spectacle Correction in people with Astigmatism, run by CooperVision, Inc. at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Oct 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Acuity (time frame: Baseline with low contrast VA). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04613882, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Oct 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in