AzTrials
AzTrials

DiabetesPhase 2NCT04617275

A 12-WEEK TITRATE STUDY TO EVALUATE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF PF-06882961 IN ADULTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS AND IN NON-DIABETIC ADULTS WITH OBESITY

A Phase 2 study testing PF-06882961 in people with Diabetes and Obesity, run by Pfizer at 38 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will assess tolerability, safety, and pharmacodynamics (PD) of twice daily (BID) administration of PF- 06882961 in adult participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) who are treated with metformin and in non-diabetic adults with obesity Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes, Obesity
What is being tested?
PF-06882961
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
151 participants
Where
38 sitesUnited States
Study dates
6 Jan 2021to 17 Nov 2021
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female participants between the ages of 18 and 75 years, inclusive, at Visit 1 (screening).

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus or secondary forms of diabetes.
  • History of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, arterial revascularization, stroke, New York Heart Association Functional Class II IV heart failure, or transient ischemic attack within 6 months of screening (Visit 1).
  • Participants with a known medical history of active liver disease (other than non alcoholic hepatic steatosis), including chronic active hepatitis B or C, or primary biliary cirrhosis.
  • History of major depressive disorder or history of other severe psychiatric disorders (eg, schizophrenia or bipolar disorder) within the last 2 years.
  • Any lifetime history of a suicide attempt.

Trial locations and contacts

38 sites in 1 country.

38 sites in 1 country

United States38 sites
  • Heritage Valley Medical Group, Inc.

    Beaver, Pennsylvania, 15009

  • Bountiful Internal Medicine

    Bountiful, Utah, 84010

  • Progressive Clinical Research

    Bountiful, Utah, 84010

  • Wade Family Medicine

    Bountiful, Utah, 84010

  • PMG Research of Raleigh, LLC d/b/a PMG Research of Cary

    Cary, North Carolina, 27518

  • PMG Research of Charlotte, LLC

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28209

  • Clinical Research Professionals

    Chesterfield, Missouri, 63005

  • Sterling Research Group, Ltd.

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219

  • Innovative Research of West Florida, Inc.

    Clearwater, Florida, 33756

  • Dallas Diabetes Research Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75230

  • Meridian Clinical Research, LLC DBA Regional Clinical Research

    Endwell, New York, 13760

  • PMG Research of Hickory, LLC

    Hickory, North Carolina, 28601

  • Juno Research, LLC

    Houston, Texas, 77074

  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32256

  • Manassas Clinical Research Center

    Manassas, Virginia, 20110

  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.

    Memphis, Tennessee, 38119

  • Solaris Clinical Research

    Meridian, Idaho, 83646

  • Nola Care LLC

    Metairie, Louisiana, 70006

  • Acevedo Clinical Research Associates

    Miami, Florida, 33142

  • Catalina Research Institute, LLC

    Montclair, California, 91763

  • Research Integrity, LLC

    Owensboro, Kentucky, 42303

  • Desert Oasis Healthcare Medical Group

    Palm Springs, California, 92262

  • Pines Care Research Center, LLC

    Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024

  • Arizona Research Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85053

  • Rancho Cucamonga Clinical Research

    Rancho Cucamonga, California, 91730

  • PMG Research of Rocky Mount, LLC - Investigational Product and Mail delivery

    Rocky Mount, North Carolina, 27804

  • PMG Research of Rocky Mount, LLC - Patient Visits

    Rocky Mount, North Carolina, 27804

  • California Research Foundation

    San Diego, California, 92123-1881

  • Unity Health - Searcy Medical Center

    Searcy, Arkansas, 72143

  • Consano Clinical Research, LLC

    Shavano Park, Texas, 78231

  • Carolina Research Center, Inc.

    Shelby, North Carolina, 28150

  • Meridian Clinical Research, LLC

    Sioux City, Iowa, 51106

  • Palmetto Clinical Research

    Summerville, South Carolina, 29485

  • Palmetto Primary Care Physicians (physicals only)

    Summerville, South Carolina, 29485

  • University Clinical Investigators, Inc.

    Tustin, California, 92780

  • Diablo Clinical Research, Inc.

    Walnut Creek, California, 94598

  • Emerson Clinical Research Institute

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20011

  • PMG Research of Winston-Salem, LLC

    Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A 12-WEEK, PHASE 2A, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, SPONSOR-OPEN, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PARALLEL GROUP STUDY TO ASSESS THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND PHARMACODYNAMICS OF PF-06882961 TITRATION IN ADULTS WITH TYPE 2 DIABETES MELLITUS TREATED WITH METFORMIN AND IN NON-DIABETIC ADULTS WITH OBESITY

This study will assess tolerability, safety, and pharmacodynamics (PD) of twice daily (BID) administration of PF- 06882961 in adult participants with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) who are treated with metformin and in non-diabetic adults with obesity

Conditions
Diabetes, Obesity
Being tested
PF-06882961, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Obesity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PF-06882961Drug

    PF-68882961 will be provided as tablets twice a day (BID)

  • PlaceboOther

    Placebo comparator will be provided as tablets twice daily for 12 weeks

Study groups in NCT04617275
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1-PF-06882961 starting dose of 5 milligram (mg) BID titrated to 120 mg in participants with T2DMExperimentalThe dose will be titrated over 12 weeks, starting with a dose of 5 mg BID to reach the target dose of 120 mg BID. Titration steps include: 5 mg BID, 10 mg BID, 20 mg BID, 40 mg BID, 60 mg BID, 80 mg BID, 100 mg BID and 120 mg BID
Receives: Drug: PF-06882961
Arm 2-PF-06882961 starting dose of 10 mg BID titrated to 100 mg in participants with T2DMExperimentalThe dose will be titrated over 12 weeks, starting with a dose of 10 mg BID to reach the target dose of 120 mg BID. Titration steps include: 10 mg BID, 20 mg BID, 40 mg BID, 60 mg BID, 80 mg BID, 100 mg BID and 120 mg BID
Receives: Drug: PF-06882961
Arm 3-PF-06882961 starting dose of 5 mg BID titrated to 80 mg in participants with T2DMExperimentalThe dose will be titrated over 12 weeks, starting with a dose of 5 mg BID to reach the target dose of 80 mg BID. Titration steps include: 5 mg BID, 10 mg BID, 20 mg BID, 40 mg BID, 60 mg BID and 80 mg BID
Receives: Drug: PF-06882961
Arm 4-PF-06882961 starting dose of 10 mg BID titrated to 80 mg in participants with T2DMExperimentalThe dose will be titrated over 12 weeks, starting with a dose of 10 mg BID to reach the target dose of 80 mg BID. Titration steps include: 10 mg BID, 20 mg BID, 40 mg BID, 60 mg BID and 80 mg BID
Receives: Drug: PF-06882961
Arm 5 - Placebo in subjects with T2DM and ObesityPlacebo comparatorMatching Placebo tablets taken twice a day (BID)
Receives: Other: Placebo
Arm 6-PF-06882961 starting dose of 10 mg BID titrated to 200 mg in participants with T2DMExperimentalThe dose will be titrated over 12 weeks, starting with a dose of 10 mg BID to reach the target dose of 200 mg BID. Titration steps include: 10 mg BID, 20 mg BID, 40 mg BID, 60 mg BID, 80 mg BID, 100 mg BID and 120 mg BID,140 mg BID, 160 mg BID, 180 MG BID, 200 mg BID
Receives: Drug: PF-06882961
Arm 7-PF-06882961 starting dose of 10 mg BID titrated to 200 mg in participants with ObesityExperimentalThe dose will be titrated over 12 weeks, starting with a dose of 10 mg BID to reach the target dose of 200 mg BID. Titration steps include: 10 mg BID, 20 mg BID, 40 mg BID, 60 mg BID, 80 mg BID, 100 mg BID and 120 mg BID,140 mg BID, 160 mg BID, 180 MG BID, 200 mg BID
Receives: Drug: PF-06882961

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study treatment, whether or not considered related to the study treatment. TEAEs were events between first dose of study drug and up to follow-up visit that were absent before treatment or that worsened after treatment. AEs presented below were TEAEs. The investigator was required to use clinical judgment to assess the potential relationship between investigational product and each AE, to define an treatment-related AE. Assessments of AE intensity were defined as mild (easily tolerated, causing minimal discomfort and not interfering with daily activities), moderate (causing sufficient discomfort and interferes with normal daily activities) and severe (preventing normal daily activities).

    Measured: Baseline through follow-up (Day 112)

Secondary outcomes (29)
  1. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities (Without Regard to Baseline Abnormality)

    Safety laboratory assessments included clinical chemistry, hematology, urinalysis, and other tests. Abnormality was determined at the investigator's discretion.

    Measured: Baseline through Visit 10 (Day 91)

  2. Number of Participants With Vital Signs Meeting the Pre-defined Categorical Summarization Criteria

    Vital signs abnormality criteria: 1) supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) <90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg); 2) supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) <50 mmHg; 3) supine pulse rate <40 or >120 beats per minute (bpm); 4) change from baseline (increase or decrease) in supine SBP >=30 mmHg; 5) change from baseline (increase or decrease) in supine DBP >=20 mmHg.

    Measured: Baseline through Visit 10 (Day 91)

  3. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data Meeting the Pre-defined Categorical Summarization Criteria

    ECG assessments included pulse rate (PR), QT, heart rate, QTcF intervals and QRS complex. ECG abnormalities criteria included: PR interval value >= 300 msec, or baseline (BL) >200 msec and >=25% increase from BL, or BL <=200 msec and >=50% increase from BL; QRS interval value >= 140msec, or >=50% increase from BL; QTcF value >450 and <=480 msec, or >480 and <=500 msec, or >500 msec, or increase from BL>30 and <=60 msec, or >60msec.

    Measured: Baseline through Visit 10 (Day 91)

  4. Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)

    The C-SSRS is an interview-based rating scale to systematically assess suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior. Participants who responded "yes" to the questions will be counted. Data relevant to the assessment of suicidality were mapped to the Columbia-Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) codes.

    Measured: Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13-14

  5. Number of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    The PHQ-9 is a 9 item self-report scale for the assessment of depressive symptoms. The PHQ-9 were completed by participants and reviewed by site staff at the pre-defined time points.

    Measured: Week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 13-14.

  6. Change From Baseline (CFB) in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2

    Baseline was defined as the result closest prior to dosing at Day1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2

  7. CFB in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 4

    Baseline was defined as the result closest prior to dosing at Day1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4

  8. CFB in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 6

    Baseline was defined as the result closest prior to dosing at Day1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 6

  9. CFB in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 8

    Baseline was defined as the result closest prior to dosing at Day1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 8

  10. CFB in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 10

    Baseline was defined as the result closest prior to dosing at Day1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 10

  11. CFB in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 12

    Baseline was defined as the result closest prior to dosing at Day1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  12. CFB in Glycolated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 2

    Baseline was defined as the result closest prior to dosing at Day1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2

  13. CFB in Glycolated HbA1c at Week 4

    Baseline was defined as the result closest prior to dosing at Day1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4

  14. CFB in Glycolated HbA1c at Week 6

    Baseline was defined as the result closest prior to dosing at Day1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 6

  15. CFB in Glycolated HbA1c at Week 8

    Baseline was defined as the result closest prior to dosing at Day1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 8

  16. CFB in Glycolated HbA1c at Week 10

    Baseline was defined as the result closest prior to dosing at Day1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 10

  17. CFB in Glycolated HbA1c at Week 12

    Baseline was defined as the result closest prior to dosing at Day1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  18. CFB in Body Weight at Week 2 (Participants With T2DM)

    Baseline was defined as the average of a duplicate measurement closest prior to dosing at Day 1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points. Average of the duplicate measurements (where applicable) was used in analyses.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2

  19. CFB in Body Weight at Week 4 (Participants With T2DM)

    Baseline was defined as the average of a duplicate measurement closest prior to dosing at Day 1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points. Average of the duplicate measurements (where applicable) was used in analyses.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4

  20. CFB in Body Weight at Week 6 (Participants With T2DM)

    Baseline was defined as the average of a duplicate measurement closest prior to dosing at Day 1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points. Average of the duplicate measurements (where applicable) was used in analyses.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 6

  21. CFB in Body Weight at Week 8 (Participants With T2DM)

    Baseline was defined as the average of a duplicate measurement closest prior to dosing at Day 1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points. Average of the duplicate measurements (where applicable) was used in analyses.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 8

  22. CFB in Body Weight at Week 10 (Participants With T2DM)

    Baseline was defined as the average of a duplicate measurement closest prior to dosing at Day 1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points. Average of the duplicate measurements (where applicable) was used in analyses.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 10

  23. CFB in Body Weight at Week 12 (Participants With T2DM)

    Baseline was defined as the average of a duplicate measurement closest prior to dosing at Day 1. The MMRM model included treatment, time, strata (male versus female) and treatment-by-time interaction as fixed effects, baseline as a covariate and the baseline-by-time interaction with time fitted as a repeated effect and participant as a random effect. An unstructured covariance matrix was used to estimate the variances and covariance within participant across time points. Average of the duplicate measurements (where applicable) was used in analyses.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

  24. CFB in Body Weight at Week 2 (Non-diabetic Participants With Obesity)

    Body weight were measured in duplicate as indicated. The second weight measurement were obtained at least 1-2 minutes apart from the first weight measurement. Weight were recorded using a calibrated scale (with the same scale used if possible for the duration of the study) reporting weight in kilograms (kg), and accuracy to the nearest 0.1 kg; ie, the device distinguished a difference between 68.4 kg vs 68.3 kg. The scale was placed on a stable, flat surface. Weight measurement was taken under the following conditions: participant is in a fasted state; after void of urine; after removal of shoes, bulky layers of clothing and jackets so that only light clothing remained; while remaining was during the measurement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2

  25. CFB in Body Weight at Week 4 (Non-diabetic Participants With Obesity)

    Body weight were measured in duplicate as indicated. The second weight measurement were obtained at least 1-2 minutes apart from the first weight measurement. Weight were recorded using a calibrated scale (with the same scale used if possible for the duration of the study) reporting weight in kilograms (kg), and accuracy to the nearest 0.1 kg; ie, the device distinguished a difference between 68.4 kg vs 68.3 kg. The scale was placed on a stable, flat surface. Weight measurement was taken under the following conditions: participant is in a fasted state; after void of urine; after removal of shoes, bulky layers of clothing and jackets so that only light clothing remained; while remaining was during the measurement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4

  26. CFB in Body Weight at Week 6 (Non-diabetic Participants With Obesity)

    Body weight were measured in duplicate as indicated. The second weight measurement were obtained at least 1-2 minutes apart from the first weight measurement. Weight were recorded using a calibrated scale (with the same scale used if possible for the duration of the study) reporting weight in kilograms (kg), and accuracy to the nearest 0.1 kg; ie, the device distinguished a difference between 68.4 kg vs 68.3 kg. The scale was placed on a stable, flat surface. Weight measurement was taken under the following conditions: participant is in a fasted state; after void of urine; after removal of shoes, bulky layers of clothing and jackets so that only light clothing remained; while remaining was during the measurement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 6

  27. CFB in Body Weight at Week 8 (Non-diabetic Participants With Obesity)

    Body weight were measured in duplicate as indicated. The second weight measurement were obtained at least 1-2 minutes apart from the first weight measurement. Weight were recorded using a calibrated scale (with the same scale used if possible for the duration of the study) reporting weight in kilograms (kg), and accuracy to the nearest 0.1 kg; ie, the device distinguished a difference between 68.4 kg vs 68.3 kg. The scale was placed on a stable, flat surface. Weight measurement was taken under the following conditions: participant is in a fasted state; after void of urine; after removal of shoes, bulky layers of clothing and jackets so that only light clothing remained; while remaining was during the measurement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 8

  28. CFB in Body Weight at Week 10 (Non-diabetic Participants With Obesity)

    Body weight were measured in duplicate as indicated. The second weight measurement were obtained at least 1-2 minutes apart from the first weight measurement. Weight were recorded using a calibrated scale (with the same scale used if possible for the duration of the study) reporting weight in kilograms (kg), and accuracy to the nearest 0.1 kg; ie, the device distinguished a difference between 68.4 kg vs 68.3 kg. The scale was placed on a stable, flat surface. Weight measurement was taken under the following conditions: participant is in a fasted state; after void of urine; after removal of shoes, bulky layers of clothing and jackets so that only light clothing remained; while remaining was during the measurement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 10

  29. CFB in Body Weight at Week 12 (Non-diabetic Participants With Obesity)

    Body weight were measured in duplicate as indicated. The second weight measurement were obtained at least 1-2 minutes apart from the first weight measurement. Weight were recorded using a calibrated scale (with the same scale used if possible for the duration of the study) reporting weight in kilograms (kg), and accuracy to the nearest 0.1 kg; ie, the device distinguished a difference between 68.4 kg vs 68.3 kg. The scale was placed on a stable, flat surface. Weight measurement was taken under the following conditions: participant is in a fasted state; after void of urine; after removal of shoes, bulky layers of clothing and jackets so that only light clothing remained; while remaining was during the measurement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Nov 2020
  2. Study start6 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion17 Nov 2021
  4. Study completion17 Nov 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
151 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04617275
Sponsor's protocol ID
C3421008
Other IDs
GLP-1Ra Ph 2 Titration Study
Status last verified
Nov 2022
First submitted
30 Oct 2020
Last updated
8 Dec 2022
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Saxena AR, Frias JP, Gorman DN, Lopez RN, Andrawis N, Tsamandouras N, Birnbaum MJ. Tolerability, safety and pharmacodynamics of oral, small-molecule glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist danuglipron for type 2 diabetes: A 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 study comparing different dose-escalation schemes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Oct;25(10):2805-2814. doi: 10.1111/dom.15168. Epub 2023 Jun 13.

    PubMed 37311722

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing PF-06882961 in people with Diabetes and Obesity, run by Pfizer at 38 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 38 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Dec 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) by Severity (time frame: Baseline through follow-up (Day 112)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04617275, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Dec 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in