AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiac DiseaseATRAP-GCSNCT04620694

Impact of Arterial Cannulation Site on Vasopressor Requirement in Cardiac Surgery

An observational study of Cardiac Disease, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Choice of arterial cannulation site during cardiac surgery is controversial. Some physicians in our institution prefer radial artery site, others prefer aortic site (via femoral artery or brachial artery). The investigators aim to compare these two strategies for vasopressor requirement. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cardiac Disease
What is being tested?
Choice of arterial cannulation site at the beginning of the surgery
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
350 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Oct 2020to Feb 2021
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adult patients scheduled for cadiac surgery wih cardiopulmonary bypass

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patient
  • Scheduled for cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass

Who cannot join

  • More than one arterial cannula at the beginning of the surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Remi Schweizer, MD contact

0033472318933

remi.schweizer@chu-lyon.fr

Jean Luc FELLAHI, MD contact

0033472318933

jean-luc.fellahi@chu-lyon.fr

France1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hôpital Louis Pradel

    Lyon

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Impact of Arterial Cannulation Site on Vasopressor Requirement During Cardiac Surgery: a Monocentric Prospective Cohort Study

Choice of arterial cannulation site during cardiac surgery is controversial. Some physicians in our institution prefer radial artery site, others prefer aortic site (via femoral artery or brachial artery). The investigators aim to compare these two strategies for vasopressor requirement. The study hypothesis is that radial artery cannulation is associated with a larger dose of vasopressor due aortic to radial arterial pressure gradient phenomenon.

Conditions
Cardiac Disease
Being tested
Choice of arterial cannulation site at the beginning of the surgery
Keywords
Cardiac surgery, Aortic to radial arterial pressure gradient, Vasopressor
Medical subject headings
Heart Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Choice of arterial cannulation site at the beginning of the surgeryDevice

    Choice of arterial cannulation site at the beginning of the surgery is at the discretion of the anesthesia physician.

Study groups in NCT04620694
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Radial artery cannulationPatients whom radial artery was cannulated at the beginning of the surgery.
Aortic cannulation (brachial or femoral artery)Patients whom femoral or brachial artery was cannulated at the beginning of the surgery. Active comparator
Receives: Device: Choice of arterial cannulation site at the beginning of the surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intraoperative vasopressor requirement

    Mean intraoperative dosage of Norepinephrine (µg.kg-1.min-1)

    Measured: end of surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Nov 2020
  2. Study start1 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completionFeb 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
350 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04620694
Sponsor's protocol ID
69HCL20_0947
Acronym
ATRAP-GCS
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
3 Nov 2020
Last updated
9 Nov 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiac Disease, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Remi Schweizer, MD (0033472318933, remi.schweizer@chu-lyon.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intraoperative vasopressor requirement (time frame: end of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Nov 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in