AzTrials
AzTrials

Vitamin D DeficiencyNCT04628000

Baseline Vitamin D Deficiency and COVID-19 Disease Severity

An observational study of Vitamin D Deficiency and Covid19, run by Parkview Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

It is known that vitamin D has been found to decrease incidence of viral respiratory infections, as well as have effects on multiple cytokines involved in immunomodulation and the bradykinin/renin-angiotensin system. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Vitamin D Deficiency, Covid19
What is being tested?
Vitamin D
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
27 Oct 2020to 14 Apr 2022
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Those hospitalized 3/9-9/7 2020 who were covid positive and had concomitant vit d level drawn

Who may be able to join

  • Covid 19 +
  • Vitamin D level

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18
  • no associated vitamin D level

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Parkview Medical Center

    Pueblo, Colorado, 81003

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Baseline Vitamin D Deficiency and COVID-19 Disease Severity/Need for Escalation of Care

It is known that vitamin D has been found to decrease incidence of viral respiratory infections, as well as have effects on multiple cytokines involved in immunomodulation and the bradykinin/renin-angiotensin system.

Recently, data was released showing a correlation between baseline vitamin D deficiency status and increased risk of contracting COVID-19.

Read more

Separate analysis shows that many of the deleterious effects of COVID-19 may be due to the bradykinin/RAS system, and that vitamin D is one plausible treatment option to modulate these effects.

Studies are currently ongoing to determine if vitamin D supplementation of those hospitalized with COVID-19 has a beneficial effect on patient outcomes.

Healthcare resources have been strained during the pandemic in areas of heavy caseload. It is possible that those with concurrent vitamin D deficiency and COVID positivity have an increased need for escalation of care. A small study has been conducted in this area, but was limited by small number of subjects.

Read the detailed description

Abstract: It is known that vitamin D has been found to decrease incidence of viral respiratory infections, as well as have effects on multiple cytokines involved in immunomodulation and the bradykinin/renin-angiotensin system. Recently, data was released showing a correlation between baseline vitamin D deficiency status and increased risk of contracting COVID-19. Separate analysis shows that many of the deleterious effects of COVID-19 may be due to the bradykinin/RAS system, and that vitamin D is one plausible treatment option to modulate these effects. Studies are currently ongoing to determine if vitamin D supplementation of those hospitalized with COVID-19 has a beneficial effect on patient outcomes.

Objective: To determine if those hospitalized with COVID-19 with baseline vitamin D deficiency, have worse outcomes during their stay than those who are not vitamin D deficient at baseline.

Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective cohort study at an urban academic medical center which included patients with a 25-hydroxycholecalciferol level measured within one year before being tested for COVID-19 and hospitalized from March 9th to September 7th, 2020.

Exposures: Vitamin D deficiency was defined by the last measurement of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol less than 20 ng/mL before COVID testing (within one year).

Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes investigated include length of stay, need for supplemental oxygen, ICU admission, need for invasive life support (mechanical ventilation, vasopressors, dialysis), and discharge status (discharged alive vs. death).

Being tested
Vitamin D
Keywords
prognosis
Medical subject headings
Vitamin D Deficiency, COVID-19

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vitamin DOther

    Also called Vitamin D deficiency

    Clinical Correlation

Study groups in NCT04628000
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Vitamin D deficiency and COVID19Vitamin D deficiency and COVID19
Receives: Other: Vitamin D

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. LOS duration in days

    Length of stay

    Measured: 3/9-9/7 2020

  2. Supp O2 flow volume in L/min

    Supplemental Oxygen need

    Measured: 3/9-9/7 2020

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Nov 2020
  2. Study start27 Oct 2020
  3. Primary completion14 Oct 2021
  4. Study completion14 Apr 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04628000
Sponsor's protocol ID
PIRB78
Status last verified
Sep 2022
First submitted
11 Nov 2020
Last updated
4 Oct 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Martineau AR, Jolliffe DA, Greenberg L, Aloia JF, Bergman P, Dubnov-Raz G, Esposito S, Ganmaa D, Ginde AA, Goodall EC, Grant CC, Janssens W, Jensen ME, Kerley CP, Laaksi I, Manaseki-Holland S, Mauger D, Murdoch DR, Neale R, Rees JR, Simpson S, Stelmach I, Trilok Kumar G, Urashima M, Camargo CA, Griffiths CJ, Hooper RL. Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory infections: individual participant data meta-analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2019 Jan;23(2):1-44. doi: 10.3310/hta23020.

    PubMed 30675873
  • Grant WB, Lahore H, McDonnell SL, Baggerly CA, French CB, Aliano JL, Bhattoa HP. Evidence that Vitamin D Supplementation Could Reduce Risk of Influenza and COVID-19 Infections and Deaths. Nutrients. 2020 Apr 2;12(4):988. doi: 10.3390/nu12040988.

    PubMed 32252338
  • Garvin MR, Alvarez C, Miller JI, Prates ET, Walker AM, Amos BK, Mast AE, Justice A, Aronow B, Jacobson D. A mechanistic model and therapeutic interventions for COVID-19 involving a RAS-mediated bradykinin storm. Elife. 2020 Jul 7;9:e59177. doi: 10.7554/eLife.59177.

    PubMed 32633718
  • ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2020 Apr 10 - . Identifier NCT04334005, Vitamin D on Prevention and Treatment of COVID 19 (COVITD-19) [cited 2020 Sept 9]; Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04334005

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Vitamin D Deficiency and Covid19, run by Parkview Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

LOS duration in days (time frame: 3/9-9/7 2020). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04628000, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in