SurvivorshipBASICNCT04660188
Impact of a Breast cAncer Survivorship Interprofessional Community Care Model
A study testing Multidisciplinary collaborative care arm in people with Survivorship and Breast Cancer, run by National Cancer Centre, Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.
Trial summary
With an increase in breast cancer survivors (BCS) in Singapore, the current oncologist-centric survivorship model will not be sustainable to respond to the rising demand of survivorship care services. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Survivorship, Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Multidisciplinary collaborative care arm
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSingapore
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2021to 20 Jul 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 21 years old or older.
- Received a formal diagnosis of breast cancer.
- At least three years after active primary treatment including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy (if any) and targeted therapy (if any).
- Ascertained to be a low-risk cancer survivor by oncologist.
- Ambulatory with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2, indicative of adequate functioning capacity to travel and receive follow-up care at polyclinics.
- Able to read and understand either English or Mandarin
Who cannot join
- Physically or mentally incapable of providing verbal/ written consent.
- Unwell or unable to comply with the study protocol that involves questionnaires completion.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Impact of a Breast cAncer Survivorship Interprofessional Community Care Model (BASIC): A Randomized Controlled Trial
With an increase in breast cancer survivors (BCS) in Singapore, the current oncologist-centric survivorship model will not be sustainable to respond to the rising demand of survivorship care services. To meet the long-term healthcare needs of Singaporeans in a sustainable manner, the investigators propose to pilot a breast cancer survivorship inter-professional community (BASIC) care model for cancer survivorship. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of this care model for implementation among BCS and healthcare providers. The investigators hypothesize that the BASIC model is feasible and acceptable to be evaluated on a larger scale. This new follow-up model can potentially reduce waiting times in tertiary centers without compromising quality of care, directly benefiting participants through more efficient follow-up sessions.
Read the detailed description
In Singapore, breast cancer accounts for approximately 30% of all new cancer cases. With an overall 10-year age-standardized survival rate of 50%, it is estimated that 900 BCS will require dedicated cancer survivorship care in Singapore annually. However, the current oncologist-centric survivorship model adopted in Singapore will not be sustainable to respond to the rising demand for survivorship care services. This inability to cope with the growing demand poses a major challenge to the health system and accentuates an emerging need for an alternative evidence-based care model to support BCS and healthcare providers in achieving efficient and effective cancer survivorship care.
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) advocates a collaborative survivorship care model involving the transition of cancer survivors from specialist to primary care setting via a risk-stratified approach. While the proposed collaborative model is promising and appealing, its feasibility and applicability in the local Asian setting considering cultural and socioeconomic factors is unknown. Furthermore, two major gaps exist: (i) there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation of structural factors in care coordination and clinical outcomes determination; and (ii) the potential of community pharmacists in cancer survivorship care is not maximized.
The main objective of the study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the BASIC care model for implementation amongst BCS and healthcare providers. The secondary objective addresses the effectiveness of BASIC model by providing robust parameters estimation for the physical symptom distress burden and quality of life outcome measures that will be used for sample size calculation in the eventual main trial.
This will be a pragmatic, randomized, controlled, pilot trial conducted at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS), participating SingHealth polyclinics and Watsons community pharmacies over a period of 2 years. Participants will be randomized into the multidisciplinary collaborative care arm or attentional control arm in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by the absence versus presence of comorbidities. In the multidisciplinary collaborative care arm, participants will experience a 12-month cancer follow-up schedule via a shared-care approach. In the attentional control arm, participants will continue with usual care.
- Conditions
- Survivorship, Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Multidisciplinary collaborative care arm
- Keywords
- survivorship care model, breast cancer survivor, shared-care, primary care, interprofessional, cancer survivorship
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Multidisciplinary collaborative care armOther
Study participants will be cared for by a team of healthcare professionals; an oncologist, a PCP and a pharmacist navigator.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Multidisciplinary collaborative care arm | Experimental | Post-treatment clinical follow-up visits will be staggered between the oncologist and a dedicated PCP. A patient navigator will be assigned to each study participant to conduct follow-up sessions over the phone regularly at an approximate interval of 3 months. Receives: Other: Multidisciplinary collaborative care arm |
| Attentional control arm | No intervention | BCS will receive follow-up care by their oncologists and any other healthcare providers under existing usual care practices at NCCS. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in participants' health-related quality of life
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is used. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/ vomiting and pain), a global quality of life status and six single item measures (dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea and financial stability). All scales are scored from 0 to 100 where a higher score on functioning and global health status scales is indicative of better functioning; and a higher score on symptom scales and single items is indicative of a higher symptom burden.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 12 months
Change in participants' physical and psychological symptom distress levels
The Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) is used. The physical domain of the RSCL comprises of 23 items and the psychological distress domain comprises of 7 items. Each item will be rated on a 4-point Likert scale ("not at all", "a little", "quite a bit" and "very much"). A total physical symptom distress score can be summed to give a final score between 23 to 92, where a higher score indicates a higher symptom distress level. A total psychological distress score can be summed to give a final score between 7 to 28, where a higher score indicates a higher psychological distress level.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 12 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Participants' satisfaction with the shared-care model
Participants in the intervention arm who received the intervention will complete an overall satisfaction questionnaire. This questionnaire is adapted from Patient Experience Measures from the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey. It comprises of 21 items divided into 4 sections evaluating (1) care accessibility and adequacy (8 items); (2) overall communication (5 items); (3) care coordination (3 items); and (4) satisfaction with care (5 items). 20 items will be rated on a Likert scale, where a higher score indicating better experience and satisfaction. One item is an open response question for participants' feedback.
Measured: One year post-intervention
Change in participants' health utilities
The EuroQol 5-Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) has five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/ discomfort and anxiety/ depression. Each dimension will be rated on a 5-point Likert scale ("no problems", "slight problems", "moderate problems", "severe problems" and "extreme problems"), where a higher score indicating greater severity. The second part consists of a visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst health imagined) to 100 (best health imagined) where participants will mark on the scale and write down the corresponding number to indicate their health state. Results from the EQ-5D-5L will be used to derive preference-based measures of health-related quality of life to estimate health utilities.
Measured: Baseline, every 3 months up to 12 months
Change in healthcare cost and productivity
A healthcare utilization survey is used where open-ended questions require participants to report their expenditure to outpatient clinics, hospitalization episodes and on medication. The second part gathers information on the work-related outcomes including change in job scope, paid/ unpaid leave and change in productivity.
Measured: Baseline, every 6 months up to 12 months
Rate of adherence to breast cancer survivorship care guidelines
The rate of adherence to evidence-based breast cancer survivorship care guidelines will be determined by the proportion of participants who satisfied each of the following areas based on documentation of review or scans/ procedures ordered: (1) annual mammograms; (2) screening for secondary primary cancers; (3) assessment and management of physical and psychosocial long-term and late effects of breast cancer or treatment; (4) health promotion; and (5) care coordination.
Measured: From start to end of study, up to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Dec 2020
- Study start1 Mar 2021
- Primary completion20 Jul 2022
- Study completion20 Jul 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for SurvivorshipStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Cancer Centre, Singapore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National University of Singapore, SingHealth Polyclinics
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rose WY Fok, Principal investigator, National Cancer Centre, Singapore
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04660188
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2019/2452
- Acronym
- BASIC
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 18 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 23 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Halpern MT, Viswanathan M, Evans TS, Birken SA, Basch E, Mayer DK. Models of Cancer Survivorship Care: Overview and Summary of Current Evidence. J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jan;11(1):e19-27. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001403. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
PubMed 25205779Grunfeld E, Fitzpatrick R, Mant D, Yudkin P, Adewuyi-Dalton R, Stewart J, Cole D, Vessey M. Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Sep;49(446):705-10.
PubMed 10756611Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D, Verma S, Dent S, Sawka C, Pritchard KI, Ginsburg D, Wood M, Whelan T. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):848-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2235. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
PubMed 16418496Blaauwbroek R, Tuinier W, Meyboom-de Jong B, Kamps WA, Postma A. Shared care by paediatric oncologists and family doctors for long-term follow-up of adult childhood cancer survivors: a pilot study. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Mar;9(3):232-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70034-2. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
PubMed 18282804Ke Y, Ng T, Chan A. Survivorship care models for breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jul;26(7):2125-2141. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4197-y. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
PubMed 29696424Ng T, Toh MR, Cheung YT, Chan A. Follow-up care practices and barriers to breast cancer survivorship: perspectives from Asian oncology practitioners. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Nov;23(11):3193-200. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2700-2. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
PubMed 25791392Chan A, Lum ZK, Ng T, Eyob T, Wang XJ, Chae JW, Dorajoo S, Shwe M, Gan YX, Fok R, Loh KW, Tan YP, Fan G. Perceptions and Barriers of Survivorship Care in Asia: Perceptions From Asian Breast Cancer Survivors. J Glob Oncol. 2016 Jun 8;3(2):98-104. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.004929. eCollection 2017 Apr.
PubMed 28717749Chan A, Gan YX, Oh SK, Ng T, Shwe M, Chan R, Ng R, Goh B, Tan YP, Fan G. A culturally adapted survivorship programme for Asian early stage breast cancer patients in Singapore: A randomized, controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2017 Oct;26(10):1654-1659. doi: 10.1002/pon.4357. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
PubMed 28024163Lim HA, Mahendran R, Chua J, Peh CX, Lim SE, Kua EH. The Distress Thermometer as an ultra-short screening tool: a first validation study for mixed-cancer outpatients in Singapore. Compr Psychiatry. 2014 May;55(4):1055-62. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
PubMed 24556515Breitenstein SM, Gross D, Garvey CA, Hill C, Fogg L, Resnick B. Implementation fidelity in community-based interventions. Res Nurs Health. 2010 Apr;33(2):164-73. doi: 10.1002/nur.20373.
PubMed 20198637van Onzenoort HA, Menger FE, Neef C, Verberk WJ, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van der Kuy PH. Participation in a clinical trial enhances adherence and persistence to treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Hypertension. 2011 Oct;58(4):573-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.171074. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
PubMed 21825228Gao F, Ng GY, Cheung YB, Thumboo J, Pang G, Koo WH, Sethi VK, Wee J, Goh C. The Singaporean English and Chinese versions of the EQ-5D achieved measurement equivalence in cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):206-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
PubMed 18619790Cheung YB, Thumboo J, Goh C, Khoo KS, Che W, Wee J. The equivalence and difference between the English and Chinese versions of two major, cancer-specific, health-related quality-of-life questionnaires. Cancer. 2004 Dec 15;101(12):2874-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20681.
PubMed 15529310Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
PubMed 8433390Tan ML, Idris DB, Teo LW, Loh SY, Seow GC, Chia YY, Tin AS. Validation of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires in the measurement of quality of life of breast cancer patients in Singapore. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Apr-Jun;1(1):22-32. doi: 10.4103/2347-5625.135817.
PubMed 27981079
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of a Breast cAncer Survivorship Interprofessional Community Care Model (BASIC): A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04660188
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BASIC / 2019/2452
- Conditions
- Survivorship, Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- survivorship care model, breast cancer survivor, shared-care, primary care, interprofessional, cancer survivorship
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Cancer Centre, SingaporeUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National University of Singapore, SingHealth Polyclinics
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jul 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
With an increase in breast cancer survivors (BCS) in Singapore, the current oncologist-centric survivorship model will not be sustainable to respond to the rising demand of survivorship care services. To meet the long-term healthcare needs of Singaporeans in a sustainable manner, the investigators propose to pilot a breast cancer survivorship inter-professional community (BASIC) care model for cancer survivorship. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility and acceptability of this care model for implementation among BCS and healthcare providers. The investigators hypothesize that the BASIC model is feasible and acceptable to be evaluated on a larger scale. This new follow-up model can potentially reduce waiting times in tertiary centers without compromising quality of care, directly benefiting participants through more efficient follow-up sessions.
Detailed description
In Singapore, breast cancer accounts for approximately 30% of all new cancer cases. With an overall 10-year age-standardized survival rate of 50%, it is estimated that 900 BCS will require dedicated cancer survivorship care in Singapore annually. However, the current oncologist-centric survivorship model adopted in Singapore will not be sustainable to respond to the rising demand for survivorship care services. This inability to cope with the growing demand poses a major challenge to the health system and accentuates an emerging need for an alternative evidence-based care model to support BCS and healthcare providers in achieving efficient and effective cancer survivorship care.
The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) advocates a collaborative survivorship care model involving the transition of cancer survivors from specialist to primary care setting via a risk-stratified approach. While the proposed collaborative model is promising and appealing, its feasibility and applicability in the local Asian setting considering cultural and socioeconomic factors is unknown. Furthermore, two major gaps exist: (i) there is a lack of comprehensive evaluation of structural factors in care coordination and clinical outcomes determination; and (ii) the potential of community pharmacists in cancer survivorship care is not maximized.
The main objective of the study is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of the BASIC care model for implementation amongst BCS and healthcare providers. The secondary objective addresses the effectiveness of BASIC model by providing robust parameters estimation for the physical symptom distress burden and quality of life outcome measures that will be used for sample size calculation in the eventual main trial.
This will be a pragmatic, randomized, controlled, pilot trial conducted at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS), participating SingHealth polyclinics and Watsons community pharmacies over a period of 2 years. Participants will be randomized into the multidisciplinary collaborative care arm or attentional control arm in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by the absence versus presence of comorbidities. In the multidisciplinary collaborative care arm, participants will experience a 12-month cancer follow-up schedule via a shared-care approach. In the attentional control arm, participants will continue with usual care.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Multidisciplinary collaborative care arm | Experimental | Other: Multidisciplinary collaborative care armPost-treatment clinical follow-up visits will be staggered between the oncologist and a dedicated PCP. A patient navigator will be assigned to each study participant to conduct follow-up sessions over the phone regularly at an approximate interval of 3 months. |
| Attentional control arm | No intervention | –BCS will receive follow-up care by their oncologists and any other healthcare providers under existing usual care practices at NCCS. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- 21 years old or older.
- Received a formal diagnosis of breast cancer.
- At least three years after active primary treatment including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy (if any) and targeted therapy (if any).
- Ascertained to be a low-risk cancer survivor by oncologist.
- Ambulatory with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2, indicative of adequate functioning capacity to travel and receive follow-up care at polyclinics.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Physically or mentally incapable of providing verbal/ written consent.
- Unwell or unable to comply with the study protocol that involves questionnaires completion.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Multidisciplinary collaborative care armStudy participants will be cared for by a team of healthcare professionals; an oncologist, a PCP and a pharmacist navigator. | Other | Multidisciplinary collaborative care arm |
Primary outcome
Change in participants' health-related quality of life
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 12 months
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is used. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of five functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social), three symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/ vomiting and pain), a global quality of life status and six single item measures (dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea and financial stability). All scales are scored from 0 to 100 where a higher score on functioning and global health status scales is indicative of better functioning; and a higher score on symptom scales and single items is indicative of a higher symptom burden.
Change in participants' physical and psychological symptom distress levels
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 12 months
The Rotterdam Symptom Checklist (RSCL) is used. The physical domain of the RSCL comprises of 23 items and the psychological distress domain comprises of 7 items. Each item will be rated on a 4-point Likert scale ("not at all", "a little", "quite a bit" and "very much"). A total physical symptom distress score can be summed to give a final score between 23 to 92, where a higher score indicates a higher symptom distress level. A total psychological distress score can be summed to give a final score between 7 to 28, where a higher score indicates a higher psychological distress level.
4 secondary outcomes
Participants' satisfaction with the shared-care model
Time frame: One year post-intervention
Change in participants' health utilities
Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 12 months
Change in healthcare cost and productivity
Time frame: Baseline, every 6 months up to 12 months
Rate of adherence to breast cancer survivorship care guidelines
Time frame: From start to end of study, up to 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Nov 2022.
- Background: PubMed 25205779Halpern MT, Viswanathan M, Evans TS, Birken SA, Basch E, Mayer DK. Models of Cancer Survivorship Care: Overview and Summary of Current Evidence. J Oncol Pract. 2015 Jan;11(1):e19-27. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2014.001403. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
- Background: PubMed 10756611Grunfeld E, Fitzpatrick R, Mant D, Yudkin P, Adewuyi-Dalton R, Stewart J, Cole D, Vessey M. Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial. Br J Gen Pract. 1999 Sep;49(446):705-10.
- Background: PubMed 16418496Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D, Verma S, Dent S, Sawka C, Pritchard KI, Ginsburg D, Wood M, Whelan T. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 20;24(6):848-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2235. Epub 2006 Jan 17.
- Background: PubMed 18282804Blaauwbroek R, Tuinier W, Meyboom-de Jong B, Kamps WA, Postma A. Shared care by paediatric oncologists and family doctors for long-term follow-up of adult childhood cancer survivors: a pilot study. Lancet Oncol. 2008 Mar;9(3):232-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70034-2. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
- Background: PubMed 29696424Ke Y, Ng T, Chan A. Survivorship care models for breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Jul;26(7):2125-2141. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4197-y. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
- Background: PubMed 25791392Ng T, Toh MR, Cheung YT, Chan A. Follow-up care practices and barriers to breast cancer survivorship: perspectives from Asian oncology practitioners. Support Care Cancer. 2015 Nov;23(11):3193-200. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2700-2. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
- Background: PubMed 28717749Chan A, Lum ZK, Ng T, Eyob T, Wang XJ, Chae JW, Dorajoo S, Shwe M, Gan YX, Fok R, Loh KW, Tan YP, Fan G. Perceptions and Barriers of Survivorship Care in Asia: Perceptions From Asian Breast Cancer Survivors. J Glob Oncol. 2016 Jun 8;3(2):98-104. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2016.004929. eCollection 2017 Apr.
- Background: PubMed 28024163Chan A, Gan YX, Oh SK, Ng T, Shwe M, Chan R, Ng R, Goh B, Tan YP, Fan G. A culturally adapted survivorship programme for Asian early stage breast cancer patients in Singapore: A randomized, controlled trial. Psychooncology. 2017 Oct;26(10):1654-1659. doi: 10.1002/pon.4357. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
- Background: PubMed 24556515Lim HA, Mahendran R, Chua J, Peh CX, Lim SE, Kua EH. The Distress Thermometer as an ultra-short screening tool: a first validation study for mixed-cancer outpatients in Singapore. Compr Psychiatry. 2014 May;55(4):1055-62. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Jan 18.
- Background: PubMed 20198637Breitenstein SM, Gross D, Garvey CA, Hill C, Fogg L, Resnick B. Implementation fidelity in community-based interventions. Res Nurs Health. 2010 Apr;33(2):164-73. doi: 10.1002/nur.20373.
- Background: PubMed 21825228van Onzenoort HA, Menger FE, Neef C, Verberk WJ, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van der Kuy PH. Participation in a clinical trial enhances adherence and persistence to treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Hypertension. 2011 Oct;58(4):573-8. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.171074. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
- Background: PubMed 18619790Gao F, Ng GY, Cheung YB, Thumboo J, Pang G, Koo WH, Sethi VK, Wee J, Goh C. The Singaporean English and Chinese versions of the EQ-5D achieved measurement equivalence in cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;62(2):206-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
- Singapore Cancer Registry: Annual Registry Report 2015Link provided by the sponsor.
- Speech by Minister of State for Health, Dr Lam Pin Min, at the MOH Committee of Supply debate 2017Link provided by the sponsor.
- Sympton burden and medication use in adult sarcoma patientsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Survivorship
Recruiting
Study of a Support Program for Quality of Life in Chinese Cancer Patients and Survivors
Cancer, Survivorship
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Obesity Treatment With Phentermine-Topiramate ER in AYA Surviving Leukemia and Lymphoma
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Hodgkin Lymphoma in Remission
Not yet recruiting
Multi-level Intervention to Successfully Transition to Adult Care for Survivors of Childhood and Adolescent Cancers: The BRIDGES-YAS! Study
Health Care Transition, Survivorship Care
RecruitingObservational study
Late Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease in Testicular Cancer Survivors
Testicular Cancer, Survivorship
Recruiting
A Study of Brief Behavioral Activation for the Treatment of Depression in Older Adult Cancer Survivors
Survivorship
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rose WY Fok principal investigator
National Cancer Centre, Singapore
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Multidisciplinary collaborative care arm in people with Survivorship and Breast Cancer, run by National Cancer Centre, Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in participants' health-related quality of life (time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04660188, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Nov 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.