AzTrials
AzTrials

Proliferative Diabetic RetinopathyPhase 4PROPERNCT04674254

Macular Perfusion Changes After Anti-VEGF Versus Targeted Retinal Photocoagulation in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

A Phase 4 study testing Bevacizumab Injection, Targeted retinal photocoagulation and Standard pan-retinal photocoagulation in people with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Overexpression, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), while proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is the principal cause of severe visual loss in patients with diabetes. Since 1981, Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) has been a standard of treatment for PDR. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Bevacizumab Injection, Targeted retinal photocoagulation and Standard pan-retinal photocoagulation
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
43 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
30 Mar 2021to 15 Mar 2023
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients ≥ 18 years old
  • Type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus
  • PDR
  • Central macular thickness less than 300 µm

Who cannot join

  • Central macular thickness more than 300 µm
  • Previous retinal laser treatment
  • Ocular conditions that may affect macular perfusion (e.g. retinal vein occlusion, uveitis, vasculitis etc.)
  • Any previous treatment for diabetic macular edema.
  • Presence of epiretinal membrane involving the macula or vitreomacular traction
  • Media opacity such vitreous hemorrhage and dense cataract.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients with previous cataract surgery within the last 3 months.
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma
  • Thromboembolic events within 6 months
  • Tractional retinal detachment.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University

    Giza, 11956

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Macular Perfusion Changes in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Following Anti-VEGF Therapy Versus Targeted and Pan-retinal Photocoagulation Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), while proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is the principal cause of severe visual loss in patients with diabetes. Since 1981, Panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) has been a standard of treatment for PDR. However, PRP can be associated with adverse effects, including visual field constriction, decreased night vision, and worsening of coexisting diabetic macular edema (DME). For this reason, some authors have advocated targeted treatment with PRP. Targeted retinal laser photocoagulation (TRP) is designed to treat areas of retinal capillary non-perfusion and intermediate retinal ischemic zones in PDR that may spare better-perfused tissue from laser-induced tissue scarring.

Protocol S by Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) has shown that patients that receive ranibizumab as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy with deferred PRP are non-inferior regarding improving in visual acuity to those eyes receiving standard prompt PRP therapy for the treatment of PDR.

Read more

Retinal ischemia is an important factor in the progression and prognosis of diabetic retinopathy. Regarding the effect of anti-VEGF drugs on macular perfusion, several studies have shown mixed results with an increase, decrease, or no effect on perfusion in response to anti-VEGF treatment. In many of these studies, however, patients with more ischemic retinas were not included. Fluorescein angiography (FA) was the method used to assess changes in macular perfusion after anti-VEGF injections in most of the clinical trials. Despite its clinical usefulness, however, FA is known to have documented risks. Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in macular perfusion evaluation in these cases was recommended by some investigators. Several studies have proved the reliability of OCTA in detecting and quantifying macular ischemia in diabetics.

The investigators aim to compare changes in the macular perfusion in patients with PDR after treatment with anti-VEGF therapy versus TRP versus Standard PRP using OCTA.

Read the detailed description

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most common microvascular complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), while proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is the principal cause of severe visual loss in patients with diabetes.

Since 1981, PRP has been a standard of treatment for PDR. However, PRP can be associated with adverse effects, including visual field constriction, decreased night vision, and worsening of coexisting diabetic macular edema (DME). for this reason, some authors have advocated targeted treatment with PRP. Targeted retinal laser photocoagulation (TRP) is designed to treat areas of retinal capillary non-perfusion and intermediate retinal ischemic zones in PDR that may spare better-perfused tissue from laser-induced tissue scarring.

Protocol S by DRCR.net has shown that patients that receive ranibizumab as anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy with deferred PRP are non-inferior regarding improving in visual acuity to those eyes receiving standard prompt PRP therapy for the treatment of PDR. However, the effect of both treatment modalities on macular perfusion has been inconclusive with no studies comparing the effect of both.

Regarding the effect of anti-VEGF drugs on macular perfusion, several studies have shown mixed results with an increase, decrease, or no effect on perfusion in response to anti-VEGF treatment. In many of these studies, however, patients with more ischemic retinas were not included. Retinal ischemia is an important factor in the progression and prognosis of diabetic retinopathy.

Fluorescein angiography (FA) was the method used to assess changes in macular perfusion after anti-VEGF injections in most of the clinical trials. Despite its clinical usefulness, however, FA is known to have documented risks and is being replaced by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in macular perfusion evaluation in these cases.

OCTA is a new noninvasive method of acquiring high-resolution images of the retinal vasculature that can be utilized in the management and study of retinal diseases without the need for dye injection. It allows the visualization of both the superficial and deep retinal capillary layers separately and the construction of microvascular flow maps allowing quantitative analysis of vascular parameters.

OCTA uses high-speed OCT scanning to detect the flow of blood by analyzing signal decorrelation between two sequential OCT cross-sectional scans repeated at the same location. Because of the movement of erythrocytes within a vessel, compared to stationary areas of the surrounding retina, only perfused blood vessels will result in signal decorrelation, leading to their imaging. The split-spectrum amplitude-decorrelation angiography (SSADA) algorithm improves the signal to noise ratio.

Several studies have proved the reliability of OCTA in detecting and quantifying macular ischemia in diabetics.

The investigators aim to compare changes in the macular perfusion in patients with PDR without macular edema after treatment with anti-VEGF therapy versus TRP versus Standard PRP using OCTA.

Being tested
Bevacizumab Injection, Targeted retinal photocoagulation, Standard pan-retinal photocoagulation
Keywords
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, optical coherence tomography angiography, macular perfusion, pan-retinal photocoagulation, fluorescein angiography, visual field
Medical subject headings
Diabetic Retinopathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bevacizumab InjectionDrug

    Also called Avastin

    Bevacizumab will be intravitreally injected every 4 weeks through 12 weeks then pro re nata thereafter for 12 months.

  • Targeted retinal photocoagulationProcedure or surgery

    Targeted retinal photocoagulation will be administered to nonperfused areas detected on fundus fluorescein angiography at baseline and repeated every 3 months as needed for 12 months.

  • Standard pan-retinal photocoagulationProcedure or surgery

    Standard pan-retinal photocoagulation will be applied to perfused and nonperfused areas of the retinal periphery at baseline and every 3 months as needed for 12 months.

Study groups in NCT04674254
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agentActive comparatorIntravitreal injections of 1.25 mg/0.05 ml of Bevacizumab every 4 weeks through 12- week visit then pro re nata to complete 12 months according to Protocol S.
Receives: Drug: Bevacizumab Injection
Targeted retinal photocoagulationActive comparatorTargeted retinal photocoagulation guided by fundus fluorescein angiography will be administered after topical anesthesia, directed to areas of nonperfused peripheral retina plus a 1-disc area margin using the Mainster lens. Subsequent treatments if needed will be delivered at 3 monthly intervals for a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The extent of the laser applied will be determined based on areas of nonperfusion identified by fundus fluorescein angiography.
Receives: Procedure: Targeted retinal photocoagulation
Standard pan-retinal photocoagulationActive comparatorStandard pan-retinal photocoagulation will be performed at baseline and then every 3 months thereafter if needed, for a minimum follow-up period of 12 months. PRP will be performed at two consecutive sessions with adherence to the guidelines of the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Group. Following topical anesthesia, 1000 to 1200 laser spots will be applied to the retina at each session with a 532 nm frequency doubled Nd-YAG laser (VISULAS, Carl Zeiss, Germany) using a spot size of 300-500 μm. PRP will be applied in all 4 retina quadrants. The Mainster lens will be used. Retreatment will be done according to the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research network protocol S classification for patients with stable, worsening, or with failure of regression of neovascularization.
Receives: Procedure: Standard pan-retinal photocoagulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in foveal avascular zone area

    The change in the foveal avascular zone area will be compared between the different treatment arms as a measure of macular perfusion change.

    Measured: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  2. Change in vascular density of the retinal capillary plexuses

    The change in retinal capillary vascular densities at different capillary layers will be compared between the different treatment arms as a measure of macular perfusion change.

    Measured: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in neovessels

    The change in neovessels following treatment with each modality will be evaluated clinically and by fundus fluorescein angiography and the response to treatment will be classified according to the criteria of protocol S of the DRCR network

    Measured: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  2. Change in central macular thickness

    The change in central macular thickness will be evaluated following treatment with each modality using optical coherence tomography.

    Measured: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  3. Change in best corrected visual acuity

    The change in best corrected visual acuity will be assessed following treatment with each modality using standard Snellen charts.

    Measured: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  4. Change in macular sensitivity

    The change in the macular sensitivity will be assessed following treatment with each modality using macular microperimetry.

    Measured: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

  5. Change in orbital blood flow

    The change in orbital blood flow will be assessed following treatment with each modality using orbital color duplex imaging.

    Measured: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Dec 2020
  2. Study start30 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion15 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion15 Mar 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
43 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04674254
Sponsor's protocol ID
MD-39-2021
Acronym
PROPER
Status last verified
Jan 2024
First submitted
6 Dec 2020
Last updated
19 Jan 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Results will be posted on clinicaltrials.gov when the study is concluded.

Publications

  • Lee R, Wong TY, Sabanayagam C. Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema and related vision loss. Eye Vis (Lond). 2015 Sep 30;2:17. doi: 10.1186/s40662-015-0026-2. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 26605370
  • Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Davis MD, DeMets DL. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. IV. Diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1984 Dec;91(12):1464-74. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(84)34102-1.

    PubMed 6521986
  • Riaskoff S. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol. 1981;197:9-17. No abstract available.

    PubMed 6182936
  • Alagorie AR, Nittala MG, Velaga S, Zhou B, Rusakevich AM, Wykoff CC, Sadda SR. Association of Intravitreal Aflibercept With Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density in Patients With Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug 1;138(8):851-857. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.2130.

    PubMed 32584384
  • Muqit MM, Marcellino GR, Henson DB, Young LB, Patton N, Charles SJ, Turner GS, Stanga PE. Optos-guided pattern scan laser (Pascal)-targeted retinal photocoagulation in proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013 May;91(3):251-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2011.02307.x. Epub 2011 Dec 16.

    PubMed 22176513
  • Nikkhah H, Ghazi H, Razzaghi MR, Karimi S, Ramezani A, Soheilian M. Extended targeted retinal photocoagulation versus conventional pan-retinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy in a randomized clinical trial. Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Feb;38(1):313-321. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0469-7. Epub 2017 Feb 6.

    PubMed 28168567
  • Wessel MM, Aaker GD, Parlitsis G, Cho M, D'Amico DJ, Kiss S. Ultra-wide-field angiography improves the detection and classification of diabetic retinopathy. Retina. 2012 Apr;32(4):785-91. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e3182278b64.

    PubMed 22080911
  • Kozak I, Luttrull JK. Modern retinal laser therapy. Saudi J Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr-Jun;29(2):137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.sjopt.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 28.

    PubMed 25892934
  • Writing Committee for the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network; Gross JG, Glassman AR, Jampol LM, Inusah S, Aiello LP, Antoszyk AN, Baker CW, Berger BB, Bressler NM, Browning D, Elman MJ, Ferris FL 3rd, Friedman SM, Marcus DM, Melia M, Stockdale CR, Sun JK, Beck RW. Panretinal Photocoagulation vs Intravitreous Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Nov 24;314(20):2137-2146. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.15217.

    PubMed 26565927
  • Elnahry AG, Abdel-Kader AA, Raafat KA, Elrakhawy K. Evaluation of Changes in Macular Perfusion Detected by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography following 3 Intravitreal Monthly Bevacizumab Injections for Diabetic Macular Edema in the IMPACT Study. J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr 27;2020:5814165. doi: 10.1155/2020/5814165. eCollection 2020.

    PubMed 32411431
  • Elnahry AG, Abdel-Kader AA, Habib AE, Elnahry GA, Raafat KA, Elrakhawy K. Review on Recent Trials Evaluating the Effect of Intravitreal Injections of Anti-VEGF Agents on the Macular Perfusion of Diabetic Patients with Diabetic Macular Edema. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2020;15(3):188-198. doi: 10.2174/1574887115666200519073704.

    PubMed 32427087
  • Elnahry AG, Abdel-Kader AA, Raafat KA, Elrakhawy K. Evaluation of the Effect of Repeated Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injections on the Macular Microvasculature of a Diabetic Patient Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med. 2019 Apr 18;2019:3936168. doi: 10.1155/2019/3936168. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 31139483
  • Ghasemi Falavarjani K, Iafe NA, Hubschman JP, Tsui I, Sadda SR, Sarraf D. Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Analysis of the Foveal Avascular Zone and Macular Vessel Density After Anti-VEGF Therapy in Eyes With Diabetic Macular Edema and Retinal Vein Occlusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Jan 1;58(1):30-34. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20579.

    PubMed 28114569
  • Manousaridis K, Talks J. Macular ischaemia: a contraindication for anti-VEGF treatment in retinal vascular disease? Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Feb;96(2):179-84. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301087.

    PubMed 22250209
  • Hsieh YT, Alam MN, Le D, Hsiao CC, Yang CH, Chao DL, Yao X. OCT Angiography Biomarkers for Predicting Visual Outcomes after Ranibizumab Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019 Oct;3(10):826-834. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 May 7.

    PubMed 31227330

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Bevacizumab Injection, Targeted retinal photocoagulation and Standard pan-retinal photocoagulation in people with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Overexpression, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in foveal avascular zone area (time frame: 0, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04674254, which also lists 21 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jan 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in