AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Respiratory FailurePhase 3EFRAIM IINCT04680884

Empirical Steroids and/or Antifungals in Immunocompromised Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure From Undetermined Etiology: a Multicenter Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

A Phase 3 study testing Experimental for steroid, Experimental for antifungals and Experimental for steroids and antifungals in people with Acute Respiratory Failure and Immunocompromised Patients, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the leading reason of ICU admission in immunocompromised patients. Failure to identify the ARF etiology is associated with increased mechanical ventilation and mortality rates. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
What is being tested?
Experimental for steroid, Experimental for antifungals and Experimental for steroids and antifungals
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
420 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
21 Dec 2020to 21 Dec 2023
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age >18 years and < 90 years
  • Known immunosuppression:
  • immunosuppressive drug
  • solid organ transplant
  • solid tumor
  • hematological malignancies
Show all 18Show fewer
  • primary immune deficiency
  • ICU admission for acute respiratory failure as defined by
  • respiratory distress with tachypnea (respiratory rate>30/min)
  • cyanosis
  • laboured breathing
  • need for more than 6L of standard oxygen to maintain SpO2>95%, or for high flow oxygen, non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation
  • No established ARF etiology at day 3
  • Informed consent signed:
  • by the patient,
  • Or informed consent signed by a family members/trustworthy person if his condition does not allow him to express his consent in written as per L1111-6,
  • Or in an emergency situation and in the absence of family members/trustworthy person, the patient can be enrolled. The consent to participate to the research will be requested as soon as the condition of the patient will allow).
  • Note: Patient with Pneumocystis pneumonia can be included given that their treatment does not require the use of neither antifungal drugs nor corticosteroids

Who cannot join

  • Patient who improved enough to be discharged from the ICU at day 3
  • Documented invasive fungal infection that requires antifungal therapy.
  • Patient needing or receiving prophylactic or empirical antifungal treatment for clinical care
  • Patient needing or receiving corticoid therapy
  • Patient receiving palliative care with comfort measures only (Do Not Intubate (DNI) and Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) patients can be included)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patient
Show all 13Show fewer
  • No social security coverage
  • Known hypersensitivity to isavuconazole or to any of excipients of CRESEMBA® specialty
  • Patient treated by ketoconazole, ritonavir, or any CYP3A4/5 inductor
  • Short QT syndrome and/or patient with a family history of short QT syndrome;
  • Liver insufficiency (any stage)
  • Moribund patients
  • Participation in another interventional research

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

About this study

Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is the leading reason of ICU admission in immunocompromised patients. Failure to identify the ARF etiology is associated with increased mechanical ventilation and mortality rates. This was confirmed in the large Efraim 1 study published in 2017, where undetermined ARF etiology affected 609/1611 (38%) patients at day 3, 402 (25%) patients at day 7 and 199 (12.3%) patients overall, and was associated with a case fatality of 55% (vs. 40% in other patients). In lung biopsy/autopsy findings from these patients, invasive fungal infection, steroid-sensitive affections (organized pneumonia, non-infectious interstitial involvement, drug-related pulmonary toxicity…), and lung infiltration by the underlying disease (lymphoma, carcinomatous lymphangitis, systemic vasculitis, connective tissue diseases, etc.) were the leading etiologies. No study has evaluated survival benefits from empirical steroids and/or antifungals in immunocompromised patients with ARF from undetermined etiology.

The main objective of this study is to reduce the 90-day mortality in immunocompromised patients with ARF from undetermined etiology at day-3. The intervention would evaluate the impact of steroids ± isavuconazole for 14 days or until ICU discharge.

Being tested
Experimental for steroid, Experimental for antifungals, Experimental for steroids and antifungals, Standard of care

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Experimental for steroidDrug

    2 mg/kg/day of IV methylprednisolone for three days. As of day 4, the daily dose will be tapered to 1 mg/kg/day until day 7, followed by 0,5 mg/kg/day from day 8 to day 14 + IV placebo of isavuconazole

  • Experimental for antifungalsDrug

    IV placebo of methylprednisolone + IV isavuconazole (200 mg every 8 hours for 2 days followed by 200 mg per day until ICU discharge or for a total duration of 14 days)

  • Experimental for steroids and antifungalsDrug

    IV methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day for three days. As of day 4, the daily dose will be tapered to 1 mg/kg/day until day 7, followed by 0.5 mg/kg/day from day 8 to day 14 + IV isavuconazole 200 mg every 8 hours for 2 days followed by 200 mg per day until ICU discharge or for a total duration of 14 days)

  • Standard of careOther

    IV placebo of methylprednisolone + IV placebo of isavuconazole. This group receives the treatment that is currently recommended.

Study groups in NCT04680884
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental for steroidExperimental2 mg/kg/day of IV methylprednisolone for three days. As of day 4, the daily dose will be tapered to 1 mg/kg/day until day 7, followed by 0,5 mg/kg/day from day 8 to day 14 + IV placebo of isavuconazole
Receives: Drug: Experimental for steroid
Experimental for antifungalsExperimentalIV placebo of methylprednisolone + IV isavuconazole (200 mg every 8 hours for 2 days followed by 200 mg per day until ICU discharge or for a total duration of 14 days)
Receives: Drug: Experimental for antifungals
Experimental for steroids and antifungalsExperimentalIV methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day for three days. As of day 4, the daily dose will be tapered to 1 mg/kg/day until day 7, followed by 0.5 mg/kg/day from day 8 to day 14 + IV isavuconazole 200 mg every 8 hours for 2 days followed by 200 mg per day until ICU discharge or for a total duration of 14 days)
Receives: Drug: Experimental for steroids and antifungals
Best standard of careOtherIV placebo of methylprednisolone + IV placebo of isavuconazole. This group receives the treatment that is currently recommended.
Receives: Other: Standard of care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mortality

    Overall death

    Measured: at day 90

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. ICU mortality

    Mortality at ICU discharge

    Measured: at ICU discharge within 6 months

  2. Hospital mortality

    Mortality at hospital discharge

    Measured: at hospital discharge within 6 months

  3. Mortality

    Overall death

    Measured: at day 28

  4. Proportion of patients with ICU acquired microbiologically documented bacterial infections

    Measured: at day 28

  5. Proportion of patients with invasive fungal infection

    Measured: at day 28

  6. Proportion of patients with herpes simplex virus (HSV) reactivation

    Measured: at day 28

  7. Proportion of patients with varicella-zoster virus (VZV) reactivation

    Measured: at day 28

  8. Proportion of patients with cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation

    Measured: at day 28

  9. Occurrence of severe hypokalemia

    Severe hypokalemia will be defined as kalemia <2,5 meq/l

    Measured: at day 28

  10. Occurence of decompensated diabetes

    Measured: at day 28

  11. Occurence of severe or newly acquired hypertension

    Measured: at day 28

  12. Emergence of aspergillus species

    Measured: at day 28

  13. Incidence of candida infection

    Measured: at day 28

  14. Incidence of post-traumatic Stress Disorder

    Post-traumatic Stress Disorder will be evaluated using IES-R scale. Impact of Event Scale - Revised (IES-R) is a 22-item self-report measure that assesses subjective distress caused by traumatic events. The higher the score, the more severe the symptoms.

    Measured: at 6 months

  15. Incidence of anxiety and depression

    Depression and anxiety will be assessed using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire. HADS is a self-administered scale of 14 items which assessed levels of depression and anxiety, divided into 2 subscales of 7 items (Anxiety or HADS-A, Depression or HADS-D). Each item is scored on a scale of 0 to 3. A score is generated for each of the two sub-scales (sum of the 7 items, ranging from 0 to 21). Limit scores : clearly or clinically symptomatic cases (score ≥ 11).

    Measured: at 6 months

  16. Quality of life

    Quality of life will be evaluated using SF36. SF-36 is a set of generic, coherent, and easily administered quality-of-life measures. These measures rely upon patient self-reporting. Items are grouped into three categories: functional status, well-being, overall health assessment. In two dimensions, the answer is binary (yes / no) and in the other 6 in ordinal quality (3 to 6 possible answers). For each dimension, the scores for the different items are coded and then summed and transformed linearly on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. A physical composite score and a mental composite score can be calculated according to an established algorithm

    Measured: at 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Dec 2020
  2. Study start21 Dec 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion21 Sep 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion21 Dec 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
420 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04680884
Sponsor's protocol ID
APHP180584
Acronym
EFRAIM II
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
18 Dec 2020
Last updated
23 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Experimental for steroid, Experimental for antifungals and Experimental for steroids and antifungals in people with Acute Respiratory Failure and Immunocompromised Patients, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Elie Azoulay, Pr (+331 42 49 34 21, elie.azoulay@aphp.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mortality (time frame: at day 90). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in