AzTrials
AzTrials

LymphedemaNCT04691310

The Efficacy of Kinesio Taping on Lymphedema Following Head and Neck Cancer Therapy

A study testing Kinesio Tex Gold in people with Lymphedema and Head and Neck Cancer, run by Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Purpose off the study is investigating to efficacy of kinesio taping on neck lymphedema after the head and neck cancer therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Lymphedema, Head and Neck Cancer, Kinesio Taping
What is being tested?
Kinesio Tex Gold
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
58 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
31 Dec 2020to 28 Feb 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18-70 years
  • External neck lymphedema
  • Head and neck cancer treatment patients
  • patients who have not open wound on neck
  • Patients who were accept to consent form

Who cannot join

  • Mental disorders Cognitive limitations Pregnancy Out of age 18-70 years old Patients who were not accept to consent form

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Prof Dr Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital

    Istanbul, 34384

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Efficacy of Kinesio Taping on Neck Lymphedema Following Head and Neck Cancer Therapy: Double Blind Randomized Placebo Controlled Study

Purpose off the study is investigating to efficacy of kinesio taping on neck lymphedema after the head and neck cancer therapy.

Read the detailed description

The neck lymphedema is a multidirectional process that depends on lymphatic circulation issues. The lymphedema can be treated using such as therapies, drugs or surgeries. There are few techniques for treatment of neck lymphedema and also in our best knowledge the kinesio taping therapy on lymphedema following neck cancer therapy had not been investigated or published. The study will assess the efficacy of kinesio taping in neck lymphedema with manual therapy after the head and neck cancer treatment.

Being tested
Kinesio Tex Gold
Keywords
Kinesio taping, neck, lymphedema, head, cancer, therapy
Medical subject headings
Lymphedema, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Kinesio Tex GoldDevice

    The Kinesio Tex Gold is a kinesio tape that had been certified and patented.

Study groups in NCT04691310
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Kinesio taping studyActive comparatorKinesio tex gold tape was applied to neck localised lymphedema as stretched. Kinesio tape maintained during consecutive days and also were re applied with manual lymphatic drainage therapy as 5 times first week, and afterthat 2 times for 3 weeks (total 4 weeks)
Receives: Device: Kinesio Tex Gold
Kinesio taping shamSham comparatorKinesio tex gold tape was applied to neck localised lymphedema as no-stretched. Kinesio tape maintained during consecutive days and also were re applied with manual lymphatic drainage therapy as 5 times first week, and afterthat 2 times for 3 weeks (total 4 weeks)
Receives: Device: Kinesio Tex Gold

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The values of diameter of lymphedema of neck with face

    The diameters of upper, middle and lower points of neck were measured with tailor meter by a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation professionals (measure unit is cm).

    Measured: Baseline

  2. The values of diameter of lymphedema of neck with face

    The diameters of upper, middle and lower points of neck and two points of face were measured with tailor meter by a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation professionals (measure unit is cm).

    Measured: 2 weeks

  3. The values of diameter of lymphedema of neck with face

    The diameters of upper, middle and lower points of neck and two points of face were measured with tailor meter by a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation professionals (measure unit is cm). The changes were assessed from baseline neck diameter at end of treatment and after one month.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  4. The values of diameter of lymphedema of neck with face

    The diameters of upper, middle and lower points of neck were measured with tailor meter by a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation professionals (measure unit is cm). The changes were assessed from baseline neck diameter at end of treatment and after one month.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  5. The outcomes of Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck 35

    It was assessed by Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck 35 that a self questionnaire in head and neck cancer patients. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 100. The high scores were worst low scores were good health.

    Measured: baseline

  6. The outcomes of Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck 35

    It was assessed by Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck 35 that a self questionnaire in head and neck cancer patients. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 100. The high scores were worst low scores were good health.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  7. The outcomes of Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck 35

    It was assessed by Quality of Life Questionnaire-Head and Neck 35 that a self questionnaire in head and neck cancer patients. The minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 100. The high scores were worst low scores were good health.

    Measured: 8 weeks

  8. The scores of head and neck external lymphedema rating scale

    They were assessed by M. D. Anderson head and neck lymphedema rating scale in head and neck cancer patients. Composite Score ranges from 0 ( low edema) to 3 (high level edema).

    Measured: Baseline

  9. The scores of head and neck external lymphedema rating scale

    They were assessed by M. D. Anderson head and neck lymphedema rating scale in head and neck cancer patients. Composite Score ranges from 0 ( low edema) to 3 (high level edema).

    Measured: 2 weeks

  10. The scores of head and neck external lymphedema rating scale

    They were assessed by M. D. Anderson head and neck lymphedema rating scale in head and neck cancer patients. Composite Score ranges from 0 ( low edema) to 3 (high level edema).

    Measured: 4 weeks

  11. The scores of head and neck external lymphedema rating scale

    They were assessed by M. D. Anderson head and neck lymphedema rating scale in head and neck cancer patients. Composite Score ranges from 0 ( low edema) to 3 (high level edema).

    Measured: 8 weeks

  12. The outcomes of Patterson larynx pharynx internal edema scale

    It was assessed with Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation Study. Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation Study results were scored on Patterson larynx pharynx edema scale. The scores of scale were no, mild, moderate and severe . The high grade symptom scores were worst, low scores were good health

    Measured: Baseline

  13. The outcomes of Patterson larynx pharynx edema scale

    It was assessed with Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation Study. Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation Study results were scored on Patterson larynx pharynx edema scale. The scores of scale were no, mild, moderate and severe. The high grade symptom scores were worst, low scores were good health

    Measured: 2 weeks

  14. The outcomes of Patterson larynx pharynx edema scale

    It was assessed with Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation Study. Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation Study results were scored on Patterson larynx pharynx edema scale. The scores of scale were no, mild, moderate and severe. The high grade symptom scores were worst, low scores were good health

    Measured: 4 weeks

  15. The outcomes of Patterson larynx pharynx edema scale

    It was assessed with Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation Study. Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation Study results were scored on Patterson larynx pharynx edema scale. The scores of scale were no, mild, moderate and severe. The high grade symptom scores were worst, low scores were good health

    Measured: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Mean of demographic

    Age, gender, history of smoke, history of morbidities, diagnosis, stage, therapies of cancer, lymphedema stages were noted

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Dec 2020
  2. Study start31 Dec 2020
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2021
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
58 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04691310
Sponsor's protocol ID
309, 2020-082
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
26 Dec 2020
Last updated
2 Aug 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kasawara KT, Mapa JMR, Ferreira V, Added MAN, Shiwa SR, Carvas N Jr, Batista PA. Effects of Kinesio Taping on breast cancer-related lymphedema: A meta-analysis in clinical trials. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018 May;34(5):337-345. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1419522. Epub 2018 Jan 8.

    PubMed 29308967
  • Deng J, Murphy BA, Dietrich MS, Wells N, Wallston KA, Sinard RJ, Cmelak AJ, Gilbert J, Ridner SH. Impact of secondary lymphedema after head and neck cancer treatment on symptoms, functional status, and quality of life. Head Neck. 2013 Jul;35(7):1026-35. doi: 10.1002/hed.23084. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

    PubMed 22791550

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Kinesio Tex Gold in people with Lymphedema and Head and Neck Cancer, run by Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The values of diameter of lymphedema of neck with face (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 15 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04691310, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Aug 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in