Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2DM-BOOSTNCT04710940
Development and Feasibility Testing of DM-BOOST Intervention.
A study testing Diabetes BOOST in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Daniel Amante at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
DM-BOOST uses clinical informatics tools to identify types of patients with gaps in diabetes care and deploy tailored, proactive outreach methods rooted in behavioral economics to nudge them towards increased engagement with diabetes self-management training and leverage patient-facing technologies to enhance… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- What is being tested?
- Diabetes BOOST
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Jan 2021to 1 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults (age 18+)
- Cognitively able to consent (Aims 2 and 3)
- Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (Aims 1-3)
- Receive primary care at UMMHC in past 12 months at time of initial analysis (Aims 1-3)
- English speaking (Aims 2 and 3)
- Have access to patient portal or a smart phone (Aim 3)
Who cannot join
- Adults unable to consent (lacking cognitive capacity) (Aims 2 and 3)
- Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers) (Aims 1-3)
- Pregnant women (Aims 1-3)
- Prisoners (Aims 1-3)
- Non-English speaking (Aims 2 and 3)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Massachusetts Medical School
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
About this study
Official title: Development and Feasibility Testing of a Diabetes Mellitus Program Using Behavioral Economics to Optimize Outreach and Self-management Support With Technology.
DM-BOOST uses clinical informatics tools to identify types of patients with gaps in diabetes care and deploy tailored, proactive outreach methods rooted in behavioral economics to nudge them towards increased engagement with diabetes self-management training and leverage patient-facing technologies to enhance longitudinal patient self-management support.
Read the detailed description
In DM-BOOST, the Principal investigator will deploy a mixed-methods, patient-centered approach to intervention development and initiate a multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) to learn how to maximize patient engagement and support of self-management training. In this pilot, study team will complete the first phase (Preparation), and initiate feasibility piloting of the second phase (Optimization). Completion of optimization and MOST's final phase (Evaluation), will occur in a subsequent project.
In the preparation phase, Principal investigator will first analyze EHR and claims data in the UMCCTS data lake to identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with gaps in diabetes care to develop patient persona archetypes (Aim 1). Next, Principal investigator will selectively recruit patients of identified persona types as consultants, elicit stakeholder feedback during community engagement studios and conduct usability testing to iteratively design the intervention (Aim 2). Study team will then conduct a feasibility pilot (Aim 3) to assess user experience of the intervention implementation and collect exploratory outcome data to be used to inform a subsequent, complete optimization trial.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Being tested
- Diabetes BOOST, Usual Care
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Diabetes BOOSTBehavioural
Participants will receive supportive care using technology for DSMT in addition to usual care.
Usual CareBehavioural
Participants will receive usual care for DSMT.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention - Diabetes BOOST | Experimental | Intervention group participants will complete a baseline survey, receive a referral to DSMT from the research team, a mailed welcome letter and self-care education sent via a series of personalized patient portal secure messages, text messages, and video call. They will be sent text messages with information about one of the American Association of Diabetes Educators 7 self-care behaviors and will receive encouragement to author their own self-management behavioral goals. Participants will also complete a telehealth training video call with research staff and review the goals that the participant replied with. The participant will then be encouraged to send a patient portal message to their DSMT CDCES that includes their personalized goals prior to their scheduled DSMT session. They will then complete a 3-month follow-up survey and qualitative interview. Receives: Behavioral: Diabetes BOOST |
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Comparison Group participants will complete a baseline survey, receive a DSMT referral request from research team to their primary care provider and a mailed welcome letter. The mailed letter will welcome the participant to the study and contain general information about diabetes self-care behaviors and goal setting. They will complete a DSMT session. They will then complete a 3-month follow-up survey and qualitative interview. Receives: Behavioral: Usual Care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Intervention Acceptability (Aim 2)
Patient-reported assessment of intervention acceptability via usability testing. Qualitative data collection informed by the Technology Acceptance Model with assessment of perceived usefulness, ease of use, behavioral intention to use and external factors. No quantitative data measured.
Measured: 1 month
Completion of diabetes self-management training (Aim 3)
Completion of diabetes self-management training.
Measured: 9 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Clinical utilization (Aim 3)
Rate of clinical utilization as measured by number of visits per participant to primary, specialty care, and emergency/hospital care visits measured 6-months after follow-up visit.
Measured: 9 months
Diabetes self-efficacy (Aim 3)
Diabetes self efficacy will be measured at baseline and 3 months after enrolling in the study using the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale. Participants will provide feedback on set of questions, using a 5-point Likert scale( with 1=Strong Disagree, 2=Somewhat Disagree, 3= Neutral, 4=Somewhat Agree, 5= Strongly Agree)
Measured: 3 months
Diabetes treatment satisfaction (Aim 3)
Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction will be measured at 3 months after enrolling in the study using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Change tool. Participants will be asked to share how their experience of current treatment has changed from their experience of treatment before the study began. They will answer each question by choosing 3 for Much More Satisfied Now up to -3 for Much Less Satisfied Now. (3,2,1,0,-1,-2,-3)
Measured: 3 months
Diabetes self-management skills (Aim 3)
Self-management skills will be measured at 3 months after enrolling in the study. Participant will be asked questions about their diabetes self-care activities during the past seven days using the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure
Measured: 3 months
Patient engagement with Diabetes Self-Management Training (Aim 3)
Engagement data will be collected by research staff. It will be measured by the numbers of patients who request contact, are reached, enrolled in the study and scheduled DSMT appointment.
Measured: 9 months
Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) (Aim 3)
Measurement of HbA1c values to determine impact of intervention. HbA1c values at baseline visit will be compared with values at 3-6 months after participant's enrollment. These data will be obtained through EHR chart review.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jan 2021
- Study start13 Jan 2021
- Primary completion1 Nov 2022
- Study completion1 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The purpose of this study is to develop and usability test a patient-centric intervention designed to improve implementation of diabetes self-management training. To accomplish this, 3 specific aims will be completed. Aim 1 - Retrospective data from the UMass Medical School EHR data repository will be analyzed to identify different clusters of patients with diabetes. Aim 2 - To facilitate a patient-centric design of the DM-BOOST intervention, Patient Research Expert Panel (PREP) members (n\</=10) will be recruited from various patient types identified in Aim 1 (Aim 2a), participate in Community Engagement Studios to inform intervention conceptualization (Aim 2b) and usability test the intervention (Aim 2c). Aim 3 - The intervention will be pilot tested in n\</=70 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Participants will be randomized to either intervention or comparison groups.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Daniel Amante
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Daniel Amante, University of Massachusetts, Worcester
- Investigators
- Daniel J Amante, PhD, MPH, Principal investigator, UMass Medical School
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04710940
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H00017902
- Acronym
- DM-BOOST
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Dec 2020
- Last updated
- 22 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Development and Feasibility Testing of a Diabetes Mellitus Program Using Behavioral Economics to Optimize Outreach and Self-management Support With Technology.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04710940
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DM-BOOST / H00017902
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Daniel AmanteUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute
- Study start
- 13 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
DM-BOOST uses clinical informatics tools to identify types of patients with gaps in diabetes care and deploy tailored, proactive outreach methods rooted in behavioral economics to nudge them towards increased engagement with diabetes self-management training and leverage patient-facing technologies to enhance longitudinal patient self-management support.
Detailed description
In DM-BOOST, the Principal investigator will deploy a mixed-methods, patient-centered approach to intervention development and initiate a multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) to learn how to maximize patient engagement and support of self-management training. In this pilot, study team will complete the first phase (Preparation), and initiate feasibility piloting of the second phase (Optimization). Completion of optimization and MOST's final phase (Evaluation), will occur in a subsequent project.
In the preparation phase, Principal investigator will first analyze EHR and claims data in the UMCCTS data lake to identify sociodemographic characteristics associated with gaps in diabetes care to develop patient persona archetypes (Aim 1). Next, Principal investigator will selectively recruit patients of identified persona types as consultants, elicit stakeholder feedback during community engagement studios and conduct usability testing to iteratively design the intervention (Aim 2). Study team will then conduct a feasibility pilot (Aim 3) to assess user experience of the intervention implementation and collect exploratory outcome data to be used to inform a subsequent, complete optimization trial.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The purpose of this study is to develop and usability test a patient-centric intervention designed to improve implementation of diabetes self-management training. To accomplish this, 3 specific aims will be completed. Aim 1 - Retrospective data from the UMass Medical School EHR data repository will be analyzed to identify different clusters of patients with diabetes. Aim 2 - To facilitate a patient-centric design of the DM-BOOST intervention, Patient Research Expert Panel (PREP) members (n</=10) will be recruited from various patient types identified in Aim 1 (Aim 2a), participate in Community Engagement Studios to inform intervention conceptualization (Aim 2b) and usability test the intervention (Aim 2c). Aim 3 - The intervention will be pilot tested in n</=70 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Participants will be randomized to either intervention or comparison groups.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention - Diabetes BOOST | Experimental | Behavioral: Diabetes BOOSTIntervention group participants will complete a baseline survey, receive a referral to DSMT from the research team, a mailed welcome letter and self-care education sent via a series of personalized patient portal secure messages, text messages, and video call. They will be sent text messages with information about one of the American Association of Diabetes Educators 7 self-care behaviors and will receive encouragement to author their own self-management behavioral goals. Participants will also complete a telehealth training video call with research staff and review the goals that the participant replied with. The participant will then be encouraged to send a patient portal message to their DSMT CDCES that includes their personalized goals prior to their scheduled DSMT session. They will then complete a 3-month follow-up survey and qualitative interview. |
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Behavioral: Usual CareComparison Group participants will complete a baseline survey, receive a DSMT referral request from research team to their primary care provider and a mailed welcome letter. The mailed letter will welcome the participant to the study and contain general information about diabetes self-care behaviors and goal setting. They will complete a DSMT session. They will then complete a 3-month follow-up survey and qualitative interview. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adults (age 18+)
- Cognitively able to consent (Aims 2 and 3)
- Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (Aims 1-3)
- Receive primary care at UMMHC in past 12 months at time of initial analysis (Aims 1-3)
- English speaking (Aims 2 and 3)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Adults unable to consent (lacking cognitive capacity) (Aims 2 and 3)
- Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers) (Aims 1-3)
- Pregnant women (Aims 1-3)
- Prisoners (Aims 1-3)
- Non-English speaking (Aims 2 and 3)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetes BOOSTParticipants will receive supportive care using technology for DSMT in addition to usual care. | Behavioural | Intervention - Diabetes BOOST |
| Usual CareParticipants will receive usual care for DSMT. | Behavioural | Usual Care |
Primary outcome
Intervention Acceptability (Aim 2)
Time frame: 1 month
Patient-reported assessment of intervention acceptability via usability testing. Qualitative data collection informed by the Technology Acceptance Model with assessment of perceived usefulness, ease of use, behavioral intention to use and external factors. No quantitative data measured.
Completion of diabetes self-management training (Aim 3)
Time frame: 9 months
Completion of diabetes self-management training.
6 secondary outcomes
Clinical utilization (Aim 3)
Time frame: 9 months
Diabetes self-efficacy (Aim 3)
Time frame: 3 months
Diabetes treatment satisfaction (Aim 3)
Time frame: 3 months
Diabetes self-management skills (Aim 3)
Time frame: 3 months
Patient engagement with Diabetes Self-Management Training (Aim 3)
Time frame: 9 months
Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) (Aim 3)
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Feb 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Recruiting
Prevalence of Diabetes-related Distress Among Patients Living With Type 2 Diabetes in a University Hospital Center and Identification of Its Associated Factors.
Diabetes Mellitus, Psychological Distress
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Individualized Nursing Interventions on Glycemic Variability and Self-Management in Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Non-Invasive MASLD Diagnosis & T2D Remission Biomarkers
MASLD, T2DM (Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Medisinstart for Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Not yet recruiting
Supplementation of Inulin + L. Acidophilus in Elders With T2DM
Diabetes Mellitus, Microbiome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniel J Amante, PhD, MPH principal investigator
UMass Medical School
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Diabetes BOOST in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Daniel Amante at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Intervention Acceptability (Aim 2) (time frame: 1 month). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Feb 2024.