FibromyalgiaPhase 3CANNFIBNCT04729179
Cannabidiol for Fibromyalgia (The CANNFIB Trial)
A Phase 3 study testing Cannabidiol in people with Fibromyalgia, run by Marius Henriksen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Fibromyalgia is serious chronic pain condition which is often accompanied by sleep disturbances, fatigue and disability and reduced quality of life. There is no cure and treatments are based on reliving symptoms and maintaining function. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Fibromyalgia
- What is being tested?
- Cannabidiol
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2021to 14 Feb 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Informed consent obtained
- Clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 criteria
- Average pain intensity ≥ 4 on a Numeric Rating Scale
- No use of medical cannabis (THC/CBD) within the last six months
- Proficiency in spoken Danish language and able to read and write in Danish
Who cannot join
- On-going participation in other medical trials for pain management of fibromyalgia
- Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis or other inflammatory diseases
- Diagnosis of other serious chronic diseases
- Impaired liver and kidney function
- Pregnancy or insufficient anti-conception therapy for fertile female participants
- Planning pregnancy or insufficient anti-conception use in fertile female partners of male participants
Show all 20Show fewer
- Breast feeding
- Surgery scheduled for the trial period or within 3 months prior to enrollment
- History of or current diagnosis of cancer
- History of or current epilepsy and seizures
- History of or major depressive disorder
- History of a suicide attempt or any suicidal behavior
- A mental state that may impede compliance with the program
- History of severe psychiatric disorders
- History of or current cannabis abuse
- History of or current drug abuse
- History of or current alcohol abuse
- Severe personality disorder
- Current use of opioids, opioid antagonists (LDN) or similar strong analgesics
- Allergic reactions to the active ingredients in cannabidiol
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Cannabidiol for Fibromyalgia -The CANNFIB Trial Protocol for a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Single-center Trial
Fibromyalgia is serious chronic pain condition which is often accompanied by sleep disturbances, fatigue and disability and reduced quality of life. There is no cure and treatments are based on reliving symptoms and maintaining function. The currently available medical treatments are not helping many patients, and many get side-effects. Medical cannabis is sought after among patients and many use this medication un-licenced, although it is not properly documented if it works or is safe. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effects and safety of medical cannabis in a properly designed randomized trial. The aim of the study is to investigate if cannabidiol (CBD) can improve pain, sleep, function and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia. The study will include 200 patients, who will receive either cannabidiol or placebo over a period of 24 weeks. Participants will be closely looked after for improvements in their condition and for potential side-effects to ensure safety.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia is a serious chronic pain condition affecting 2-5 % of the background population. The disease burden in most affected individuals is substantial; with widespread musculoskeletal pain, high pain intensity, often accompanied by sleep disturbances, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and emotional distress. Fibromyalgia is associated with disability and muscle fatigue, affecting daily life activities, leading to poor social participation and incapacity for normal employment. Studies have shown that many patients, are not satisfied with the treatments offered, and rate their health and quality of life after treatment as poor.
There is currently is no cure for fibromyalgia, and management aiming at symptom reduction and maintenance of optimal functioning is recommended by clinical guidelines, including both non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment strategies. Recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of fibromyalgia propose antidepressants and anticonvulsants, which target central pain processing mechanisms. These treatments have been tested in controlled trials for their efficacy in patients with fibromyalgia, and meta-analyses on these interventions have revealed that overall effect sizes are modest, as only a minority of patients have substantial benefit (patient reported pain relief of 50% or greater), while more have moderate benefit (patient reported pain relief of 30% or greater). Many patients have no or minimal benefit or will discontinue the treatment due to side effects. However, it appears that even moderate reductions in pain may lead to considerable increase in self-reported quality of life and other outcome domains in this specific patient population.
Medical cannabis is popularly advocated for different health conditions including chronic pain, both among politicians and in the general population in Denmark, although evidence is sparse efficacy and on what types of medical cannabis to use and what dosages to prescribe for the different conditions. In addition, safety issues such as adverse events and serious adverse events is not properly assesed. Physicians are reluctant to prescribe medical cannabis to their patients, and many patients living with chronic pain are known to self-administer unlicensed medical cannabis. The extent of actual cannabis use is unknown, although, one study has documented that 13% of patients with fibromyalgia use cannabis regularly with a more extensive use among male patients compared to females. Numbers from a Danish context show that only 17 out of 286 (6%), patients with fibromyalgia participating in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program in Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg hospital during 2018, stated that they were using self-administrated cannabis on a regular basis (unpublished data). As self-administrated off-label use of cannabis is illegal in Denmark, this number may well be underreported. Still, individuals diagnosed with fibromyalgia who do admit to cannabis use, are sharing stories with health professionals about how unlicensed cannabis has improved their coping with everyday life, functional ability, pain, sleep, fatigue, mood and overall health related quality of life. Such compelling stories cannot be ignored and underline the necessity of exploring the efficacy of medical cannabis in a proper research design (i.e. with good internal validity).
The use of the cannabis plant for medical purposes is limited in Europe and the European addiction societies stresses the need for further studies on the efficacy and possible dangers regarding medical cannabis intake. Regulations are lacking on registration and medical indications, and the development of uniform compounds regarding strength and types of products and rules concerning sales and marketing.
In Denmark, production and distribution of medical cannabis is illegal. However, starting from January 1st, 2018, a four-year pilot scheme has been legalized and approved by the Danish Medicines Agency, allowing for medical cannabis in the treatment of conditions such as multiple sclerosis, spinal injuries and nausea after chemotherapy and neuropathic pain. Although patients suffering from fibromyalgia have few treatment options for management of their disabling condition, this group is not included in the pilot scheme. However, it is legal for physicians to prescribe cannabis for this and other patient groups.
Medical cannabis Medical cannabis is the term for medications derived from dried cannabis plants in the form of capsules, pills or extracts/oils. The top shoot of the plant contains 100 cannabinoids that are divided into two subgroups; Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), affecting the cannabinoid type 1 receptors located in the central nervous system, and the cannabinoid type 2 receptors located outside of the central nervous system. While the THC cannabinoids have psychoactive, appetite stimulating and nausea reducing effects, cannabidiol has anti-inflammatory, anti-convulsive and immune modulating effects. Studies are inconclusive regarding the effect of cannabidiol on appetite and food intake. Cannabinoids are known to be highly lipophilic and to accumulate in fatty tissue, and may influence the metabolism, fat distribution and accumulation in users. It has been implicated that both TCH and CBD have pain reducing effects. CBD is confirmed to have a favorable safety profile compared to THC.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has approved Epydiolex® as the first prescription cannabis drug derived from the cannabis plant, for treating rare and severe forms of epilepsy. Synthetically manufactured cannabis such as dronabinol (USA) and nabilone (USA and UK), have been approved earlier in the treatment of nausea after chemotherapy. The only synthetic cannabis based approved drug in Denmark is Sativex® for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. However, none of the cannabis drugs are currently approved for the treatment of chronic pain conditions.
Evidence is sparse on medical cannabis in the treatment of fibromyalgia. In a Cochrane review on herbal cannabis (hashish, marihuana), plant-based and synthetic cannabinoids for fibromyalgia, only two out of four identified studies on the topic were included, due to small sample sizes, short-term duration and poor reporting of the other studies. The two studies were both on synthetic cannabinoid (nabilone). No high-quality studies on plant-based cannabis could be identified. Evidence for efficacy was inconsistent as one study favored nabilone on pain and quality of life, compared to placebo, and the other study favored nabilone on sleep compared to Amitriptyline (anti-depressant). However, the quality of the studies was low, and tolerability was low due to side effects.
Recent systematic reviews, have investigated the existing evidence on the effectiveness of cannabinoids for chronic non-cancer pain, including fibromyalgia. No impact on physical and emotional functioning has been found, and only low-quality evidence found improved sleep and patient global impression of change. Thus, it was concluded to be unlikely that cannabinoids are effective in the treatment of non-cancer pain, as findings were inconsistent. Survey studies, however, have showed favorable effect on fibromyalgia symptoms and health-related quality of life, and improved pain management and sleep, among users of unlicensed cannabis compared to non-users, although no information on type and dosages of cannabis was given in the surveys. Negative patients' perspectives themes such as the high cost, the negative effects of cannabis and the "views of others", including their health care professionals, were also identified. A recent retrospective study showed significantly favorable outcomes on fibromyalgia symptoms among medical cannabis users, and only mild adverse events. However, the retrospective design, the relatively small sample size and short duration reduced the quality of the study.
Based on the high demand and an increasing popularity of medical cannabis - which is currently used unlicensed among many patients with fibromyalgia, despite the lack of high-quality evidence on efficacy and safety, a well-designed randomized trial with a large sample size and clinically relevant duration is warranted.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of cannabidiol use compared to placebo, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of cannabidiol compared to placebo in patients with fibromyalgia over 24 weeks.
HYPOTHESES: The primary hypothesis of the study is that pain intensity will be significantly reduced in participants receiving cannabidiol compared to those receiving identically appearing placebo after 24 weeks.
Secondary hypotheses are that sleep quality and duration, activities of daily living and quality of life, will be improved in participants receiving cannabidiol compared to those receiving placebo after 24 weeks. It is also hypothesized that participants receiving cannabidiol will improve on several supportive exploratory secondary outcomes (see outcome measures section), and that a higher proportion of those receiving cannabidiol will have a substantial benefit (50 % pain reduction) and a moderate benefit (30 % pain reduction).
STUDY DESIGN: The trial is designed as a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind and parallel-group trial.; the trial contains three periods: A pre-randomization screening period (week -8 to 0), a main trial period (week 0 to 24), and a post interventional observation period (week 24 to 36). The trial is designed to determine the efficacy and safety of cannabidiol use for patients with fibromyalgia.
The trial is scheduled to start inclusion of first patient first visit, February 2021 or as soon as possible thereafter, and the study period will go on for two year and end with the last patient last visit in December 2022.
Eligible participants, who are included at screening, will be randomized in a 1:1 manner to receive either cannabidiol 50 mg or placebo. Allocation will also be stratified based on sex (male vs. female), age and pain intensity (over vs. under 7 on the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised version (FIQ-R) pain numeric rating scale, to ensure that the groups are equal. A computer-generated randomization sequence will create subject identification numbers and allocate the subjects to treatment arms. The randomization sequence will be created by an independent biostatistician using a random number generator (SAS Proc Plan), and subsequently entered in the electronic Case Report Form (e-CRF), that will be developed specifically for the study, by an independent data manager. If unblinding of a participant is required due to an adverse event, the primary investigator can request to break the randomization code for the individual patient, via the independent data manager. The unblinding will always be performed at patient level and unblinding can take place any time during the day (24/7). Randomization and concealed allocation are done electronically in the e-CRF at the randomization visit (week 0).
The study will be conducted at the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen. The Parker Institute is a well-established research institute and clinical department with secretariat, data managers and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) trained health care professionals including physicians and study nurses. Monitoring will be conducted from the initiation and throughout the trial by the GCP-unit at Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg hospital, in accordance with the GCP rules and regulations.
The trial will end when the last patient has completed the last visit as well as the 12-week post interventional observation period, or prematurely discontinued the intervention or withdrawn from the trial, which comes last.
- Conditions
- Fibromyalgia
- Being tested
- Cannabidiol, Placebo
- Keywords
- Cannabidiol, Chronic widespread pain, Sleep disturbances, Fatigue, Functional ability, Quality of life
- Medical subject headings
- Fibromyalgia, Chronic Pain, Parasomnias, Fatigue
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CannabidiolDrug
Also called Cannabidiol active ingredient
Participants will start with 10 mg of cannabidiol daily and the dose will be escalated every third day until the maximum dosage of 50 mg is reached (after two weeks). The participants be on the 50 mg dosage of cannabidiol for 24 weeks.
PlaceboDrug
Also called Cannabidiol Placebo
Placebo is administered as tablets of 10 mg that are identical in appearance, taste, and smell to the Cannabidiol tablets.The participants will be on the 50 mg dosage of placebo for 24 weeks.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cannabidiol | Experimental | Participants will start with 10 mg of cannabidiol daily and the dose will be escalated every third day until the maximum dosage of 50 mg is reached (after two weeks). The participants be on the 50 mg dosage of cannabidiol for 24 weeks. Receives: Drug: Cannabidiol |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo is administered as tablets of 10 mg that are identical in appearance, taste, and smell to the Cannabidiol tablets.The participants will be on the 50 mg dosage of placebo for 24 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain intensity
The primary endpoint is change in pain intensity, measured with the 0-10 pain numeric rating scale, from the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised. The minimum value is 0, which is the best outcome, indicating no pain. The maximum value is 10, which is the worst outcome, indicating the worst possible pain.
Measured: From baseline to week 24
Secondary outcomes (6)
Sleep quality
The first of six key secondary outcomes is change in sleep quality, measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; total score of overall sleep quality. Scores are ranging from 0 to 21, with lower scores indicating better sleep quality and higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.
Measured: From baseline to week 24
Sleep duration
The second of six key secondary outcomes is change in sleep duration, measured with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; sleep duration domain, with number of hours of actual sleep during the night.
Measured: From baseline to week 24
Objectively measured sleep duration
The third of six key secondary outcomes is change in objectively measured sleep duration, with number of hours of nightly sleep, measured with the Sens triaxial accelerometer device; MOTION® activity and sleep measurement system.
Measured: From baseline to week 24
Objectively measured sleep patterns
The fourth of six key secondary outcomes is change in objectively measured sleep patterns, measured with the Sens triaxial accelerometer device; MOTION® activity and sleep measurement system, in which the different sleep phases during the night are indicated.
Measured: From baseline to week 24
Activities of daily living
The fifth of six key secondary outcomes is change in Activities of Daily Living (ADL), measured with the Assessment of Motor and process skills (AMPS) test, which is an observation-based, standardized evaluation of the individual's ability to perform and complete activities of daily living. The measure is based on 16 ADL motor skills and 20 ADL process skills. Scores range from 0 to 4 on an ordinal scale, with 0 indicating the lowest level of ADL and 4 indicating the highest ADL level. Activities of daily living is also measured with the Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire, in which items are rated on a 4 point Likert scale from 0= no problem to 3=no longer able to complete the task. Scores are calculated for total and subscale scores and expressed as a percentage from 0 to 100%. Lower percentage indicates a higher ADL level, and higher percentage indicates a lower ADL level.
Measured: From baseline to week 24
Health-related quality of life
The sixth of six key secondary outcomes is change in quality of life, measured with the EuroQol Self-Rated Health Questionnaire, developed by the EuroQual group and international network of multidisciplinary researchers.The scores goes from 0 -100, with 0 indicating the worst possible health condition and 100 indicating the best possible health condition.
Measured: From baseline to week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jan 2021
- Study start1 Mar 2021
- Primary completion14 Feb 2024
- Study completion14 Feb 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (64)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for FibromyalgiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single center trial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Marius Henriksen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Marius Henriksen, Frederiksberg University Hospital
- Investigators
- Kirstine Amris, Dr. Med, Principal investigator, The Parker Institute, Frederiksberg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04729179
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P142
- Other IDs
- 2019-002394-59, H-20047715, 2019
- Acronym
- CANNFIB
- Status last verified
- Mar 2024
- First submitted
- 18 Jan 2021
- Last updated
- 25 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Jones GT, Atzeni F, Beasley M, Fluss E, Sarzi-Puttini P, Macfarlane GJ. The prevalence of fibromyalgia in the general population: a comparison of the American College of Rheumatology 1990, 2010, and modified 2010 classification criteria. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Feb;67(2):568-75. doi: 10.1002/art.38905.
PubMed 25323744Walitt B, Nahin RL, Katz RS, Bergman MJ, Wolfe F. The Prevalence and Characteristics of Fibromyalgia in the 2012 National Health Interview Survey. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138024. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26379048Wolfe F, Brahler E, Hinz A, Hauser W. Fibromyalgia prevalence, somatic symptom reporting, and the dimensionality of polysymptomatic distress: results from a survey of the general population. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 May;65(5):777-85. doi: 10.1002/acr.21931.
PubMed 23424058Smith HS, Harris R, Clauw D. Fibromyalgia: an afferent processing disorder leading to a complex pain generalized syndrome. Pain Physician. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):E217-45.
PubMed 21412381Coster L, Kendall S, Gerdle B, Henriksson C, Henriksson KG, Bengtsson A. Chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain - a comparison of those who meet criteria for fibromyalgia and those who do not. Eur J Pain. 2008 Jul;12(5):600-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.10.001. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
PubMed 18024204Hallberg LR, Carlsson SG. Coping with fibromyalgia. A qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2000;14(1):29-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2000.tb00558.x.
PubMed 12035259Bandak E, Amris K, Bliddal H, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Henriksen M. Muscle fatigue in fibromyalgia is in the brain, not in the muscles: a case-control study of perceived versus objective muscle fatigue. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun;72(6):963-6. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202340. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
PubMed 23223425Amris K, Waehrens EE, Jespersen A, Bliddal H, Danneskiold-Samsoe B. Observation-based assessment of functional ability in patients with chronic widespread pain: a cross-sectional study. Pain. 2011 Nov;152(11):2470-2476. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.05.027. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
PubMed 21715094Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006 May;10(4):287-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
PubMed 16095934Sjogren P, Ekholm O, Peuckmann V, Gronbaek M. Epidemiology of chronic pain in Denmark: an update. Eur J Pain. 2009 Mar;13(3):287-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
PubMed 18547844Ablin JN, Buskila D. Emerging therapies for fibromyalgia: an update. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2010 Sep;15(3):521-33. doi: 10.1517/14728214.2010.491509.
PubMed 20486862Hauser W, Walitt B, Fitzcharles MA, Sommer C. Review of pharmacological therapies in fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jan 17;16(1):201. doi: 10.1186/ar4441.
PubMed 24433463Smith HS, Bracken D, Smith JM. Pharmacotherapy for fibromyalgia. Front Pharmacol. 2011 Mar 31;2:17. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2011.00017. eCollection 2011.
PubMed 21772818Hauser W, Wolfe F, Tolle T, Uceyler N, Sommer C. The role of antidepressants in the management of fibromyalgia syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CNS Drugs. 2012 Apr 1;26(4):297-307. doi: 10.2165/11598970-000000000-00000.
PubMed 22452526Hauser W, Urrutia G, Tort S, Uceyler N, Walitt B. Serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for fibromyalgia syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD010292. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010292.
PubMed 23440848
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cannabidiol for Fibromyalgia -The CANNFIB Trial Protocol for a Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Single-center Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04729179
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CANNFIB / P142
- Conditions
- Fibromyalgia
- Keywords
- Cannabidiol, Chronic widespread pain, Sleep disturbances, Fatigue, Functional ability, Quality of life
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Marius HenriksenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 14 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 Feb 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Fibromyalgia is serious chronic pain condition which is often accompanied by sleep disturbances, fatigue and disability and reduced quality of life. There is no cure and treatments are based on reliving symptoms and maintaining function. The currently available medical treatments are not helping many patients, and many get side-effects. Medical cannabis is sought after among patients and many use this medication un-licenced, although it is not properly documented if it works or is safe. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the effects and safety of medical cannabis in a properly designed randomized trial. The aim of the study is to investigate if cannabidiol (CBD) can improve pain, sleep, function and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia. The study will include 200 patients, who will receive either cannabidiol or placebo over a period of 24 weeks. Participants will be closely looked after for improvements in their condition and for potential side-effects to ensure safety.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia is a serious chronic pain condition affecting 2-5 % of the background population. The disease burden in most affected individuals is substantial; with widespread musculoskeletal pain, high pain intensity, often accompanied by sleep disturbances, fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, and emotional distress. Fibromyalgia is associated with disability and muscle fatigue, affecting daily life activities, leading to poor social participation and incapacity for normal employment. Studies have shown that many patients, are not satisfied with the treatments offered, and rate their health and quality of life after treatment as poor.
There is currently is no cure for fibromyalgia, and management aiming at symptom reduction and maintenance of optimal functioning is recommended by clinical guidelines, including both non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment strategies. Recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of fibromyalgia propose antidepressants and anticonvulsants, which target central pain processing mechanisms. These treatments have been tested in controlled trials for their efficacy in patients with fibromyalgia, and meta-analyses on these interventions have revealed that overall effect sizes are modest, as only a minority of patients have substantial benefit (patient reported pain relief of 50% or greater), while more have moderate benefit (patient reported pain relief of 30% or greater). Many patients have no or minimal benefit or will discontinue the treatment due to side effects. However, it appears that even moderate reductions in pain may lead to considerable increase in self-reported quality of life and other outcome domains in this specific patient population.
Medical cannabis is popularly advocated for different health conditions including chronic pain, both among politicians and in the general population in Denmark, although evidence is sparse efficacy and on what types of medical cannabis to use and what dosages to prescribe for the different conditions. In addition, safety issues such as adverse events and serious adverse events is not properly assesed. Physicians are reluctant to prescribe medical cannabis to their patients, and many patients living with chronic pain are known to self-administer unlicensed medical cannabis. The extent of actual cannabis use is unknown, although, one study has documented that 13% of patients with fibromyalgia use cannabis regularly with a more extensive use among male patients compared to females. Numbers from a Danish context show that only 17 out of 286 (6%), patients with fibromyalgia participating in a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program in Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg hospital during 2018, stated that they were using self-administrated cannabis on a regular basis (unpublished data). As self-administrated off-label use of cannabis is illegal in Denmark, this number may well be underreported. Still, individuals diagnosed with fibromyalgia who do admit to cannabis use, are sharing stories with health professionals about how unlicensed cannabis has improved their coping with everyday life, functional ability, pain, sleep, fatigue, mood and overall health related quality of life. Such compelling stories cannot be ignored and underline the necessity of exploring the efficacy of medical cannabis in a proper research design (i.e. with good internal validity).
The use of the cannabis plant for medical purposes is limited in Europe and the European addiction societies stresses the need for further studies on the efficacy and possible dangers regarding medical cannabis intake. Regulations are lacking on registration and medical indications, and the development of uniform compounds regarding strength and types of products and rules concerning sales and marketing.
In Denmark, production and distribution of medical cannabis is illegal. However, starting from January 1st, 2018, a four-year pilot scheme has been legalized and approved by the Danish Medicines Agency, allowing for medical cannabis in the treatment of conditions such as multiple sclerosis, spinal injuries and nausea after chemotherapy and neuropathic pain. Although patients suffering from fibromyalgia have few treatment options for management of their disabling condition, this group is not included in the pilot scheme. However, it is legal for physicians to prescribe cannabis for this and other patient groups.
Medical cannabis Medical cannabis is the term for medications derived from dried cannabis plants in the form of capsules, pills or extracts/oils. The top shoot of the plant contains 100 cannabinoids that are divided into two subgroups; Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), affecting the cannabinoid type 1 receptors located in the central nervous system, and the cannabinoid type 2 receptors located outside of the central nervous system. While the THC cannabinoids have psychoactive, appetite stimulating and nausea reducing effects, cannabidiol has anti-inflammatory, anti-convulsive and immune modulating effects. Studies are inconclusive regarding the effect of cannabidiol on appetite and food intake. Cannabinoids are known to be highly lipophilic and to accumulate in fatty tissue, and may influence the metabolism, fat distribution and accumulation in users. It has been implicated that both TCH and CBD have pain reducing effects. CBD is confirmed to have a favorable safety profile compared to THC.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), has approved Epydiolex® as the first prescription cannabis drug derived from the cannabis plant, for treating rare and severe forms of epilepsy. Synthetically manufactured cannabis such as dronabinol (USA) and nabilone (USA and UK), have been approved earlier in the treatment of nausea after chemotherapy. The only synthetic cannabis based approved drug in Denmark is Sativex® for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. However, none of the cannabis drugs are currently approved for the treatment of chronic pain conditions.
Evidence is sparse on medical cannabis in the treatment of fibromyalgia. In a Cochrane review on herbal cannabis (hashish, marihuana), plant-based and synthetic cannabinoids for fibromyalgia, only two out of four identified studies on the topic were included, due to small sample sizes, short-term duration and poor reporting of the other studies. The two studies were both on synthetic cannabinoid (nabilone). No high-quality studies on plant-based cannabis could be identified. Evidence for efficacy was inconsistent as one study favored nabilone on pain and quality of life, compared to placebo, and the other study favored nabilone on sleep compared to Amitriptyline (anti-depressant). However, the quality of the studies was low, and tolerability was low due to side effects.
Recent systematic reviews, have investigated the existing evidence on the effectiveness of cannabinoids for chronic non-cancer pain, including fibromyalgia. No impact on physical and emotional functioning has been found, and only low-quality evidence found improved sleep and patient global impression of change. Thus, it was concluded to be unlikely that cannabinoids are effective in the treatment of non-cancer pain, as findings were inconsistent. Survey studies, however, have showed favorable effect on fibromyalgia symptoms and health-related quality of life, and improved pain management and sleep, among users of unlicensed cannabis compared to non-users, although no information on type and dosages of cannabis was given in the surveys. Negative patients' perspectives themes such as the high cost, the negative effects of cannabis and the "views of others", including their health care professionals, were also identified. A recent retrospective study showed significantly favorable outcomes on fibromyalgia symptoms among medical cannabis users, and only mild adverse events. However, the retrospective design, the relatively small sample size and short duration reduced the quality of the study.
Based on the high demand and an increasing popularity of medical cannabis - which is currently used unlicensed among many patients with fibromyalgia, despite the lack of high-quality evidence on efficacy and safety, a well-designed randomized trial with a large sample size and clinically relevant duration is warranted.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of cannabidiol use compared to placebo, and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of cannabidiol compared to placebo in patients with fibromyalgia over 24 weeks.
HYPOTHESES: The primary hypothesis of the study is that pain intensity will be significantly reduced in participants receiving cannabidiol compared to those receiving identically appearing placebo after 24 weeks.
Secondary hypotheses are that sleep quality and duration, activities of daily living and quality of life, will be improved in participants receiving cannabidiol compared to those receiving placebo after 24 weeks. It is also hypothesized that participants receiving cannabidiol will improve on several supportive exploratory secondary outcomes (see outcome measures section), and that a higher proportion of those receiving cannabidiol will have a substantial benefit (50 % pain reduction) and a moderate benefit (30 % pain reduction).
STUDY DESIGN: The trial is designed as a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind and parallel-group trial.; the trial contains three periods: A pre-randomization screening period (week -8 to 0), a main trial period (week 0 to 24), and a post interventional observation period (week 24 to 36). The trial is designed to determine the efficacy and safety of cannabidiol use for patients with fibromyalgia.
The trial is scheduled to start inclusion of first patient first visit, February 2021 or as soon as possible thereafter, and the study period will go on for two year and end with the last patient last visit in December 2022.
Eligible participants, who are included at screening, will be randomized in a 1:1 manner to receive either cannabidiol 50 mg or placebo. Allocation will also be stratified based on sex (male vs. female), age and pain intensity (over vs. under 7 on the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised version (FIQ-R) pain numeric rating scale, to ensure that the groups are equal. A computer-generated randomization sequence will create subject identification numbers and allocate the subjects to treatment arms. The randomization sequence will be created by an independent biostatistician using a random number generator (SAS Proc Plan), and subsequently entered in the electronic Case Report Form (e-CRF), that will be developed specifically for the study, by an independent data manager. If unblinding of a participant is required due to an adverse event, the primary investigator can request to break the randomization code for the individual patient, via the independent data manager. The unblinding will always be performed at patient level and unblinding can take place any time during the day (24/7). Randomization and concealed allocation are done electronically in the e-CRF at the randomization visit (week 0).
The study will be conducted at the Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, University of Copenhagen. The Parker Institute is a well-established research institute and clinical department with secretariat, data managers and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) trained health care professionals including physicians and study nurses. Monitoring will be conducted from the initiation and throughout the trial by the GCP-unit at Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg hospital, in accordance with the GCP rules and regulations.
The trial will end when the last patient has completed the last visit as well as the 12-week post interventional observation period, or prematurely discontinued the intervention or withdrawn from the trial, which comes last.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single center trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cannabidiol | Experimental | Drug: CannabidiolParticipants will start with 10 mg of cannabidiol daily and the dose will be escalated every third day until the maximum dosage of 50 mg is reached (after two weeks). The participants be on the 50 mg dosage of cannabidiol for 24 weeks. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo is administered as tablets of 10 mg that are identical in appearance, taste, and smell to the Cannabidiol tablets.The participants will be on the 50 mg dosage of placebo for 24 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Informed consent obtained
- Clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1990 criteria
- Average pain intensity ≥ 4 on a Numeric Rating Scale
- No use of medical cannabis (THC/CBD) within the last six months
- Proficiency in spoken Danish language and able to read and write in Danish
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- On-going participation in other medical trials for pain management of fibromyalgia
- Diagnosis of Rheumatoid Arthritis or other inflammatory diseases
- Diagnosis of other serious chronic diseases
- Impaired liver and kidney function
- Pregnancy or insufficient anti-conception therapy for fertile female participants
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CannabidiolAlso: Cannabidiol active ingredientParticipants will start with 10 mg of cannabidiol daily and the dose will be escalated every third day until the maximum dosage of 50 mg is reached (after two weeks). The participants be on the 50 mg dosage of cannabidiol for 24 weeks. | Drug | Cannabidiol |
| PlaceboAlso: Cannabidiol PlaceboPlacebo is administered as tablets of 10 mg that are identical in appearance, taste, and smell to the Cannabidiol tablets.The participants will be on the 50 mg dosage of placebo for 24 weeks. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Pain intensity
Time frame: From baseline to week 24
The primary endpoint is change in pain intensity, measured with the 0-10 pain numeric rating scale, from the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire Revised. The minimum value is 0, which is the best outcome, indicating no pain. The maximum value is 10, which is the worst outcome, indicating the worst possible pain.
6 secondary outcomes
Sleep quality
Time frame: From baseline to week 24
Sleep duration
Time frame: From baseline to week 24
Objectively measured sleep duration
Time frame: From baseline to week 24
Objectively measured sleep patterns
Time frame: From baseline to week 24
Activities of daily living
Time frame: From baseline to week 24
Health-related quality of life
Time frame: From baseline to week 24
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Mar 2024.
- Background: PubMed 25323744Jones GT, Atzeni F, Beasley M, Fluss E, Sarzi-Puttini P, Macfarlane GJ. The prevalence of fibromyalgia in the general population: a comparison of the American College of Rheumatology 1990, 2010, and modified 2010 classification criteria. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Feb;67(2):568-75. doi: 10.1002/art.38905.
- Background: PubMed 26379048Walitt B, Nahin RL, Katz RS, Bergman MJ, Wolfe F. The Prevalence and Characteristics of Fibromyalgia in the 2012 National Health Interview Survey. PLoS One. 2015 Sep 17;10(9):e0138024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138024. eCollection 2015.
- Background: PubMed 23424058Wolfe F, Brahler E, Hinz A, Hauser W. Fibromyalgia prevalence, somatic symptom reporting, and the dimensionality of polysymptomatic distress: results from a survey of the general population. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013 May;65(5):777-85. doi: 10.1002/acr.21931.
- Background: PubMed 21412381Smith HS, Harris R, Clauw D. Fibromyalgia: an afferent processing disorder leading to a complex pain generalized syndrome. Pain Physician. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):E217-45.
- Background: PubMed 18024204Coster L, Kendall S, Gerdle B, Henriksson C, Henriksson KG, Bengtsson A. Chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain - a comparison of those who meet criteria for fibromyalgia and those who do not. Eur J Pain. 2008 Jul;12(5):600-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.10.001. Epub 2007 Nov 19.
- Background: PubMed 12035259Hallberg LR, Carlsson SG. Coping with fibromyalgia. A qualitative study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2000;14(1):29-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2000.tb00558.x.
- Background: PubMed 23223425Bandak E, Amris K, Bliddal H, Danneskiold-Samsoe B, Henriksen M. Muscle fatigue in fibromyalgia is in the brain, not in the muscles: a case-control study of perceived versus objective muscle fatigue. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013 Jun;72(6):963-6. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202340. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
- Background: PubMed 21715094Amris K, Waehrens EE, Jespersen A, Bliddal H, Danneskiold-Samsoe B. Observation-based assessment of functional ability in patients with chronic widespread pain: a cross-sectional study. Pain. 2011 Nov;152(11):2470-2476. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.05.027. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
- Background: PubMed 16095934Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006 May;10(4):287-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 18547844Sjogren P, Ekholm O, Peuckmann V, Gronbaek M. Epidemiology of chronic pain in Denmark: an update. Eur J Pain. 2009 Mar;13(3):287-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
- Background: PubMed 20486862Ablin JN, Buskila D. Emerging therapies for fibromyalgia: an update. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2010 Sep;15(3):521-33. doi: 10.1517/14728214.2010.491509.
- Background: PubMed 24433463Hauser W, Walitt B, Fitzcharles MA, Sommer C. Review of pharmacological therapies in fibromyalgia syndrome. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Jan 17;16(1):201. doi: 10.1186/ar4441.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Fibromyalgia
Active, not recruiting
Objective Measurement of Pain Regulation in Individuals Who Have Received Internet-delivered Exposure-based Cognitive Behavior Therapy
Fibromyalgia
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Open-Label Safety Study of AXS-14 in Subjects With Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia
Recruiting
Exercise Interventions and Dietary Advice in Fibromyalgia and IBS
Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Recruiting
Whole-body Cryotherapy in Those With Chronic Fatigue: A Feasibility Study
ME/CFS, Fibromyalgia (FM)
Recruiting
Auricular Acupuncture for Autonomic Balance and Pain in Fibromyalgia
Fibromyalgia Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kirstine Amris, Dr. Med principal investigator
The Parker Institute, Frederiksberg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Cannabidiol in people with Fibromyalgia, run by Marius Henriksen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain intensity (time frame: From baseline to week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04729179, which also lists 64 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2024.