Tumor, SolidNCT04750772
Positron Nuclide Labeled DOTA-FAPI PET Study in Colocrectal Cancer
A study testing 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG and 18F-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CT in people with Tumor, Solid and Positron-Emission Tomography, run by Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
To evaluate the normal physiological distribution of positron nuclide labeled DOTA-FAPI PET/CT in human body and its diagnostic efficiency for colorectal cancers Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Tumor, Solid, Positron-Emission Tomography, Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG and 18F-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CT
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 16 Oct 2019to Jan 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ECOG score 0-2
- patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated colorectal cancers
- patients who underwent paired 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for tumor staging to decide the most proper treatment strategy
- patients who underwent paired 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT to detect tumor recurrence and metastases (repeat staging)
- expected survival ≥12 weeks
- blood routine, liver and kidney function meet the following criteria : blood routine: WBC≥4.0×109L or neutrophils ≥1.5×109L, PLT≥100×109/L, Hb≥90g/L;PT and APTT ULN 1.5 or less; Liver and kidney function: t-bil ≤1.5×ULT(upper limit of normal value), ALT/AST≤2.5ULN or ≤5×ULT(subjects with liver metastasis), ALP≤2.5ULN(ALP≤ 4.5ULN if there is bone metastasis or liver metastasis);BUN 1.5 x or less ULT, SCr 1.5 x or less ULT
Show all 9Show fewer
- at least one measurable target lesion according to RECIST1.1
- women must use effective contraception during the study period and for 6 months after the end of the study (effective contraception means sterilization, hormone devices, condoms, contraceptives/pills, abstinence or vasectomy by a partner, etc.);Men should consent to subjects who must use contraception during the study period and for 6 months after the end of the study period
- able to understand and sign the informed consent voluntarily, with good compliance.
Who cannot join
- severe abnormalities of liver and kidney function;
- women preparing for pregnancy, pregnancy and lactation;
- cannot lie supine for half an hour;
- refuse to join the clinical researcher;
- suffering from claustrophobia or other mental illness;
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Zhi Yang, PHD contact
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Peking University Cancer Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100142
Xuejuan Wang, MD, 86 10-88196363, xuejuan_wang@hotmail.com
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Positron Nuclide Labeled DOTA-FAPI PET and FDG PET Study in Colocrectal Cancer
To evaluate the normal physiological distribution of positron nuclide labeled DOTA-FAPI PET/CT in human body and its diagnostic efficiency for colorectal cancers
Read the detailed description
Participants first undergo an 18F-FDG PET/CT, followed by 68Ga-FAPI04 PET/CT in groups. The purpose of the study is to explore the possibility of superiority of FAPI in diagnosis of colorectal cancer (TNM staging) by the comparison of the two tracers uptake (the maximum of standardized uptake value, SUVmax). Histopathology and conventional imaging follow-up are served as the reference standard.
- Being tested
- 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CT, 18F-FDG and 18F-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CT
- Keywords
- Colorectal Cancer, Positron-Emission Tomography, FAPI
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CTDiagnostic test
Each subject receive a single intravenous injection of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04, and undergo PET/CT imaging within the specified time
18F-FDG and 18F-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CTDiagnostic test
Each subject receive a single intravenous injection of 18F-FDG and 18F-DOTA-FAPI04, and undergo PET/CT imaging within the specified time
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04 | Experimental | Each subject receive a single intravenous injection of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04, and undergo PET/CT imaging within the specified time Receives: Diagnostic Test: 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CT |
| 18F-DOTA-FAPI04 | Experimental | Each subject receive a single intravenous injection of 18F-FDG and 18F-DOTA-FAPI04, and undergo PET/CT imaging within the specified time Receives: Diagnostic Test: 18F-FDG and 18F-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CT |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
finial clinical staging(TNM)
To explore the effect of FAPI PET/CT on staging of Colorectal cancer by comparing with FDG PET/CT
Measured: 60-120days
Secondary outcomes (1)
SUVmax
To compare the uptake (SUVmax)of two tracers (FAPI and FDG)in colorectal cancer (including the normal organs, primary tumors and metastases)
Measured: 60-120days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Feb 2021
- Study start16 Oct 2019
- Primary completionDec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Tumor, SolidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Xuejuan Wang,MD, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
- Investigators
- Zhi Yang, Study director, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04750772
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- XW-YZ-FAPI-2019KT95
- Status last verified
- Jun 2022
- First submitted
- 8 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 27 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Loktev A, Lindner T, Burger EM, Altmann A, Giesel F, Kratochwil C, Debus J, Marme F, Jager D, Mier W, Haberkorn U. Development of Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted Radiotracers with Improved Tumor Retention. J Nucl Med. 2019 Oct;60(10):1421-1429. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.224469. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
PubMed 30850501Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
PubMed 31912902Dekker E, Tanis PJ, Vleugels JLA, Kasi PM, Wallace MB. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2019 Oct 19;394(10207):1467-1480. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0.
PubMed 31631858Chakedis J, Schmidt CR. Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2018 Apr;27(2):377-399. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
PubMed 29496096Kantorova I, Lipska L, Belohlavek O, Visokai V, Trubac M, Schneiderova M. Routine (18)F-FDG PET preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional staging and its impact on treatment decision making. J Nucl Med. 2003 Nov;44(11):1784-8.
PubMed 14602860Petersen RK, Hess S, Alavi A, Hoilund-Carlsen PF. Clinical impact of FDG-PET/CT on colorectal cancer staging and treatment strategy. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Aug 15;4(5):471-82. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 25143865Berger KL, Nicholson SA, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA. FDG PET evaluation of mucinous neoplasms: correlation of FDG uptake with histopathologic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Apr;174(4):1005-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.4.1741005.
PubMed 10749239Borello A, Russolillo N, Lo Tesoriere R, Langella S, Guerra M, Ferrero A. Diagnostic performance of the FDG-PET/CT in patients with resected mucinous colorectal liver metastases. Surgeon. 2021 Oct;19(5):e140-e145. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
PubMed 34581274Lindner T, Loktev A, Altmann A, Giesel F, Kratochwil C, Debus J, Jager D, Mier W, Haberkorn U. Development of Quinoline-Based Theranostic Ligands for the Targeting of Fibroblast Activation Protein. J Nucl Med. 2018 Sep;59(9):1415-1422. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.210443. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
PubMed 29626119Chen H, Pang Y, Wu J, Zhao L, Hao B, Wu J, Wei J, Wu S, Zhao L, Luo Z, Lin X, Xie C, Sun L, Lin Q, Wu H. Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F] FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in patients with various types of cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jul;47(8):1820-1832. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04769-z. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
PubMed 32222810
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Positron Nuclide Labeled DOTA-FAPI PET and FDG PET Study in Colocrectal Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04750772
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- XW-YZ-FAPI-2019KT95
- Keywords
- Colorectal Cancer, Positron-Emission Tomography, FAPI
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking University Cancer Hospital & InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2022 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate the normal physiological distribution of positron nuclide labeled DOTA-FAPI PET/CT in human body and its diagnostic efficiency for colorectal cancers
Detailed description
Participants first undergo an 18F-FDG PET/CT, followed by 68Ga-FAPI04 PET/CT in groups. The purpose of the study is to explore the possibility of superiority of FAPI in diagnosis of colorectal cancer (TNM staging) by the comparison of the two tracers uptake (the maximum of standardized uptake value, SUVmax). Histopathology and conventional imaging follow-up are served as the reference standard.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04 | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CTEach subject receive a single intravenous injection of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04, and undergo PET/CT imaging within the specified time |
| 18F-DOTA-FAPI04 | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: 18F-FDG and 18F-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CTEach subject receive a single intravenous injection of 18F-FDG and 18F-DOTA-FAPI04, and undergo PET/CT imaging within the specified time |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- ECOG score 0-2
- patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated colorectal cancers
- patients who underwent paired 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for tumor staging to decide the most proper treatment strategy
- patients who underwent paired 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT to detect tumor recurrence and metastases (repeat staging)
- expected survival ≥12 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- severe abnormalities of liver and kidney function;
- women preparing for pregnancy, pregnancy and lactation;
- cannot lie supine for half an hour;
- refuse to join the clinical researcher;
- suffering from claustrophobia or other mental illness;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CTEach subject receive a single intravenous injection of 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04, and undergo PET/CT imaging within the specified time | Diagnostic test | 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04 |
| 18F-FDG and 18F-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CTEach subject receive a single intravenous injection of 18F-FDG and 18F-DOTA-FAPI04, and undergo PET/CT imaging within the specified time | Diagnostic test | 18F-DOTA-FAPI04 |
Primary outcome
finial clinical staging(TNM)
Time frame: 60-120days
To explore the effect of FAPI PET/CT on staging of Colorectal cancer by comparing with FDG PET/CT
1 secondary outcome
SUVmax
Time frame: 60-120days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jun 2022.
- Background: PubMed 30850501Loktev A, Lindner T, Burger EM, Altmann A, Giesel F, Kratochwil C, Debus J, Marme F, Jager D, Mier W, Haberkorn U. Development of Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted Radiotracers with Improved Tumor Retention. J Nucl Med. 2019 Oct;60(10):1421-1429. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.224469. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 31912902Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 31631858Dekker E, Tanis PJ, Vleugels JLA, Kasi PM, Wallace MB. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2019 Oct 19;394(10207):1467-1480. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0.
- Results publication: PubMed 29496096Chakedis J, Schmidt CR. Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2018 Apr;27(2):377-399. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 14602860Kantorova I, Lipska L, Belohlavek O, Visokai V, Trubac M, Schneiderova M. Routine (18)F-FDG PET preoperative staging of colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional staging and its impact on treatment decision making. J Nucl Med. 2003 Nov;44(11):1784-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 25143865Petersen RK, Hess S, Alavi A, Hoilund-Carlsen PF. Clinical impact of FDG-PET/CT on colorectal cancer staging and treatment strategy. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Aug 15;4(5):471-82. eCollection 2014.
- Results publication: PubMed 10749239Berger KL, Nicholson SA, Dehdashti F, Siegel BA. FDG PET evaluation of mucinous neoplasms: correlation of FDG uptake with histopathologic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Apr;174(4):1005-8. doi: 10.2214/ajr.174.4.1741005.
- Results publication: PubMed 34581274Borello A, Russolillo N, Lo Tesoriere R, Langella S, Guerra M, Ferrero A. Diagnostic performance of the FDG-PET/CT in patients with resected mucinous colorectal liver metastases. Surgeon. 2021 Oct;19(5):e140-e145. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 29626119Lindner T, Loktev A, Altmann A, Giesel F, Kratochwil C, Debus J, Jager D, Mier W, Haberkorn U. Development of Quinoline-Based Theranostic Ligands for the Targeting of Fibroblast Activation Protein. J Nucl Med. 2018 Sep;59(9):1415-1422. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.210443. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
- Results publication: PubMed 32222810Chen H, Pang Y, Wu J, Zhao L, Hao B, Wu J, Wei J, Wu S, Zhao L, Luo Z, Lin X, Xie C, Sun L, Lin Q, Wu H. Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 and [18F] FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and metastatic lesions in patients with various types of cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jul;47(8):1820-1832. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-04769-z. Epub 2020 Mar 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Tumor, Solid
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ABSK043 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor
Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Safety and Efficacy Extension Study of Pertuzumab in Patients With Solid Tumors Previously Enrolled in a Hoffmann-La Roche-Sponsored Pertuzumab Clinical Trial
Solid Tumors
RecruitingPhase 1
IL-12 Genetically Engineered Myeloid Cells in Participants With Relapsed, Refractory Solid Tumors
Relapsed Solid Tumor Malignancies, Refractory Solid Tumor Malignancies
RecruitingObservational study
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Toxicity Risk Prediction in Solid Tumors
Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zhi Yang, PHD contact
Zhi Yang study director
Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 18F-FDG and 68Ga-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CT and 18F-FDG and 18F-DOTA-FAPI04 PET/CT in people with Tumor, Solid and Positron-Emission Tomography, run by Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Xuejuan Wang, MD (86 010 88196363, xuejuan_wang@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
finial clinical staging(TNM) (time frame: 60-120days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04750772, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2022.