AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Neck PainNCT04752488

The Effect of Telerehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

A study testing Telerehabilitation (TR) and Conventional Rehabilitation (CR) in people with Chronic Neck Pain, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Telerehabilitation offers more efficient follow-up of patients during their home exercise period as a cost-effective and effective treatment model. This study was planned to examine the effectiveness of telerehabilitation in patients with chronic neck pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Neck Pain
What is being tested?
Telerehabilitation (TR) and Conventional Rehabilitation (CR)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
20 Mar 2022to 29 Jul 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients between the ages of 18 - 65
  • Patients who have suffered from neck pain for at least 3 months
  • Signing the consent form

Who cannot join

  • Situations that prevent the evaluation or communication with the individual
  • Illiterate individuals
  • Individuals who have undergone an operation due to neck pain problem, diagnosed with a tumor, infection, ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis or inflammatory diseases, fracture, cauda equina syndrome
  • Conditions in which specific pathological condition is proven such as malignant condition, fracture, systemic rheumatoid disease
  • Orthopedic and neurological problems that prevent evaluation and/or treatment
  • Complaints of pain and numbness spreading to the upper extremities
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Individuals with a diagnosed psychiatric disease
  • Individuals who have received physiotherapy in the last 6 months
  • Individuals using another treatment method during the study
  • Individuals with musculoskeletal pain in any other part of the body during work
  • Pregnant participants

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Training and Research Hospital

    Muğla

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Telerehabilitation and Conventional Rehabilitation on Clinical Results and Exercise Adherence in Patients With Chronic Neck Pain

Telerehabilitation offers more efficient follow-up of patients during their home exercise period as a cost-effective and effective treatment model. This study was planned to examine the effectiveness of telerehabilitation in patients with chronic neck pain. The aim of the study is to compare the video-based and telerehabilitation based home-exercise program in patients with chronic neck pain. It is aimed to evaluate the patients in terms of pain, functionality, quality of life, and exercise adherence.

Read the detailed description

With telerehabilitation, patients can easily adapt to home exercise programs and be monitored remotely. In this way, it will be ensured that individuals can apply their exercises at an optimum level in non-clinical settings and to prevent exercise application errors that occur due to the learning effect frequently observed in conventional methods. Exercise is considered a central element in physical therapy and rehabilitation management in patients with chronic neck pain. However, studies have found that improvements after physical therapy and rehabilitation are not preserved in the long term, and recurrence of chronic low back pain is common. With a more cost-effective treatment model, "telerehabilitation", it is aimed that patients can be followed more efficiently during their home exercise period. The aim of the study is to compare the video-based and telerehabilitation based home-exercise program in patients with chronic neck pain. It is aimed to evaluate the patients in terms of pain, functionality, quality of life, and exercise adherence.

Being tested
Telerehabilitation (TR), Conventional Rehabilitation (CR)
Keywords
Telerehabilitation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Telerehabilitation (TR)Other

    The home exercise program will be educated to the patient on the first day. Exercises for isometric and isotonic strengthening, stretching, and stabilization of the neck muscles will be given. Exercises will be presented to the patients in audio-video format and detailed instructions with explanations. The exercise protocol will also be the same as in the conventional rehabilitation group. Patients will be asked to do the exercises once a day for 8 weeks and 10 repetitions each.

  • Conventional Rehabilitation (CR)Other

    The home exercise program will be educated to the patient on the first day. Isometric and isotonic strengthening, stretching and stabilization exercises for the neck muscles will be given. Exercise information form including explanation and picture of the exercises will be given to the patients. Patients will be asked to do the exercises once a day for 8 weeks and 10 repetitions each.

Study groups in NCT04752488
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Telerehabilitation (TR) GroupExperimentalThe TR group will be followed up through the video-based exercise software within the 8-week home exercise program.
Receives: Other: Telerehabilitation (TR)
Conventional Rehabilitation (CR) GroupActive comparatorThe CR group will be trained face-to-face with conventional methods before the 8-week home exercise program, and an exercise program will be prescribed with a visual information form.
Receives: Other: Conventional Rehabilitation (CR)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    The patients will be asked to mark their pain feelings for rest and activity on a 10 cm numerical line (0: no pain, 10: unbearable pain). It is planned to use numerical VAS in our study. The cut-off values for chronic musculoskeletal pain will be classified as the severity of pain according to VAS as follows:

    <3.4 centimeters: mild pain, 3.5-7.4 centimeters: moderate pain, > 7.5 centimeters: severe pain.

    Measured: 2 minutes

  2. Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    NDI consists of 10 titles: pain intensity, personal care, lifting, reading, headache, concentration, study, driving, sleeping, and recreation. For each item included in the study; 0 indicates "no disability" and 5 represents "complete disability" Participants will be asked to give points between these scores. The total score ranges between 0 (no disability) and 50 (complete disability).

    Measured: 5 minutes

  3. Short Form-36 (SF-36)

    SF-36 consists of thirty-six items. These provide measurements of eight dimensions. Subscales evaluate health between 0-100 points; '0' indicates poor health, '100' indicates good health.

    Measured: 5 minutes

  4. Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia

    The scale is a 17-item. A 4-point Likert scoring (1= strongly disagree, 4= totally agree) is used in the scale. The participant gets a total score between 17-68. The high score obtained by the participant indicates that the kinesiophobia is also high.

    Measured: 5 minutes

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS)

    EARS provides a measurement of commitment to home exercise. This may facilitate the evaluation of interventions that promote self-management, for the treatment of chronic conditions.

    Measured: 5 minutes

  2. Telemedicine Patient Questionnaire

    Telemedicine Patient Questionnaire evaluates the usability and satisfaction of the patients. The total score is scored between 17 and 85. Higher scores indicate expectation, satisfaction and usability.

    Measured: 5 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Feb 2021
  2. Study start20 Mar 2022
  3. Primary completion20 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion29 Jul 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized controlled trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04752488
Sponsor's protocol ID
Mugla Training and Research
Status last verified
Aug 2022
First submitted
10 Feb 2021
Last updated
16 Aug 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Telerehabilitation (TR) and Conventional Rehabilitation (CR) in people with Chronic Neck Pain, run by Marmara University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (time frame: 2 minutes). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in