AzTrials
AzTrials

Mitral Valve RegurgitationNCT04775108

First-In-Human Clinical Study for Treatment of Severe Mitral Valve INsufficiency With Epygon™ TRanscatheter Mitral VAlve System

A study testing Epygon™ Transcatheter Mitral Valve System in people with Mitral Valve Regurgitation, run by Epygon at 10 sites in 4 countries.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The EPYGON VALVE is an innovative mitral valve, intended for valve replacement of a native mitral valve through a minimally invasive implant procedure by means of a dedicated implant device. The EPYGON VALVE is a bio prosthesis, composed by a functional assembly of bovine pericardium on a NiTinol stent. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Mitral Valve Regurgitation
What is being tested?
Epygon™ Transcatheter Mitral Valve System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
10 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
1 Feb 2021to 31 Dec 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients of age ≥ 60 years.
  • Patients with primary or secondary severe symptomatic mitral valve regurgitation.
  • Patients with severe, symptomatic mitral regurgitation and who have been evaluated by a multidisciplinary Heart Team and deemed to be ineligible for conventional valve surgery and not eligible for transcatheter repair.
  • Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 30%.
  • Patients in NYHA functional classes III to IV.
  • Patients who have clearly accepted participation in this clinical study and who have signed the informed consent.
  • Patients who are willing to accept and undergo all protocol related requirements.
  • Patients not planning to transfer abroad.

Who cannot join

  • Clinical exclusion criteria (preoperative screening)
  • Patients involved in other clinical assessments for drugs or devices that could interfere or alter the study endpoints.
  • Patients with clinical/anatomical conditions unsuitable for a transapical surgical approach.
  • Patients who have previously undergone implantation of a transcatheter aortic valve prosthesis.
  • Patients with previous implantation of a mitral heart valve prosthesis.
  • Patients with previous implantation of a mitral annuloplasty ring.
Show all 29Show fewer
  • Patients needing emergency or life-saving interventions.
  • Patients with a heavily calcified mitral annulus and/or anterior mitral leaflet.
  • Patients with active infection or endocarditis (suspect endocarditis included).
  • Patients with echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass or thrombus.
  • Patients which suffered an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days of the intended treatment (defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with elevation of CK-MB ≥ 3 times normal in the absence of pathological Q waves), if no assay for CK-MB was performed, elevation of CK level to >2 times normal without new Q waves, or elevated Troponin level is also considered a non-Q wave MI).
  • Patients with an active peptic ulcer or upper GI bleeding within the prior 30 days.
  • Patients with a documented allergy towards contrast media, and to any compound of the investigated medical device.
  • Patients that have neurological disease severely affecting ambulation or day to day functioning.
  • Patients with any stroke within the prior 30 days.
  • Patients with senile dementia, according to the advice from a specialized neurologist.
  • Patients in whom transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated since TEE is used for both preoperative screening and guidance during implant procedure.
  • Patients who is unwilling or deemed by the Investigator to be unwilling to comply with the requirements of the protocol, or subject with a history of non-compliance.
  • Patients unable to understand and sign the Informed Consent Form in absence of legal representative.
  • Patients with a lack of capacity to consent.
  • Patients unable to read and write.
  • Echographic exclusion criteria (preoperative screening)
  • Patients with left ventricular apex aneurysm;
  • Patients with aorto-mitral angle <120°;
  • Patients with a systolic/diastolic mitral valve area assessed as not compatible with the sizing policy matrix defined by the Sponsor.
  • Computerized Tomographic (CT) exclusion criteria (preoperative screening)
  • Patients with ventricular morphology (position of papillary muscles, ventricular wall hypertrophy) unsuitable with the study valve design;
  • Patients with aorto-mitral angle <120°;
  • Patients with a systolic/diastolic mitral valve area assessed as not compatible with the sizing policy matrix defined by the Sponsor.

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 4 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

10 sites in 4 countries

Spain5 sites, 5 recruiting
  • Hospital German Trias i Pujol

    Badalona

    Christian Munoz Guijosa

    Recruiting
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

    Barcelona

    Antonino Ginel Iglesias

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Clinico San Carlos

    Madrid

    Luis Carlos Maroto Castellanos

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca

    Murcia

    Sergio Canovas Lopez

    Recruiting
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocio

    Seville

    José Miguel Borrego Dominguez

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Spain

Austria2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Medical University of Innsbruck

    Innsbruck

    Nikolaos Bonaros

    Recruiting
  • Medical University of Vienna - Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery

    Vienna

    Martin Andreas

    Recruiting

Other trials in Austria

Italy2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Careggi Hospital Florence Italy Largo Brambilla

    Florence

    Pierluigi Stefano

    Recruiting
  • A.O.U. Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

    Torino

    Mauro Rinaldi

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

Serbia1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute

    Belgrade

    Slobodan Micovic

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in Serbia

About this study

Official title: First-In-Human Clinical Study for Treatment of Severe Mitral Valve INsufficiency With Epygon™ TRanscatheter Mitral VAlve System (MINERVA FIH)

The EPYGON VALVE is an innovative mitral valve, intended for valve replacement of a native mitral valve through a minimally invasive implant procedure by means of a dedicated implant device.

The EPYGON VALVE is a bio prosthesis, composed by a functional assembly of bovine pericardium on a NiTinol stent.

The purpose of this trial is to assess the safety and feasibility of the Epygon™ Transcatheter mitral valve and the transapical delivery system, in adult patients with severe, symptomatic mitral regurgitation.

Being tested
Epygon™ Transcatheter Mitral Valve System
Keywords
Mitral regurgitation, Mitral valve replacement
Medical subject headings
Mitral Valve Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Epygon™ Transcatheter Mitral Valve SystemDevice

    The EPYGON VALVE is an innovative mitral valve, intended for valve replacement of a native mitral valve through a minimally invasive implant procedure by means of a dedicated implant device.

    The EPYGON VALVE is a bio prosthesis, composed by a functional assembly of bovine pericardium on a NiTinol stent.

Study groups in NCT04775108
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Implanted patientsExperimentalImplantation of Epygon mitral valve prosthesis
Receives: Device: Epygon™ Transcatheter Mitral Valve System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Device Safety

    defined as the absence of major device or procedure related serious adverse events evaluated on the following clinical events:

    1. death
    2. major cardiac structural complications (as per MVARC definitions)
    3. life-threatening bleeding (MVARC scale)
    4. any prosthesis-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication, that require surgery or repeated intervention.
    5. myocardial infarction or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG
    6. severe hypotension, heart failure or respiratory failure requiring intravenous vasopressors or invasive or mechanical heart failure treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices, including intra-aortic balloon pumps or left ventricular or biventricular assist devices, or prolonged intubation for ≥ 48H
    7. major vascular complications
    8. stroke
    9. stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (includes new dialysis)

    Measured: [Timeframe: at 30 days]

  2. Device Success

    1. Technical Success (as per MVARC definition) defined as alive patient at exit from procedure room, with all of the following:
    2. Successful access, delivery and retrieval of the Epygon delivery system
    3. Successful deployment and positioning of the Epygon Transcatheter mitral valve
    4. Freedom from additional emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the device or access procedure.
    5. Continued intended safety and performance of the device, including:
    6. No evidence of structural or functional failure (as per MVARC definition)
    7. No specific device-related technical failure issues and complications (as per MVARC definition)
    8. Reduction of mitral regurgitation (MR) to either optimal (0+ to trace) or acceptable (reduced by at least 1 grade from baseline with no more than 2+ MR) without significant mitral stenosis (post-procedure EOA ≥ 1.5 cm2 with a transmitral gradient < 5mmHg) and with no greater than mild (1+) paravalvular MR (and without associated hemolysis)

    Measured: [Timeframe: at 30 days]

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Device Safety

    defined as absence of major device or procedure related serious adverse events evaluated on the following clinical events:

    1. death
    2. major cardiac structural complications
    3. life-threatening bleeding (MVARC scale)
    4. any prosthesis-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication, that require surgery or repeated intervention.
    5. myocardial infarction or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG
    6. severe hypotension, heart failure or respiratory failure requiring intravenous vasopressors or invasive or mechanical heart failure treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices, including intra-aortic balloon pumps or left ventricular or biventricular assist devices, or prolonged intubation for ≥ 48H
    7. major access complications
    8. stroke
    9. stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (includes new dialysis)

    Measured: [Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]

  2. Patient success (as per MVARC definition)

    All of the following must be present:

    1. Device success (either optimal or acceptable)
    2. Patient returned to the pre-procedural setting
    3. No rehospitalizations or reinterventions for the underlying condition (e.g., mitral regurgitation, heart failure)
    4. Improvement from baseline in symptoms (e.g., NYHA improvement by ≥ 1 functional class)
    5. Improvement from baseline in functional status (e.g., 6-min walk test improvement by ≥ 50 m)
    6. Improvement from baseline in quality-of-life (e.g., Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire improvement by ≥ 10)

    Measured: [Time frame: 12 months from implantation]

  3. Evaluation of clinical status on the basis of the NYHA functional classification

    Measured: [Time frame Preoperative, 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]

  4. Six-minute walk test

    Measured: [Time frame: Preoperative, 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]

  5. Quality of Life score (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire)

    The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.

    Measured: [Time frame: Preoperative, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]

  6. Hemodynamic performance assessed by echocardiography

    1. Prosthetic mean atrio-ventricular ΔP < 5 mm Hg
    2. Prosthetic Effective Orifice Area (EOA) ≥ 1.5 cm2
    3. Mitral valve regurgitation reduction (vs. preoperative) of at least 1 grade and not more than moderate (2+)
    4. Prosthetic paravalvular valve leakage (PVL) not more than mild (1+) without hemolysis

    Measured: [Time frame: Preoperative on native mitral valve, Postoperative, 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]

  7. Technical Success (as per MVARC definition)

    defined as alive patient at exit from procedure room, with all of the following:

    1. Successful access, delivery and retrieval of the Epygon delivery system
    2. Successful deployment and positioning of the Epygon Transcatheter mitral valve
    3. Freedom from additional emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the device or access procedure.

    Measured: [Time Frame: immediately after procedure]

  8. Device Success

    1. Technical Success (as per MVARC definition) defined as alive patient at exit from procedure room, with all of the following:
    2. Successful access, delivery and retrieval of the Epygon delivery system
    3. Successful deployment and positioning of the Epygon bioprosthesis
    4. Freedom from additional emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the device or access procedure.
    5. Continued intended safety and performance of the device, including:
    6. No evidence of structural or functional failure (as per MVARC definition)
    7. No specific device-related technical failure issues and complications (as per MVARC definition)
    8. Reduction of mitral regurgitation (MR) to either optimal (0+ to trace) or acceptable (reduced by at least 1 grade from baseline with no more than 2+ MR) without significant mitral stenosis (post-procedure EOA ≥ 1.5 cm2 with a transmitral gradient < 5mmHg) and with no greater than mild (1+) paravalvular MR (and without associated hemolysis)

    Measured: [Time frame: 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]

  9. Procedural Success

    All of the following must be present:

    1. Device success (either optimal or acceptable), And
    2. Absence of major device or procedure related serious adverse events, including:
    3. death
    4. major cardiac structural complications (as per MVARC definitions)
    5. life-threatening bleeding (MVARC scale)
    6. any prosthesis-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication, that require surgery or repeated intervention.
    7. myocardial infarction or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG
    8. severe hypotension, heart failure or respiratory failure requiring intravenous vasopressors or invasive or mechanical heart failure treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices, including intra-aortic balloon pumps or left ventricular or biventricular assist devices, or prolonged intubation for ≥ 48H
    9. major vascular complications
    10. stroke
    11. stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (includes new dialysis).

    Measured: [Time frame: 30 days]

  10. Incidence of adverse events

    Measured: [Time frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]

  11. Incidence of serious adverse events

    Measured: [Time frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]

  12. Incidence of adverse events related to device

    Measured: [Time frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]

  13. Incidence of adverse events related to procedure

    Measured: [Time frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]

  14. Absence of all-cause mortality

    Measured: [Time frame: 30 days, 3, 6, 12 months and yearly up to 5 years from implantation]

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Mar 2021
  2. Study start1 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04775108
Sponsor's protocol ID
MINERVA FIH
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
25 Feb 2021
Last updated
7 Aug 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Epygon™ Transcatheter Mitral Valve System in people with Mitral Valve Regurgitation, run by Epygon at 10 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 29 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in Spain, Austria, Italy, Serbia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Christophe Giot (+33 4 42 95 12 20, christophe.giot@affluentmedical.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Device Safety (time frame: [Timeframe: at 30 days]). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in