AzTrials
AzTrials

Treatment Adherence and ComplianceNCT04778163

The Use of Humor With Young Adults in Psychiatric Care

A study testing Clinical use of humor in people with Treatment Adherence and Compliance and Psychiatric Disorder, run by University Hospital, Geneva at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Clinical study in psychiatry in young adult patients between 18 and 25 years old. The aim of the study is to evaluate the therapeutic impact of the clinical use of humor through 6 group sessions (group of 5 to 10 patients), at the rate of one hour session per week for 6 weeks. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 25 years
What is being tested?
Clinical use of humor
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
34 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
19 Sep 2019to 31 Oct 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 25 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Young adult patients of a psychiatric's unit (young people from 18 to 25 years old with beginner psychic disorders) who are French-speaking and able to give their informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Those who do not meet the above criteria.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Programme JADE

    Geneva, 1202

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Clinical study in psychiatry in young adult patients between 18 and 25 years old. The aim of the study is to evaluate the therapeutic impact of the clinical use of humor through 6 group sessions (group of 5 to 10 patients), at the rate of one hour session per week for 6 weeks.

The investigators will form 2 groups of 5 to 10 patients matched in terms of gender, education level and score on a scale measuring their sense of humor. The participants will be asked to complete a series of tests measuring their ability to use humor, psychiatric symptoms and well-being.

Read more

Group 1 (test group) will participate in the humor-based sessions, while Group 2 (control group) will receive regular treatment for 6 weeks (waiting list: patients in Group 2 will attend humor-based sessions once Group 1 has completed their 6 weeks).

At the end of the 6-week sessions, both groups will receive the same series of pre-session tests to see whether or not there has been improvement in their overall functioning, psychiatric symptomatology and appreciation/use of humor.

At the end of the 2x 6-week sessions, group 2 will again receive this series of pre-session tests to see whether or not their overall functioning, psychiatric symptomatology and appreciation/use of humour has improved.

Objective(s)/Aim:

To evaluate the resilience of young adult psychiatric patients and their ability to cope with stress through the use of humor in a set of 6 modules on the use of humor.

To evaluate the symptoms.

Outcome/Endpoints :

Using scales, measure this evolution.

Read the detailed description

Project design and procedures :

The investigators will form 2 groups of 5 to 10 patients matched on their score on the sense of humor scale, their gender and their level of education. The participants will be asked to complete a series of tests measuring their ability to use humor, clinical variables and general functioning.

Group 1 - experimental - will participate in a "humor group" with a one-hour group session per week for 6 weeks.

Group 2 - the control group - will follow a usual treatment regimen for 6 weeks. At the end of the "Humor Group" of group 1, the 2 groups of patients will undergo a second series of tests identical to those of the pregroup. The paired patients should be randomly assigned. The control group will do the "Humor Group" after 6 weeks.

Being tested
Clinical use of humor
Keywords
Young people, Young adults, Humor, Psychotherapy, Group psychotherapy, Resilience
Medical subject headings
Treatment Adherence and Compliance, Mental Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Clinical use of humorBehavioural

    Also called Treatment, Group psychotherapy

    Clinical study in psychiatry in young adult patients between 18 and 25 years old. The aim of the study is to evaluate the therapeutic impact of the clinical use of humor through 6 group sessions (group of 5 to 10 patients), at the rate of one hour session per week for 6 weeks.

    The investigators will form 2 groups of 5 to 10 patients matched in terms of gender, education level and score on a scale measuring their sense of humor. The participants will be asked to complete a series of tests measuring their ability to use humor, psychiatric symptoms and well-being.

Study groups in NCT04778163
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Humor group 1ExperimentalGroup 1 - experimental - will participate in a "humor group" with a one-hour group session per week for 6 weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: Clinical use of humor
Control group 2No interventionGroup 2 - the control group - will follow an usual treatment regimen for 6 weeks. At the end of the "Humor Group" of group 1, the 2 groups of patients will undergo a second series of tests identical to those of the pregroup. The paired patients should be randomly assigned. The control group will do the "Humor Group" after 6 weeks.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary outcome is sense of humor using scale : Sense of Humor Scale (from 36 to 144 : higher scores mean a better outcome).

    To evaluate whether or not their appreciation/use of humor has improved.

    Measured: About three years

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Coping evolution using scale : Coping Humor Scale (from (-14) to (+14) : higher scores mean a better outcome).

    To evaluate whether or not the coping evolution has improved.

    Measured: About three years

  2. Psychiatric symptoms evolution using scale : Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (from 24 to 168 : higher scores mean a worse outcome).

    To evaluate whether or not the overall psychiatric symptomatology has improved.

    Measured: About three years

  3. Global functioning using scales : Global Assessment Functioning (from 1 to 100 : higher scores mean a better outcome).

    To evaluate whether or not the overall functioning has improved.

    Measured: About three years

  4. Clinical global impression using scale : Clinical Global Impression (from 1 to 7 : higher scores mean a worse outcome).

    To evaluate whether or not the overall global clinical impression has improved.

    Measured: About three years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2021
  2. Study start19 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A treatment arm receives a psychotherapeutic group intervention (based on humor with cognitive behavioural and psychoeducative approaches) over a period 6 weeks. A control arm is placed on a 6 week waiting list.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
34 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04778163
Sponsor's protocol ID
CDEVILLE
Status last verified
Oct 2022
First submitted
30 Jan 2021
Last updated
1 Nov 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Bozikas VP, Kosmidis MH, Giannakou M, Anezoulaki D, Petrikis P, Fokas K, Karavatos A. Humor appreciation deficit in schizophrenia: the relevance of basic neurocognitive functioning. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007 Apr;195(4):325-31. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000243798.10242.e2.

    PubMed 17435483
  • Compas BE, Connor-Smith JK, Saltzman H, Thomsen AH, Wadsworth ME. Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychol Bull. 2001 Jan;127(1):87-127.

    PubMed 11271757
  • Corcoran R, Cahill C, Frith CD. The appreciation of visual jokes in people with schizophrenia: a study of 'mentalizing' ability. Schizophr Res. 1997 Apr 11;24(3):319-27. doi: 10.1016/s0920-9964(96)00117-x.

    PubMed 9134592
  • Corrigan PW, Powell KJ, Fokuo JK, Kosyluk KA. Does humor influence the stigma of mental illnesses? J Nerv Ment Dis. 2014 May;202(5):397-401. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000138.

    PubMed 24727719
  • Franzini LR. Humor in therapy: the case for training therapists in its uses and risks. J Gen Psychol. 2001 Apr;128(2):170-93. doi: 10.1080/00221300109598906.

    PubMed 11506047
  • Valentine L, Gabbard GO. Can the use of humor in psychotherapy be taught? Acad Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;38(1):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s40596-013-0018-2.

    PubMed 24430586
  • Ventura J, Nuechterlein KH, Subotnik KL, Gutkind D, Gilbert EA. Symptom dimensions in recent-onset schizophrenia and mania: a principal components analysis of the 24-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychiatry Res. 2000 Dec 27;97(2-3):129-35. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1781(00)00228-6.

    PubMed 11166085
  • Derouesne C. [Neuropsychology of humor: an introduction Part 1. Psychological data]. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2016 Mar;14(1):95-103. doi: 10.1684/pnv.2016.0583. French.

    PubMed 27005341
  • Etienne E, Braha S, Januel D. [Humour and the theory of mind in schizophrenia: a review of the literature]. Encephale. 2012 Apr;38(2):164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Jul 5. French.

    PubMed 22516275
  • McGhee, P. (1994). How to develop your sense of humor. Dubuque: Kendall Hunt.

  • Rengade, C.E. (2014). L'humour en thérapie cognitive et comportementale. J thér comport cogn, 24(1), 1-4.

  • Salameh, W.A. (1983). Humor in psychotherapy: past outlooks, present status, and future frontiers. In: McGhee, P.E., Goldstein, J.H., editors. Handbook of humor research. Volume II Applied studies. New York: Springer, 61-88.

  • Ventura, J., Green, M.F., Shaner, A., Liberman, R.P. (1993). Training and quality assurance with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale: "The drift busters". International Journal of Methods in Psychiatry Research, 3, 221-224.

  • Cai C, Yu L, Rong L, Zhong H. Effectiveness of humor intervention for patients with schizophrenia: a randomized controlled trial. J Psychiatr Res. 2014 Dec;59:174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.09.010. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

    PubMed 25266473
  • Falkenberg I, Buchkremer G, Bartels M, Wild B. Implementation of a manual-based training of humor abilities in patients with depression: a pilot study. Psychiatry Res. 2011 Apr 30;186(2-3):454-7. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.10.009. Epub 2010 Nov 11.

    PubMed 21071099

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Clinical use of humor in people with Treatment Adherence and Compliance and Psychiatric Disorder, run by University Hospital, Geneva at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary outcome is sense of humor using scale : Sense of Humor Scale (from 36 to 144 : higher scores mean a better outcome). (time frame: About three years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04778163, which also lists 16 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in