Advanced DementiaPROSPECTNCT04779684
Promoting Self-determination for Institutionalized Older People Without Decision-making Capacity: Advance Care Planning by Proxy
A study testing Advance care planning by proxy for health care proxies of people without medical decision making capacity in people with Advanced Dementia and Loss of Medical Decision Making Capacity, run by Ralf J. Jox at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
This study aims to test the acceptability and feasibility of an advance care planning (ACP) intervention which has been developed to be used with the health care proxies of residential aged care facility (RACF) residents who no longer have decision making capacity for medical decisions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 70 to 110 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Advanced Dementia, Loss of Medical Decision Making Capacity
- What is being tested?
- Advance care planning by proxy for health care proxies of people without medical decision making capacity
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2021to 31 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 70 to 110 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Health Care Proxy Inclusion Criteria:
- Is the legally authorized health care proxy for an RACF resident who: no longer has medical decision making capacity (according to medical judgement), is over 70 years of age and lives in an RACF in the canton of Vaud;
- Has sufficient language proficiency to complete a written questionnaire and participate in discussions.
Health Care Proxy Exclusion Criteria:
- Has insufficient language proficiency to complete a written questionnaire and participate in discussions.
- Lacks decision making capacity
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Lausanne University Hospital
Lausanne, Canton of Vaud, 1011
About this study
This study aims to test the acceptability and feasibility of an advance care planning (ACP) intervention which has been developed to be used with the health care proxies of residential aged care facility (RACF) residents who no longer have decision making capacity for medical decisions. The intervention involves two discussions that are facilitated by a trained health professional. The first discussion aims to discuss the resident's life story, values, previous medical treatments and experiences with illness and death and whether or not they have previously documented their wishes for future care. The second discussion also involves the treating physician and aims to document anticipatory decisions for emergency situations. Follow-up discussions after 12 months or any change in situation will be conducted.
Read the detailed description
Patient-centered care involves treating patients in the way that is the most aligned with their values and their self-determination. This is the aim of Advance Care Planning (ACP), a communication-based complex intervention. ACP involves accompanied reflection about one's values, anticipation of potential health problems in future states of impaired decision-making capacity, consideration of a range of treatment and care options, anticipatory decision making and the documentation and communication of these decisions to family members and health care professionals. This process ensures that a person's self-determination is respected even when she is no longer able to make health care decisions. ACP programs are well established in the English-speaking world and are currently being developed across Asia and Europe.
Participation in ACP requires decision-making capacity. Yet, many people lose this capacity before having formally expressed their care preferences. In these cases, their health care proxies, families and health professionals are called upon to make decisions on their behalf, based on what they believe the person would have wanted (presumed will). This is problematic and distressing for both family members and health professionals. The fact that many people do not participate in ACP or complete advanced directives, along with an increasing prevalence of neuro-degenerative diseases entailing a loss of decision-making capacity, means that growing numbers of people are likely to require others to make medical decisions on their behalf.
The investigator's exploratory research, confirmed by the literature, highlights an urgent unmet need for comprehensive and systematic interventions to assist in promoting self-determination of older people who lack decision making capacity. ACP by proxy (ACP-bp) has been suggested as a model to help proxies of incapacitated patients plan ahead and prepare for future care decisions. However, this model has never been specifically developed nor tested. This is why the investigators have developed a specific model of ACP-bp and aim to test it in a pilot study among proxies of residential aged care facility (RACF) residents who lack decision making capacity, primarily due to advanced dementia.
The investigators aim to test the acceptability and feasibility of this intervention and the appropriateness of outcome measures through a pilot study in two RACFs in the Swiss canton of Vaud over a period of one year. A process evaluation will be conducted through the triangulation of mixed-method data: self-report scales, semi-structured interviews, document analyses, resident health care records and an economic cost analysis. This will form the basis for a subsequent cluster-randomized control trial to test the intervention's effectiveness. This novel approach of ACP-bp has potential to promote self-determination and patient-centered care that improves both the ethical appropriateness and economic sustainability of care. It may lead to patients being treated in accordance with their wishes, reduce unnecessary overtreatment and avoid distress for family members and health care professionals. This approach also responds to calls for models of ACP which can be used in people with dementia and people living in RACFs, vulnerable populations that have generally remained invisible in ACP research so far.
- Being tested
- Advance care planning by proxy for health care proxies of people without medical decision making capacity
- Keywords
- Advance Care Planning by proxy, Surrogate decision making, Advanced Dementia, Decision making capacity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Advance care planning by proxy for health care proxies of people without medical decision making capacityOther
Two discussions between a trained health professional and a health care proxy of an RACF resident who no longer has decision making capacity. First discussion focuses on life story, values, previous experiences with medical treatments, illness and death. Second discussion also includes treating physician and focuses on establishing general goals of care and medical orders in case of emergency.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ACP by proxy pilot intervention group | Experimental | All participants are included in the intervention group Receives: Other: Advance care planning by proxy for health care proxies of people without medical decision making capacity |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acceptability of the ACP by proxy intervention
Acceptability of the intervention from the perspectives of health care proxies, RACF health professionals and physicians will be assessed through qualitative interviews asking about their experiences of the intervention. Interviews will be conducted 12 months after the start of the intervention
Measured: 12 months
Feasibility of the ACP by proxy intervention in RACFs
Feasibility of the intervention from the perspectives of health care proxies, RACF health professionals and physicians will be assessed through qualitative interviews asking about their experiences of the intervention. Interviews will be conducted 12 months after the start of the intervention.
Measured: 18 month
Secondary outcomes (2)
Decisional conflict
Health care proxy decisional conflict in making decisions on behalf of an RACF resident who no longer has medical decision making capacity (as measured by the Decisional Conflict Scale). Higher scores indicate more decisional conflict (minimum score: 0, maximum score: 64).
Measured: 18 months
Self-efficacy in giving care concordent with resident wishes
Health professional self-efficacy in providing care that is consistent with the wishes of a person who no longer has medical decision making capacity will be assessed through a single item numerical rating scale from 1-10 (higher scores indicate more self-efficacy)
Measured: 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Mar 2021
- Study start1 Aug 2021
- Primary completion30 Oct 2023
- Study completion31 Oct 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Advanced DementiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Pilot study of acceptability and fesability
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ralf J. Jox
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Ralf J. Jox, University of Lausanne Hospitals
- Investigators
- Ralf J Jox, MD,PhD, Principal investigator, University of Lausanne Hospitals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04779684
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACPbp
- Acronym
- PROSPECT
- Status last verified
- Nov 2023
- First submitted
- 23 Feb 2021
- Last updated
- 1 Dec 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Jones L, Rubli Truchard E, Sterie AC, Rhyner Y, Iorio E, Jox RJ. Advance care planning by proxy for residential aged care facility residents: results of a pilot interventional study. Innov Aging. 2026 Apr 7;10(6):igag033. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igag033. eCollection 2026.
PubMed 42131731
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Dec 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Promoting Self-determination for Institutionalized Older People Without Decision-making Capacity: Advance Care Planning by Proxy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04779684
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PROSPECT / ACPbp
- Keywords
- Advance Care Planning by proxy, Surrogate decision making, Advanced Dementia, Decision making capacity
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ralf J. JoxUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to test the acceptability and feasibility of an advance care planning (ACP) intervention which has been developed to be used with the health care proxies of residential aged care facility (RACF) residents who no longer have decision making capacity for medical decisions. The intervention involves two discussions that are facilitated by a trained health professional. The first discussion aims to discuss the resident's life story, values, previous medical treatments and experiences with illness and death and whether or not they have previously documented their wishes for future care. The second discussion also involves the treating physician and aims to document anticipatory decisions for emergency situations. Follow-up discussions after 12 months or any change in situation will be conducted.
Detailed description
Patient-centered care involves treating patients in the way that is the most aligned with their values and their self-determination. This is the aim of Advance Care Planning (ACP), a communication-based complex intervention. ACP involves accompanied reflection about one's values, anticipation of potential health problems in future states of impaired decision-making capacity, consideration of a range of treatment and care options, anticipatory decision making and the documentation and communication of these decisions to family members and health care professionals. This process ensures that a person's self-determination is respected even when she is no longer able to make health care decisions. ACP programs are well established in the English-speaking world and are currently being developed across Asia and Europe.
Participation in ACP requires decision-making capacity. Yet, many people lose this capacity before having formally expressed their care preferences. In these cases, their health care proxies, families and health professionals are called upon to make decisions on their behalf, based on what they believe the person would have wanted (presumed will). This is problematic and distressing for both family members and health professionals. The fact that many people do not participate in ACP or complete advanced directives, along with an increasing prevalence of neuro-degenerative diseases entailing a loss of decision-making capacity, means that growing numbers of people are likely to require others to make medical decisions on their behalf.
The investigator's exploratory research, confirmed by the literature, highlights an urgent unmet need for comprehensive and systematic interventions to assist in promoting self-determination of older people who lack decision making capacity. ACP by proxy (ACP-bp) has been suggested as a model to help proxies of incapacitated patients plan ahead and prepare for future care decisions. However, this model has never been specifically developed nor tested. This is why the investigators have developed a specific model of ACP-bp and aim to test it in a pilot study among proxies of residential aged care facility (RACF) residents who lack decision making capacity, primarily due to advanced dementia.
The investigators aim to test the acceptability and feasibility of this intervention and the appropriateness of outcome measures through a pilot study in two RACFs in the Swiss canton of Vaud over a period of one year. A process evaluation will be conducted through the triangulation of mixed-method data: self-report scales, semi-structured interviews, document analyses, resident health care records and an economic cost analysis. This will form the basis for a subsequent cluster-randomized control trial to test the intervention's effectiveness. This novel approach of ACP-bp has potential to promote self-determination and patient-centered care that improves both the ethical appropriateness and economic sustainability of care. It may lead to patients being treated in accordance with their wishes, reduce unnecessary overtreatment and avoid distress for family members and health care professionals. This approach also responds to calls for models of ACP which can be used in people with dementia and people living in RACFs, vulnerable populations that have generally remained invisible in ACP research so far.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Pilot study of acceptability and fesability
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ACP by proxy pilot intervention group | Experimental | Other: Advance care planning by proxy for health care proxies of people without medical decision making capacityAll participants are included in the intervention group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 70 to 110 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Advance care planning by proxy for health care proxies of people without medical decision making capacityTwo discussions between a trained health professional and a health care proxy of an RACF resident who no longer has decision making capacity. First discussion focuses on life story, values, previous experiences with medical treatments, illness and death. Second discussion also includes treating physician and focuses on establishing general goals of care and medical orders in case of emergency. | Other | ACP by proxy pilot intervention group |
Primary outcome
Acceptability of the ACP by proxy intervention
Time frame: 12 months
Acceptability of the intervention from the perspectives of health care proxies, RACF health professionals and physicians will be assessed through qualitative interviews asking about their experiences of the intervention. Interviews will be conducted 12 months after the start of the intervention
Feasibility of the ACP by proxy intervention in RACFs
Time frame: 18 month
Feasibility of the intervention from the perspectives of health care proxies, RACF health professionals and physicians will be assessed through qualitative interviews asking about their experiences of the intervention. Interviews will be conducted 12 months after the start of the intervention.
2 secondary outcomes
Decisional conflict
Time frame: 18 months
Self-efficacy in giving care concordent with resident wishes
Time frame: 18 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Dec 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42131731Jones L, Rubli Truchard E, Sterie AC, Rhyner Y, Iorio E, Jox RJ. Advance care planning by proxy for residential aged care facility residents: results of a pilot interventional study. Innov Aging. 2026 Apr 7;10(6):igag033. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igag033. eCollection 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Advanced Dementia
Recruiting
Clinical Applications of Advanced Ophthalmic Imaging
Multiple Sclerosis, Dry Eye Syndromes
Enrolling by invitation
Effects of FEED@Home Intervention
Dementia, Dementia Severe
Not yet recruiting
Dyadic Life Review Intervention for Older Patients With Advanced Cancer and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias and Their Caregivers
Cancer
Recruiting
A Culturally Adapted Decision Aid Intervention to Support Chinese American Dementia Caregivers in Feeding-Related Decisions
Dementia Caregivers, End of Life Decision Making
Recruiting
Improving Access to Care for Veterans With Memory Loss
Alzheimer Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ralf J Jox, MD,PhD principal investigator
University of Lausanne Hospitals
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Advance care planning by proxy for health care proxies of people without medical decision making capacity in people with Advanced Dementia and Loss of Medical Decision Making Capacity, run by Ralf J. Jox at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acceptability of the ACP by proxy intervention (time frame: 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04779684, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Dec 2023.