AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung FunctionsNCT04788771

Comparison of Tracheal Intubation vs Laryngeal Mask Airway in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal Hernia Repair

A study testing Tracheal intubation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair in people with Lung Functions and Pain Score, run by Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patient comfort and satisfaction of inguinal hernia repairs can be affected by the anesthesia technique chosen in addition to the surgical method. In our study, we aimed to compare the anesthesia method used in patients during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair, which is a minimally invasive method.It… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Lung Functions, Pain Score
What is being tested?
Tracheal intubation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
10 Feb 2021to 10 Mar 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of unilateral inguinal hernia

Who cannot join

  • Clinical diagnosis of incarcerated inguinal hernia Clinical diagnosis of inguinal hernia with pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Bakirkoy Training and Research Hospital

    Istanbul, 34300

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Tracheal Intubation and Laryngeal Mask Airway in Laparoscopic Total Extraperitoneal (TEP) Repair in Patients With Unilateral Inguinal Hernia

Patient comfort and satisfaction of inguinal hernia repairs can be affected by the anesthesia technique chosen in addition to the surgical method. In our study, we aimed to compare the anesthesia method used in patients during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair, which is a minimally invasive method.It was planned to evaluate the patients' quality of life, pain conditions, additional medical support needs for pain, length of hospital stay, duration of surgery, complications during and after surgery and recurrence rates.In addition, it was planned to compare the effects of the anesthesia method used on the lung capacity of the patients. The most important achievement of the study will be to show that laparoscopic hernia repair, which is frequently performed by intubation, can be performed safely with the Laryngeal mask.

Read the detailed description

The study was designed as a prospective randomized study, and a total of 100 patients were planned to be evaluated. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair will be performed by anesthesia with laryngeal mask and treceal intubation. Patients with a lariyngeal mask will be named as "group 1", and patients who undergo tracheal intubation will be named as "group 2".

Patients diagnosed with inguinal hernia radiologically and diagnosed with ultrasound will be operated. Patients between the ages of 18 and 75 years will be included in the study. Patients with relapse will be excluded. All patients will be evaluated for preoperative anesthesia and their suitability for laryngeal mask or tracheal intubation will be examined. Patients considered unsuitable for anyone will not be included in the study.

All patients will be explained in two methods before surgery and their patients will be randomized. Randomization will be done on the website www.randomizer.org. All patients will be entered on the website by numbering and the method chosen by the website will be applied according to the order of arrival.

Patients will be placed in the supine position under operating room conditions and anesthesia will be appropriate. After anesthesia, the surgical procedure will begin. The first incision time will be accepted as the surgery start time, and the end time of skin suturization will be recorded as the end of the surgery.

VAS scores of the patients at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th and 12th hours after surgery will be learned and recorded by the service nurses. Additional medical needs of patients due to pain will be recorded.

Demographic data and additional diseases of the patients will be recorded. Operation times, hospitalization times, wound infections, seroma, scrotal edema and pain scores will be recorded. Complications developed during the operation will be recorded. After surgery, patients' nausea, vomiting, headache, shoulder pain and pain scores will be compared. Patients will be called to the general surgery outpatient clinic in the first week, first month, third month, and sixth month after the operation.

Being tested
Tracheal intubation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tracheal intubation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repairProcedure or surgery

    laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair

Study groups in NCT04788771
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tracheal intubation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repairSham comparatorTracheal intubation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair
Receives: Procedure: Tracheal intubation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair
laryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repairActive comparatorlaryngeal mask airway in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair
Receives: Procedure: Tracheal intubation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. VAS score

    Evaluation of postoperative 1th hour pain score with VAS scale

    Measured: postoperative 1th hour vas score

  2. Anatomical delineation: satisfactory (n)(%)

    Surgeon's evaluation at the end of the operation

    Measured: up to 2 hour

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Sore throat

    sore throat that develops after surgery

    Measured: up to 2 hour

  2. Hoarsaness and dysphonia

    Hoarsaness and dysphonia develops after surgery

    Measured: up to 2 hour

  3. seroma

    postoperative seroma

    Measured: up to 30 day

  4. scrotal edema

    postoperatif scrotal edema

    Measured: up to 30 day

  5. ventilation time

    ventilation time during surgery

    Measured: up to 2 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Mar 2021
  2. Study start10 Feb 2021
  3. Primary completion10 Aug 2021
  4. Study completion10 Mar 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Tracheal intubation
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04788771
Sponsor's protocol ID
BakirkoyEAH LMA
Status last verified
Dec 2022
First submitted
5 Mar 2021
Last updated
5 Dec 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Nevescanin A, Vickov J, Elezovic Baloevic S, Pogorelic Z. Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Tracheal Intubation for Laparoscopic Hernia Repair in Children: Analysis of Respiratory Complications. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Jan;30(1):76-80. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0382. Epub 2019 Oct 15.

    PubMed 31613680
  • Nagahisa Y, Hashida K, Matsumoto R, Kawashima R, Okabe M, Kawamoto K. A randomized clinical study on postoperative pain comparing between the supraglottic airway device and endotracheal tubing in transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP). Hernia. 2017 Jun;21(3):391-396. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1586-y. Epub 2017 Feb 13.

    PubMed 28194529

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Tracheal intubation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair in people with Lung Functions and Pain Score, run by Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

VAS score (time frame: postoperative 1th hour vas score). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04788771, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in