Comparison Of Dexmedetomidine And Dexamethasone As An Adjuvant To Bupivacaine In Brachial Plexus Block

Peripheral nerve block (PNB), as an integral part of regional anesthetic technique, remains a well-accepted component of comprehensive anaesthetic care. William Halstead (1852-1922) was first to perform Brachial Plexus Block (BPB) in 1884 by surgically exposing the roots of the brachial plexus and injecting each nerve directly. Kulenkampff described the first percutaneous supraclavicular approach in 1911. BPB provides both intraoperative anaesthesia as well as postoperative analgesia. Being a regional anaesthetic technique, it has many advantages over general anaesthesia like effective analgesia with good motor blockade, awake patient, extended postoperative analgesia, early mobilization, no airway manipulation, avoidance of polypharmacy and decreased incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Advantages of supraclavicular approach include rapid onset and reliable blockade with a small volume of local anaesthetic and produced a more intense motor blockade and reduced the incidence of Horner's syndrome compared with Interscalene BPB. The clinical indications of supraclavicular BPB have been confined to upper limb surgeries below the midshaft of humerus because of concerns that it is performed too distally from the cervical nerve roots to block the suprascapular nerve which innervates 70% of the shoulder joint in addition to the subacromial bursa, coracoclavicular ligament, and acromioclavicular joint. There is evidence that peripheral nerve blocks performed by ultrasound guidance alone, or in combination with Peripheral Nerve Stimulator (PNS), are superior in terms of improved sensory and motor block, reduced need for supplementation and fewer minor complications reported. Using ultrasound alone shortens performance time when compared with nerve stimulation, but when used in combination with PNS it increases performance time. Many local anaesthetics have been used to produce brachial plexus block. Most common among them is bupivacaine, because of its higher potency and prolonged duration of action. Bupivacaine is an amide local anaesthetic. It prevents transmission of nerve impulses by inhibiting passage of sodium ions through selective ion channel in nerve membranes. This slows the rate of depolarization such that threshold potential is not reached and action potential not propagated. The half life of bupivacaine in adults is 3.5 hours. The commonly used concentrations in brachial plexus block are 0.25%, 0.375% and 0.5%. Studies have shown that mass of bupivacaine rather than concentration is the major determinant of the Effective Dose 50 (ED50) for achieving supraclavicular brachial plexus block. The concentration of bupivacaine that will be used in our study is 0.5% and volume is 20 ml. Adjuvants or additives are often used with local anaesthetics for its synergistic effect by prolonging the duration of sensory-motor block and limiting its cumulative dose requirement. Various drugs like opioids, epinephrine, alpha-2 adrenergic antagonists, steroids, anti-inflammatory drugs, midazolam, ketamine, magnesium sulfate and neostigmine have been used to potentiate the effect of local anesthetics. Due to its potential adverse effects, current researches are exploring newer drugs and delivery mechanisms to prolong the duration of action of local anesthetics. Recently, dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine have been identified as clinically effective adjuncts; several metaanalyses have convincingly demonstrated their efficacy and prolonging the analgesic duration of PNB. Dexmedetomidine, a potent α2 adrenoceptor agonist, is approximately eight-times more selective towards the α2 adrenoceptor than clonidine. Dexmedetomidine is also reportedly safe and effective when administered with long-acting local anesthetics in PNBs. No significant histopathologic abnormalities were reported after intrathecal or perineural administration of dexmedetomidine. There have been four proposed mechanisms for the action of alpha 2 adrenergic agonists in peripheral nerve blocks. These mechanisms include centrally mediated analgesia, ∝2B-adrenoceptor mediated vasoconstrictive effects, attenuation of the inflammatory response, and direct action on the peripheral nerve. In this study we are adding 1mcg/kg dexmedetomidine as adjunct to bupivacaine as previous studies have shown that 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine added perineurally to levobupivacaine in Supraclavicular BPB is a safer dose than 2 mcg/kg with less sedation, bradycardia, and comparable analgesia. Dexamethasone is a very potent and highly selective glucocorticoid. Various studies have been done using dexamethasone as an adjuvant to local anaesthetics mixture in brachial plexus block resulting in variable effects on onset but prolonged duration of analgesia and motor block. Dexamethasone produces analgesia by blocking pain signal transmission in nociceptive c-fibers, suppressing ectopic neural discharge and by inhibiting the action of phospholipase A2. The block prolonging effect of peripherally applied dexamethasone could be due to alteration in the function of potassium channels in the excitable cells by dexamethasone via glucocorticoid receptors present in the brachial plexus. It may also be due to the local vasoconstrictive effect of dexamethasone via glucocorticoid receptors. In this study we are using 4 mg dexamethasone as articles have shown that perineural dexamethasone at a dose of 4 mg prolongs the duration of analgesia after local anaesthetic PNB with efficacy similar to a dose of 8 mg and without any reported serious adverse effects. However, each of these molecules is associated with undesirable side effects: increased glycemia, neurotoxicity and risk of precipitation may occur after use of dexamethasone but studies show that these toxicities are very unlikely with peripheral use and at the low dose of 4mg which will be used in this study; bradycardia, hypotension, and sedation for dexmedetomidine. Importantly, most published trials of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine have compared these adjuncts to control, with very scant head-to-head comparison. Notably, literature is characterized by conflicting results and inconsistent reporting of side effects.