AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisTDE-SEPNCT04806217

Nature of the Link Between Executive Functions and Theory of Mind in Multiple Sclerosis

A study testing Theory of Mind in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Lille Catholic University.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to explore inhibition and inference abilities in The Theory of Mind skills in multiple sclerosis patients using the Theory of Mind task. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis
What is being tested?
Theory of Mind
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jul 2022to 1 Jan 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • People :
  • With multiple sclerosis
  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Not objecting to the use of their data

Who cannot join

  • Any associated neurological pathology or severe or chronic somatic disease (cancer)
  • Visual and/or auditory disorders that do not allow for test taking
  • Uncontrolled major psychiatric disorders
  • Recent treatment with corticosteroids (less than 4 weeks before the evaluation)
  • Patients under guardianship, curatorship or safeguard of justice
  • Pregnant women

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Amélie Lansiaux, MD, PhD contact

03.20.22.52.69

lansiaux.amelie@ghicl.net

About this study

The purpose of this study is to explore inhibition and inference abilities in The Theory of Mind skills in multiple sclerosis patients using the Theory of Mind task.

Read the detailed description

Multiple sclerosis is an autoimmune inflammatory disease of the central nervous system. It can cause lesions responsible for motor, ocular, sensory and cognitive symptoms.

The Theory of Mind and the primary facial emotions recognition (anger, joy, fear, surprise, sadness, disgust) are two processes of social cognition that play a role in the social interactions and social reasoning. The Theory of Mind is defined by the ability to understand the other person including thoughts, beliefs and desires that are unique and that may be different from our own.

In multiple sclerosis, difficulties in social cognition are associated with cognitive disorders, (even if the link with a deficit in executive functions remains debated). Indeed, when attributing a mental state to another person is needed,it is mandatory to put ourselves in the other person's place to adopt another perspective. Thus, several executive functions are required: working memory to maintain and manipulate several perspectives, flexibility to switch from one perspective to another one, and finally the inhibition of our own perspective to adopt the other's point of view.

The Theory of Mind's assessment uses nonverbal false belief task which assesses the ability to inhibit its own perspective to infer the mental state of another and the ability to change its perspective to adopt another's.

Thus, the purpose of this study is to explore inhibition and inference abilities in The Theory of Mind skills in multiple sclerosis patients using the Theory of Mind task.

Being tested
Theory of Mind
Keywords
Multiple sclerosis, Theory of Mind, Nonverbal false belief task, Cognitive functions, Inhibition and inference abilities
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Inhibition, Psychological

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Theory of MindOther

    Patients will be submitted to different neuropsychological tests used in routine and the non-verbal false belief task through in the Theory of Mind

Study groups in NCT04806217
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
¨Patients with multiple sclerosisExperimentalPatients : * With multiple sclerosis * Aged of 18 and over * Recruited during their consultation in the adult outpatient unit or neurological unit or during a hospitalization.
Receives: Other: Theory of Mind

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of correct answers to the "unknown reality" false belief tasks

    The number of correct answers to the "unknown reality" false belief tasks out of 12 tests will allow to obtain a mental state inference score

    Measured: Day 0

  2. Number of correct answers to the "known reality" false belief tasks

    The number of correct answers to the "known reality" false belief tasks out of 12 tests will allow to obtain a score for inhibition of its own perspective

    Measured: Day 0

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT)

    Verbal episodic memory abilities will be measured through the Learning test of a 16 words list belonging to 4 distinct semantic categories (flowers, fish, clothes, fruit). The list is presented 5 times to the patient who must remember it immediately after each presentation, after the presentation of a second interfering list and after a 20-minute delay. A main score is extracted.

    Measured: Day 0

  2. Brief Visuo-spatial Memory Test (BVMT)

    Learning test in episodic visuo-spatial memory of 6 simple geometrical drawings. This test presents 3 phases during which the sheet containing the 6 drawings is presented to the participant for 10 seconds, followed by an immediate recall phase (free hand reproduction of the drawings). A delayed recall phase (at 7 minutes) and a delayed recognition phase (among 12 distractors) is also proposed. A main score is extracted.

    Measured: Day 0

  3. Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)

    Coding test in which the patient has 90 seconds to state orally the correspondence of numbers (from 1 to 9) to 9 different symbols (matched according to a matching standard). The correct answers number is measured.

    Measured: Day 0

  4. Stroop test

    The Stroop test is used to evaluate executive functions, especially inhibition abilities and sensitivity to interference. This test offers 3 situations in which performance is measured by the time taken by the patient for each situation and the number of uncorrected errors.

    Measured: Day 0

  5. Trail Making test

    The Trail Making Test is used to evaluate executive functions especially the cognitive flexibility abilities. The subject's performance is evaluated by the time taken by the subject, the total number of errors and the number of perseveration errors.

    Measured: Day 0

  6. Verbal fluency test

    The verbal fluency test evaluates executive functions, and more specifically the spontaneous flexibility's abilities. The performance is evaluated by the number of different words cited.

    Measured: Day 0

  7. Verbal fluency test

    The participant in a given time, evokes (orally or in writing) the greatest number of words according to a given instruction, generally according to a semantic or phonemic categorization. A verbal fluency test measures the participant's ease in producing meaningful speech, both qualitatively and quantitatively

    Measured: Day 0

  8. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

    The Beck Depression Inventory is used to assess depressive disorders. It is a 13-items self-questionnaire rated from 0 (no problem) to 3 (maximum severity of this symptom). The depression's severity is assessed by classifying the total score into 3 levels of intensity: <3: Normal; 3-8: Borderline; >8: Depressed.

    Measured: Day 0

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Mar 2021
  2. Study start1 Jul 2022 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04806217
Sponsor's protocol ID
RC-P00109
Acronym
TDE-SEP
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
16 Mar 2021
Last updated
13 Jan 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Theory of Mind in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Lille Catholic University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Amélie Lansiaux, MD, PhD (03.20.22.52.69, lansiaux.amelie@ghicl.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of correct answers to the "unknown reality" false belief tasks (time frame: Day 0). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jan 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in