AzTrials
AzTrials

Radial Artery CatheterizationNCT04806932

Comparison of the Modified and Conventional Approach of Radial Artery Cannulation Under Short-axis Ultrasound Guidance in ICU Hypotensive Patients.

A study testing The modified approach and The conventional approach in people with Radial Artery Catheterization, run by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Radial artery cannulation can be performed under short-axis ultrasound guidance. However, the first puncture success rate was low in patients with hypotensive patients. Compared with the conventional approach, the modified approach combined the ultrasonic location system with a dynamic needle tip positioning… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Radial Artery Catheterization
What is being tested?
The modified approach and The conventional approach
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
102 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
11 Apr 2021to 28 Feb 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients in intensive care units;
  • The need for invasive hemodynamic monitoring (arterial blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring);
  • The need for frequent blood sampling (arterial blood gas analysis and general laboratory evaluation);
  • Vasopressor therapy;

Who cannot join

  • a negative Allen test;
  • ulnar artery occlusion;
  • prevalent atherosclerosis;
  • a blocked or embolized target vessel determined by ultrasound assessment;
  • Raynaud disease;
  • infection near the radial artery puncture site;

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032

    Guowei Tu, PhD, +8613501996995, tu.guowei@zs-hospital.sh.cn

    Zhe Luo, PhD, +8613916127028, luo.zhe@zs-hospital.sh.cn

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Modified Approach and Conventional Approach of Radial Artery Cannulation Under Short-axis Ultrasound Guidance in Intensive Care Unit(ICU) Hypotensive Patients: a Randomized Controlled Study.

Radial artery cannulation can be performed under short-axis ultrasound guidance. However, the first puncture success rate was low in patients with hypotensive patients. Compared with the conventional approach, the modified approach combined the ultrasonic location system with a dynamic needle tip positioning technique. The aim of our study is to compare the first puncture success rate and safety between the two approaches of ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation in hypotensive ICU patients.

Read the detailed description

Hypotensive patients in the intensive care unit may have extremely unstable hemodynamics. Blood pressure is the most important outcome in the diagnosis and treatment of shock. Vasopressor drugs are often required to maintain blood pressure in addition to fluid infusion. Noninvasive blood pressure measurement is unable to meet the clinical requirements. It is necessary to establish an invasive blood pressure monitoring method as soon as possible that can observe the real-time pressure. Radial artery cannulation has become the most commonly used due to its superficial location and less severe complication. However, radial artery cannulation is difficult to achieve in hypotensive patients due to weak radial artery pulsation, small arterial diameter, and peripheral vasospasm as blood flow is directed toward central vessels.

Some studies have shown that ultrasound-guided cannulation is more successful than the palpation technique. However, the success rate is largely dependent on the ultrasound operator's experience and skills. The operator requires good hand-eye coordination, technical skills, and some experience to overcome this shortcoming of ultrasound, which limits the advantages of ultrasound-guided vascular puncture, especially for operators with insufficient experience. There are 2 basic approaches in needling techniques: short-axis out-of-plane(SA-OOP) and long-axis in-plane(LA-IP) techniques.

In-plane technology requires the operator to be very skilled at ultrasound technology, which is more dependent on experience and can be difficult for novices to master; on the other hand, given that the long axis is subject to slice-thickness artifacts, due to the measurable thickness of the ultrasound beam itself, the cannula in the long axis appears to be in the same plane as the extremely small radial artery, even when the cannula has not been successfully inserted into the artery. Therefore, we prefer the out-of-plane technique.

The short-axis view has the advantages of providing better visualization of the surrounding structures and easier imaging which is convenient for novices to master. The procedure of radial artery puncture can be divided into 3 steps. The first step is to locate the puncture site, the second step is the puncture, and the last step entails the insertion of the cannula into the radial artery.

The first step is particularly important because appropriate localization facilitates the success of the puncture and insertion. The first difficulty encountered during radial artery puncture is the exact positioning of the puncture point. Ultrasound with developing lines guided by dynamic ultrasound has achieved a good effect in patients without hypotension. In the group with the modified technique, we use the developing line to locate the puncture site.

The second difficulty encountered during radial artery puncture is the risk of posterior wall penetration. With the dynamic needle tip positioning(DNTP) technique, the operator keeps real-time track of the position of the needle tip at all times which significantly reduces the chance of posterior wall perforation. We combined the developing line and DNTP technique in the modified group and assume that the technique theoretically increases the success rate and decreases the complication rate of radial artery puncture. Therefore, in this trial, we compared the success rate of radial artery puncture using the traditional method and modified technique in hypotensive ICU patients.

Being tested
The modified approach, The conventional approach
Keywords
radial artery catheterization, ultrasound, hypotensive, critical ill

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The modified approachProcedure or surgery

    The first three attempts via the modified approach will be performed. If the first three attempts failed, the location or operator of the subsequent attempts of artery puncture will be changed.

  • The conventional approachProcedure or surgery

    The conventional approach

Study groups in NCT04806932
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
The modified approachActive comparatorThe first three attempts via the modified approach will be performed. If the first three attempts failed, the location or operator of the subsequent attempts of artery puncture will be changed.
Receives: Procedure: The modified approach
The conventional approachPlacebo comparatorThe first three attempts via the conventional approach will be performed. If the first three attempts failed, the location or operator of the subsequent attempts of artery puncture will be changed.
Receives: Procedure: The conventional approach

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. First-pass success

    successful catheterization on the first attempt

    Measured: approximately 3 minutes

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Overall success

    successful catheterization without a limit on the number of punctures.

    Measured: within 10 minutes

  2. The cannulation time

    the interval between skin contact with the probe and confirmation of the arterial waveform on the monitor.

    Measured: within 10 minutes

  3. Posterior wall puncture

    the operator saw the needle passing the posterior wall or blood backflow appeared then disappeared while needle advancing.

    Measured: within 10 minutes

  4. the number of attempts

    the number of attempts until successful cannulation

    Measured: within 10 minutes

  5. Complication rate

    bleeding, hematoma,thrombosis, vasospasm, occlusion, aneurysm

    Measured: Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Mar 2021
  2. Study start11 Apr 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Feb 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
102 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04806932
Sponsor's protocol ID
MARS
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
17 Mar 2021
Last updated
3 May 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Quan Z, Tian M, Chi P, Cao Y, Li X, Peng K. Modified short-axis out-of-plane ultrasound versus conventional long-axis in-plane ultrasound to guide radial artery cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2014 Jul;119(1):163-169. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000242.

    PubMed 24806143
  • Liu L, Tan Y, Li S, Tian J. "Modified Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning" Short-Axis, Out-of-Plane, Ultrasound-Guided Radial Artery Cannulation in Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2019 Jul;129(1):178-183. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003445.

    PubMed 29787409
  • Clemmesen L, Knudsen L, Sloth E, Bendtsen T. Dynamic needle tip positioning - ultrasound guidance for peripheral vascular access. A randomized, controlled and blinded study in phantoms performed by ultrasound novices. Ultraschall Med. 2012 Dec;33(7):E321-E325. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1312824. Epub 2012 Oct 11.

    PubMed 23059741

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing The modified approach and The conventional approach in people with Radial Artery Catheterization, run by Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hongyu He, PhD (021-64041990 ext. 692958, he.hongyu@zs-hospital.sh.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

First-pass success (time frame: approximately 3 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04806932, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in