AsthmaPACAPNCT04810169
Towards Participatory Paediatric Asthma Action Plans
An observational study of Asthma, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Asthma is the most common chronic disease in children. The management of asthma attacks at home is based on asthma action plans that are very heterogeneous and reflect the diversity of recommendations on this subject. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 11 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Asthma
- What is being tested?
- Smart inhaler
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 10 Dec 2021to 26 Jul 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 11 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: Children with asthma
Who may be able to join
- Parent of 18 years or more
- Parent with a smartphone compatible with a smart inhaler
- Parent with child who :
- is 3 years to 11 years 11 months old
- has physician-diagnosed asthma diagnosis
- has a prescription of emergency treatment in case of asthma symptom
- Non-opposition of the legal guardian
Who cannot join
- Refuse to participate at the study
- Difficulty reading and/or understanding French language
- Technical problem (malfunction) with the smart inhalers and/or the associated mobile application during the initial test with the parent's smartphone
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Asthma is the most common chronic disease in children. The management of asthma attacks at home is based on asthma action plans that are very heterogeneous and reflect the diversity of recommendations on this subject. The purpose of this study is to observe using smartinhalers how children and their families use their emergency treatment at home in case of asthma symptoms and asthma attacks, to allow building new recommendations based not only on the literature, but also on real-world data.
Read the detailed description
Asthma is the most common chronic disease in children. Asthma exacerbations are responsible for many unscheduled consultations by paediatricians and general practitioners, numerous emergency room visits and frequent hospitalizations
Asthma action plans are documents given to families and schools to give the actions to be taken in the event of an asthma attack occurring in the family or school environment. They are recommended by all learned societies, because, combined with patient education and regular consultations, they reduce the need for unscheduled care.
The main drug in the action plan is the emergency treatment, i.e. a short-acting bronchodilator (SABA). However, the doses of SABA to be used vary widely depending on the recommendations. For children up to 5 years of age, the international board of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) suggests limiting the home dose to 2 puffs of 100μg every 20 minutes, to be repeated twice before consulting a physician if there is no improvement. This dose is increased to 4-10 puffs every 20 minutes in children 6 years and older. The British Thoracic Society in the United Kingdom advises administering salbutamol puffs one at a time, 30 to 60 seconds apart, until symptoms improve, with a maximum of 10 puffs. In France, the Groupe de Recherche sur les Avancées en PneumoPédiatrie (GRAPP) recommends to administer higher doses of salbutamol at home, up to one puff per 2 kg of weight, with a maximum of 10 to 15 puffs, to be repeated every 20 minutes for one hour, before giving oral corticosteroids. These very heterogeneous protocols reflect the diversity of doses proposed in the literature, and the paucity of clinical research data that makes it impossible to determine whether one approach is better than another. A study that looked at the goals of parents of children with asthma highlighted that this heterogeneity of practices is a source of stress for families: "I would like one plan and not ten" explained one parent; "I would like a plan that doesn't change all the time" reported another.
Harmonization of practices is necessary in order to provide families and school physicians nurses with a consistent approach..
The aim of this study is therefore to observe, using inhalers connected to salbutamol inhalers (smart inhalers), how families manage an asthma exacerbation at home, and to integrate these data into the establishment of future recommendations.
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Being tested
- Smart inhaler
- Keywords
- Action plan, Asthma, Paediatric
- Medical subject headings
- Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Smart inhalerDevice
- Automatic record (number of actuations and their timing) of the use of the emergency treatment through the smart inhaler
- Questionnaire sent to the parents at each use of the smart inhaler to get information regarding the reason of use and the efficacy of the treatment given
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Smart inhaler | Children with smart inhaler Receives: Device: Smart inhaler |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean number of emergency-treatments administered in the first two hours of management
Mean number of emergency-treatments administered in the first two hours of management, depending on the symptoms initially presented by the child (cough, wheezing, dyspnea, or respiratory distress) or an association of symptoms, which led to the disappearance of the symptom(s) that prompted the initiation of salbutamol.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (5)
Improvement of one or more symptoms
Improvement of the symptom(s), defined in a binary manner as an improvement reported by parents on the mobile application within 24 hours of the onset of the symptom(s).
Measured: 6 months
Elimination of one or more symptoms
Elimination of one or more symptoms defined in a binary manner (success/failure) by not using salbutamol for an asthmatic symptom within 24 hours of the onset of the symptom or symptoms.
Measured: 6 months
Compliance score for action plan
taking into account the number of salbutamol puffs administered compared to the recommended number of salbutamol puffs, the duration between salbutamol puffs compared to the recommended duration, and the sequence of actions performed (including corticosteroids and use of the healthcare system) compared to the recommended sequence of actions - This score will be calculated as follows: (Number of expected actions on the action plan and according to the evolution of symptoms - Number of actions recorded by the smartinhalers and on the research application) / number of expected actions * 100.
Measured: 6 months
Overtreatment by families
Family overuse of salbutamol, defined as ((number of puffs recorded - number of puffs expected)/(number of puffs expected) * 100) strictly greater than 50%.
Measured: 6 months
Undertreatment by families
Under-use of salbutamol by families, defined as ((number of puffs recorded - number of puffs expected)/(number of puffs expected) * 100) strictly less than -50%.
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Mar 2021
- Study start10 Dec 2021
- Primary completion26 Jul 2023
- Study completion26 Jul 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AsthmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David DRUMMOND, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04810169
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APHP200937
- Other IDs
- 2020-A02722-37
- Acronym
- PACAP
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 8 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 1 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Marguet C, Michelet I, Couderc L, Lubrano M. [Management of acute asthma exacerbation in childhood: French recommendations]. Arch Pediatr. 2009 Jun;16(6):505-7. doi: 10.1016/S0929-693X(09)74046-1. No abstract available. French.
PubMed 19541064Pinnock H, Parke HL, Panagioti M, Daines L, Pearce G, Epiphaniou E, Bower P, Sheikh A, Griffiths CJ, Taylor SJ; PRISMS and RECURSIVE groups. Systematic meta-review of supported self-management for asthma: a healthcare perspective. BMC Med. 2017 Mar 17;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0823-7.
PubMed 28302126Heidi M, Emily K, Benjamin H, Michael C, Robert K, Mitch B, Chris G, Mando W, Andrew B. Patient reported outcomes for preschool children with recurrent wheeze. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2019 Mar 26;29(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41533-019-0120-3.
PubMed 30914646Gonsard A, Giovannini-Chami L, Cros P, Masson A, Menetrey C, Mordacq C, Cisterne C, Personnic J, Roy C, Poirault C, Abou Taam R, Hadchouel A, Pirojoc A, Delacourt C, Drummond D. Home use of short-acting beta agonists by children with asthma: a multicentre digital prospective study. Arch Dis Child. 2025 Aug 18;110(9):701-705. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327447.
PubMed 40169179
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Towards Participatory Paediatric Asthma Action Plans
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04810169
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PACAP / APHP200937
- Conditions
- Asthma
- Keywords
- Action plan, Asthma, Paediatric
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
- Study start
- 10 Dec 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Jul 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Asthma is the most common chronic disease in children. The management of asthma attacks at home is based on asthma action plans that are very heterogeneous and reflect the diversity of recommendations on this subject. The purpose of this study is to observe using smartinhalers how children and their families use their emergency treatment at home in case of asthma symptoms and asthma attacks, to allow building new recommendations based not only on the literature, but also on real-world data.
Detailed description
Asthma is the most common chronic disease in children. Asthma exacerbations are responsible for many unscheduled consultations by paediatricians and general practitioners, numerous emergency room visits and frequent hospitalizations
Asthma action plans are documents given to families and schools to give the actions to be taken in the event of an asthma attack occurring in the family or school environment. They are recommended by all learned societies, because, combined with patient education and regular consultations, they reduce the need for unscheduled care.
The main drug in the action plan is the emergency treatment, i.e. a short-acting bronchodilator (SABA). However, the doses of SABA to be used vary widely depending on the recommendations. For children up to 5 years of age, the international board of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) suggests limiting the home dose to 2 puffs of 100μg every 20 minutes, to be repeated twice before consulting a physician if there is no improvement. This dose is increased to 4-10 puffs every 20 minutes in children 6 years and older. The British Thoracic Society in the United Kingdom advises administering salbutamol puffs one at a time, 30 to 60 seconds apart, until symptoms improve, with a maximum of 10 puffs. In France, the Groupe de Recherche sur les Avancées en PneumoPédiatrie (GRAPP) recommends to administer higher doses of salbutamol at home, up to one puff per 2 kg of weight, with a maximum of 10 to 15 puffs, to be repeated every 20 minutes for one hour, before giving oral corticosteroids. These very heterogeneous protocols reflect the diversity of doses proposed in the literature, and the paucity of clinical research data that makes it impossible to determine whether one approach is better than another. A study that looked at the goals of parents of children with asthma highlighted that this heterogeneity of practices is a source of stress for families: "I would like one plan and not ten" explained one parent; "I would like a plan that doesn't change all the time" reported another.
Harmonization of practices is necessary in order to provide families and school physicians nurses with a consistent approach..
The aim of this study is therefore to observe, using inhalers connected to salbutamol inhalers (smart inhalers), how families manage an asthma exacerbation at home, and to integrate these data into the establishment of future recommendations.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Smart inhaler | – | Device: Smart inhalerChildren with smart inhaler |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 11 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Children with asthma
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Parent of 18 years or more
- Parent with a smartphone compatible with a smart inhaler
- Parent with child who :
- Non-opposition of the legal guardian
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Refuse to participate at the study
- Difficulty reading and/or understanding French language
- Technical problem (malfunction) with the smart inhalers and/or the associated mobile application during the initial test with the parent's smartphone
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Smart inhaler* Automatic record (number of actuations and their timing) of the use of the emergency treatment through the smart inhaler * Questionnaire sent to the parents at each use of the smart inhaler to get information regarding the reason of use and the efficacy of the treatment given | Device | Smart inhaler |
Primary outcome
Mean number of emergency-treatments administered in the first two hours of management
Time frame: 6 months
Mean number of emergency-treatments administered in the first two hours of management, depending on the symptoms initially presented by the child (cough, wheezing, dyspnea, or respiratory distress) or an association of symptoms, which led to the disappearance of the symptom(s) that prompted the initiation of salbutamol.
5 secondary outcomes
Improvement of one or more symptoms
Time frame: 6 months
Elimination of one or more symptoms
Time frame: 6 months
Compliance score for action plan
Time frame: 6 months
Overtreatment by families
Time frame: 6 months
Undertreatment by families
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Dec 2025.
- Background: PubMed 19541064Marguet C, Michelet I, Couderc L, Lubrano M. [Management of acute asthma exacerbation in childhood: French recommendations]. Arch Pediatr. 2009 Jun;16(6):505-7. doi: 10.1016/S0929-693X(09)74046-1. No abstract available. French.
- Background: PubMed 28302126Pinnock H, Parke HL, Panagioti M, Daines L, Pearce G, Epiphaniou E, Bower P, Sheikh A, Griffiths CJ, Taylor SJ; PRISMS and RECURSIVE groups. Systematic meta-review of supported self-management for asthma: a healthcare perspective. BMC Med. 2017 Mar 17;15(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0823-7.
- Background: PubMed 30914646Heidi M, Emily K, Benjamin H, Michael C, Robert K, Mitch B, Chris G, Mando W, Andrew B. Patient reported outcomes for preschool children with recurrent wheeze. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2019 Mar 26;29(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41533-019-0120-3.
- Results publication: PubMed 40169179Gonsard A, Giovannini-Chami L, Cros P, Masson A, Menetrey C, Mordacq C, Cisterne C, Personnic J, Roy C, Poirault C, Abou Taam R, Hadchouel A, Pirojoc A, Delacourt C, Drummond D. Home use of short-acting beta agonists by children with asthma: a multicentre digital prospective study. Arch Dis Child. 2025 Aug 18;110(9):701-705. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-327447.
- Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. (2020)Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Asthma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate GB-0895 Adjunctive Therapy in Adults and Adolescents With Severe Uncontrolled Asthma (SOLAIRIA-2)
Severe Asthma
Active, not recruiting
Nasal Immune Challenge Study
Innate Inflammatory Response, Asthma
Not yet recruiting
Reducing Exposure With Air Cleaners and Technology
Asthma, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
Not yet recruiting
Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BPAP) for Severe Asthma
Pediatric Asthma, Acute Asthma
Recruiting
Lung Immune Challenge Study: Controlled Exposure to Inhaled Resiquimod (R848)
Innate Immunity, Mucosal Immunity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David DRUMMOND, MD, PhD principal investigator
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Asthma, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean number of emergency-treatments administered in the first two hours of management (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04810169, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Dec 2025.