Innate Inflammatory ResponseNCT06021002
Nasal Immune Challenge Study
A study testing R848 and Saline in people with Innate Inflammatory Response and Asthma, run by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Respiratory viral infections cause significant illness, especially in vulnerable individuals and is a topic of immense significance during the current COVID-19 global pandemic. Respiratory diseases such as asthma involve inflammation of the airways and viruses are a major cause of asthma attacks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Innate Inflammatory Response, Asthma, Nasal Allergy
- What is being tested?
- R848 and Saline
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 24 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 9 Aug 2022to 30 Sep 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Male or female aged 18 years and above
- Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.
- Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study.
- Female participants of child-bearing potential and male participants whose partner is of child-bearing potential must be willing to ensure that they or their partner use effective contraception during the study
- Participant has clinically acceptable laboratory and ECG at enrolment.
Show all 19Show fewer
- Negative lateral flow or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for SARS-CoV-2
- For healthy volunteers:
- No clinical history of allergic rhinitis, asthma or eczema
- Negative skin prick tests or specific IgE response to a panel of common aeroallergens: cat, dog, grass pollen, tree pollen, house dust mite, fungal spores
- Normal blood eosinophil count (< 300 cells/μL)
- Normal baseline forced expiratory volume (FEV1) i.e. ≥80%
- For volunteers with allergic rhinitis with or without asthma:
- A clinical history of allergic rhinitis symptoms (sneezing, runny or itchy nose) in response to aeroallergens
- At least one positive skin-prick test or specific IgE response to a panel of common aeroallergens: cat, dog, grass pollen, tree pollen, house dust mite, fungal spores
- Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥50% predicted
- Participants are permitted to have physician-diagnosed mild to moderate asthma which is not poorly controlled as evidenced by an Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) score of ≤1.5.
- If they have asthma, they are permitted to be on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and a long-acting beta agonist (LABA), but no other controller medication.
- Have had no other courses of medication including nasal and systemic corticosteroids, whether prescribed or over-the-counter, in the four weeks before first study dose other than mild analgesia, vitamins and mineral supplements or, for females, oral contraceptives.
Who cannot join
- Recent infections in past 14 days before screening: especially upper respiratory tract illnesses (including colds and influenza), sore throats, sinusitis, infective conjunctivitis.
- Lower respiratory tract infection in past 28 days
- Nasal anatomical defects, precluding use of nasal sampling techniques
- The participant may not enter the study if any of the following apply:
- Female participants who are pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the study.
- Respiratory diseases (other than hay fever or asthma where specified)
Show all 12Show fewer
- Significant medical history of hepatic, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, renal, endocrine, infective, haematological, autoimmune, metabolic, rheumatological, neurological, dermatological or neoplastic conditions
- Extreme obesity (BMI >40)
- Depression and psychiatric disorders
- Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study.
- Participants who have participated in another research study involving an investigational product in the past 12 weeks
- Smoking in previous 6 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Akhilesh Jha, MBBS, PhD contact
United Kingdom1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 0QQ
Akhilesh Jha
About this study
Respiratory viral infections cause significant illness, especially in vulnerable individuals and is a topic of immense significance during the current COVID-19 global pandemic. Respiratory diseases such as asthma involve inflammation of the airways and viruses are a major cause of asthma attacks. The nose is easier to access than the lungs but has similar cells and is therefore useful to study immune responses throughout the respiratory tract.
Rather than study the effects of a live virus on the immune system, it is possible to give a component or mimic of a virus to simulate an infection in a similar but more straightforward manner, without causing disease.
Read more
In this study we will use a nasal spray containing a sterile substance called Resiquimod (also called R848) to mimic a viral infection. Resiquimod does not contain any living organisms and therefore there is no possibility of developing a real infection.
Resiquimod works by binding to receptors in cells that line the inside of the nose (epithelial cells) as well as cells that can fight infection (immune cells). These cells respond to Resiquimod and cause mild inflammation in the nose, similar to a mild cold. We can then take samples to measure this response and investigate how it differs between individuals. This will help us better understand how the human immune system responds to viruses, and which cells and molecules the body uses to defend itself against infection.
Read the detailed description
Background Acute respiratory viral infections cause significant morbidity, especially in vulnerable individuals and is a topic of immense significance during the current COVID-19 global pandemic. Respiratory diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) involve inflammation of the airways and viruses are a major cause of exacerbations. Whilst new biological drugs targeting allergic and eosinophilic immune pathways have been developed for allergic asthma, therapeutic options for treating asthma exacerbations remain limited and rely on decades-old blunt tools such as oral corticosteroids. Development of new therapies and vaccines to combat viral respiratory tract infections is slow, partly because of the limited understanding of innate immune responses at the respiratory mucosal site of disease. Detailed characterization of such responses can facilitate biomarker definition for respiratory diseases, providing mechanistic insights and a platform for the testing of novel therapeutics.
Our understanding of the role of innate immunity to infection has recently undergone a paradigm shift as it is now recognized that innate cells (and not just adaptive immune cells) have the capacity to undergo "training" after infection via metabolic changes and epigenetic reprogramming. Pathogens can therefore modulate chromatin structure and the transcriptional programme of innate immune cells, which can result in altered but non-specific responses upon reinfection either with the same or heterologous stimuli. These epigenetic mechanisms may be particularly relevant in understanding how viral triggers (e.g. influenza) can lead to increased susceptibility to bacterial infections and cause pneumonia (e.g. due to streptococcus spp.).
Most studies have focused on peripheral immune cells such as macrophages, but the concept of innate immune training has been extended to long-lived non-immune skin epithelial stem cells, which have the capacity for "inflammatory memory". Allergic inflammatory memory has also recently been established in respiratory progenitor cells. Murine studies have highlighted the potential for structural cells (such as epithelial cells) to have the potential to mount immune responses. However, mechanisms of innate immune "memory" in human respiratory mucosal epithelial and immune cells in response to microbes and pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) are not well understood despite the respiratory tract being under a constant barrage of infectious stimuli.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play a critical role in the initial detection of microbes and PAMPs. TLR7/8 specifically detects RNA viruses such as influenza, rhinovirus, and coronavirus. Airway epithelial and immune cells express TLR7/8 and are therefore vital in mounting the innate immune response to viral infections, as well as helping shape adaptive immunity. Resiquimod (R848) is a single-stranded RNA viral analogue that binds to TLR7/8. When given systemically to treat human hepatitis C infection, it causes cytokine release and a flu-like syndrome. However, R848 has been successfully employed topically as a skin cream for actinic keratosis. TLR7 agonists have been developed for therapeutic use by repeated dose intranasal administration to target allergic inflammation in healthy volunteers and those with allergic rhinitis.
Rationale for current study Intranasal R848 administration has now been established in a human challenge model in healthy volunteers and in those with allergic rhinitis (AR) and allergic rhinitis with asthma (ARwA) by the chief investigator. In total, 44 volunteers have received intranasal R848 at a range of doses; 9 healthy volunteers received 10µg per nostril (n=9) with one person receiving 100µg per nostril (n=1); subsequently 35 volunteers received between 1-2µg per nostril based on weight (0.02µg/kg, healthy n=12, AR n=12, ARwA n=11). This dose was well tolerated by all volunteers with minimal nasal symptoms and no significant change in airflow obstruction (FEV1) in volunteers with asthma. Intranasal R848 was well tolerated systemically with no change in physiological measures or serum inflammatory mediators compared to saline challenge. The study demonstrated that individuals with AR and ARwA have increased nasal mucosal interferon and chemokine responses compared to healthy volunteers. This is coupled with the observation that there is a small and transient reduction in peripheral eosinophil counts at 4 hours and in lymphocyte counts at 24 hours, a finding limited to volunteers with AR and ARwA. This suggests that leukocyte trafficking may be occurring from the peripheral blood to the nasal mucosa. These findings highlight that dysregulated mucosal innate immune responses are likely to be important in determining the clinical outcome of viral triggers.
R848 nasal challenge (up to 2µg per nostril) is therefore a practical, tolerable, and non-invasive method to stimulate and investigate TLR-driven respiratory mucosal innate immune responses in both health and disease.
Defining the cellular basis for TLR-driven innate immunity will help provide mechanistic insights into how these responses differ between individuals, its dysregulation in disease (such as during an asthma exacerbation) and susceptibility to secondary infections. Understanding the epigenetic mechanisms which regulate interferon and chemokine production may help identify the molecular drivers of excessive or dampened inflammation, helping to refine potential therapeutic targets. Given the current COVID-19 pandemic, the clinical translational model utilised in this study allows for a practical and straightforward method to assess the host factors which determine respiratory mucosal innate immunity.
The goal of this project is to utilize an established tolerable human nasal TLR agonist challenge model combined with single-cell transcriptomic and epigenetic techniques to precisely characterize innate immune responses and mechanisms of innate immune training in airway epithelial and immune cells. Samples will be collected from the nasal mucosa and blood before and after saline and R848 challenge. Cell cultures from airway epithelium and blood will also be established to assess the functional impact of R848 on cellular response to repeat stimulation with viral and bacterial ligands. Study populations will include healthy participants and those with allergic rhinitis with/without asthma in order to investigate how in-vivo innate immunity is altered in these populations. Some participants will also undergo repeat nasal challenge to assess mechanisms of innate immune memory in the respiratory tract.
- Conditions
- Innate Inflammatory Response, Asthma, Nasal Allergy
- Being tested
- R848, Saline
- Medical subject headings
- Inflammation, Asthma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
R848Drug
Nasal R848 administration
SalineDrug
Nasal saline administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single nasal challenge R848 allergic rhinitis | Other | Not described Receives: Drug: R848 |
| Single nasal challenge R848 healthy | Other | Not described Receives: Drug: R848 |
| Single nasal challenge saline | Other | Single nasal challenge saline allergic rhinitis and healthy Receives: Drug: Saline |
| Repeat nasal challenge R848 allergic rhinitis | Other | Not described Receives: Drug: R848 |
| Repeat nasal challenge R848 healthy | Other | Not described Receives: Drug: R848 |
| Repeat nasal challenge saline | Other | Repeat nasal challenge saline allergic rhinitis and healthy Receives: Drug: Saline |
| Sample collection only | No intervention | Sample collection only (no nasal challenge) to optimise laboratory protocols |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Nasal CXCL10 gene expression baseline vs post-challenge
Increase in CXCL10 nasal mucosal gene expression at 24 hours after nasal challenge with R848 compared to baseline.
Measured: 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (5)
Nasal CXCL10 gene expression between healthy and allergic rhinitis participants
Difference in CXCL10 nasal mucosal gene expression at 24 hours after R848 challenge between healthy subjects and those with allergic rhinitis.
Measured: 24 hours
Average body temperature comparison between first and second nasal R848 challenge
Change in participant's temperature between first and second nasal challenge with R848 (as a marker of clinical tolerability).
Measured: 2 weeks
Nasal CXCL10 AUC between first and second nasal challenge
Difference in CXCL10 nasal mucosal protein in nasal mucosal lining fluid over 24 hours expressed as area under curve (AUC) between first and second nasal challenge with R848.
Measured: 2 weeks
Nasal CXCL10 gene expression saline vs R848 single challenge
Difference in nasal CXCL10 gene expression after saline and R848 single challenge
Measured: 24 hours
Nasal CXCL10 gene expression saline vs R848 repeat challenge
Difference in nasal CXCL10 gene expression after saline and R848 repeat challenge
Measured: 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Sep 2023
- Study start9 Aug 2022
- Primary completion30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Innate Inflammatory ResponseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Akhilesh Jha, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06021002
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A095696
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 21 Aug 2023
- Last updated
- 1 Sep 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Jha A, Thwaites RS, Tunstall T, Kon OM, Shattock RJ, Hansel TT, Openshaw PJM. Increased nasal mucosal interferon and CCL13 response to a TLR7/8 agonist in asthma and allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Feb;147(2):694-703.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
PubMed 32717253
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Sep 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Nasal Immune Challenge Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06021002
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A095696
- Conditions
- Innate Inflammatory Response, Asthma, Nasal Allergy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 24 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Respiratory viral infections cause significant illness, especially in vulnerable individuals and is a topic of immense significance during the current COVID-19 global pandemic. Respiratory diseases such as asthma involve inflammation of the airways and viruses are a major cause of asthma attacks. The nose is easier to access than the lungs but has similar cells and is therefore useful to study immune responses throughout the respiratory tract.
Rather than study the effects of a live virus on the immune system, it is possible to give a component or mimic of a virus to simulate an infection in a similar but more straightforward manner, without causing disease.
In this study we will use a nasal spray containing a sterile substance called Resiquimod (also called R848) to mimic a viral infection. Resiquimod does not contain any living organisms and therefore there is no possibility of developing a real infection.
Resiquimod works by binding to receptors in cells that line the inside of the nose (epithelial cells) as well as cells that can fight infection (immune cells). These cells respond to Resiquimod and cause mild inflammation in the nose, similar to a mild cold. We can then take samples to measure this response and investigate how it differs between individuals. This will help us better understand how the human immune system responds to viruses, and which cells and molecules the body uses to defend itself against infection.
Detailed description
Background Acute respiratory viral infections cause significant morbidity, especially in vulnerable individuals and is a topic of immense significance during the current COVID-19 global pandemic. Respiratory diseases such as asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) involve inflammation of the airways and viruses are a major cause of exacerbations. Whilst new biological drugs targeting allergic and eosinophilic immune pathways have been developed for allergic asthma, therapeutic options for treating asthma exacerbations remain limited and rely on decades-old blunt tools such as oral corticosteroids. Development of new therapies and vaccines to combat viral respiratory tract infections is slow, partly because of the limited understanding of innate immune responses at the respiratory mucosal site of disease. Detailed characterization of such responses can facilitate biomarker definition for respiratory diseases, providing mechanistic insights and a platform for the testing of novel therapeutics.
Our understanding of the role of innate immunity to infection has recently undergone a paradigm shift as it is now recognized that innate cells (and not just adaptive immune cells) have the capacity to undergo "training" after infection via metabolic changes and epigenetic reprogramming. Pathogens can therefore modulate chromatin structure and the transcriptional programme of innate immune cells, which can result in altered but non-specific responses upon reinfection either with the same or heterologous stimuli. These epigenetic mechanisms may be particularly relevant in understanding how viral triggers (e.g. influenza) can lead to increased susceptibility to bacterial infections and cause pneumonia (e.g. due to streptococcus spp.).
Most studies have focused on peripheral immune cells such as macrophages, but the concept of innate immune training has been extended to long-lived non-immune skin epithelial stem cells, which have the capacity for "inflammatory memory". Allergic inflammatory memory has also recently been established in respiratory progenitor cells. Murine studies have highlighted the potential for structural cells (such as epithelial cells) to have the potential to mount immune responses. However, mechanisms of innate immune "memory" in human respiratory mucosal epithelial and immune cells in response to microbes and pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) are not well understood despite the respiratory tract being under a constant barrage of infectious stimuli.
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play a critical role in the initial detection of microbes and PAMPs. TLR7/8 specifically detects RNA viruses such as influenza, rhinovirus, and coronavirus. Airway epithelial and immune cells express TLR7/8 and are therefore vital in mounting the innate immune response to viral infections, as well as helping shape adaptive immunity. Resiquimod (R848) is a single-stranded RNA viral analogue that binds to TLR7/8. When given systemically to treat human hepatitis C infection, it causes cytokine release and a flu-like syndrome. However, R848 has been successfully employed topically as a skin cream for actinic keratosis. TLR7 agonists have been developed for therapeutic use by repeated dose intranasal administration to target allergic inflammation in healthy volunteers and those with allergic rhinitis.
Rationale for current study Intranasal R848 administration has now been established in a human challenge model in healthy volunteers and in those with allergic rhinitis (AR) and allergic rhinitis with asthma (ARwA) by the chief investigator. In total, 44 volunteers have received intranasal R848 at a range of doses; 9 healthy volunteers received 10µg per nostril (n=9) with one person receiving 100µg per nostril (n=1); subsequently 35 volunteers received between 1-2µg per nostril based on weight (0.02µg/kg, healthy n=12, AR n=12, ARwA n=11). This dose was well tolerated by all volunteers with minimal nasal symptoms and no significant change in airflow obstruction (FEV1) in volunteers with asthma. Intranasal R848 was well tolerated systemically with no change in physiological measures or serum inflammatory mediators compared to saline challenge. The study demonstrated that individuals with AR and ARwA have increased nasal mucosal interferon and chemokine responses compared to healthy volunteers. This is coupled with the observation that there is a small and transient reduction in peripheral eosinophil counts at 4 hours and in lymphocyte counts at 24 hours, a finding limited to volunteers with AR and ARwA. This suggests that leukocyte trafficking may be occurring from the peripheral blood to the nasal mucosa. These findings highlight that dysregulated mucosal innate immune responses are likely to be important in determining the clinical outcome of viral triggers.
R848 nasal challenge (up to 2µg per nostril) is therefore a practical, tolerable, and non-invasive method to stimulate and investigate TLR-driven respiratory mucosal innate immune responses in both health and disease.
Defining the cellular basis for TLR-driven innate immunity will help provide mechanistic insights into how these responses differ between individuals, its dysregulation in disease (such as during an asthma exacerbation) and susceptibility to secondary infections. Understanding the epigenetic mechanisms which regulate interferon and chemokine production may help identify the molecular drivers of excessive or dampened inflammation, helping to refine potential therapeutic targets. Given the current COVID-19 pandemic, the clinical translational model utilised in this study allows for a practical and straightforward method to assess the host factors which determine respiratory mucosal innate immunity.
The goal of this project is to utilize an established tolerable human nasal TLR agonist challenge model combined with single-cell transcriptomic and epigenetic techniques to precisely characterize innate immune responses and mechanisms of innate immune training in airway epithelial and immune cells. Samples will be collected from the nasal mucosa and blood before and after saline and R848 challenge. Cell cultures from airway epithelium and blood will also be established to assess the functional impact of R848 on cellular response to repeat stimulation with viral and bacterial ligands. Study populations will include healthy participants and those with allergic rhinitis with/without asthma in order to investigate how in-vivo innate immunity is altered in these populations. Some participants will also undergo repeat nasal challenge to assess mechanisms of innate immune memory in the respiratory tract.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 7
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single nasal challenge R848 allergic rhinitis | Other | Drug: R848 |
| Single nasal challenge R848 healthy | Other | Drug: R848 |
| Single nasal challenge saline | Other | Drug: SalineSingle nasal challenge saline allergic rhinitis and healthy |
| Repeat nasal challenge R848 allergic rhinitis | Other | Drug: R848 |
| Repeat nasal challenge R848 healthy | Other | Drug: R848 |
| Repeat nasal challenge saline | Other | Drug: SalineRepeat nasal challenge saline allergic rhinitis and healthy |
| Sample collection only | No intervention | –Sample collection only (no nasal challenge) to optimise laboratory protocols |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Male or female aged 18 years and above
- Able (in the Investigators opinion) and willing to comply with all study requirements.
- Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the study.
- Female participants of child-bearing potential and male participants whose partner is of child-bearing potential must be willing to ensure that they or their partner use effective contraception during the study
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Recent infections in past 14 days before screening: especially upper respiratory tract illnesses (including colds and influenza), sore throats, sinusitis, infective conjunctivitis.
- Lower respiratory tract infection in past 28 days
- Nasal anatomical defects, precluding use of nasal sampling techniques
- The participant may not enter the study if any of the following apply:
- Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the study, or may influence the result of the study, or the participant's ability to participate in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| R848Nasal R848 administration | Drug | Repeat nasal challenge R848 allergic rhinitis, Repeat nasal challenge R848 healthy, Single nasal challenge R848 allergic rhinitis, Single nasal challenge R848 healthy |
| SalineNasal saline administration | Drug | Repeat nasal challenge saline, Single nasal challenge saline |
Primary outcome
Nasal CXCL10 gene expression baseline vs post-challenge
Time frame: 24 hours
Increase in CXCL10 nasal mucosal gene expression at 24 hours after nasal challenge with R848 compared to baseline.
5 secondary outcomes
Nasal CXCL10 gene expression between healthy and allergic rhinitis participants
Time frame: 24 hours
Average body temperature comparison between first and second nasal R848 challenge
Time frame: 2 weeks
Nasal CXCL10 AUC between first and second nasal challenge
Time frame: 2 weeks
Nasal CXCL10 gene expression saline vs R848 single challenge
Time frame: 24 hours
Nasal CXCL10 gene expression saline vs R848 repeat challenge
Time frame: 2 weeks
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Sep 2023.
- Background: PubMed 32717253Jha A, Thwaites RS, Tunstall T, Kon OM, Shattock RJ, Hansel TT, Openshaw PJM. Increased nasal mucosal interferon and CCL13 response to a TLR7/8 agonist in asthma and allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Feb;147(2):694-703.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.07.012. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Innate Inflammatory Response
RecruitingObservational study
Study of the Effect of Innate on the Inflammatory Response to Endotoxin
Asthma, Atherosclerosis
Recruiting
Effects of SPSIP Block on Perioperative Inflammation and TLR4 in Breast Cancer Surgery
Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block (SPSIPB), Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Immune Cell Response to Stimuli
Inflammation
Active, not recruiting
COMPArative Study of the Consequence on innaTe Immune Response du to Bacterial or Viral Infection in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit
Viral Infection, Sepsis
Recruiting
The Role of Circadian Clock Proteins in Innate and Adaptive Immunity
Pneumonia, Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Akhilesh Jha, MBBS, PhD contact
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing R848 and Saline in people with Innate Inflammatory Response and Asthma, run by Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Akhilesh Jha, MBBS, PhD (akhilesh.jha@nhs.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Nasal CXCL10 gene expression baseline vs post-challenge (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06021002, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2023.