Self ManagementNCT04822662
The Individual and Family Self Management Theory Based Epilepsy Education Program's Effectiveness
A study testing Epilepsy Education Programme in people with Self Management and Epilepsy; Seizure, run by KTO Karatay University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of the study; to determine the effect of education program given to adolescents diagnosed with epilepsy and their parents based on Ryan and Sawin's individual and family self-management theory, on adolescents 'attitudes towards disease, self-efficacy, quality of life and parents' nurse-parent support levels. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Self Management, Epilepsy; Seizure, Quality of Life
- What is being tested?
- Epilepsy Education Programme
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 11 Mar 2021to 11 Mar 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Having a diagnosis of epilepsy for at least 6 months,
- Being in the age range of 12-18 years,
- Cerebral palsy, attention deficit, lack of mental retardation, except for a different physical or epilepsy,
- Receiving monotherapy treatment for epilepsy
- To be able to communicate in Turkish
Who cannot join
- Cerebral palsy, attention deficit, mental retardation other than epilepsy,
- Patients who are over the age of 18 or who switch to an adult care program,
- Not being open to communication and cooperation, not taking polytherapy
- Adolescents not continuing the monitoring phase or wanting to stop working at any stage,
- Prior history of seizures due to screen exposure
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Necmettin Erbakan University
Konya, Meram, 42090
About this study
Official title: The Effectiveness of The Education Program Based on The Individual and Family Self Management Theory Given For Epilepsy Adolescents and Parents: Randomized Controlled Trial
The aim of the study; to determine the effect of education program given to adolescents diagnosed with epilepsy and their parents based on Ryan and Sawin's individual and family self-management theory, on adolescents 'attitudes towards disease, self-efficacy, quality of life and parents' nurse-parent support levels.
Read the detailed description
In addition to the expected effects of epilepsy on children, the course of the disease and the course of the child's life will change as the duration of life with the disease increases. In epilepsy, it is necessary to develop self-management behaviors in order to facilitate adaptation to the disease, to encourage seizure control and to increase the quality of life. Regular repetition of the trainings created within the framework of a certain plan to improve self-management behaviors is one of the recommended steps to strengthen the individual with chronic disease in the disease process. This randomized controlled study including aged 12-18 adolescents with a diagnosis of epilepsy, monotherapy, mental retardation without cerebral palsy, and no secondary disease and their parents. However, there isn't enough published research examining the effect of education program given to adolescents diagnosed with epilepsy and their parents based on Ryan and Sawin's individual and family self-management theory, on adolescents 'attitudes towards disease, self-efficacy, quality of life and parents' nurse-parent support levels.
- Conditions
- Self Management, Epilepsy; Seizure, Quality of Life
- Being tested
- Epilepsy Education Programme
- Keywords
- Epilepsy, Self-Management, Chronic Disease, Adolescent, Education
- Medical subject headings
- Epilepsy, Chronic Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Epilepsy Education ProgrammeBehavioural
Firstly the Child Introduction Form and Parent Information Form were applied. Then the Child's Attitude Towards Self-Disease Scale, Seizure Self-Efficacy Scale for Children, Quality of Life Scale for Children were filled to children. Nurse-Parent Support Scale were applied to the parents in the Pretest and Post Test data.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group: Epilepsy education program | Experimental | The training prepared for epilepsy will be held in 3 main modules and 5 sessions with two weeks intervals. Each session will last 25 minutes. Trainings will be given to adolescents and their parents online. Receives: Behavioral: Epilepsy Education Programme |
| Control Group | No intervention | The control group will receive standard epilepsy treatment without any training intervention. The group did not receive any other intervention. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Child Introduction Form
The form consists of 15 questions that question the content dimension (risk factors specific to the disease, factors specific to the physical and social environment, individual and familial factors) and the process dimension concepts (disease-specific knowledge and beliefs, self-regulation, social facilitation).
Measured: First measurement - Before education programme (1st week)
Development of the Child Attitude Toward Illness Scale
Child Attitude Toward Illness Scale was developed by Austin (1993) to measure the attitudes of children with chronic diseases towards their disease. The validity and reliability of the 13-item single-dimension scale was conducted by Ersun and Bolisik (2012) with children aged 9-17 years with epilepsy.
The average score that can be obtained from the scale varies between 1 and 5. The average score of 1 and 2 indicates negative attitude, 3 indicates neutral attitude, 4 and 5 indicate positive attitude.
Measured: First measurement - Before education programme (1st week)
Seizure Self-Efficacy Scale for Children
Seizure Self-efficacy Scale for Children was developed by Caplin et al. (2002) and adapted to Turkish by Tutar Güven and İşler Dalgıç (Tutar Güven and İsler 2015). It was conducted with children aged 9-18 years with epilepsy and the Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was 0.89. The scale consists of a single dimension with a 15-item five-point Likert structure and the scale items are scored between 1-5. indicates that it is.
Measured: First measurement - Before education programme (1st week)
The Children's Quality of Life Scale
The Children's Quality of Life Scale was developed in 2001 by Varni et al. For adolescents aged 13-18. The internal consistency coefficient of the scale varies between 0.80-0.88. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Çakın Memik et al. In 2007 and the internal consistency coefficient was found to be 0.82. PedsQL, which is one of the general quality of life scales, is a quality of life scale suitable for use in both healthy and ill adolescents. It is a five-point Likert-type scale consisting of 23 items that determines the health-related quality of life of adolescents aged 13-18.
Measured: First measurement - Before education programme (1st week)
Parents Information Form
This form was prepared by the researchers in line with the literature. In the form, the individual and self management theory consists of 15 questions regarding the concepts of content and process dimension.
Measured: First measurement - Before education programme (1st week)
Nurse-Parent Support Scale
The Nurse Parent Support Scale, developed by Miles et al. (1999) and tested by Yigit et al in 2017, consists of 21 items in a five-point likert structure. There is no reverse item in the scale that measures perceived nurse support by parents. The scale consists of four sub-dimensions. The scale consists of four sub-dimensions. These; It consists of 21 items in total: "Information and Communication Support", "Emotional Support", "Respect Support", "Quality Care".
Measured: First measurement - Before education programme (1st week)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Development of the Child Attitude Toward Illness Scale
Development of the Child Attitude Toward Illness Scale was developed by Austin (1993) to measure the attitudes of children with chronic diseases towards their disease. The validity and reliability of the 13-item single-dimension scale was conducted by Ersun and Bolisik (2012) with children aged 9-17 years with epilepsy.
The average score that can be obtained from the scale varies between 1 and 5. The average score of 1 and 2 indicates negative attitude, 3 indicates neutral attitude, 4 and 5 indicate positive attitude.
Measured: Second measurement - After education programme (10th week)
Seizure Self-Efficacy Scale for Children
Seizure Self-efficacy Scale for Children was developed by Caplin et al. (2002) and adapted to Turkish by Tutar Güven and İşler Dalgıç (Tutar Güven and İsler 2015). It was conducted with children aged 9-18 years with epilepsy and the Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was 0.89. The scale consists of a single dimension with a 15-item five-point Likert structure and the scale items are scored between 1-5. indicates that it is.
Measured: Second measurement - After education programme (10th week)
The Children's Quality of Life Scale
The Children's Quality of Life Scale was developed in 2001 by Varni et al. For adolescents aged 13-18. The internal consistency coefficient of the scale varies between 0.80-0.88. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Çakın Memik et al. In 2007 and the internal consistency coefficient was found to be 0.82. PedsQL, which is one of the general quality of life scales, is a quality of life scale suitable for use in both healthy and ill adolescents. It is a five-point Likert-type scale consisting of 23 items that determines the health-related quality of life of adolescents aged 13-18.
Measured: Second measurement - After education programme (10th week)
Nurse-Parent Support Scale
The Nurse Parent Support Scale, developed by Miles et al. (1999) and tested by Yigit et al in 2017, consists of 21 items in a five-point likert structure. There is no reverse item in the scale that measures perceived nurse support by parents. The scale consists of four sub-dimensions. The scale consists of four sub-dimensions. These; It consists of 21 items in total: "Information and Communication Support", "Emotional Support", "Respect Support", "Quality Care".
Measured: Second measurement - After education programme (10th week)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Mar 2021
- Study start11 Mar 2021
- Primary completion11 Nov 2021
- Study completion11 Mar 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Self ManagementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- In this study, stratified sampling was employed based on age and sex. Two strata, \[12-14 age, girl\] and \[15-18 age, boy\], were generated to ensure even distribution in terms of age and sex in each group. First, thirty-six adolescent were stratified into two groups (A and B), which were then stratified again into two: \[12-14 age, girl\] and \[15-18 age, boy\]. A scheme was developed to randomize the age and sex of \[12-14, girl\] and \[15-18 age, boy\] into two groups (A and B), resulting in the experimental and control groups stratified by the age and sex and blocked into paired-groups of (2:2/\[12-14 age, girl\]:\[15-18 age, boy\]). Permutation was also used to strike a balance between the strata. Block sets were generated for each combination of the prognostic factors (age and sex). The experimental and control groups were then randomized into the strata using a random numbers table.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- KTO Karatay University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hilal Kurt, KTO Karatay University
- Investigators
- Hilal Kurt Sezer, Master, Principal investigator, KTO Karatay UniversitySibel KUCUKOGLU, Assoch prof, Study director, Selcuk UniversityAbdullah Canbal, Dr, Study director, Necmettin Erbakan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04822662
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KaratayUh01
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 31 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: It will be shared after the article is published.
Publications
Austin JK, Huberty TJ. Development of the Child Attitude Toward Illness Scale. J Pediatr Psychol. 1993 Aug;18(4):467-80. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/18.4.467.
PubMed 8410570Tutar Guven S, Isler A. Validity and Reliability of the Seizure Self-Efficacy Scale for Children with Epilepsy. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2015 Mar;52(1):47-53. doi: 10.5152/npa.2015.7399. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
PubMed 28360675Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8):800-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006.
PubMed 11468499Miles MS, Carlson J, Brunssen S. The nurse parent support tool. J Pediatr Nurs. 1999 Feb;14(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/S0882-5963(99)80059-1.
PubMed 10063248Caplin D, Austin JK, Dunn DW, Shen J, Perkins S. Development of a self-efficacy scale for children and adolescents with epilepsy. Children's Health Care. 2002; 31(4): 295-309.
Ersun A, Bolışık B. VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH ADAPTATION OF THE CHILD ATTITUDE TOWARD ILLNESS SCALE. EGEHFD. 2012; 28:37-45.
Sezer HK, Kucukoglu S, Canbal A. The effectiveness of an individual and family self-management theory-based education program given for adolescents with epilepsy and parents: Randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Nov-Dec;79:171-180. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.08.026. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
PubMed 39276443
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effectiveness of The Education Program Based on The Individual and Family Self Management Theory Given For Epilepsy Adolescents and Parents: Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04822662
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KaratayUh01
- Conditions
- Self Management, Epilepsy; Seizure, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- Epilepsy, Self-Management, Chronic Disease, Adolescent, Education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- KTO Karatay UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Mar 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study; to determine the effect of education program given to adolescents diagnosed with epilepsy and their parents based on Ryan and Sawin's individual and family self-management theory, on adolescents 'attitudes towards disease, self-efficacy, quality of life and parents' nurse-parent support levels.
Detailed description
In addition to the expected effects of epilepsy on children, the course of the disease and the course of the child's life will change as the duration of life with the disease increases. In epilepsy, it is necessary to develop self-management behaviors in order to facilitate adaptation to the disease, to encourage seizure control and to increase the quality of life. Regular repetition of the trainings created within the framework of a certain plan to improve self-management behaviors is one of the recommended steps to strengthen the individual with chronic disease in the disease process. This randomized controlled study including aged 12-18 adolescents with a diagnosis of epilepsy, monotherapy, mental retardation without cerebral palsy, and no secondary disease and their parents. However, there isn't enough published research examining the effect of education program given to adolescents diagnosed with epilepsy and their parents based on Ryan and Sawin's individual and family self-management theory, on adolescents 'attitudes towards disease, self-efficacy, quality of life and parents' nurse-parent support levels.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- In this study, stratified sampling was employed based on age and sex. Two strata, [12-14 age, girl] and [15-18 age, boy], were generated to ensure even distribution in terms of age and sex in each group. First, thirty-six adolescent were stratified into two groups (A and B), which were then stratified again into two: [12-14 age, girl] and [15-18 age, boy]. A scheme was developed to randomize the age and sex of [12-14, girl] and [15-18 age, boy] into two groups (A and B), resulting in the experimental and control groups stratified by the age and sex and blocked into paired-groups of (2:2/[12-14 age, girl]:[15-18 age, boy]). Permutation was also used to strike a balance between the strata. Block sets were generated for each combination of the prognostic factors (age and sex). The experimental and control groups were then randomized into the strata using a random numbers table.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group: Epilepsy education program | Experimental | Behavioral: Epilepsy Education ProgrammeThe training prepared for epilepsy will be held in 3 main modules and 5 sessions with two weeks intervals. Each session will last 25 minutes. Trainings will be given to adolescents and their parents online. |
| Control Group | No intervention | –The control group will receive standard epilepsy treatment without any training intervention. The group did not receive any other intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Having a diagnosis of epilepsy for at least 6 months,
- Being in the age range of 12-18 years,
- Cerebral palsy, attention deficit, lack of mental retardation, except for a different physical or epilepsy,
- Receiving monotherapy treatment for epilepsy
- To be able to communicate in Turkish
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Cerebral palsy, attention deficit, mental retardation other than epilepsy,
- Patients who are over the age of 18 or who switch to an adult care program,
- Not being open to communication and cooperation, not taking polytherapy
- Adolescents not continuing the monitoring phase or wanting to stop working at any stage,
- Prior history of seizures due to screen exposure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Epilepsy Education ProgrammeFirstly the Child Introduction Form and Parent Information Form were applied. Then the Child's Attitude Towards Self-Disease Scale, Seizure Self-Efficacy Scale for Children, Quality of Life Scale for Children were filled to children. Nurse-Parent Support Scale were applied to the parents in the Pretest and Post Test data. | Behavioural | Experimental Group: Epilepsy education program |
Primary outcome
Child Introduction Form
Time frame: First measurement - Before education programme (1st week)
The form consists of 15 questions that question the content dimension (risk factors specific to the disease, factors specific to the physical and social environment, individual and familial factors) and the process dimension concepts (disease-specific knowledge and beliefs, self-regulation, social facilitation).
Development of the Child Attitude Toward Illness Scale
Time frame: First measurement - Before education programme (1st week)
Child Attitude Toward Illness Scale was developed by Austin (1993) to measure the attitudes of children with chronic diseases towards their disease. The validity and reliability of the 13-item single-dimension scale was conducted by Ersun and Bolisik (2012) with children aged 9-17 years with epilepsy. The average score that can be obtained from the scale varies between 1 and 5. The average score of 1 and 2 indicates negative attitude, 3 indicates neutral attitude, 4 and 5 indicate positive attitude.
Seizure Self-Efficacy Scale for Children
Time frame: First measurement - Before education programme (1st week)
Seizure Self-efficacy Scale for Children was developed by Caplin et al. (2002) and adapted to Turkish by Tutar Güven and İşler Dalgıç (Tutar Güven and İsler 2015). It was conducted with children aged 9-18 years with epilepsy and the Cronbach's alpha value of the scale was 0.89. The scale consists of a single dimension with a 15-item five-point Likert structure and the scale items are scored between 1-5. indicates that it is.
The Children's Quality of Life Scale
Time frame: First measurement - Before education programme (1st week)
The Children's Quality of Life Scale was developed in 2001 by Varni et al. For adolescents aged 13-18. The internal consistency coefficient of the scale varies between 0.80-0.88. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Çakın Memik et al. In 2007 and the internal consistency coefficient was found to be 0.82. PedsQL, which is one of the general quality of life scales, is a quality of life scale suitable for use in both healthy and ill adolescents. It is a five-point Likert-type scale consisting of 23 items that determines the health-related quality of life of adolescents aged 13-18.
Parents Information Form
Time frame: First measurement - Before education programme (1st week)
This form was prepared by the researchers in line with the literature. In the form, the individual and self management theory consists of 15 questions regarding the concepts of content and process dimension.
Nurse-Parent Support Scale
Time frame: First measurement - Before education programme (1st week)
The Nurse Parent Support Scale, developed by Miles et al. (1999) and tested by Yigit et al in 2017, consists of 21 items in a five-point likert structure. There is no reverse item in the scale that measures perceived nurse support by parents. The scale consists of four sub-dimensions. The scale consists of four sub-dimensions. These; It consists of 21 items in total: "Information and Communication Support", "Emotional Support", "Respect Support", "Quality Care".
4 secondary outcomes
Development of the Child Attitude Toward Illness Scale
Time frame: Second measurement - After education programme (10th week)
Seizure Self-Efficacy Scale for Children
Time frame: Second measurement - After education programme (10th week)
The Children's Quality of Life Scale
Time frame: Second measurement - After education programme (10th week)
Nurse-Parent Support Scale
Time frame: Second measurement - After education programme (10th week)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Mar 2022.
- Results publication: PubMed 8410570Austin JK, Huberty TJ. Development of the Child Attitude Toward Illness Scale. J Pediatr Psychol. 1993 Aug;18(4):467-80. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/18.4.467.
- Results publication: PubMed 28360675Tutar Guven S, Isler A. Validity and Reliability of the Seizure Self-Efficacy Scale for Children with Epilepsy. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2015 Mar;52(1):47-53. doi: 10.5152/npa.2015.7399. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 11468499Varni JW, Seid M, Kurtin PS. PedsQL 4.0: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001 Aug;39(8):800-12. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006.
- Results publication: PubMed 10063248Miles MS, Carlson J, Brunssen S. The nurse parent support tool. J Pediatr Nurs. 1999 Feb;14(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/S0882-5963(99)80059-1.
- Results publicationCaplin D, Austin JK, Dunn DW, Shen J, Perkins S. Development of a self-efficacy scale for children and adolescents with epilepsy. Children's Health Care. 2002; 31(4): 295-309.
- Results publicationErsun A, Bolışık B. VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH ADAPTATION OF THE CHILD ATTITUDE TOWARD ILLNESS SCALE. EGEHFD. 2012; 28:37-45.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39276443Sezer HK, Kucukoglu S, Canbal A. The effectiveness of an individual and family self-management theory-based education program given for adolescents with epilepsy and parents: Randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Nov-Dec;79:171-180. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.08.026. Epub 2024 Sep 13.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. It will be shared after the article is published.
Related trials for Self Management
Recruiting
Efficacy of a Self-Management Smartphone App to Improve Safety Skills in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis
Rhumatoid Arthisis, Spondyloarthritis (SA)
Not yet recruiting
Use and Acceptability of an AI-Assisted Health Application for Individuals Living With a Chronic Condition
Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Recruiting
Linking Education, Produce Provision, and Community Referrals to Improve Diabetes Care (LINK)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Nutrition Poor
Not yet recruiting
A Nurse-Led Personalized Self-Management Counseling Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence and Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Medication Adherence, Glycemic Control for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruiting
Community Health Worker Nutrition Self-Management Support for Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Health
Hypertension (HTN), CKD - Chronic Kidney Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hilal Kurt Sezer, Master principal investigator
KTO Karatay University
Sibel KUCUKOGLU, Assoch prof study director
Selcuk University
Abdullah Canbal, Dr study director
Necmettin Erbakan University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Epilepsy Education Programme in people with Self Management and Epilepsy; Seizure, run by KTO Karatay University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Child Introduction Form (time frame: First measurement - Before education programme (1st week)). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04822662, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2022.