AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Pulmonary AspergillosisPhase 3NCT04824417

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Clinical Outcomes With Six Months of Therapy With Oral Itraconazole Versus Oral Voriconazole for Management of Treatment naïve Subjects With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis

A Phase 3 study testing Itraconazole 200 mg and Voriconazole 200mg in people with Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 2 sites in India.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The current initial therapy for CPA is with six months of oral itraconazole. However, the response with six months of therapy has a response rate of 65-70% and has a relapse rate after stopping treatment of up to 50%. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 13 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis
What is being tested?
Itraconazole 200 mg and Voriconazole 200mg
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
116 participants
Where
2 sitesIndia
Study dates
1 Mar 2021to 31 May 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 13 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • The cases will include treatment naïve consecutive subjects with chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA). The diagnosis of CPA will be made by a multidisciplinary team (pulmonary physicians, radiologist and microbiologist) based on composite of clinical, radiological and microbiological criteria.(9, 10) This includes presence of all the following: (i) one or more clinical symptoms (persistent cough, recurrent hemoptysis, weight loss, malaise, fever and dyspnea) for ≥3 months; (ii) slowly progressive or persistent radiological findings (one or more cavities and surrounding fibrosis, infiltrates, consolidation, with or without fungal ball or progressive pleural thickening) on computed tomography (CT) of the thorax; (iii) immunological (A.fumigatus-specific IgG >27 mgA/L or positive Aspergillus precipitins) or microbiological evidence of Aspergillus infection (growth of Aspergillus in respiratory secretions or serum galactomannan index >0.6 or BALF galactomannan index >1.4); and, (iv) exclusion of other pulmonary disorders with similar presentation.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects with any of the following will be excluded: (i) failure to provide informed consent; (ii) patients on immunosuppressive drugs, intake of prednisolone (or equivalent) >10 mg for at least 3 weeks or a diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus syndrome; (iii) intake antifungal azoles for >3 weeks in the preceding six months; (iv) subjects with active pulmonary infection due to mycobacterium tuberculosis or mycobacteria other than tuberculosis (MOTT); (v) subjects with others forms of pulmonary aspergillosis (allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, chronic necrotizing aspergillosis and angio-invasive aspergillosis); and, (vi) pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

India2 sites
  • Chest clinic

    Chandigarh, 160012

  • Respiratory ICU, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, PGIMER

    Chandigarh, 160012

Other trials in India

About this study

The current initial therapy for CPA is with six months of oral itraconazole. However, the response with six months of therapy has a response rate of 65-70% and has a relapse rate after stopping treatment of up to 50%. Voriconazole is a third-generation azole and a theoretical advantage of lower MICs compared to itraconazole. Also, oral voriconazole has good availability (95%) in fasting state. This is likely to improve the response rate and reduce the chances of relapse of chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. There is no head to head comparison of oral itraconazole with oral voriconazole. In this study we intent to compare the clinical outcomes with six months of therapy with oral itraconazole versus oral voriconazole for management of treatment naïve subjects with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis

Read the detailed description

Aspergillus is a saprophytic fungus which is present normally in our surroundings and causes a large number of pulmonary diseases spreading through inhalational route. The spectrum of disease caused by aspergillus spp. is wide with the manifestations of the disease being governed primarily by the status of the underlying host immunity, which then determines the nature of the host-aspergillus interaction. Patients with an intact immunity have a more stable and indolent form of disease like aspergilloma whereas with a worsening immune status, the risk of invasive disease increases. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) are two of the commonest pulmonary manifestations seen in non-immunocompromised patients whereas invasive pulmonary aspergillosis being more common in the immunocompromised patients.(1-3) Estimates suggest that CPA affects around 3 million people across the globe, which may still be an under estimated number as the disease co exists with other pulmonary co-morbidities which make accurate diagnosis a pitfall. In India the annual incidence of CPA was estimated in 2011 and varied between 27,000-0.17 million cases, with different estimates. Based on the mortality rate for CPA which was estimated to be 15% annually, the 5-year prevalence of CPA was placed at 290,147 cases with 5-year prevalence rate being 24 per 100,000 in the same year.(4, 5) The disease confers significant morbidity and mortality, making it a significant burden for the society as well as the healthcare. Apart from the respiratory symptoms, CPA causes significant constitutional symptoms as well which adds to the misery of the patient. The diagnosis of CPA is based on presence of chronic symptoms, consistent radiology and demonstration of Aspergillus by direct (culture) or indirect (serological) methods.(1-3) Even though CPA is more of a disease spectrum but overall it is characterized by slowly progressive lung cavitation which may or may not show presence of mycetoma /fungal ball in patients with pre-existing structural lung diseases, even though other patterns have also been identified.

The treatment options majorly consist of medical management with at least 6-month long treatment with antifungal drugs - most significantly the azole groups. Itraconazole is the preferred azole for the treatment of CPA.(6-8) However the response with itraconazole is seen in around 60-75% of the subjects.(9) Moreover, about 30%-50% of the subjects have disease relapse that requires prolonged therapy. The lower response could be because of variable pharmacokinetics and drug absorption of oral itraconazole. Also, itraconazole has many drug interactions. Voriconazole is a third-generation azole and is currently the therapy of choice for invasive aspergillosis due to its lower minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values compared to itraconazole. In addition, the pharmacokinetics of voriconazole are not variable and oral form has a good bioavailability (up to 95%). In a previous study, the use of voriconazole resulted in radiological control in 97% of the subjects and a significant improvement in patients' symptoms but global success at six-months was only seen in 32% subjects.(10) However, despite being multicenter the study only included 48 subjects. Moreover, there was no control group and the authors did not use therapeutic dose monitoring. In addition, the study also included subjects with subacute invasive aspergillosis (SAIA). Thus, there is lack of information regarding the role of voriconazole in subjects with CPA. We hypothesize that the use of voriconazole will be associated with better treatment outcomes compared with oral itraconazole in treatment naïve subjects with CPA. In this randomized controlled trial, we compare the clinical outcomes of six months therapy with oral itraconazole with oral voriconazole in treatment naïve subjects with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis.

REFERENCES

  1. Ullmann AJ, Aguado JM, Arikan-Akdagli S, Denning DW, Groll AH, Lagrou K, et al. Diagnosis and management of Aspergillus diseases: executive summary of the 2017 ESCMID-ECMM-ERS guideline. Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2018.
  2. Patterson TF, Thompson GR, 3rd, Denning DW, Fishman JA, Hadley S, Herbrecht R, et al. Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(4):e1-e60.
  3. Denning DW, Cadranel J, Beigelman-Aubry C, Ader F, Chakrabarti A, Blot S, et al. Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: rationale and clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management. The European respiratory journal. 2016;47(1):45-68.
  4. Agarwal R, Denning DW, Chakrabarti A. Estimation of the burden of chronic and allergic pulmonary aspergillosis in India. PloS one. 2014;9(12):e114745.
  5. Agarwal R. Burden and distinctive character of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in India. Mycopathologia. 2014;178(5-6):447-56.
  6. Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Behera D, Chakrabarti A. Performance of serum galactomannan in patients with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses. 2015;58(7):408-12.
  7. Agarwal R, Dua D, Choudhary H, Aggarwal AN, Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, et al. Role of Aspergillus fumigatus-specific IgG in diagnosis and monitoring treatment response in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Mycoses. 2017;60(1):33-9.
  8. Ashbee HR, Barnes RA, Johnson EM, Richardson MD, Gorton R, Hope WW. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of antifungal agents: guidelines from the British Society for Medical Mycology. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014;69(5):1162-76.
  9. Agarwal R, Vishwanath G, Aggarwal AN, Garg M, Gupta D, Chakrabarti A. Itraconazole in chronic cavitary pulmonary aspergillosis: a randomised controlled trial and systematic review of literature. Mycoses. 2013;56(5):559-70.
  10. Cadranel J, Philippe B, Hennequin C, Bergeron A, Bergot E, Bourdin A, et al. Voriconazole for chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: a prospective multicenter trial. European journal of clinical microbiology \& infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology. 2012;31(11):3231-9.
Being tested
Itraconazole 200 mg, Voriconazole 200mg
Keywords
cpa, aspergillosis
Medical subject headings
Aphakia, congenital primary, Aspergillosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Itraconazole 200 mgDrug

    Control

  • Voriconazole 200mgDrug

    Comparator

Study groups in NCT04824417
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlActive comparatorOral itraconazole
Receives: Drug: Itraconazole 200 mg
InterventionExperimentalOral voriconazole
Receives: Drug: Voriconazole 200mg

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. proportion of subjects with an overall favourable response at the end of oral itraconazole therapy

    Measured: six months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. number of relapses at six-months after completion of therapy

    Measured: six months

  2. adverse events due to itraconazole or voriconazole

    Measured: six months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Apr 2021
  2. Study start1 Mar 2021
  3. Primary completion31 May 2024
  4. Study completion31 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized trial
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
116 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04824417
Sponsor's protocol ID
PGI/IEC/2019/002366
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
27 Mar 2021
Last updated
14 Aug 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Sehgal IS, Agarwal R, Dhooria S, Prasad KT, Muthu V, Aggarwal AN, Rudramurthy SM, Garg M, Chakrabarti A. Oral itraconazole versus oral voriconazole for treatment-naive patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in India (VICTOR-CPA trial): a single-centre, open-label, randomised, controlled, superiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2026 Mar;26(3):239-249. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(25)00537-7. Epub 2025 Oct 29.

    PubMed 41175884

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Itraconazole 200 mg and Voriconazole 200mg in people with Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 2 sites in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

proportion of subjects with an overall favourable response at the end of oral itraconazole therapy (time frame: six months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04824417, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in