AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Pulmonary AspergillosisPhase 3NAB-CPANCT06447402

A Trial to Compare Nebulized Amphotericin B and Nebulized Normal Saline as Maintenance in Patients With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis

A Phase 3 study testing Normal saline and Amphotericin B deoxycholate in people with Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis and CPA, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The treatment of CPA is with oral itraconazole for 6-12 months. Oral itraconazole results in better clinical outcomes in CPA compared to supportive care. A recent study comparing 6 months with 12 months of oral itraconazole for longer duration treatment found longer duration reduced CPA relapse and improved clinical… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis, CPA, Aspergilloma
What is being tested?
Normal saline and Amphotericin B deoxycholate
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
196 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
3 Jun 2024to 31 Aug 2027
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • consecutive subjects with CPA who have received 12 months therapy with oral itraconazole

Who cannot join

  • failure to provide informed consent; (ii) patients on immunosuppressive drugs, intake of >10 mg prednisolone (or equivalent) for at least 3 weeks in last 3 months, or a diagnosis of human immunodeficiency virus syndrome, ; (iii) subjects with active pulmonary infection due to mycobacterium tuberculosis or mycobacteria other than tuberculosis (MOTT); (iv) subjects with others forms of pulmonary aspergillosis (subacute and acute invasive aspergillosis); (v) pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Inderpaul S Sehgal, MD, DM contact

91-172-2756823

inderpgi@outlook.com

India1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Chest clinic

    Chandigarh, Chandigarh, 160012

    Inderpaul S Sehgal, MD,DM, +91-172275 ext. 6823, inderpgi@outlook.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Nebulized Amphotericin B and Nebulized Normal Saline as Maintenance in Increasing Time to Relapse in Patients With Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis Treated With 12 Months of Oral Itraconazole

The treatment of CPA is with oral itraconazole for 6-12 months. Oral itraconazole results in better clinical outcomes in CPA compared to supportive care. A recent study comparing 6 months with 12 months of oral itraconazole for longer duration treatment found longer duration reduced CPA relapse and improved clinical outcomes. However, longer duration of itraconazole could cause emergence of drug resistant Aspergillus fumigatus and therapy related adverse event. A recent study found nebulized amphotericin B non-inferior to oral itraconazole for treating CPA as primary therapy. However, the study was small and included patients with simple aspergilloma and used nebulized amphotericin B for 7 days.To be effective, an inhaled drug should be delivered in sufficient quantity to achieve therapeutic levels.The minimum inhibitory concentration of amphotericin B for A.fumigatus is 0.5 mg/L. In one study, nebulization of 30 mg of amphotericin B deoxycholate achieved a mean concentration of 0.68 mg/L in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Notably, the serum levels of amphotericin B after nebulization are 20 times less than after systemic administration and is safer. Further, there is a dose-response relation with nebulized amphotericin B, the higher the dose used for nebulization, the higher are the levels achieved in the lung tissue. Nebulized amphotericin B has been used in lung transplant recipients to prevent invasive aspergillosis. Also, two recent studies have demonstrated that use of nebulized amphotericin B as maintenance therapy led to a reduction in ABPA relapse rates and prolonged time to exacerbation. We believe that inhaled amphotericin B as a maintenance therapy could reduce CPA relapse and prolong time to relapse. In this study, we plan to evaluate nebulized amphotericin B as a maintenance therapy in clinically stable CPA patients treated with 12 months of oral antifungal therapy

Read the detailed description

Aspergillus is a ubiquitous fungus that causes a spectrum of human lung diseases depending on the host immunity and the immune response. In those with overt immunodeficiency, Aspergillus spp. causes invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. In immunocompetent individuals with structurally damaged lungs Aspergillus spp. causes chronic pulmonary aspergillosis. On the other hand, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) complicated the disease course of asthmatics and cystic fibrosis due to a hyperimmune response mounted by the host against the fungi colonizing the airways.

Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) has significant global burden, yet under-reported aspergillus related chronic lung disease. CPA is a chronic progressive lung disease that has a five-year mortality of over 50%. CPA has a significant global burden with more than a million individuals are affected with CPA globally. In India alone, more than 100,000 individuals are affected with CPA annually. CPA occurs primarily in patients with pre-existing structural lung disease, including post-pulmonary tuberculosis lung disease (PTBLD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and others. In our experience, PTBLD is the most common risk factor for CPA.(3-5) While the treatment of pulmonary TB is highly effective, almost 25-30% of the cases are left with sequelae of the disease including cavities, parenchymal fibrosis, and others. Patients with sequelae are not only at higher risk of recurrence of TB but are also prone to colonization with Aspergillus fumigatus. It has been estimated that CPA develops in approximately 20-25% of treated pulmonary tuberculosis with residual cavity. Unfortunately, the recognition of CPA is poor amongst physicians and even pulmonary physicians. Patients with recurrent cough, hemoptysis, fever or weight loss and a negative sputum examination for AFB or Xpert MTB/Rif are labelled as smear negative pulmonary tuberculosis. In fact, almost 50% of the patients with CPA are misdiagnosed as pulmonary TB and receive empiric anti-TB therapy because of the similarities in presentation of the two disorders. Untreated CPA is fatal with a five-year mortality of 30-80%.This has clinical implications as these patients with CPA would benefit from antifungal agents. While the actual burden of CPA among treated TB patients is not known, a mathematical model estimated that approximately 0.14 million cases are affected annually. Further, it was shown that if the mortality of CPA is estimated as 15% annually, the 5-year burden of CPA is about 290,147 cases with a 5-year prevalence rate of 24 per 100,000.

The diagnosis of CPA is based on the constellation of clinical symptoms (low-grade fever, weight loss, anorexia, malaise, cough with expectoration, recurrent hemoptysis, fatigue, chest pain, and dyspnea, for at least three months), persistent or progressive radiological features (one or more cavities with or without fungal ball, fibrosis, pericavitary infiltrates, consolidation, nodules and pleural thickening) and the presence of either direct (positive sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid [BALF] culture) or indirect (elevated serum or BALF galactomannan index or Aspergillus fumigatus-specific precipitins [or IgG] antibodies in serum) evidence of Aspergillus infection. Of the available diagnostic modalities, serology is the most reliable component of the CPA diagnostic pathway. Currently, the estimation of A.fumigatus-specific IgG by enzyme immunoassay (Phadia, Immulite and others) is considered the most sensitive test in the diagnosis of CPA. In a recent study, using a cut-off of 27 mgA/L, the sensitivity of A.fumigatus-specific IgG in the diagnosis of CPA was about 91.3%.The prevalence of CPA in India in subjects not known. Our group has estimated the burden of CPA following pulmonary TB using a mathematical modelling.

The treatment of CPA is with oral itraconazole for 6-12 months. Oral itraconazole results in better clinical outcomes in CPA compared to supportive care. A recent study comparing 6 months with 12 months of oral itraconazole for longer duration treatment found longer duration reduced CPA relapse and improved clinical outcomes. However, longer duration of itraconazole could cause emergence of drug resistant Aspergillus fumigatus and therapy related adverse event. A recent study found nebulized amphotericin B non-inferior to oral itraconazole for treating CPA as primary therapy. However, the study was small and included patients with simple aspergilloma and used nebulized amphotericin B for 7 days.To be effective, an inhaled drug should be delivered in sufficient quantity to achieve therapeutic levels. The minimum inhibitory concentration of amphotericin B for A.fumigatus is 0.5 mg/L. In one study, nebulization of 30 mg of amphotericin B deoxycholate achieved a mean concentration of 0.68 mg/L in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Notably, the serum levels of amphotericin B after nebulization are 20 times less than after systemic administration and is safer. Further, there is a dose-response relation with nebulized amphotericin B, the higher the dose used for nebulization, the higher are the levels achieved in the lung tissue. Nebulized amphotericin B has been used in lung transplant recipients to prevent invasive aspergillosis. Also, two recent studies have demonstrated that use of nebulized amphotericin B as maintenance therapy led to a reduction in ABPA relapse rates and prolonged time to exacerbation. We believe that inhaled amphotericin B as a maintenance therapy could reduce CPA relapse and prolong time to relapse. In this study, we plan to evaluate nebulized amphotericin B as a maintenance therapy in clinically stable CPA patients treated with 12 months of oral antifungal therapy.

AIMS To compare the clinical outcomes of nebulized amphotericin B deoxycholate versus nebulized normal saline as maintenance therapy in CPA subjects treated with 12 months of antifungal therapy

Being tested
Normal saline, Amphotericin B deoxycholate
Keywords
CCPA, CFPA, CPA, Post TB lung abnormality, PTLD

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Normal salineDrug

    5 mL of normal saline will be nebulised in the control arm

  • Amphotericin B deoxycholateDrug

    2 mL of the above reconstituted amphotericin B solution will be obtained in a sterile syringe and transferred into the drug chamber of a nebulizer. Three mL of distilled water will be added to 2 mL of the reconstituted amphotericin B (5 mL liquid in the chamber ensures complete and easy nebulization of all the contents)

Study groups in NCT06447402
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Saline armPlacebo comparator5 ml normal saline will be given as nebulization
Receives: Drug: Normal saline
NAB armExperimentalAmphotericin B dexoycholate will be nebulised twice daily
Receives: Drug: Amphotericin B deoxycholate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to first exacerbation

    Time to exacerbation of CPA after stopping itraconazole

    Measured: 12 months after randomization

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. frequency of relapses at 12-months after randomization

    number of CPA relapsed during follow up

    Measured: 12 months after randomization

  2. Treatment emergent adverse events

    Number of therapy related adverse reactions in each arm

    Measured: 12 months after randomization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Jun 2024
  2. Study start3 Jun 2024
  3. Primary completion1 May 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
196 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06447402
Sponsor's protocol ID
SPL-577
Acronym
NAB-CPA
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
3 Jun 2024
Last updated
22 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: We will share on a reasonable request to the PI

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Normal saline and Amphotericin B deoxycholate in people with Chronic Pulmonary Aspergillosis and CPA, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Inderpaul S Sehgal, MD, DM (91-172-2756823, inderpgi@outlook.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to first exacerbation (time frame: 12 months after randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in