AzTrials
AzTrials

Aphasia, AcquiredNCT04828759

Virtual Reality in Aphasia Telerehabilitation

A study testing VR-treatment and Treatment as usual in people with Aphasia, Acquired, run by University of Oulu.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the immersive 3D HMD VR technology in the language intervention with a home-based telerehabilitation approach for people with aphasia. The assessments will be conducted at the baseline (prior the intervention periods) and after each intervention period (i.e. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Aphasia, Acquired
What is being tested?
VR-treatment and Treatment as usual
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Apr 2021to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Post-stroke aphasia ≥ 3 months from stroke
  • Age 18-75 years
  • Finnish as a native language
  • Relative have the motivation and willingness to support person with aphasia in rehabilitation process
  • At least some level of spoken output
  • Moderate-to-severe aphasia
  • Deficit in a word retrieval process

Who cannot join

  • Participation in other intervention study during the study
  • Participation in other traditional speech and language therapy during the VR-intervention (i.e. 9-10 weeks period).
  • Severe and current psychotic disorder
  • Dementia/other neurodegenerative disease
  • History of previous stroke (/strokes) if not recovered, excluding TIAs (the criteria for the recovery: no residual aphasia or other disabilities caused by stroke which would affect in significant manner on everyday life)
  • Active epilepsy / migraine (< 3 years)
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Severe apraxia of speech
  • Inability to act according to given instruction
  • Severe neuropsychological disorder or the decline of cognitive / memory functions, which would significantly affect for training during the VR-intervention
  • Vision or hearing impairment which would prevent the use of VR HMD
  • if the participant's treatment or medication is unsuitable with the use of VR HMD device as assessed by the physician
  • if the participant has the pacemaker or implantable (electric) medical device

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Matti Lehtihalmes, Professor contact

+358407024320

matti.lehtihalmes@oulu.fi

Emilia Malinen, MA contact

+358407194250

emilia.malinen@oulu.fi

About this study

Official title: Combining Immersive Virtual Reality With Telerehabilitation to Provide Language Intervention for People With Aphasia: A Randomized Waitlist Controlled Trial

The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the immersive 3D HMD VR technology in the language intervention with a home-based telerehabilitation approach for people with aphasia. The assessments will be conducted at the baseline (prior the intervention periods) and after each intervention period (i.e. after the VR-intervention period and the waitlist period).

Read the detailed description

The purpose of the present project is to study the effects, feasibility, and the participants' experiences of this novel kind of language intervention. The effects of the intervention will be studied with various outcome measures in terms of language performance, functional communication, and quality of life. The aim is to explore the VR-intervention on the group level and with a randomized waitlist control group design (or delayed crossover design). In this study, the people with aphasia will be practicing at their home with support of their relatives, and participants will also receive regular remote guidance by a speech and language therapist (SLT) during the intervention. The relatives are also involved in the assessment process.

Being tested
VR-treatment, Treatment as usual
Keywords
aphasia, virtual reality, head-mounted device, rehabilitation, telerehabilitation
Medical subject headings
Aphasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • VR-treatmentBehavioural

    The participants will be randomized either to group which receives the VR-intervention immediately (A) or to the waitlist control group (B). After the baseline assessment, the participants in the group A participate VR-intervention lasting for 8 weeks, and the participants in the group B will receive 8 weeks waitlist period. After the 8 weeks, the groups switch their places

  • Treatment as usualBehavioural

    The participants will be randomized either to group which receives the VR-intervention immediately (A) or to the waitlist control group (B). After the baseline assessment, the participants in the group A participate VR-intervention lasting for 8 weeks, and the participants in the group B will receive 8 weeks waitlist period. After the 8 weeks, the groups switch their places

Study groups in NCT04828759
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
VR-treatment, then Treatment as usualExperimentalParticipants will receive 8 weeks of VR-treatment. Participants are allowed to practice as much as they wish during the VR-intervention. However, they are given a recommendation of the amount of practice (5 h / week). Before the VR-intervention, the participants will receive a guidance for using the VR-devices (i.e. orientation period) by the SLT. Participants will be able to contact the SLT freely during the 8 weeks VR-intervention period. After the orientation period, the participants will be practicing at their homes independently. However, they will receive remote guidance by the SLT. The guidance includes weekly remote guidance sessions by SLT (8 x 45 min) to ensure that training is fluent and unproblematic. Additionally, the content of exercises can be modified during these sessions. The SLT is also able to monitor the training of participants with the system. Devices: VR headset and controller, Tablet computer.
Receives: Behavioral: VR-treatment
Treatment as usual, then VR-treatmentExperimentalWait list control group: During the waitlist period the participants will receive the traditional speech and language therapy rehabilitation offered by (if offered) the general health care system in their own home municipality. The amount of rehabilitation is not controlled during the wait list period. However, the amount of received traditional speech and language rehabilitation in waitlist period will be documented. The waitlist control group will receive the same VR intervention period after the 8 weeks waitlist period.
Receives: Behavioral: Treatment as usual

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in language abilities from baseline to week 9 and to week 18

    Language abilities are assessed using language quotient LQ score of Western Aphasia Battery (WAB), performed at the baseline (prior the intervention periods) and after each intervention period (i.e. after the VR-intervention period and the waitlist period)

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 9 and to week 18

  2. Change in naming abilities from baseline to week 9 and to week 18

    Naming abilities for nouns and verbs are assessed with Boston Naming Test (BNT) and TNT-test (action naming test in Finnish) performed at the baseline (prior the intervention periods) and after each intervention period (i.e. after the VR-intervention period and the waitlist period)

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 9 and to week 18

  3. Change in verbal fluency from baseline to week 9 and to week 18

    Verbal fluency is assessed using multiple categories (produced words per one minute in each category), performed at the baseline (prior the intervention periods) and after each intervention period (i.e. after the VR-intervention period and the waitlist period)

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 9 and to week 18

  4. Change in functional communication skills from baseline to week 9 and to week 18

    Functional communication skills are assessed with Communication Effectiveness Index (CETI), performed at the baseline (prior the intervention periods) and after each intervention period (i.e. after the VR-intervention period and the waitlist period)

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 9 and to week 18

  5. Change in quality of life from baseline to week 9 and to week 18

    Quality of life is assessed with Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQOL-39), performed at the baseline (prior the intervention periods) and after each intervention period (i.e. after the VR-intervention period and the waitlist period)

    Measured: Change from baseline to week 8 and to week 18

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Attrition rates during the study.

    Amount of drop outs of participants during the study,

    Measured: Through study completion, up to 18 weeks

  2. Participants' experiences of the VR-intervention

    The structural survey of participants' experiences of the VR-intervention.

    Measured: After VR-intervention period, at the week 9 or at the week 18, depending of the group the patient has been randomized

  3. Data collected by VR-devices regarding the performance of participants during the VR-intervention

    Amounts of training (in minutes) and e.g. naming speed and range of head movements collected automatically by VR-devices

    Measured: Through the VR-intervention up to 8 weeks or through the weeks 10-17, depending of the group the patient has been randomized

  4. Date collected by remote sessions regarding the experiences of participants and feasibility of VR-intervention

    Data collected with semi-structural interview during remote guidance sessions (8 times during the VR-period) by the researcher. In addition, participants will be able to contact the researcher freely during the 8 weeks VR-intervention period.

    Measured: Weekly during the VR-intervention up to 8 weeks or through the weeks 10-17, depending of the group the patient has been randomized

  5. Participants' experiences of the waitlist period

    The structural survey of participants' experiences of the waitlist period

    Measured: After waitlist period, at the week 9 or at the week 18, depending of the group the patient has been randomized

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Apr 2021
  2. Study start1 Apr 2021 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04828759
Sponsor's protocol ID
70/2020
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
23 Mar 2021
Last updated
2 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing VR-treatment and Treatment as usual in people with Aphasia, Acquired, run by University of Oulu.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Matti Lehtihalmes, Professor (+358407024320, matti.lehtihalmes@oulu.fi), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in language abilities from baseline to week 9 and to week 18 (time frame: Change from baseline to week 9 and to week 18). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in