Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipNCT04831372
On-Table Versus Off-Table Total Hip Arthroplasty
A study testing Off Table Group and On Table Group in people with Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip and Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by Carilion Clinic at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) is a common way to perform total hip arthroplasty. There are two main techniques to perform total hip replacement through the anterior approach. The first method is the "on-table" method, which uses a specialized surgical table, called a traction table. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Osteoarthritis, Hip
- What is being tested?
- Off Table Group and On Table Group
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 93 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Apr 2021to 25 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients undergoing primary unilateral THA
- Patient 18 years of age and older
- Patients who are able to provide consent
Who cannot join
- Bilateral procedure
- Non-Primary arthroplasty
- Prior non-arthroplasty operation requiring removal of hardware
- Inability to have spinal anesthesia (blood thinners)
- BMI > 40
- Active Smoking
Show all 9Show fewer
- HbA1c > 8.0
- Failure to meet medical clearance
- Pregnant women per standard of care
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Carilion Institute for Orthopaedics & Neurosciences
Roanoke, Virginia, 24014
About this study
Official title: Comparing On-Table vs Off-Table Total Hip Arthroplasty Via the Direct Anterior Approach: A Prospective Randomized Trial
The Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) is a common way to perform total hip arthroplasty. There are two main techniques to perform total hip replacement through the anterior approach. The first method is the "on-table" method, which uses a specialized surgical table, called a traction table. This table involves placing both feet in specialized boots that are then hooked up to the table, and allows for positioning of the operative leg with aid of the table. The major limitations associated with the traction table are the need for two additional staff members and the purchase of said table. The second method is the "off-table" method. In this method the patient is placed on a standard operating room table and the operative leg is manually positioned by the surgeon during the procedure . This obviates the need for the additional staff members or purchase of a specialized table. Both the "on-table" and "off-table" techniques are routinely used both worldwide and by our joint replacement specialists at Carilion Clinic. This study will aim to compare the efficiency and efficacy of performing the DAA for total hip arthroplasty utilizing either the "on-table" or "off- table" technique. Patients will be randomized to receive their total hip arthroplasty with either the "on- table" or "off-table" method.
Read the detailed description
BACKGROUND: The Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become increasingly popular in the US over the last decade (Berry \& Bozic, 2010). Major limitations of the DAA with traction table include the need for an additional surgeon's assistant, a traction table operator, and the purchase of said table. To counter these limitations, some surgeons advocate for the performing the DAA with a conventional operating room table {Cohen, 2017;Molenaers, 2017}. However to date, there are no studies directly comparing the efficiency and efficacy of these two techniques for DAA.
OBJECTIVE: Currently, it is unclear which surgical technique is more efficient and effective for total hip arthroplasties (THA). We hypothesize that there will be an increase in efficiency as measured by time when performing a standard operating table (Off-Table) DAA THA when compared to a purpose built traction table (On-Table) DAA THA. In addition, there will be less pain and faster functional recovery in the early post-operative period for patients who underwent an "Off-Table" DAA THA when compared to an "On-Table" DAA THA.
SPECIFIC AIMS: 1) Determine whether there is a difference in operating room efficiency between surgeries after a THA via DAA with a standard OR table versus a purpose-built traction table; 2) examine whether there is a difference in early post-operative pain and clinical outcomes when comparing patients who underwent a THA via the DAA with a standard OR table versus a purpose built traction table. 3) report differences in complication rates between those two.
METHODS: This is a prospective randomized clinical trial that will evaluate adult patients admitted to Carilion Clinic undergoing primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty. Off and on table DAA procedures will be performed by a single surgeon with multiple years of training and experience in both. Cluster randomization will be performed where patients will be randomized through scheduling. Demographic data will be collected. Operative records will be used to record operative times for each approach. Radiographs to assess implant positioning on postoperative day 0. The primary outcome variables are intra-operative data such as time the patient enters the operating room, time of incision, time of dressing application, exit room time, implants used, operative report. For secondary outcome variables, we will assess at 2 and 6 week follow ups routine Patient-Reported Outcome Measures including narcotic utilization based on pill count and MEq, and the PROMIS and HOOS, JR. measures.
EXPECTED OUTCOMES: We expect that the Off-table DAA technique will be associated with faster set up, surgical time, and overall room time when compared to the On-table approach. Additionally, we expect less early post-operative pain in the groin, knee and ankle. We expect that the patient report outcome measures at 2 and 6 weeks post-op for the off-table DAA group will be equivalent or better than the on-table DAA group. Finally we expect no difference in complication rate.
- Being tested
- Off Table Group, On Table Group
- Keywords
- Direct anterior approach, Hip arthroplasty, On table, Off table
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Hip
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Off Table GroupProcedure or surgery
Total Hip arthroplasty being performed via the Direct Anterior Approach using a standard operating room table
On Table GroupProcedure or surgery
Total Hip arthroplasty being performed via the Direct Anterior Approach using a traction table
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| On Table Group | Active comparator | The Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) is a common way to perform total hip arthroplasty. There are two main techniques to perform total hip replacement through the anterior approach.
The control group will be using the first method, which is the "on-table" method, which uses a specialized surgical table, called a traction table. This table involves placing both feet in specialized boots that are then hooked up to the table, and allows for positioning of the operative leg with aid of the table.
Both the "on-table" and "off-table" techniques are routinely used both worldwide and by our joint replacement specialists at Carilion Clinic. This study will aim to compare the efficiency and efficacy of performing the DAA for total hip arthroplasty utilizing either the "on-table" or "off- table" technique. Patients will be randomized to receive their total hip arthroplasty with either the "on- table" or "off-table" method. Receives: Procedure: On Table Group |
| Off Table Group | Experimental | The Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) is a common way to perform total hip arthroplasty. There are two main techniques to perform total hip replacement through the anterior approach.
The experimental group will be using the second method, which is the "off-table" method. In this method the patient is placed on a standard operating room table and the operative leg is manually positioned by the surgeon during the procedure . This obviates the need for the additional staff members or purchase of a specialized table.
Both the "on-table" and "off-table" techniques are routinely used both worldwide and by our joint replacement specialists at Carilion Clinic. This study will aim to compare the efficiency and efficacy of performing the DAA for total hip arthroplasty utilizing either the "on-table" or "off- table" technique. Patients will be randomized to receive their total hip arthroplasty with either the "on- table" or "off-table" method. Receives: Procedure: Off Table Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Set Up Time
Time point that patient enters room to time point of first incision
Measured: Time point that patient enters room to time point of first incision
Surgery Time
Time point of first incision to time point of dress application
Measured: Time point of first incision to time point of dress application
Takedown Time
Time point of Dress application to Time point of exiting operating room
Measured: Time point of Dress application to Time point of exiting operating room
Total Room Time
Time point that patient enters room to time point of exiting operating room
Measured: Time point that patient enters room to time point of exiting operating room
Secondary outcomes (3)
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System/Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement scores
Hip pain measure survey on a scale of 0 - 10 with 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain
Measured: pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, 6 weeks post op, 1 year post op
Visual Analog Scale scores
Hip, knee, ankle pain measure survey on a scale of 0 - 10 with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain
Measured: pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, 6 weeks post op, 1 year post op
Narcotic Utillization
Measured by pill count usage and converted into MME
Measured: 2 weeks post op pill count
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Apr 2021
- Study start7 Apr 2021
- Primary completion25 Jan 2024
- Study completion25 Jan 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Primary Objectives- Determine whether there is a difference in operating room efficiency when preparing for, positioning, performing and turning over an operating room after a total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) when using a purpose built traction table ("On-Table") vs a standard operating table ("Off-Table")? Secondary Objective- Examine whether there is a difference in early post-operative pain, mobilization, complication rates and clinical outcomes when comparing patients who underwent a THA via the DAA when using an "On-Table" vs "Off-Table" technique.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 93 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Carilion Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Trevor M Owen, MD, Principal investigator, Carilion Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04831372
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-20-1004
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 1 Apr 2021
- Last updated
- 16 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: No current plan to do so.
Publications
Abdel MP, Berry DJ. Current Practice Trends in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasties Among Members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons: A Long-Term Update. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S24-S27. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
PubMed 30852068Bender B, Nogler M, Hozack WJ. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009 Jul;40(3):321-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.01.003.
PubMed 19576399Berger RA. Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004 Apr;35(2):143-51. doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00111-1.
PubMed 15062700Berry DJ, Bozic KJ. Current practice patterns in primary hip and knee arthroplasty among members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6 Suppl):2-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.033. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
PubMed 20580196Cohen EM, Vaughn JJ, Ritterman SA, Eisenson DL, Rubin LE. Intraoperative Femur Fracture Risk During Primary Direct Anterior Approach Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With and Without a Fracture Table. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2847-2851. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
PubMed 28511947Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec;441:115-24. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000194309.70518.cb.
PubMed 16330993Molenaers B, Driesen R, Molenaers G, Corten K. The Direct Anterior Approach for Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Extensile Acetabular Approach on a Regular Operating Room Table. J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1553-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
PubMed 28087159Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, Hirota S, Yoshikawa H. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Aug;24(5):698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.012. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
PubMed 18555653Post ZD, Orozco F, Diaz-Ledezma C, Hozack WJ, Ong A. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: indications, technique, and results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;22(9):595-603. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-09-595.
PubMed 25157041Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE, Hozack WJ. Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Aug;25(5):671-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
PubMed 20378307Tian S, Goswami K, Manrique J, Blevins K, Azboy I, Hozack WJ. Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Morphometrically Optimized Femoral Stem, a Conventional Operating Table, Without Fluoroscopy. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2):327-332. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.023. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
PubMed 30448326
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing On-Table vs Off-Table Total Hip Arthroplasty Via the Direct Anterior Approach: A Prospective Randomized Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04831372
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB-20-1004
- Keywords
- Direct anterior approach, Hip arthroplasty, On table, Off table
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 93 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Carilion ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine and Research Institute
- Study start
- 7 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 25 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Jan 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) is a common way to perform total hip arthroplasty. There are two main techniques to perform total hip replacement through the anterior approach. The first method is the "on-table" method, which uses a specialized surgical table, called a traction table. This table involves placing both feet in specialized boots that are then hooked up to the table, and allows for positioning of the operative leg with aid of the table. The major limitations associated with the traction table are the need for two additional staff members and the purchase of said table. The second method is the "off-table" method. In this method the patient is placed on a standard operating room table and the operative leg is manually positioned by the surgeon during the procedure . This obviates the need for the additional staff members or purchase of a specialized table. Both the "on-table" and "off-table" techniques are routinely used both worldwide and by our joint replacement specialists at Carilion Clinic. This study will aim to compare the efficiency and efficacy of performing the DAA for total hip arthroplasty utilizing either the "on-table" or "off- table" technique. Patients will be randomized to receive their total hip arthroplasty with either the "on- table" or "off-table" method.
Detailed description
BACKGROUND: The Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become increasingly popular in the US over the last decade (Berry \& Bozic, 2010). Major limitations of the DAA with traction table include the need for an additional surgeon's assistant, a traction table operator, and the purchase of said table. To counter these limitations, some surgeons advocate for the performing the DAA with a conventional operating room table {Cohen, 2017;Molenaers, 2017}. However to date, there are no studies directly comparing the efficiency and efficacy of these two techniques for DAA.
OBJECTIVE: Currently, it is unclear which surgical technique is more efficient and effective for total hip arthroplasties (THA). We hypothesize that there will be an increase in efficiency as measured by time when performing a standard operating table (Off-Table) DAA THA when compared to a purpose built traction table (On-Table) DAA THA. In addition, there will be less pain and faster functional recovery in the early post-operative period for patients who underwent an "Off-Table" DAA THA when compared to an "On-Table" DAA THA.
SPECIFIC AIMS: 1) Determine whether there is a difference in operating room efficiency between surgeries after a THA via DAA with a standard OR table versus a purpose-built traction table; 2) examine whether there is a difference in early post-operative pain and clinical outcomes when comparing patients who underwent a THA via the DAA with a standard OR table versus a purpose built traction table. 3) report differences in complication rates between those two.
METHODS: This is a prospective randomized clinical trial that will evaluate adult patients admitted to Carilion Clinic undergoing primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty. Off and on table DAA procedures will be performed by a single surgeon with multiple years of training and experience in both. Cluster randomization will be performed where patients will be randomized through scheduling. Demographic data will be collected. Operative records will be used to record operative times for each approach. Radiographs to assess implant positioning on postoperative day 0. The primary outcome variables are intra-operative data such as time the patient enters the operating room, time of incision, time of dressing application, exit room time, implants used, operative report. For secondary outcome variables, we will assess at 2 and 6 week follow ups routine Patient-Reported Outcome Measures including narcotic utilization based on pill count and MEq, and the PROMIS and HOOS, JR. measures.
EXPECTED OUTCOMES: We expect that the Off-table DAA technique will be associated with faster set up, surgical time, and overall room time when compared to the On-table approach. Additionally, we expect less early post-operative pain in the groin, knee and ankle. We expect that the patient report outcome measures at 2 and 6 weeks post-op for the off-table DAA group will be equivalent or better than the on-table DAA group. Finally we expect no difference in complication rate.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Primary Objectives- Determine whether there is a difference in operating room efficiency when preparing for, positioning, performing and turning over an operating room after a total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) when using a purpose built traction table ("On-Table") vs a standard operating table ("Off-Table")? Secondary Objective- Examine whether there is a difference in early post-operative pain, mobilization, complication rates and clinical outcomes when comparing patients who underwent a THA via the DAA when using an "On-Table" vs "Off-Table" technique.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| On Table Group | Active comparator | Procedure: On Table GroupThe Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) is a common way to perform total hip arthroplasty. There are two main techniques to perform total hip replacement through the anterior approach. The control group will be using the first method, which is the "on-table" method, which uses a specialized surgical table, called a traction table. This table involves placing both feet in specialized boots that are then hooked up to the table, and allows for positioning of the operative leg with aid of the table. Both the "on-table" and "off-table" techniques are routinely used both worldwide and by our joint replacement specialists at Carilion Clinic. This study will aim to compare the efficiency and efficacy of performing the DAA for total hip arthroplasty utilizing either the "on-table" or "off- table" technique. Patients will be randomized to receive their total hip arthroplasty with either the "on- table" or "off-table" method. |
| Off Table Group | Experimental | Procedure: Off Table GroupThe Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) is a common way to perform total hip arthroplasty. There are two main techniques to perform total hip replacement through the anterior approach. The experimental group will be using the second method, which is the "off-table" method. In this method the patient is placed on a standard operating room table and the operative leg is manually positioned by the surgeon during the procedure . This obviates the need for the additional staff members or purchase of a specialized table. Both the "on-table" and "off-table" techniques are routinely used both worldwide and by our joint replacement specialists at Carilion Clinic. This study will aim to compare the efficiency and efficacy of performing the DAA for total hip arthroplasty utilizing either the "on-table" or "off- table" technique. Patients will be randomized to receive their total hip arthroplasty with either the "on- table" or "off-table" method. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- All patients undergoing primary unilateral THA
- Patient 18 years of age and older
- Patients who are able to provide consent
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Bilateral procedure
- Non-Primary arthroplasty
- Prior non-arthroplasty operation requiring removal of hardware
- Inability to have spinal anesthesia (blood thinners)
- BMI > 40
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Off Table GroupTotal Hip arthroplasty being performed via the Direct Anterior Approach using a standard operating room table | Procedure or surgery | Off Table Group |
| On Table GroupTotal Hip arthroplasty being performed via the Direct Anterior Approach using a traction table | Procedure or surgery | On Table Group |
Primary outcome
Set Up Time
Time frame: Time point that patient enters room to time point of first incision
Time point that patient enters room to time point of first incision
Surgery Time
Time frame: Time point of first incision to time point of dress application
Time point of first incision to time point of dress application
Takedown Time
Time frame: Time point of Dress application to Time point of exiting operating room
Time point of Dress application to Time point of exiting operating room
Total Room Time
Time frame: Time point that patient enters room to time point of exiting operating room
Time point that patient enters room to time point of exiting operating room
3 secondary outcomes
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System/Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement scores
Time frame: pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, 6 weeks post op, 1 year post op
Visual Analog Scale scores
Time frame: pre-op, 2 weeks post-op, 6 weeks post op, 1 year post op
Narcotic Utillization
Time frame: 2 weeks post op pill count
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Feb 2024.
- Background: PubMed 30852068Abdel MP, Berry DJ. Current Practice Trends in Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasties Among Members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons: A Long-Term Update. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7S):S24-S27. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
- Background: PubMed 19576399Bender B, Nogler M, Hozack WJ. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009 Jul;40(3):321-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.01.003.
- Background: PubMed 15062700Berger RA. Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004 Apr;35(2):143-51. doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00111-1.
- Background: PubMed 20580196Berry DJ, Bozic KJ. Current practice patterns in primary hip and knee arthroplasty among members of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6 Suppl):2-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.033. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
- Background: PubMed 28511947Cohen EM, Vaughn JJ, Ritterman SA, Eisenson DL, Rubin LE. Intraoperative Femur Fracture Risk During Primary Direct Anterior Approach Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty With and Without a Fracture Table. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2847-2851. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
- Background: PubMed 16330993Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec;441:115-24. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000194309.70518.cb.
- Background: PubMed 28087159Molenaers B, Driesen R, Molenaers G, Corten K. The Direct Anterior Approach for Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Extensile Acetabular Approach on a Regular Operating Room Table. J Arthroplasty. 2017 May;32(5):1553-1559. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.016. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
- Background: PubMed 18555653Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, Hirota S, Yoshikawa H. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Aug;24(5):698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.012. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
- Background: PubMed 25157041Post ZD, Orozco F, Diaz-Ledezma C, Hozack WJ, Ong A. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: indications, technique, and results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;22(9):595-603. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-22-09-595.
- Background: PubMed 20378307Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Pour AE, Hozack WJ. Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Aug;25(5):671-9.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.002. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
- Background: PubMed 30448326Tian S, Goswami K, Manrique J, Blevins K, Azboy I, Hozack WJ. Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Morphometrically Optimized Femoral Stem, a Conventional Operating Table, Without Fluoroscopy. J Arthroplasty. 2019 Feb;34(2):327-332. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.10.023. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. No current plan to do so.
Related trials for Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
RecruitingObservational study
Z1 Hip System: Post-Market Clinical Follow Up Study
Hip Osteoarthritis, Acute Traumatic Fracture of the Femoral Head or Neck
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Muscle Stiffness, Functional Reserve, and Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis (Knee / Hip), Sarcopenia
RecruitingPhase 4
Low-Volume Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block With Dexamethasone vs Standard-Volume PENG Block After Total Hip Arthroplasty
Pain, Postoperative, Muscle Weakness
RecruitingObservational study
Tau Pathology in the Brain After Hip or Knee Replacement Surgery
Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction, Alzheimer Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Carotid Ultrasound for Post-Spinal Anesthesia Hypotension in Elderly Hip Surgery
Hypotension After Spinal Anesthesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Trevor M Owen, MD principal investigator
Carilion Clinic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Off Table Group and On Table Group in people with Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip and Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by Carilion Clinic at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Set Up Time (time frame: Time point that patient enters room to time point of first incision). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04831372, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Feb 2024.