Prostate CancerETADAPTNCT04832113
Impact of Patient's Therapeutic Education in APA and Dietetic on Radiotherapy Reproducibility Sessions for Prostate Cancer
A study testing Adapted Physical Activity and Dietetic and conventional management in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Centre Leon Berard at 5 sites in France.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of Patient's Therapeutic Education (PTE) in Adapted Physical Activity (APA) ans dietetic on the reduction of interventions number on rectal volume (laxative or probe). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Adapted Physical Activity and Dietetic and conventional management
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 216 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 21 Jun 2021to Apr 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- I1: Age >= 18 years old.
- I2: Patient with prostatic adenocarcinoma with indication for first-line or post-operative radiotherapy (adjuvant or biologic recurrence).
- I3: Patient able to practice a physical activity (certificate of aptitude for adapted physical activity).
- I4: Life expectancy greater than 6 months.
- I5: Absence of chronic inflammatory intestinal disease or intestinal surgery.
- I6: Signed informed consent.
- I7: Patient covered by a medical insurance.
- I8. At least 20 sessions of radiotherapy planned
Who cannot join
- E1: Patient does not understand and cannot read French.
- E2: Patient followed for a psychiatric pathology or presenting cognitive disorders.
- E3: Inability to comply with study follow-up goegraphical, social or psychological reasons.
- E4: Patient requiring tutorship or curatorship or patient deprived of liberty.
- E5: Participation to another clinical trial which may interfere with principal Endpoint assessment.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
France5 sites, 5 recruiting
- Recruiting
Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste de Grenoble Institut Daniel HOLLARD
Grenoble, 38028
Olivia DIAZ, MD, o-diaz@ghm-grenoble.fr
- Not yet recruiting
Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Samy HORN, MD, samy.horn@chu-lyon.fr
- Recruiting
Centre Eugène Marquis
Rennes, 35042
Manon BATY, MD, m.baty@rennes.unicancer.fr
- Not yet recruiting
Chu de saint etienne
Saint-Etienne, Rhône-Alpes Auvergne, 42000
Thomas REYNAUD, MD
Thomas.Reynaud@chu-st-etienne.fr
- Not yet recruiting
Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau
Saint-Herblain, 44805
Stéphane SUPIOT, MD, stephane.supiot@ico.unicancer.fr
About this study
Official title: ETADAPT- Evaluation of the Impact of Patient's Therapeutic Education (PTE) in Adapted Physical Activity (APA) and Dietetic on the Reproducibility of Radiotherapy Sessions for Prostate Cancers.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of Patient's Therapeutic Education (PTE) in Adapted Physical Activity (APA) ans dietetic on the reduction of interventions number on rectal volume (laxative or probe).
The secondary objectives are to evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education (PTE) between the 2 arms on repositionnind during the radiotherapy session, the gastrointestinal toxicity, the need to use laxative or transit regulating treatment or techniques, the quality of life, the undernutrition and food intake, the evolution in eating/hydratation and physical habits.
For the experimetal arm, the satisfaction and the compliance with PTE program will be evaluated, as well as the need of additionnal use of dietary and APA consultations.
Read the detailed description
Prostate cancer is the 3rd cause of cancer mortality in patient aged over 50 years. Radiotherapy treatment plans require specific conditions:
- Reproductibility of patient's positioning (requiring management of bladder and rectal fillings at each session).
- An image-guided treatment consisting in acquiring an image before each session. This pre-treatment Imaging allows the optimal adjustment of the target volume and organs at risk (bladder and rectum).
To allow reproductibility of target volume positioning at each radiotherapy session, it's recommended to have an empty rectum at the time of the radiotherapy preparation scan, and to check repletion before each session.
It's recommended that the patient has a comfortably full bladder to limit the volume of irradiated bladder mucosa. The radiotherapy teams don't have any recommendations concerning the rectum and manage this problem session by session, according to the repositioning Imaging of the current day.
According to a pilot study carried out in 2017 in the radiotherapy department of the Léon Bérard center, an intervention for a dilated rectum (probe or laxative) was necessary for an average of 25% of session per patient.
These rectal problems can be partly explained by the age (60-80 years) and sedentary lifestyle of patients with prostate cancer. Physical activities, adapted hydratation and changes in eating habits are an integral part of the constipation and flatulence prevention.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Adapted Physical Activity and Dietetic, conventional management
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Adapted Physical Activity and DieteticOther
Also called Follow-up of Adapted Physical Activity and Dietetic Hydratation
session in addtion conventional management dietetic, hydratation and physical activity
conventional managementOther
Also called conventional management dietary and hydratation
Dietary and hydratation advices according to the recommendations
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Therapeutics Education (PTE) | Experimental | Educational diagnosis prior radiotherapy and participation to Patient Therapeutics Education (PTE) in Adapted Physical Activity (APA) and dietetic sessions. In addition to conventional support (dietary and hydration advice). Receives: Other: Adapted Physical Activity and Dietetic |
| Conventional support | Other | Dietary and hydration advices Receives: Other: conventional management |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluate the impact of Patient's Therapeutic Education in APA on the reduction of interventions number on rectum
Number of uninstallation during the radiotherapy session
Measured: An average of 4 months
Secondary outcomes (18)
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on patient's repositionning efficiency
Rate of patients never uninstalled compared to patients uninstalled during prostate's radiotherapy
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the gastrointestinal toxicity
Acute gastrointestinal toxicity ≥ grade 2 (NCI- CTCAE V5)
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the use of laxative or transit regulating treatment or techniques
Prescribed laxatives or transit regulation treatments or techniques
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on patients' quality of life
Using European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Core Quality of life questionnaire (QLQC30) (Evaluation of patient's quality of life during the last 7 days - From 4 [worse reply] to 1 [better reply])
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the undernutrition
Collection of patients' weight (kg)
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the food intake
Collection of patients' weight (kg)
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the undernutrition
Using Socio Economic Factor Index scale (SEFI) (Scale from 10 [I ate my entire meal] to 0 [I did not eat anything])
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the food intake
Using Socio Economic Factor Index scale (SEFI) (Scale from 10 [I ate my entire meal] to 0 [I did not eat anything])
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the undernutrition
Using the "Eating and hydration habits questionnaire"
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the food intake
Using the "Eating and hydration habits questionnaire"
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the evolution in eating habits
Using the "Eating and hydration habits questionnaire"
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the evolution in hydratation habits
Using the "Eating and hydration habits questionnaire"
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the evolution in APA habits
Using International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) (Description of the physical activity during the last 7 days)
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate patient's satisfaction with Patient's Therapeutic Education program (experimental arm)
Using satisfaction questionnaire (scale from 1 [worse evaluation] to 4 [better evaluation])
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the compliance to APA session recommendations
Daily collection of steps numbers
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the compliance to APA session recommendations
Evaluation during phone calls every 15 days
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the number of patients requiring additional dietetic session
Evaluation during phone calls every 15 days
Measured: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the number of patients requiring additional APA session
Evaluation during phone calls every 15 days
Measured: An average of 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Apr 2021
- Study start21 Jun 2021
- Primary completionOct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Leon BerardThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon Berard
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pascale Roux, Principal investigator, Centre Leon Berard
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04832113
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ET20-0284 ETADAPT
- Acronym
- ETADAPT
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2021
- Last updated
- 31 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ETADAPT- Evaluation of the Impact of Patient's Therapeutic Education (PTE) in Adapted Physical Activity (APA) and Dietetic on the Reproducibility of Radiotherapy Sessions for Prostate Cancers.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04832113
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ETADAPT / ET20-0284 ETADAPT
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Leon BerardUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 21 Jun 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2024 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of Patient's Therapeutic Education (PTE) in Adapted Physical Activity (APA) ans dietetic on the reduction of interventions number on rectal volume (laxative or probe).
The secondary objectives are to evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education (PTE) between the 2 arms on repositionnind during the radiotherapy session, the gastrointestinal toxicity, the need to use laxative or transit regulating treatment or techniques, the quality of life, the undernutrition and food intake, the evolution in eating/hydratation and physical habits.
For the experimetal arm, the satisfaction and the compliance with PTE program will be evaluated, as well as the need of additionnal use of dietary and APA consultations.
Detailed description
Prostate cancer is the 3rd cause of cancer mortality in patient aged over 50 years. Radiotherapy treatment plans require specific conditions:
- Reproductibility of patient's positioning (requiring management of bladder and rectal fillings at each session).
- An image-guided treatment consisting in acquiring an image before each session. This pre-treatment Imaging allows the optimal adjustment of the target volume and organs at risk (bladder and rectum).
To allow reproductibility of target volume positioning at each radiotherapy session, it's recommended to have an empty rectum at the time of the radiotherapy preparation scan, and to check repletion before each session.
It's recommended that the patient has a comfortably full bladder to limit the volume of irradiated bladder mucosa. The radiotherapy teams don't have any recommendations concerning the rectum and manage this problem session by session, according to the repositioning Imaging of the current day.
According to a pilot study carried out in 2017 in the radiotherapy department of the Léon Bérard center, an intervention for a dilated rectum (probe or laxative) was necessary for an average of 25% of session per patient.
These rectal problems can be partly explained by the age (60-80 years) and sedentary lifestyle of patients with prostate cancer. Physical activities, adapted hydratation and changes in eating habits are an integral part of the constipation and flatulence prevention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Therapeutics Education (PTE) | Experimental | Other: Adapted Physical Activity and DieteticEducational diagnosis prior radiotherapy and participation to Patient Therapeutics Education (PTE) in Adapted Physical Activity (APA) and dietetic sessions. In addition to conventional support (dietary and hydration advice). |
| Conventional support | Other | Other: conventional managementDietary and hydration advices |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- I1: Age >= 18 years old.
- I2: Patient with prostatic adenocarcinoma with indication for first-line or post-operative radiotherapy (adjuvant or biologic recurrence).
- I3: Patient able to practice a physical activity (certificate of aptitude for adapted physical activity).
- I4: Life expectancy greater than 6 months.
- I5: Absence of chronic inflammatory intestinal disease or intestinal surgery.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- E1: Patient does not understand and cannot read French.
- E2: Patient followed for a psychiatric pathology or presenting cognitive disorders.
- E3: Inability to comply with study follow-up goegraphical, social or psychological reasons.
- E4: Patient requiring tutorship or curatorship or patient deprived of liberty.
- E5: Participation to another clinical trial which may interfere with principal Endpoint assessment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Adapted Physical Activity and DieteticAlso: Follow-up of Adapted Physical Activity and Dietetic Hydratationsession in addtion conventional management dietetic, hydratation and physical activity | Other | Patient Therapeutics Education (PTE) |
| conventional managementAlso: conventional management dietary and hydratationDietary and hydratation advices according to the recommendations | Other | Conventional support |
Primary outcome
Evaluate the impact of Patient's Therapeutic Education in APA on the reduction of interventions number on rectum
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Number of uninstallation during the radiotherapy session
18 secondary outcomes
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on patient's repositionning efficiency
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the gastrointestinal toxicity
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the use of laxative or transit regulating treatment or techniques
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on patients' quality of life
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the undernutrition
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the food intake
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the undernutrition
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the food intake
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the undernutrition
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the food intake
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the evolution in eating habits
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the evolution in hydratation habits
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the contribution of Patient's Therapeutic Education on the evolution in APA habits
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate patient's satisfaction with Patient's Therapeutic Education program (experimental arm)
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the compliance to APA session recommendations
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the compliance to APA session recommendations
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the number of patients requiring additional dietetic session
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Evaluate the number of patients requiring additional APA session
Time frame: An average of 4 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 Aug 2023.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pascale Roux principal investigator
Centre Leon Berard
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Adapted Physical Activity and Dietetic and conventional management in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Centre Leon Berard at 5 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Séverine METZGER (+33478782786, severine.metzger@lyon.unicancer.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluate the impact of Patient's Therapeutic Education in APA on the reduction of interventions number on rectum (time frame: An average of 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2023.